More

Chris Dodd's Departure Could Endanger Potential Consumer Protection Agency

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:10 PM ET

It's the question buzzing around Washington and Wall Street this week: Will Sen. Christopher Dodd's sudden retirement announcement further jeopardize his already thorny task of overhauling the nation's financial regulatory system?

At risk in particular, some Capitol Hill observers say, may be a proposal to create a new consumer protection agency that President Obama has characterized as a must for financial reform.

Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat who announced Wednesday that he will not seek re-election in November after 35 years in Congress, is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. As chair, Dodd is in position to rewrite the rules for Wall Street in the wake of the most debilitating financial crisis since the Great Depression. The U.S. House passed its own sweeping financial package last month with the consumer agency as the centerpiece.

There are two schools of thought on how Dodd's planned departure will impact legislation. Financial industry insiders surmise that Dodd, short on political capital, will run out the clock on his last year in office or look for a quick bipartisan compromise. On the other hand, consumer advocates believe that Dodd, now free from the constraints of fundraising and campaigning, will want to burnish a legacy as the man who set the bankers straight.

In a press conference Wednesday, Dodd did not directly address the future of his reform package. But amidst staunch Republican opposition, some aspects of his broad effort, such as the proposed consumer agency, have seemed endangered for weeks. The new independent body would regulate financial products such as mortgages and credit cards.

Days after the House approved a consumer agency, Dodd's counterpart in the House, Rep. Barney Frank, expressed concern that the provision would not survive the Senate.

"The one [provision] that I am most worried about is the consumer agency," Frank said in an interview with the Huffington Post Investigative Fund last month. "We have been talking to Senator Dodd," Frank said, "but I am worried that he's not going to be able to get Republican support or 60 democrats for a vigorous consumer agency."

Frank should know. He spent much of last year fighting Republicans, pro-business Democrats and industry lobbyists over the agency. (The Chamber of Commerce remains the fiercest opponent of the agency and has vowed to turn up the heat in the Senate battle.) Ultimately, no Republicans supported Frank's plan even though it exempted some key sources of consumer loans--auto dealers, smaller banks and student lenders--from the agency's oversight.

When Dodd first formally proposed the consumer agency in an 1,136-page draft bill last fall, the banking committee's ranking Republican, Richard Shelby, lambasted the idea.

"An agency that requires financial firms to provide products to consumers repeats the same dangerous practices that led to unqualified consumers receiving mortgages they couldn't afford," Shelby said at a Nov. 19 committee hearing. The Alabama Republican added that he would be opposing Dodd's bill, which he said needed a "complete rewrite."

But on Dec. 23, in the spirit of the season, Dodd and Shelby released a joint statement saying they had made "meaningful progress" toward resolving their differences. A compromise, they said, might be reached by the end of January.

The sooner the better, reform advocates believe. If the Senate fails to pass a bill this year, Sen. Tim Johnson, a business-friendly Democrat from South Dakota would replace Dodd at the helm of the banking committee. Johnson was the only Senate Democrat last year to oppose new regulations of the credit card industry, which is largely headquartered in his state.

Whatever the end result, Frank said in a statement Wednesday that he anticipated Dodd would push ahead with the challenging political battle. "I will miss his leadership in future Congresses, but I do look forward to working closely with him for the rest of this year on finishing the job of significant financial regulatory reform, to which he is committed, and to which he has already worked to advance, " Frank said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

It's the question buzzing around Washington and Wall Street this week: Will Sen. Christopher Dodd's sudden retirement announcement further jeopardize his already thorny task of overhauling the nation'...
It's the question buzzing around Washington and Wall Street this week: Will Sen. Christopher Dodd's sudden retirement announcement further jeopardize his already thorny task of overhauling the nation'...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
01:24 AM on 01/11/2010
I cant wait to see who Dodd goes to work for when he leaves. Then we will know who finally decided they couldnt pay enough to get him to kill this, so they bought him hook line and sinker. Im sure he will make millions, maybe even billions. But it will be worth it for the Ivy Greed Capitalist who dont want to give the consumer any chance of having any rights when it comes to being ripped off.
08:37 PM on 01/09/2010
Chris "friend of Angelo" Dodd will get a lobbying job making $1,000,000 per year. What do you libs think of that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:36 PM on 01/08/2010
Hit the road Dodd.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Noble 2
06:11 PM on 01/08/2010
Why does anyone think Dodd, who helped eradicate controls of how TARP was used; would be a good Treasury Secretary?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gover
02:49 PM on 01/08/2010
Could we get someone who doesn't take bribes?

Is that even on the table?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Noble 2
06:13 PM on 01/08/2010
No.. Obama or GWB would not respect a man who could not be bribed.
02:45 PM on 01/08/2010
i wonder where he will end up. Health Care Industry or Wall Street? they both owe him bigtime, im sure he'll cash those chips in pretty soon
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsrl317
Persuade me or prove me wrong, and I will change
10:57 AM on 01/08/2010
Oh, who cares. As if this administration or this congress would ever do anything bold like financial reform and strong consumer protections. Look at how they handed credit cards. Feel good yet? They can't becasue they won't. The Democrats and Republicans are bought off, and I am done with these two parties in particular. Thom Hartmann suggests taking over the democratic party like the Evangelicals did with the GOP. I do not agree. Start up another party and invade from there. Fighting the machinery of the Democrats is like fighting windmills, although it is an interesting proposition.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
02:57 AM on 01/08/2010
I will be totally depressed if President Obama makes Dodd anything in his administration.
Dodd should retire out to pasture to live out his life not able to do any more harm to the American citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSWatchdog
citizen
09:35 PM on 01/07/2010
Don't hold off for much help from Dodd to pass GOOD financial reform legislation. From Politico Daily Digest Jan 6, 2010:

Some on K Street think Dodd's decision increases the chances for a strong Dodd-Shelby product, since Dodd won't have to worry about how the bill affects his standing back home as a candidate with an image problem. This, in particular, could ease the way for the death of a stand-alone Consumer Financial Protection Agency -- the No. 1 cause of consumer groups, labor unions and other activists on the left working the legislation.

'Passing historic bipartisan legislation is on the goal line. Now that Dodd is retiring, he can ignore the demands of the special interests on the left (consumer groups, trial bar, unions) and dance with the special interests that brought him to the dance in the first place. Us, his loyal donors in the banking community,' e-mails one gleeful and Republican financial services lobbyist.

See it at:
http://www.politico.com/email-alerts/morningmoney/morningmoney_01062010.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:23 PM on 01/07/2010
no big loss really. The WH would of made sure it was as toothless and as full of loopholes as the rest of the phony "reforms" they have touted anyway. One thing Obama excels at is keeping his big corporate donors safe from any real reform.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ResearchtheFacts
12:08 AM on 01/08/2010
Could not have said it better myself. For this country to be in such dire economic shape there sure is more than enough lobbying dollars to go around. It's like a vicious circle--lobbyist, congress members and the White House just passing the money back and forth to each other.
03:46 PM on 01/07/2010
I still believe the US economy & government is a joke that only exists to serve and enrich the already wealthy & well connected.
hat tip to http://iamned-site.blogspot.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
03:28 PM on 01/07/2010
Although I'm not a big fan of Chris Dodd, I take him over Tim (Geithner) anyday. Looks like were stuck with more Berneke. But someone, PLEASE send Larry Summer packing somewhere, ANYWHERE.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabela
like animals better than people.
03:15 PM on 01/07/2010
Yeah, like either party will allow actually protection for consumers. They are all owned by Wall Street.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
03:30 PM on 01/07/2010
Yeah, but one party will be slightly less infernal that the other, and let's face it - we need to grab every crumb we can get - until we can overhaul the whole sick system.
02:49 PM on 01/07/2010
Dodd and Dorgan may be suffering from the other way big money can control the democracy:

Threats.

I hope the FBI and such have used their surveillance to note any increase in threats to these men.

Then again, The conservative moles may have used that surveillance to find some "Dirty" on these men.

Just because you are paranoid, does not mean they aren't out to get you. Go research the fear politicians had of J Edgar Hoover founder of the FBI.
photo
hrc04
put on your pants and go home.
02:30 PM on 01/07/2010
If anything, his upcoming retirement should embolden him, not weaken his fighting spirit.
02:34 PM on 01/07/2010
Also emboldens everyone else to shoot teh bill down until he is gone. Republicans are 100% against it; and with the trend toward a republican majority in teh senate in 2010, they have no reason to do anything except stall this until next year.
photo
hrc04
put on your pants and go home.
02:38 PM on 01/07/2010
But Republicans can't stop it...there needs to be an all out campaign for this thing, and against the people who choose not to act in the wake of the recent financial crisis.