EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

US Marines End Role In Iraq, Biden Holds Talks In Baghdad

ADAM SCHRECK   01/23/10 09:05 PM ET   AP

Us Marines Iraq

RAMADI, Iraq — The U.S. Marines marked the end of nearly seven years in Iraq on Saturday by handing the Army their command of Anbar province, once one of the war's fiercest battlefields but now a centerpiece of U.S.-Iraqi cooperation.

The changing of the guard – overseen by military brass and some of Anbar's influential Sunni sheiks – signals the start of an accelerated drawdown of American troops as the U.S. increasingly shifts its focus to the war in Afghanistan.

American commanders are trumpeting security gains in places such as the western Anbar province as a sign that their partnership with Iraqi security forces is working, and that the local troops can keep the country safe.

But fears are growing about a possible resurgence in sectarian tensions – fed by the Shiite-dominated government's plans to blacklist more than 500 parliamentary candidates over suspected links to Saddam Hussein's regime.

In Baghdad, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden met with Iraq's leaders Saturday to try to alleviate the pressures. While he kept expectations of a breakthrough low – telling reporters after a meeting with President Jalal Talabani it was up to the Iraqis, not him, to resolve the issue – his visit alone underscored Washington's concern.

The White House worries the bans could raise questions over the fairness of the March 7 parliamentary election, which is seen as an important step in the American pullout timetable and a way to break political stalemates over key issues such as dividing Iraq's oil revenue.

"I am confident that Iraq's leaders are seized with this problem and are working to find a just solution," Biden said during his visit.

The Marines formally handed over U.S. responsibility for Sunni-dominated Anbar, Iraq's largest province, to the Army during a ceremony at a base in Ramadi, the scene of some of the war's most intense fighting. Overall control of the province shifted from the U.S. military to Iraq in September 2008, but the U.S. continues to provide support for Iraqi forces.

Iraqi and American color guards stood together at attention as both countries' national anthems were played by a U.S. military band.

As many as 25,000 Marines were in Iraq at the peak of the fighting, mostly in Anbar province. Fewer than 3,000 remain. All but a handful of those will ship out in a matter of weeks.

The Marines' extended stay in Anbar went against the grain of the Corps' usual role as a fighting force designed to quickly seize territory and then turn it over to the Army to maintain control from fixed bases.

Sharing the front row at the handover ceremony with American Army and Marine generals were some of Anbar's influential tribal sheiks in traditional checkered headdresses and gold-embroidered robes. Their decision to shift support to the Americans is credited with sapping the Sunni insurgency – including al-Qaida in Iraq – of much of its strength in areas near Baghdad.

Maj. Gen. Terry Wolff, the Army commander who assumed responsibility for the province, said he hoped security gains cemented by U.S. troops and their Iraqi counterparts would ensure a smooth transfer despite the overall drawdown in American forces.

"The goal that we all seek is the Iraqis securing their own election, and that the election is fair and the election is free," he told reporters after the handover.

If all goes as planned, the last remaining Marines will be followed out by tens of thousands of soldiers in the coming months. President Barack Obama has ordered all but 50,000 troops out of the country by Aug. 31, with most to depart after the parliamentary election in March.

The remaining troops will leave by the end of 2011 under a U.S.-Iraqi security pact.

The changeover at Ramadi, 70 miles (115 kilometers) west of Baghdad, leaves the U.S. Army's 1st Armored Division with responsibility over both Baghdad and Anbar, the vast desert province that stretches from western Baghdad to the borders of Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

The province was once the heart of the deadly Sunni insurgency that erupted after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. In the battles for control of the cities of Fallujah and Ramadi, the Marines saw some of the most brutal and deadliest fighting of the war.

Violence began dropping off in the province in late 2006 when Sunni fighters – known as Awakening Councils – turned against al-Qaida and sided with the Marines to fight the insurgency.

The upcoming parliamentary election is considered an important step toward speeding the U.S. troop pullout and seeking progress on stalled political initiatives. Among them: passing laws clarifying the rules for foreign oil investment and dividing the revenue among Iraq's main groups.

But plans to ban hundreds of candidates have raised deep concerns in Washington that the voting could widen rifts between the majority Shiites who gained power after Saddam's fall and Sunnis who are struggling to regain influence.

Biden, who arrived late Friday, had a full agenda of meetings with Iraqi leaders, including Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who has strongly supported the blacklist and has resisted attempts at possible American mediation.

Some Sunni leaders have accused the Shiite-led government of using the ban as a political tool. But al-Maliki insists that Iraq must purge all ties to Saddam's Sunni-dominated regime. A vetting panel has put 512 names on the blacklist and more are expected.

Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh told The Associated Press that during the meeting with al-Maliki, Biden was careful not to "give the wrong message that America wants to interfere in the Iraqi affairs."

Biden later met with Talabani, who has asked for a legal review on the blacklist. The courts are expected to examine whether the vetting panel has legal grounding because it does not have formal parliamentary approval.

The panel includes two controversial Shiite figures: Ali al-Lami, who was once detained by the U.S. military over a 2008 attack in a Shiite district of Baghdad; and Ahmed Chalabi, who is blamed for supplying U.S. officials with faulty intelligence on Saddam's weapons program prior to the 2003 invasion.

Al-Lami is also a candidate in the March election – raising further complaints from Sunnis about possible political motives behind the list.

___

Associated Press Writers Matt Apuzzo and Bushra Juhi in Baghdad contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

RAMADI, Iraq — The U.S. Marines marked the end of nearly seven years in Iraq on Saturday by handing the Army their command of Anbar province, once one of the war's fiercest battlefields but now ...
RAMADI, Iraq — The U.S. Marines marked the end of nearly seven years in Iraq on Saturday by handing the Army their command of Anbar province, once one of the war's fiercest battlefields but now ...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 310
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
11:46 AM on 01/25/2010
Is this article a FRAUD?
"As of 01 March 2006 there were 133,000 US troops in Iraq, down from about 160,000 in December 2005 during parliament­ary elections. The Pentagon cut Army combat brigades to 15 from 17. The 25th Infantry Division from Hawaii, along with seven other major military units are scheduled to deploy as part of the Summer 2006 troop rotation. The Pentagon hoped to reduce the US presence in Iraq to less than 100,000 by the end of 2006"
http://www­.globalsec­urity.org/­military/o­ps/iraq_or­bat.htm

From the article above..."A­s many as 25,000 Marines were in Iraq at the peak of the fighting, mostly in Anbar province. Fewer than 3,000 remain. "
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
11:53 AM on 01/25/2010
Seems like a big attempt to create a media reality that the occupation and illegal invasion and war in Iraq has ended. How many Iraqis have we destroyed? One estimate from the Lancet I believe says over 1 million. That is a war crime of immense proportion­s towards a people who had absolutely nothing to do with 9-11.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:19 AM on 01/25/2010
What a pathetic understate­ment that diminishes the importance of the Shia action. Banning 500 politicans and candidates from seeking political office. Iraq is still a client state of America. As long as there are military bases present, Iraq will remain a subservien­t client of America. In fact, the constituti­on of Iraq was censored and crafted with American interferen­ce and involvemen­t. Rumsfeld literally told Pachachi what he could and could not have in it, as an editor. Today, Iraq is a pathetic fraud. America should be ashamed of itself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
11:48 AM on 01/25/2010
This article smells of Prop-O-Gan­da.
photo
SparkyDash
Save a pretzel for the gas jets.
07:37 AM on 01/25/2010
Thank you President Obama.

Thank you Vice President Joe Biden.

Thank you U.S. Marines.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
10:24 PM on 01/24/2010
Liz Cheney thinks it is "Bad" for us to leabe Iraq.
photo
SparkyDash
Save a pretzel for the gas jets.
07:39 AM on 01/25/2010
consider the source, of course...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
11:49 AM on 01/25/2010
We aren't leaving Iraq despite what this article seems to claim.
08:19 PM on 01/24/2010
The headline is misleading­.

There will be US contractor­s in the region for years to come.

Baghdad's US military base is a city within a city and will continue to be there.

There is terrible pollution (depleted Uranium for example) that will cause health issue for years to come.

Our presence will be lasting and permanent.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
11:50 AM on 01/25/2010
Absolutely­. This article is directly from the Central Commisaria­t of Military Prop-O-Gan­da.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LemonMeringue
01:32 PM on 01/24/2010
$2 billion a week goes down the drain in Iraq, yet the U.S. pledged $100 million for Haiti relief.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WilliamL
12:50 PM on 01/24/2010
When was the last time the CIC has been to Iraq or Afghanista­n?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RRK70
02:22 PM on 01/24/2010
And what does that matter? If Obama were to visit Iraq republican­ts would just whine and cry about him making "pretty speeches" and "ignoring domestic policy". No matter what, republican­ts will complain. It's their official MO.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lmpub
11:08 AM on 01/24/2010
Let's keep them coming out of Iraq. Thank you Marines!
05:45 PM on 01/24/2010
I want to echo you.
THANK YOU to the men and women of the USMC. You have served well and beyond all expectatio­ns. Most of you have given your best while some have given their all ( died). We celebrate your return and hope we will never again send you to do a job without a mission.

Thank you President Obama. Change of command is tough but you weathered the criticism to bring home the marines in an orderly and honorable fashion, and I know soon the army, af, and navy will follow. Thank for keeping the main thing the main thing.

Thank you VP Biden for understand­ing that every country has the right to determine it's future. While the US may provide guidance and suggestion­s, it is up to the Iraqis to decide what they will do with their country. We are leaving and that's final

A prayer for the Iraqis: The Americans have shed blood, tears, treasure for you. Please look at the clock and hear the tick ticking it's time to make a decision on what type of country you want.
photo
SparkyDash
Save a pretzel for the gas jets.
07:38 AM on 01/25/2010
Very nice post...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Eberly
Systems Engineer, Naval Reservist, Born
10:38 AM on 01/24/2010
As far as guarding the Embassy. When I was in Iraq, the embassy was guarded by contractor­s from South America ... Peru, I think. When things really get back to normal for Iraq ... the Marines will be returning to guard the Embassy which is usually what Marines do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Eberly
Systems Engineer, Naval Reservist, Born
10:09 AM on 01/24/2010
So now that this is winding down lets go over what was accomplish­ed.

After the first Gulf War Iraq was embargoed and the Iraqi was subjected to shortages, while the brutal regime went on as usual using it power to get what it wanted, to a point. For 10 years the United States and other countries maintained a great expense two no fly zones. Saddam kept his desire to have Nuclear Weapons. We now know explicitly from his own words that he didn't come clean about not having weapons before the US invasion mainly because he didn't want Iran to know he was weak in this regard. Before the invasion the embargoes, which were punishing the Iraqi citizen but keeping Saddam from moving ahead with a weapons program, were about to be curtailed with pressure from France and Russia who were owed money by Iraq. The predictabl­e outcome of this would have been that Iraq now would have been moving ahead with WMD and under the control of a brutal and unstable dictator or his younger son Qusey, who may have been even more brutal.

Today we have an Iraq which has a chance of being a more normal country, and we have taken out a factor which would have served to accelerate Iran's ambitions to arm itself with WMD to counter Iraq. The US, in fighting the insurgency­, has rediscover­ed and added to the knowledge and expertise to counter many of the threats it will see in the future.
10:41 AM on 01/24/2010
"Today we have an Iraq which has a chance of being a more normal country"
For me that is the salient point. It will take a long time, maybe ten years, I think, before we can really see the full effects of OIF. Already Iraq is not a normal country by Arab middle eastern standards. If the government survives, it will be the only functionin­g democracy in the region. A successful Iraq will in the long run have a large impact on the greater Middle East. If it survives its first decade, then I imagine it won't be much longer before Saudis begin asking the kigndom, "Do we need an American invasion before we get to vote?"
Well, that's one possible outcome. We placed our bets and took our chancs, anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:42 PM on 01/24/2010
It's not winding down, not at all. Don't be fooled. We will still have forces there for many years to come, though most will be private contractor­s.
05:31 AM on 01/24/2010
So who will look after the world's largest embassy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Misbah Ali
02:19 AM on 01/24/2010
wait!!!! hold on!!!! how can we leave!!!! we havent found the weapons of mass destructio­n!!!
01:40 AM on 01/24/2010
Tell me again in a moths time how many actually left Iraq.
11:49 PM on 01/23/2010
So, now that its finally over. I'm not really sure what the goal was and what we accoplishe­d exactly? Can anyone fill me in? Oh I know, we've finally secured the Haifa project. That's right, 8km of oil pipeline directed right into Haifa, Israel. Wow, and paid for by who, that's right me and you the American taxpayer. I wonder how much of that oil we will see. I mean, I'm all for taking the oil now that we're 7 years and trillions of dollars invested in it. Maybe now gasoline prices will come down. Probably not, but I bet they will in Israel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Misbah Ali
02:14 AM on 01/24/2010
what do you mean?? ive nvr heard of this..
photo
latia65
"squeezed middle and/or damp squib"
02:21 AM on 01/24/2010
dux said OIL OIL OIL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aznurse
09:55 PM on 01/23/2010
Is this a secret?? There's been no mention of it on MSN.
But who cares? The Balloon boys mother admitted it was a hoax.
It's all about priorities­.