iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WATCH: Members Of Congress Talk About Moving Their Money To Small Banks

First Posted: 03/22/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:15 PM ET

Members of Congress considering moving their money from major financial institutions to community banks have some of the same concerns ordinary customers do, according to interviews progressive video blogger Mike Stark conducted this week on Capitol Hill.

The Huffington Post searched financial disclosure forms filed by members of Congress and found that at least 53 senators use one of the nation's biggest six banks for their personal accounts. Information wasn't available for another 17. In the House, at least 104 members use big banks; at least 119 already use only small banks or credit unions. Information wasn't available for the rest. [Scroll down to find out where your senators and representative bank.]

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) told Stark that she began looking into moving her money from big banks to small ones when she heard about the campaign and thought it was a "great idea," but wanted to look into it.

"I have some questions to ask about the online banking capacity and the debit card use, etc., but I'm pretty excited about the idea," she said.

Huffington Post editors and economist Rob Johnson launched a viral campaign in December, urging people to move their money from bailed-out, too-big-to-fail banks and put it in small community banks or responsible credit unions.

Stark filmed nine members of Congress; all but Rep. Mike Castle (R-Del.) endorsed the idea.

Castle is running for Senate in Delaware, a state with a heavy concentration of credit card companies thanks to its lack of consumer protection laws.

"I don't think a movement like that is going to make much difference, but it'll obviously get some publicity and attention," Castle said. "My banking is done with local banking anyway."

Castle dismissed the notion that consumers should punish major banks, which took taxpayer money and then cut lending, raised credit card interest rates and showered executives with billions in bonuses. "These institutions are still vitally important to the economy of the country and they're going to be there whether some people transfer their assets or whatever. Remember, they're dealing in many instances in large businesses and large accounts and that kind of thing," he said. "They haven't failed at it. I mean, there's some arguments both ways. The small banks haven't done that well, either."

Several members of Congress said they once had their money in community banks, but that those banks were taken over.

"My bank that I have now, which is now Bank of America, started out just like that, as a community bank. And then it got bought up. And then it got bought up. And then it got bought up. And now it's swallowed into the too-big-to-fail banks," Schakowsky said.

Rep. Tim Bishop (D-N.Y.) said the same thing happened to him. In order to keep his money in his hometown, he'll have to keep it in a big bank. "I have money in what started out as small, community banks that have now been bought up by larger banks. I'm a lifelong resident of my little hometown and I've tried to bank in that little hometown and so I have local banks that, as I say, have now been bought up by larger banks," he said.

Stark asked Bishop if he'd move his money. "You know, I'll take a look at it but I think it's unlikely that I'll move things from where they are," he said, while backing community banks in general. "It's telling that the community banks have really weathered this storm reasonably well."

Rep. Dan Boren (D-Okla.) said he couldn't move his money to a small bank -- because he's always been in one. "The larger banks are some faceless institution...For my money, I like to know that Dale's on the other line," said Boren. "That's how it should be for everybody."

The enthusiasm for the movement of money was bipartisan. Rep. Tom McLintock (R-Calif.) praised the idea in full-throated free-market terms. "It's a great idea. I think the most important consumer protection that exists is the word no," he said. For now, he felt protected enough, he said. "It's all a trade-off. It's a question of what services do I get versus what risks do I take. I'm perfectly satisfied with my current arrangement." (Deposits in community banks, credit unions and big banks alike are protected up to $250,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.)

Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wy.) said she already uses a community bank and Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.) said he uses community banks and credit unions. "In Wyoming, we only have community banks," said Lummis.

Castle, however, is unconvinced that the people will act collectively against the big banks.

"I just don't think it's very likely to happen in terms of any kind of a major movement as far as the country is concerned," he said.

Members of Congress are required to report where they hold their deposits. Huffington Post's Jeremy Binckes sifted through the disclosure documents and compiled spreadsheets that can be found here for the House and here for the Senate. Your member may not have disclosed; if an account holds less than $5,000, it can be kept private.

We're compiling a database of where members of Congress hold their campaign and personal money. Where do your representatives bank? Call 202.224.3121 to reach your member. And report back using the PARTICIPATE button below.
Where Does Your Rep. Bank?
 

Find a picture, click the participate button, add a title and upload your picture

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Members of Congress considering moving their money from major financial institutions to community banks have some of the same concerns ordinary customers do, according to interviews progressive video ...
Members of Congress considering moving their money from major financial institutions to community banks have some of the same concerns ordinary customers do, according to interviews progressive video ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 89
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mtracy9
08:33 AM on 01/22/2010
Get rid Geitner -- who is a su.ck up to corporate interests -- and

impose a fee on the banks to get

the taxpayer's money back from these lee.ches.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
05:10 PM on 01/21/2010
Theres Delawares Faux Moderate Congressman, just a' lovin' on them Wall Streeters!
01:19 PM on 01/21/2010
I'm sure that the members have several bank accounts and their campaign accounts are with the large banks. This was a good report but I don't believe it.
12:47 PM on 01/21/2010
They obviously know something that we don't.
12:46 PM on 01/21/2010
How about moving our money out of Fannie and Freddie?

These people are clueless.
photo
imusintheevening
With,without,who'll deny it's whatthe fights about
12:34 PM on 01/21/2010
Enact a law that all banks must honor any ATM card for free.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidShort
12:53 PM on 01/21/2010
So a bank should eat the cost of operating an ATM? You do know these cost money to operate, right? If they can no longer charge the fee for privilege/service, the cost they can no longer charge will only be recovered through higher fees for those that use that bank. Why should they foot the bill so you can have that convenieince?
photo
imusintheevening
With,without,who'll deny it's whatthe fights about
12:58 PM on 01/21/2010
They save enormous amounts of money by using ATM's. Do you remember standing in line every week to cash your check with a teller? They should foot the bill because they have caused enormous damage to the economy, and they should be forced to provide basic services in return for the allowance to be in government backed business.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LemonMeringue
Happy Birthday, Steve Jobs - Feb. 24th
11:47 AM on 01/21/2010
Are we supposed to be impressed?

When they outlaw the legalized bribery called lobbying, I will sit up and take names.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgofca
11:47 AM on 01/21/2010
Credit unions are the way to go. Small banks sometimes get taken over by bigger banks or sometimes invest their funds with bigger banks. If you sign up with a credit union, you won't have to worry about that.
We're moving in a couple of months and we plan to join one in our new community.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidShort
10:53 AM on 01/21/2010
I think one thing that is missing in this report is why they are moving to smaller banks. After reading some of the headlines the past couple of days, the administration is making a lot of noise about more regulations on the big banks. Could this be a sign of things to come? Only time will be able to answer that.

And if the plans for regulating the bigger banks is such a good idea, why are the Congresspeople (persons?) running from them? What is in store for the rest of us that use the larger banks because of better access, stability, more services, etc? Given this administration's penchance for 'do as I say or else' (GM/Chrysler) I think I know the answer to those questions. We are indeed in dark times. The administration is well on its way to make things worse.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Veneita
If trolls had minds, they wouldn't be trolls
09:52 AM on 01/21/2010
My money is already in a credit union. However, I just moved my retirement account from AIG/Valic, one of the optional retirement programs my employer offers to another vendor. Move your 401K before Valic goes broke by doling out bonuses!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Marysdude
GySgt USMC (Retired)
06:09 AM on 01/21/2010
I wonder if it would be feasible for a bill requiring all government contractors use local banks or credit unions if they want to continue contracting with 'we the people'...hmmm...
02:42 AM on 01/21/2010
LOL This guy looks like Harry Reid but photoshopped.
01:40 AM on 01/21/2010
As glad as I am to see Senators and Representatives move their money to main street banks, I am much more eager for them to start moving Federal funds from the large, abusive banks to these smaller institutions.
That is the message which would be heard loud and clear in the board rooms as they conspire how to hand out our money as bonuses to themselves without raising too much public outcry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cebudavid
02:08 AM on 01/21/2010
Amen on your comment, I agree!.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:04 AM on 01/21/2010
I checked a decent local bank in my region using http://moveyourmoney.info opened my account with them and was delighted with their attention and service.

Next step is getting all my online banking and ebills setup (almost done!) then get my direct deposit transferred over.

It seems such a small action but it made me feel pretty good about it. If this one ever gets bought over by the big ones, I'll do the same thing over again and again! This is war! Let's make these sleezy b.a.s.tards small!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:32 AM on 01/21/2010
I actually started moving my money years ago when Wells Fargo first bought First Interstate. It's sometimes a pain in the tuchas, but well worth it. Love my small locally owned bank and personal service. Can't beat it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steel71
01:00 AM on 01/21/2010
Food for thought. In 1964, person (A) saved 100 grand in dollar bills; Person (B) saved 100 grand in 1964 quarters. Today, person (A) has 100 grand; person (B) has almost 1.4 million dollars. They both saved their money since 1964, but one decided to save it in real money (90% silver), the other saved it in Federal Reserve bank notes. Many would think that person (B) made a lot of money but that’s not true. Person (B) maintained the value of his money while Person (A) lost value. Today, a 1964 quarter almost buys a gallon of gas—just like it did in 1964. So, should you save your money in Federal Reserve banking notes AKA( American currency)? Or, should you save it in gold in silver? I think you all know the answer…