More

FCIC Set To Question Bank CEOs About Financial Meltdown

JIM KUHNHENN   01/ 8/10 06:25 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Two blocks from the Treasury, where the government not long ago scrambled to save a collapsing financial system, a team of investigators armed with subpoena powers is preparing the official narrative of the crisis and what went wrong.

As Washington focuses on Congress' regulatory response to the 2008 Wall Street meltdown, the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission that Congress created last spring has been an afterthought.

Until now.

On Wednesday and Thursday, the commission will hold its first public hearings featuring a gallery of the nation's top bank executives – Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, John Mack of Morgan Stanley and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America.

"The irony here is it's as if there was an earthquake and the only buildings standing today are the buildings that were at the epicenter of the earthquake," the commission's chairman, Phil Angelides, said in an interview Thursday. "You have millions of people unemployed, millions have lost their homes, and Wall Street is having a record year with record profits and record bonuses. People want to understand why."

Angelides is the Democratic former California treasurer. His vice chairman is Republican Bill Thomas, a former congressman who chaired the House Ways and Means Committee. Together they lead a 10-member bipartisan commission with an ambitious mandate and limited time.

They were interviewed jointly Thursday in a small, spare conference room in an eighth-floor office suite on Pennsylvania Avenue within sight of the White House and the Treasury building.

Despite their different party labels, both men say that because they aim to explain the crises – not issue recommendations on how to avoid the next one – their work should be fairly nonpartisan.

Still, Angelides and Thomas said the commission could also offer proposed remedies or alternatives if there is strong consensus about the causes of the crisis.

The two men shrugged off decisions by President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats to proceed with a regulatory overhaul before the commission's work is done. They said the commission's final findings could still inform future legislation and could be a resource for regulators and for the industry itself.

Thomas in particular displayed impatience with bankers who worry that some additional government scrutiny and transparency will impair the industry.

"We came close to the worst thing in the world," Thomas said. "So whenever you hear from these people, 'Well, this will make us not to do this and not to do that,' I immediately flip it from negative to positive and say, 'Yeah, and so?'"

Both agreed that the crisis was the result of failures by individuals specifically and by the banking system in general. But in featuring the bankers at its first public hearings, the commission is sending a clear message that the first part of the narrative starts with the chief executives.

The commission is modeled on the 9/11 panel that examined the causes of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. But its prototype could be the so-called Pecora Commission, the Senate committee that investigated Wall Street abuses in 1933-34. It was named after Ferdinand Pecora, the committee's chief lawyer.

On this point, Thomas and Angelides part ways.

"Nobody remembers the Pecora Commission," Thomas protested. "The press created the knowledge of the Pecora Commission. C'mon, it's mostly not applicable."

"Here's where I think it is," Angelides countered. "It is different than the 1930s, but I do think there is a raw hunger for people to know."

Congress instructed the new commission to explore 22 issues, ranging from the effect of monetary policy on terms of credit and government fiscal imbalances to bank compensation structures.

Thomas said the commission's inquiry should include a look at the consequences of the 1999 repeal of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act that forced the separation of commercial and investment banks. Without the act, banks were unrestrained, Thomas said.

"It was wide open country, which I think is part of the problem in terms of not having a mental, financial, almost moral, obligation anymore because there is no backstop," he said.

And while Angelides said the commission's job was not to redebate the merits of the $700 billion bank bailout, he also said the commission's inquiry does not end at the height of the crisis in fall 2008.

"We start with the belief that the financial crisis is not a past-tense phenomenon," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — Two blocks from the Treasury, where the government not long ago scrambled to save a collapsing financial system, a team of investigators armed with subpoena powers is preparing the ...
WASHINGTON — Two blocks from the Treasury, where the government not long ago scrambled to save a collapsing financial system, a team of investigators armed with subpoena powers is preparing the ...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:01 PM on 01/13/2010
Smarter?

2003 Bill to regulate Fannie/Freddie went nowhere/

3-8-04 - (Bloomberg)

AIG,Citigroup,Merrill Backs Bush

-$2.9mil Bush

-$275,000 Kerry!

2005-Bill to regulate Fannie/Freddie passed House, dropped in the Senate

Where is accountability w/Sen Shelby AL - he was Chairman of Banking Committee for years!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Slater
Sommelier, harpsichordist, mostly progressive, ope
01:46 AM on 01/13/2010
Millions of ordinary people lost significant value to their 401K's, retirement funds, stock portfolios, market funds, mortgages, property values in the last year and a half. How can these clowns go on justifying their pay, bonuses, behavior and that of their institutions with a clear conscience?
12:54 AM on 01/13/2010
Here's my question for Lloyd:

You own 3-4 million shares of Goldman per the latest regulatory filings. You are one of the largest individual shareholders. The increase in the stock's price is far more relevant to you and your net worth than what you pay yourself each year. Compensation is taxed at the highest rate for you, which is nearly 50% including city and state taxes. Long term capital gains are taxed at half the cost. If you didn't pay any compensation to anyone at your firm, the effect of doing so would increase the stock price by at least $40 per share. Even in your best year, 2007, you paid yourself nearly $70 million, which was $35 million after income taxes. The stock price increase of not paying any compensation to anyone would increase your net worth by $160 million, which is probably closer to $120 million after taxes. You'd be 4 times better off not paying anyone at your company.

So, why in the world do you pay them (including yourself)?

Is it because that as a shareholder you need them?

Nah, forget that - there's no way it could be.
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
12:51 AM on 01/13/2010
Oooooh.... questions! I'm sure their quaking in their boots.
The time for Obama to do something about the banks was a year ago, but he lacks the character to do so.
photo
LoneRangerDude
Cross between The Lone Ranger and The Dude
12:50 AM on 01/13/2010
Bankers get millions in bonuses ... but branch tellers get a pittance. What's wrong with this picture?
photo
Republitarian
I own US corporations.
12:45 AM on 01/13/2010
This is so ridiculous. It's like feeding cats on your back porch steak, then yelling at them for being spoiled and greedy for not eating cat food.

The only reason these idiots have jobs and bonuses and banks anymore is because the big dumb moral hazard government bailed them out! An essential element of capitalism is risk, and the Fed and the Treasury completely removed that, or should I say, dumped it onto the taxpayer.

Should have let them all fail, then you'd see some behavior corrections. But why should they when mommy will be there to catch them?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
12:44 AM on 01/13/2010
Yet another congressional dog and pony show.
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
12:18 AM on 01/13/2010
I would ask each of them the same question.

If you are so valuable as to justify your salary and bonuses, why did you not see the economic collapse coming and take steps to protect you shareholders and keep your bank solvent?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
12:43 AM on 01/13/2010
Fanned!