More

Harry Reid's Remark About Obama: GOP Claims It's As Bad As Trent Lott

DAVID ESPO   01/11/10 10:14 PM ET   AP

Game Change

WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sought to slam the book shut Monday on a controversy stemming from remarks about President Barack Obama's race and dialect, and a string of forgiving statements from prominent blacks made clear his leadership post is not in immediate jeopardy.

"I've apologized to the president," he said, and to everyone "within the sound of my voice that I could have used a better choice of words." He spoke in Apex, Nev., his first public comments since the issue flared over the weekend.

"I'll continue to do my work for the African-American community ... I'm not going to dwell on this any more," he added.

While nationally prominent Democrats ranging from Obama to the Rev. Al Sharpton have rallied to his side, the impact of the gaffe in Reid's home state of Nevada is unpredictable. The 70-year-old majority leader is seeking re-election this fall, and recent polls show him trailing potential Republican rivals.

Republicans have called on Reid to step down as majority leader, a move that would undermine his re-election chances in Nevada, where he is running as a powerful senior lawmaker who can deliver for his home state.

As majority leader, Reid has been the point man for the past year in trying to pass Obama's legislative program through the Senate, and there was no public evidence the controversy has eroded his standing. Any change in leadership would be felt most immediately in the drive to win final passage for health care legislation, an area in which he has committed enormous amounts of time, energy and credibility.

Reid's remarks in his home state were his first in public since the weekend disclosure that he had described Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign as a light-skinned African-American "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one." Those reflections appear in a new book, "Game Change," by Time magazine's Mark Halperin and New York magazine's John Heilemann.

Reid swiftly telephoned his apologies to the president, who accepted them and issued a statement saying, "As far as I am concerned, the book is closed."

Two days later, Reid said he agreed on that last point, and sought to shore up his civil rights credentials. "As a very young man in the state of Nevada I was one of the leaders of the civil rights movement in Nevada, and it had a lot of moving to do," he said.

The latest expression of forgiveness came from Attorney General Eric Holder, who said in an interview with The Associated Press the remark was "unfortunate, but I don't think that there is a prejudiced bone in his body." Holder is the first black to serve as the nation's top law enforcement official.

Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., head of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Sharpton also said Reid did not deserve to lose his leadership position as a result of his comments. New York Gov. David Paterson, who is black, said Reid's remarks were reprehensible and degrading, but he said Reid shouldn't lose his leadership post as a result.

Obama, asked about the controversy in a TV One interview, said Reid "used some inartful language in trying to praise me."

Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., asked if Reid should step aside, told a Milwaukee television station, WISN-TV, "I'm thinking about that...I have not decided whether these comments merit that or not."

Reid has a history of sparking controversy with off-the-cuff remarks, and possibly as a result, he rarely makes appearances on television interview programs. Increasingly, he speaks from a script when he addresses reporters in the Capitol.

In 2004, he called President George W. Bush a liar for actions relating to a proposed nuclear waste dump in Nevada, then said he would not back off.

Several months later, in comments to high school students in Nevada, Reid said the president was a loser, then called the White House swiftly to apologize.

While Democrats quickly coalesced around Reid, Republicans sought political gain in the controversy.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee said in a statement "voters are reminded" of when then-Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., said in 2002 the country would have been better off if Dixiecrats had won the presidential election in 1948. Lott spoke at a 100th birthday party for Sen. Strom Thurmond, who sought the White House a half-century earlier on a platform of racial segregation.

Michael Steele, who is black and the chairman of the Republican Party, accused Democrats of trying to have it both ways.

"There is this standard where the Democrats feel that they can say these things and they can apologize when it comes from the mouths of their own. But if it comes from anyone else, it's racism," Steele said.

Steele did not mention that it was Bush's White House and fellow Republicans, embarrassed by the comments, who ultimately pushed Lott from his leadership position.

Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the GOP leader, refrained from criticism.

___

Associated Press writer Oskar Garcia in Apex, Nev., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sought to slam the book shut Monday on a controversy stemming from remarks about President Barack Obama's race and dialect, and a string of forgivi...
WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sought to slam the book shut Monday on a controversy stemming from remarks about President Barack Obama's race and dialect, and a string of forgivi...
Filed by Jessie Kunhardt  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
09:10 PM on 01/12/2010
What Reid said was blatantly offensive. When Reid comes out and says he used a "poor choice of words" he seems to ignore the fact that the logical progression of his argument is inherently racist.

Lott said “When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over the years, either.” Objectively, to draw racism from Lott's comments takes a great leap of inference and a some mild usage of extrasensory perception to know what the man was thinking. Lott explained, "My comments were not an endorsement of his positions of over 50 years ago, but of the man and his life.” Trent's explanation was honest & illuminating. But the media is more likely to take Reid at his word (and not press him on his thought) while they disregarded Lott's words and presume his thoughts were racist
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
11:10 PM on 01/12/2010
Strom Thurmond was best known for his virulent hatred of integration in 1948, so when Lott said if he had been elected, "we wouldn't have had all these problems over the years" the implication was blatantly racial, whether you recognize it or not -- most people took it just as he meant it (from an Ole Miss grad who was for segregation in his youth, I will have you know).

It was far from an innocent statement -- and a very stupid one. He deserved to resign.

On the other hand Reid WANTED Obama to run... their was no animus in his statement -- just a assertion of fact that people like you would be more likely to vote for a black man who didn't appear "too black". And he was right.
05:03 PM on 01/13/2010
...and didn't Joe Biden say something similar? What is about skin-tone that has these gentlemen obsessed?

I voted for our President not because he was "light-skinned" but his promise of a fresh approach. That said...

I should thank you, Don... for proving my point. Somehow from my initial post you gathered that I make racially-based decisions. Similar to what the media did to Trent Lott, you made a blind leap of inference and implication based on your own knee-jerk predisposition. Amazed that you have me figured out from a 9-line post. Extrasensory, indeed.
beansie
dont bee a dont bee.....bee a do bee...
03:05 PM on 01/12/2010
As a resident of Wisconsin it saddens me to hear Russ Feingold sit on the fence. I think he needs to use his common sense about this issue....I think Russ is gearing up for his own greatness in Washington and he is too worried about saying the "wrong" thing. Buck up Russ and do the right thing!
photo
profitforless
6 and 20 thousand years
11:32 AM on 01/12/2010
According to the GOP and the MSM this is the most damming thing in the Book – NOT Sarah Palins inability to remember names, History or the truth ,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
04:23 AM on 01/12/2010
It always astounds me how tone deaf Republicans seem to be regarding race and gender issues. It's as if they don't really think with their heart engaged.

They nominate Clarence Thomas , totally unqualified to be on the bench, to the Supreme Court to replace the brilliant Thurgood Marshall...and don't see a difference.

They pick Sarah Palin to draw Hillary Clinton voters without regard to ideology.

They choose Michael Steele to parallel the election of Barack Obama.

Do you see a pattern here -- all totally inferior copies of exceptional people with only superficial similarities.

It's no wonder they lost both houses ands the presidency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
medic628
01:49 AM on 01/12/2010
What Harry said from my point of view was bad, however it does not come close to what Lott said about voting and supporting Strom.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rosal
JUSTICE always wins
09:45 PM on 01/11/2010
Speaking of "trying to have it both ways": Teabaggers, birthers, Rush, etc.etc.etc.
Hypocrisy, anyone?
09:38 PM on 01/11/2010
Greetings Citizens,

Response to Comments By Trent Lott and Harry Reid Do Not Equal Integrity

How does the President and other Democratic Leaders reconcile their responses to the comments made by Trent Lott in 2002 and Harry Reid in 2008. Is it time or is it the lack of integrity to serve political expediency?

Why is it that the leadership of the current administration and the Congress overlook their high calling in preserving their integrity and setting the example for integrity to the future of our nation?

Warm regards,

Michael Winters
09:24 PM on 01/11/2010
Had Strom Thurmond won it might have delayed the election of a black man to the highest office in the land for 100 years.......
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
08:35 PM on 01/11/2010
Where were the racially hyper sensitive Republicans when Rush Limbaugh referred to BO as Barack the magic Negro?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
henrypapillon
Mitt--free up the last 9 years' taxes
07:32 PM on 01/11/2010
Wait. I thought they said there was nothing wrong with what Trent Lott said? Which way is it?
isadora
Leftie, educator, labor activist, Unitarian Univer
05:15 PM on 01/11/2010
The repubs bizarre 'racial sensitivity' attack boggles the mind. And then there's their equally wacko comparison of Reid with Trent Lott--LOL (Lott's Old Logic).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
listentome
Remember, no matter where you go, there you are !
05:03 PM on 01/11/2010
There is no comparison at all, either implicitly or explicitly. Reid was making an accurate observation about a AA candidate who could win the presidency. Lott was making a clock turning back statement about going back to a time when segregation reigned and was supreme for whites.
05:00 PM on 01/11/2010
President Bush's team wanted to get rid of Senator Lott because he insisted on following Senate rules and refused to try out the nuclear option. Senator Lott went because President Bush's team wanted him gone. He was replaced with Senator Frist who had no scruples about undermining the Senate's traditions to achieve the "Bush agenda" (which was so "wonderful" for all of us, obviously).

There is no similarity here, though the GOP will make hay out of anything these days and will invent it when there is none to find.
04:04 PM on 01/11/2010
To be brief, I dont think that Reid's comments were racist at all. The term 'light - skinned' is something that has been used by black people forever. Negro dialect, thats hardly considered offensive. What a crappy comparison to compare Reid and Lott. HA! Considering this is the 2nd democrat to make a sorta 'racist' comment, at least he manned up and apologized for it. Biden had a comment similar and he apologized and look at him now, he's the VP!

On the other hand, I dont understand the reasoning behind Steele's crying. The reason why that its not a big deal is because these comments were made BEFORE Obama was elected pres. GOP has made 'racist' comment after comment AFTER Obama was elected. (Black house and its minons, affirmative action for the nobel peace prize, need i go on). Even Steele himself stated that he would get more black people to vote with fried chicken and koolaid! But did he apologize for him or on behalf of his GOP friends?? Nope I'm black, african - american, negro, whatever you want to call it and the GOP reminds of the GOP my dad would tell me about when he grew up in Alabama. Now especially that Palin is about to be on FAUX!! People get ready....
03:56 PM on 01/11/2010
I don't get it. The GOP and their minions concerned about "racial remarks" about the President now? Did they take a cultural sensitivity course over the weekend or what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kellym33
04:07 PM on 01/11/2010
Excellent!