Charla Nash Seeking Face, Hand Transplant After Chimp Attack

JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN   01/25/10 04:49 PM ET   AP

Charla Nash

NEW HAVEN, Conn. — An Ohio hospital has told the family of a Connecticut woman mauled and blinded by a chimpanzee a year ago that she is not a candidate for a face and hand transplant.

Charla Nash's family is looking into alternative facilities after the Cleveland Clinic said it could not do both transplants, family attorney Bill Monaco told The Associated Press on Monday. He said the transplants have to be done simultaneously and come from the same donor.

The 200-pound chimpanzee went berserk in February after its owner asked Nash to help lure it back into her house. The animal ripped off Nash's hands, nose, lips and eyelids.

The hospital, which in 2008 performed the nation's first face transplant but has not done hand transplants, said Monday that Nash has made significant progress in her recovery and more surgeries are planned to further help her regain some independence.

"However, due to the complexity of her injuries, the medical team has concluded she is not a candidate for transplantation at this time," the hospital said in a statement.

The clinic has not ruled out the possibility of some type of collaboration with another hospital, Monaco said.

Nash's family is researching the possibilities of the transplants at a few other hospitals in the United States and one in Canada, Monaco said.

"It will significantly improve her quality of life," Monaco said.

A face transplant would help Nash smell, breath and eat, while a hand transplant would help her be more independent, Monaco said. Nash has great difficulty eating and mostly uses a straw, he said.

Even if Nash was declared a candidate for the transplants, the surgery would not be done for years, Monaco said.

In April, dozens of doctors working in teams over 30 hours performed the world's first simultaneous partial-face and double-hand transplant at the Henri Mondor hospital in the Paris suburb of Creteil on a 30-year-old burn victim. The man died in June after suffering a heart attack during follow-up surgery.

Dr. Warren Breidenbach, a surgeon at Jewish Hospital in Louisville, Ky., who in 1999 did the nation's first hand transplant, said physical therapy would be extremely difficult for someone who is blind and receives hand transplants.

"When a patient is blind, they cannot feel or see their transplanted hand," Breidenbach said. "The feeling in the transplanted hand takes years to grow back."

The Cleveland Clinic has good hand surgeons, but hand transplant surgery involves a lot of research and a long regulatory process, Breidenbach said.

Prosecutors said in December they would not charge the owner, Sandra Herold, because there was no evidence she knowingly disregarded any risk the animal posed.

Nash, who revealed her heavily disfigured face in November on "The Oprah Winfrey Show," has been at the Cleveland Clinic since soon after the attack. She expects to be discharged soon to an undetermined facility for rehabilitation, Monaco said.

Nash's family is suing Herold for $50 million and wants to sue the state for $150 million. Nash's family has said Herold was negligent and reckless for lacking the ability to control "a wild animal with violent propensities."

Herold's attorney has called the attack work-related – Nash worked for Herold and the animal played a promotional role in Herold's tow-truck business – and said her family's case should be treated like a workers' compensation claim. The strategy, if successful, would limit potential damages and insulate Herold from personal liability.

Test results showed that Travis had the anti-anxiety drug Xanax in his system.

The chimp, which was shot and killed by police, had also escaped in 2003 from his owner's car and led police on a chase for hours in downtown Stamford. No one was injured.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

Filed by David Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:51 PM on 01/25/2010
a worker's comp claim?
04:18 PM on 01/25/2010
The blurred photo is censorship pure and simple.

And people in the US are pointing the finger at China....
09:23 PM on 01/25/2010
she is wearing a veil... it isn't blurred.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AngelaQuattrano
I just like to write comments
04:14 PM on 01/25/2010
Her face has not been edited, that is a veil she is wearing to cover it.
04:03 PM on 01/25/2010
You can never trust a chimp .... remember that folks
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DallasDon
Yo Yo Yo, This Is My Crow... ✈. Bye, Yo.
03:44 PM on 01/25/2010
Ms. Nash is a much stronger person than me.
If I were going on the Oprah show, I'd agonize for days about my hair, clothes and appearance. Yet here, Ms. Nash is brave enough to share her story with the world because there were mistakes made that people need to learn from.
If I were her fiend who owned that chimp, I'd spend the rest of life trying to make it up to Ms. Nash. I'd try to raise money for her medical needs and raise public awareness of the dangers involved in keeping wild animals as pets.
Ms. Nash is a brave and courageous woman to go on living with this unimaginable horror and to do it with dignity. Something a lot of people should take note of.

My best wishes and prayers to Ms. Nash and I hope she has a joyful and happy life from here on out.
photo
SpookyTwo
Enhancing the lives of Liberals ....... every day.
02:56 PM on 01/25/2010
That chimp was a real chump.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:23 PM on 01/25/2010
That poor woman. I simply cannot imagine what she's going through. A shame.
iridium53
Semper Fi
02:23 PM on 01/25/2010
So, would this be covered in the new Democratic healthcare plan?

Or, would activities like keeping dangerous animals be excluded?

Should society cover the medical risks of people who keep rattlesnakes, boas, alligators, lions, and chimpanzees?
Is there really a societal benefit? Or, should they have to carry their own insurance?
02:31 PM on 01/25/2010
She didn't own the dangerous animal, her friend did. This woman is truly a victim of someone elses stupidity.
03:08 PM on 01/25/2010
IIII don't know.... she knew that it was a chimpanzee, not a kitten.
photo
BUSTERtheCAT
SNL owes me MONEY
02:36 PM on 01/25/2010
clown
01:53 PM on 01/25/2010
I don't understand why HuffPo continues to blur out this woman't face, as though her very existence were offensive. She went on the Oprah show voluntarily to discuss what happened to her. She's a human being, and doesn't deserve to be treated like something we need to be protected from.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MintysMom
03:50 PM on 01/25/2010
I was one of the people when she first revealed her face who asked that HP not shock people without warning them first before clicking. It's graphic, IMO. A tragedy, yes. But some people absorb and process graphic images differently than others. Just because some people have no problems viewing graphic images, doesn't mean it isn't traumatic for others.
03:57 PM on 01/25/2010
I think a reasonable argument can be made for either blurring or not blurring her face. She was not born with a birth defect, rather she suffered a horrific injury and she is in the process of having the damage corrected. Some people would argue that publishing pictures out-of-context and just for a headline teaser amounts to yellow journalism--using titillatingly graphic photos to pander to the readers' taste for the gruesome. I agree with your point that people who have been disfigured shouldn't be marginalized or treated as less than human. But, I have mixed feelings about running her photo, at least where it's just part of some blurb. The article is not a thoughtful cover story about overcoming a disability, nor is it a tasteful documentary about surviving a disfiguring accident. Short little "human interest" articles like this have the potential to turn their subjects into some sort of sideshow where the focus of the article just becomes "Oh my God! Look at her face!"