Adis Medunjanin Got Al-Qaeda Training: Prosecutors

TOM HAYS   01/ 9/10 09:19 PM ET   AP

Adis Medunjanin

NEW YORK — A New York City man under investigation for his links to a terror suspect pleaded not guilty Saturday to charges that he flew to Pakistan to get military training from al-Qaida.

Adis Medunjanin entered the plea during a swift arraignment at a federal court in Brooklyn. He faces counts of receiving military training from a foreign terrorist organization and conspiracy to commit murder in a foreign country.

The 25-year-old was one of two Queens men arrested early Friday in connection with the investigation of Najibullah Zazi, a Colorado airport driver who pleaded not guilty last year to supporting terrorism.

The indictment made public by prosecutors on Saturday provided scant details on the accusations against Medunjanin, who was born in Bosnia but is a U.S. citizen.

It said the charges were related to a trip he made to Pakistan in August of 2008. Prosecutors have said that Zazi, Medunjanin and a third man, Zarein Ahmedzay, traveled there together that summer. All three attended high school together and lived for years in the same Queens neighborhood.

Zazi has been under arrest since September, charged with getting explosives training from al-Qaida and later hatching a foiled scheme to attack targets in New York with homemade bombs. The new indictment did not directly tie Medunjanin to the New York plot – what Attorney General Eric Holder has called one of the most serious terrorism cases since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Outside court, defense attorney Robert C. Gottlieb told reporters that his client's not guilty plea was "emphatic." He accused authorities of holding and interrogating Medunjanin for two days without letting him see his family or a lawyer.

"The questioning was illegal," Gottlieb said. Prosecutors declined to comment.

Ahmedzay pleaded not guilty Friday to charges that he lied to the FBI during the probe about places he visited during the 2008 trip. He was taken into custody early Friday morning while working a late-night shift driving a cab in Manhattan.

Ahmedzay, 24, and Medunjanin were first publicly linked to the investigation in September, when the FBI raided their homes shortly before Zazi's arrest.

FBI agents had Medunjanin under surveillance, but apparently did not intend to arrest him when they went to his Queens apartment Thursday afternoon to seize his passport. Once that happened, authorities say he became upset and took off in his car.

A law enforcement official confirmed reports that Medunjanin then phoned 911 and ranted in Arabic, "We love death more than you love life," before purposely ramming his car into another vehicle and fleeing on foot.

The official was not authorized to discuss the arrest and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.

After being captured and treated for minor injuries, federal investigators took him into custody. There were no signs of injury Saturday when he appeared in court wearing a black hooded winter jacket and entered his plea in a firm voice.

Gottlieb suggested that the car incident had been overblown, saying, "Let's see what the evidence is."

Medunjanin was ordered held without bail until a hearing Thursday.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

NEW YORK — A New York City man under investigation for his links to a terror suspect pleaded not guilty Saturday to charges that he flew to Pakistan to get military training from al-Qaida. Adis...
NEW YORK — A New York City man under investigation for his links to a terror suspect pleaded not guilty Saturday to charges that he flew to Pakistan to get military training from al-Qaida. Adis...
Filed by David Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:11 AM on 01/11/2010
Was anyone REALLY expecting him to plead "guilty as charged"?
11:20 PM on 01/10/2010
Coincidence that the Met has the Jihad Jitters?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/jihad_jitters_at_met_76yj3VNUy4hcRAnhOcPCHP
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deepfreezevideo
Now with even MORE microbial micro-bio!
10:24 PM on 01/10/2010
Well gosh Zazi if you love death so much, then please, allow us to deliver it to you.
11:06 PM on 01/10/2010
LOL>>>>>
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:04 PM on 01/10/2010
So can anybody explain to me why some courts don't allow photographs? I think it's great that they're doing their part to keep figure-drawing alive, and providing employment for a few art school grads who otherwise might have to wait tables, but what's the rationale, exactly?
10:47 PM on 01/09/2010
"The indictment made public by prosecutors on Saturday provided scant details on the accusations against Medunjanin,."

Perhaps because facts and truth are scant.
11:06 PM on 01/10/2010
Another Jihadi lover tool.
11:36 PM on 01/10/2010
Another American willing to let the jihadists win.

Perhaps you should study the variants of a quote by a true American: Ben Franklin

The saying has also appeared in many paraphrased forms:

* They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.
He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.
He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.
People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.
If we restrict liberty to attain security we will lose them both.
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither.
Those who would trade in their freedom for their protection deserve neither.
Those who give up their liberty for more security neither deserve liberty nor security.
02:55 AM on 01/11/2010
Would you defend anybody who would bomb the US, or only a Muslim? Just curious.
11:49 AM on 01/11/2010
I would defend anyone who was arrested on scant evidence. Amerioca claims that they have "standards".

The evidence has to be presented to the defending attorney, and then we'll see if the "rules of evidence" are met. So far, my bet is No.