iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

What Obama Should Say, But Won't

First Posted: 03/29/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:20 PM ET

Obama Speech

Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, and the American people:
I stand before you after one year as your president, proud of what we have accomplished but humbled by how much further we have to go.

And I am here to tell you what I intend to do about it.

The one-year mark is a good time to take stock, and in doing so I've reached two conclusions. One is that there is nothing wrong with my overall goals -- the goals that I believe in with every bone in my body, the goals I set out in my campaign, and the goals you elected me to achieve. But my other conclusion is that there has been something wrong with my strategy. I can, and must do better.

When I took office, I truly believed that the best way to accomplish those goals -- that the best thing for America -- was for me to try to find areas of compromise, both within my own party and between Democrats and Republicans.

And I thought the best way forward was to surround myself with experienced pragmatists, so we could get things done.

I thought I could accomplish more that way, but I was wrong.

I underestimated many things, among them the nearly absolute resistance of an ever more radicalized Republican leadership; and my ability to persuade powerful and self-satisfied people at the highest levels of government and business to change with words alone.

Now it's time for me not to pull back, but to push forward -- more aggressively.

I vowed to fight for you. I have been fighting for you. But now I'm going to recalibrate. I will use my power as president directly. I will not just ask Congress and bankers and health industry leaders and industrial polluters to take the actions necessary to make this country a fairer, healthier, cleaner and more prosperous place. I will take unilateral action where I can, and where I can't, there will be lines drawn in the sand, and there will be consequences for those who do not heed them.

For instance, let's talk about health care, a topic that has taken up entirely too much of the legislative bandwidth this past year. Improving our health insurance system is a moral imperative -- it's a tremendous tragedy that so many Americans are uninsured, or underinsured, or suddenly without insurance exactly when they need it, or get denied insurance because of pre-existing conditions, and find themselves having to make choices involving their health that no human being should have to make. It's also a fiscal imperative, as rising health costs are the single greatest threat to our federal budget, our economy, and the long-term financial wellbeing of American families. You want deficit reduction? Help me bring these outrageous health care costs down.

Well, my advisers and I thought the best way to pass a bill was to avoid a pitched public battle with the health industry. So we struck some secret deals with the big pharmaceutical companies and insurance executives. Then we let Congress do its thing. But that was a mistake. Yes, without industry opposition and after quite a slog, we managed to almost pass something. But it wasn't worth all the compromises. You can't take pride in winning a battle if you cede so much before you fight it, and on top of that you win ugly. So what to do now? Well, I'm going to ask the House to pass the Senate version of health care reform legislation right away, and then have the Senate revise the numbers through a process that only requires 50 votes. I will not be held hostage by obstructionist members of the opposition party or gutless members of my own. And then we move on.

Another mistake I made this past year was allowing myself to see the financial crisis too much through bankers' eyes. My chief economic advisers are almost without exception men who hail from the financial world, and it's not that their advice was all bad, it was just unbalanced. I continue to maintain that the actions we took prevented a terrible economic calamity. But from this point forward, I'm bringing in people with backgrounds in domestic and social policy to join my economic team, so that we keep the right balance going forward. And going forward, I'm setting these goals: The taxpayers must be made whole for the billions of dollars they've spent on bailouts and subsidies, implicit and explicit, to people who are now showering themselves with staggeringly inappropriate bonus payments (and this may include paying those bonuses back); the people who caused this mess should be held accountable, which means a complete public reckoning of how it happened and who was responsible, followed by political, civil and criminal action as necessary; we must break up banks that are too big to fail so that no Wall Street fat cats can ever again take inordinate risks with impunity, knowing the upsides will be all theirs, and the taxpayers will come to their rescue if they bet wrong; and the most crucial economic goal, bar none, involves putting people back to work and growing the economy again.

Some of the anger growing in this country is legitimate. Middle class, Main Street America is hurting, and needs help. My message to you: Help is on the way.

But some of the anger is misdirected at the government. I will not apologize for believing the government has an enormous role to play in righting the economy and improving the lives of ordinary Americans. I believe in government that is a great power for good. To those of you who are screaming about government takeovers, I say, you're wrong -- and show me a better idea. Letting everyone to their own devices is what got us into this crisis in the first place; it's not a solution.

I will be frank. The stimulus was just a first step. We need a massive, concerted burst of government spending on public works, infrastructure and green jobs. This is not the time to decrease entitlements -- you don't cut Social Security just when people's life savings have taken a massive hit, you increase it. Intelligent, well-planned pro-growth pro-family policies will help get this country back on its feet and improve everyone's quality of life.

Once we're on a clearer glide path, then we can cut back on spending -- and raise taxes. That's how you reduce the deficit. But you don't do that in a period of recession. And you certainly don't raise spending while cutting taxes, which is what my predecessor did, greatly contributing to the hole we're now in.

Indeed, let's not kid ourselves, moving forward is vastly more difficult because we have a lot of fixing to do first. I wish that weren't the case. Blame Anthony Scalia.

But the good news is that there is a bright future if we do things right. First comes short-term government involvement to jumpstart the private sector. In the coming days, I'll be proposing a national infrastructure bank and a national green bank, to get American businesses and families rebuilding America even while addressing our long-term energy and climate problems. We'll put people first. We'll return to an economy that rewards work, where growth leads to rising wages, not an increased concentration of wealth among the super-rich. Go read my books. I'm going to go re-read my books myself.

Just in the last few weeks, I succumbed to the lure of cheap political gimmicks. Tonight, I renounce them. My chief of staff is a great believer in things that poll well, like spending freezes and deficit commissions. But I'm not going to treat you like children. I'm going to level with you. We need to cut the long-term deficit, which means we have to make some tough cuts and raise taxes -- but now is not the time.

I have never lied to you; and I never will. I thought for a year that the better part of valor lay in trying to find common ground and consensus among what I hoped were reasonable people. That's how I've lived most of my life. But what the country needs, what I campaigned on, and what I will be henceforth, is a fighter.

And I need you to fight with me. There is a reason things are the way they are; those who are doing well -- the corporations and the wealthy who have reaped the benefits of increased productivity that belong to the workers; the health industry that has grown fat on costs that are way above any reasonable standard; the rich who no longer pay their fair share of taxes; the banking titans who get multi-million payoffs for mergers and exotic trades and speculation that add not one penny of value to anyone but themselves -- they don't want change. As I start to fight harder, their resistance will grow. I plan to flush them out into the open. And I need your help to offset their newly-granted ability to influence elections even more than ever before. On every level, it's you, the American people, who must reward politicians not for pandering but for fighting on your behalf. The only way they'll stop doing what their financial backers want is if they feel more pain than gain from doing the wrong thing. The movement that elected me in a victory for hope and change in November 2008 must rise again.

You asked for change then -- and let there be no doubt that you got change. This country is no longer a rogue nation, torturing its enemies, embarking on wars on false pretenses. We have rejected the politicization of justice, and national security. When I talk to you, I tell it like it is; there are no scare tactics or fairy tales to confuse you. We have put an end to an era of profound irresponsibility, where problems weren't solved, they were constantly being created, and long existing problems were kicked down the road.

But there is so much more to do, so much more to change. The state of the union is troubled. But I see a way out. Let's go there together.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, and the American people: I stand before you after one year as your president, proud of what we have accomplished but humbled by how much furt...
Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, and the American people: I stand before you after one year as your president, proud of what we have accomplished but humbled by how much furt...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 721
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
07:53 PM on 02/01/2010
Dear Dan Froomkin,

as a speachwriter, YOU ARE HIRED!

Now, how do we force Obama to use your material?!

RT
.
08:07 PM on 01/28/2010
I think that the President did the right thing in his State of the Union address when he began to clear up the misinformation about federal deficit. He is RIGHT that in the last full fiscal year under President Bush (the 2007/2008 fiscal year) the annual deficit was nearly $1 trillion. (This is NOT the deficit number announced by the Bush administration; this is the one that includes the "off budget" money for the wars, military overruns, money taken from the Social Security Trust Fund, etc.).
What the President did not say, but should have, is that Social Security plays NO part in our federal debt, either in the annual deficit or the total debt. Social Security has more than paid for itself for decades, as it, unlike the wars and the military, has an income offset from payroll taxes. Medicare has played only a very minor role in annual deficits, as well.
There is so much misinformation out there about how the annual deficit is built that it is time to set the record straight. And, there should be more talk about the true reason for our annual deficits and increasing federal debt: They are caused, primarily, by the wars, direct military costs, support for the military, and interest on the debt, which has been caused by the wars, direct military costs, ....
The bottom line is that there will be no reducing the federal debt until we pull back on wars and the military.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dupree
Speaking Truth to Lies
02:58 PM on 01/28/2010
Part TWO

I just had to vent. I will tell her to her face that she is NO SUPPORTER of this president and if anything she does more to empower the right winged teabaggers and tries over the call of duty to make this president impotent although it does not work for he has far more going for HIM than SHE fact not spin. And I dare you to have the guts to print this in its entirety or at all. YOU ..ARRIANA does more to impeded progress than all the teabaggers put together and in fact I respect them more than you for at least they are bold enough to show their true allegiance and do not perpetuate a myth as if they want the President to succeed. I suggest YOU run for office and change Washington for your credentials are in question at least by me. And I say this with total conviction.
02:52 PM on 01/28/2010
Quote of the Night :






''So let me start the discussion of government spending by setting the record straight. At the beginning of the last decade, America had a budget surplus of over $200 billion. By the time I took office, we had a one year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade. Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the effects of the recession put a $3 trillion hole in our budget. That was before I walked in the door.




- enjoy :))
08:13 PM on 01/28/2010
I agree. The year he was referring to would be the 2007/2008 fiscal year. The 2008/2009 fiscal year (start of October to the end of september) come out about $1.8 trillion in the red. About $500 billion of that was spent before President Obama took office. The rest came after he took office. None of this was due to Social Security. Very little was due to Medicare. The bulk was due to the spending on the wars, the military, military support, Homeland Security and interest on the debt. Our military industrial complex is running us into the ground. The more the President gets this information out to Americans, the better, I think. Obama inherited a mess. He did well to turn the banking/financial disaster around. It cost taxpayers a bunch. That is why he said that he hated the banks bailout. But he and Congress need to address the incredible spending on the wars, the military, etc. before we really ARE broke.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:37 PM on 01/28/2010
He should have said something about the needs of the workers and the poor, not just frame it as a competition between the Middle class and the Elite. He should have something about the errors of deindustrialization, outsourcing, and "Free" Trade Friedman economics. Also, still no call for reinstating Sherman Anti Trust.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grf67
12:59 PM on 01/28/2010
The fundamentalist republicans and their zelot commentator friends will spread anger and fear as far as they can. Neither has any answers, but they will complain and cry like the thumb suckers that they are.
12:22 PM on 01/28/2010
Obama did make a mistake..he underestimated the power of the "pundits" both on television and on-line to play to people's fears by presenting a government that behaves like Godzilla .The louder and more verbally violent these commentators became ,the greater the viewing audience..as if you were attending a hockey game just waiting for the fight to break out..

Imagine if we didn't have social security or medicare and Obama was presenting those concepts today..talk about ratings !
12:02 PM on 01/28/2010
This week, Oregonians voted by substantial majority, even in many red rural counties, to raise taxes on the richest persons and corporations to balance the budget.

State Republicans, big business, the editorials, outside money and campaigning by the swift boat crew - NOTHING stopped the will of the people. The vote wasn't even that close.

Did MSM even mention it? Have the national Dems noticed the victory?

All the bluster about Scott Brown in MA could be negated by pivoting attention to this course in Oregon.

Of course, most of the United States does not even know where Oregon is on the map.
photo
kathy001
Don't bogart that duck
02:34 PM on 01/28/2010
I agree, this is an important story. I do not agree that most of the US doesn't know where Oregon is. Those people are in the minorty - they are just really, really loud.
11:59 AM on 01/28/2010
My problem has never been wtih what Obama SAYS. it's in what he DOES (or doesn't do). In fact, I think he ought to do a little more DOING that doesn't remotely coincide with what he says. LBJ was great at this. In other words, tell people what they want to hear (because they're children). And then work like hell to push through what they really need.

Obama is very naive if he thinks people know what is best for them. And the GOP is great at making anything and everthing (other than tax cuts) sound like a huge enema. How many people even know who Keynes was? Look at the people who held up signs saying "Don't let the government mess with my Medicare." That's our electorate.

Again, Obama needs to tell them what they want to hear. And do the opposite.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bcantrll
11:44 AM on 01/28/2010
That's pretty much what he said. He just needs to dumb it down a little.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Plurabelle06
10:35 AM on 01/28/2010
Sorry, but No Child Left Behind has had a terrible impact on the educational system.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
10:04 AM on 01/28/2010
It's fun being an armchair quarterback! I bet you could have done better than Brett Favre in the NFC Championship game, too.
04:22 AM on 01/28/2010
Sorry guy the State of the Union speech by President Obama was so much better than your 8th grade level speech --- and my apologies to all 8th graders with better literary skills than yours.
10:03 AM on 01/28/2010
Really? Did you miss the substance while you thought up that clever jab about eighth graders?
03:08 AM on 01/28/2010
"Well, I'm going to ask the House to pass the Senate version of health care reform legislation right away, and then have the Senate revise the numbers through a process that only requires 50 votes. I will not be held hostage by obstructionist members of the opposition party or gutless members of my own. And then we move on." Oh, really????? News flash: The people of this country did not elect this guy as king. There is a reason that we have a 3-party system. The Republican members of Congress were elected to office just as the Democrat members were, and they have a responsibility to vote the way their constituents would have them vote. And the people of our country are not happy at all with the current health care bill. It needs to be scrapped. We do need insurance reform, and we do need health care that is more affordable, but we do not need these things at the expense of our freedom. We do not need our lives to be controlled by the government, and our country cannot afford to spend what this bill will cost. Passing the bill with only 50 votes would be a tragic mistake, but the good news would be that we will have a very different Congress in November 2012. So maybe it's worth the trade-off.
10:51 AM on 01/28/2010
Oh, really!!! Constituents vote for a party to have them refuse to participate in anything? That's what they were elected for? To do nothing about anything important to Americans and to our country?
01:48 PM on 01/28/2010
I think you meant "there is a reason we have separation of powers," since we do not have a three party system.
12:40 AM on 01/28/2010
Indulging in a little State of the Union fanfiction, are we? Next time add something about gay rights. Slash is always a lot more fun.