iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Al Franken's Anti-Rape Amendment Makes Defense Budget

First Posted: 04/03/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:25 PM ET

Franken

President Barack Obama's 2011 defense budget proposal includes language that would prevent the government from working with contractors who deny victims of sexual assault the right to their day in court.

Buried deep in the Department of Defense budget proposal (page 92 of 94 of this PDF file)
released on Monday is language that mirrors an amendment passed into law this year by Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.).

Like that effort -- which came in response to the assault and rape of Jamie Leigh Jones by her fellow employees at defense contractor KBR -- the DoD's budget would prohibit the government from doing business with companies that deny court hearings for victims of assault. It would also allow victims to sue the employers of the contractor and not just the contractor itself. Any contractors whose contracts total more than $1 million or more would be subjected to the legislation.

Franken's office, which was already ecstatic that their amendment had been adopted in this years appropriations bill, said they were pleasantly shocked that it would now be law of the land for two years running (though, Congress still has to vote on the budget).

Below is the relevant language from the DoD budget request - identical to the Franken amendment's language:

None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be expended for any Federal contract for an amount in excess of $1,000,000 that is awarded more than 60 days after the effective date of this Act, unless the contractor agrees not to:


(1) enter into any agreement with any of its employees or independent contractors that requires, as a condition of employment, that the employee or independent contractor agree to resolve through arbitration any claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention; or

(2) take any action to enforce any provision of an existing agreement with an employee or independent contractor that mandates that the employee or independent contractor resolve through arbitration any claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention.

(b) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be expended for any Federal contract awarded more than 180 days after the effective date of this Act unless the contractor certifies that it requires each covered subcontractor to agree not to enter into, and not to take any action to enforce any provision of, any agreement as described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), with respect to any employee or independent contractor performing work related to such subcontract. For purposes of this subsection, a "covered subcontractor'' is an entity that has a subcontract in excess of $1,000,000 on a contract subject to subsection (a).

The Secretary of Defense may waive the application of subsection (a) or (b) to a particular contractor or subcontractor for the purposes of a particular contract or subcontract if the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary personally determines that the waiver is necessary to avoid harm to national security interests of the United States...


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
President Barack Obama's 2011 defense budget proposal includes language that would prevent the government from working with contractors who deny victims of sexual assault the right to their day in cou...
President Barack Obama's 2011 defense budget proposal includes language that would prevent the government from working with contractors who deny victims of sexual assault the right to their day in cou...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 494
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
06:33 AM on 02/03/2010
For all of those so shocked that the GOP would try to stop this legislation, maybe this will finally expose the repubs for who & what they truly are. Why doesn't this make more news anyhow? I can understand it not being on Faux Gnus, but the other major networks should definitely be putting this out there for the general public to see.
11:39 PM on 02/02/2010
One of the most under reported aspects of the military. As a decorated military veteran I wrote about this on my blog.

http://pinione.blogspot.com/2009/08/rape-and-sexual-assault-in-military.html
11:19 PM on 02/02/2010
i can't believe anyone could be against this...unless its a crowd of ayn rand devotees....seroiusly a woman was raped in iraq by her co-workers (ie fellow mercenaries / contractors) all of whom worked for the same company...then they kidnapped her and lmprisioned her in a cargo container while they destroyed evidence...then claim that the US has no legal authority to do anything about it....how about military tribunals for this bunch of idiots.....just remember your tax dollars pay those very mercs about 10x per day what we pay for a US soldier.....your republican spent tax dollars at work....remember the use of contractors was Rummy's defense department and unfortunately obama has continued the policy.....so no money for social programs but no problem for paying these maniacs who think iraq is their way of living out some sick wild west fantasy....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
07:01 PM on 02/03/2010
Talk about TOTAL GOP HYPOCRISY!

I am incensed that our government doesn't have the SPINE to send our own troops into situations (and risk the ire of the taxpayer as their sons and daughters come home in body bags), while they hire these mercenary DROIDS at exorbitant amounts, to do a piss-poor job at that!

This is not the behavior of MY country! Where is my country, and what have you f84Kin' alien bA$&ARd$ DONE WITH IT!

Don't even THINK about a Ann-Rand apologist reply to this until I've had a chance to calm down, unless you're as mad as I am about this travesty!!! This has got to stop!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
07:03 PM on 02/03/2010
Oh, BTW, you DINOs who had anything to do with this are on my $H!T-list, too!
05:42 PM on 02/02/2010
An anti-rape amendment? Does that replace the pro-rape amendment? Give me a break. If necessary then make a stand alone law, applying to all federal agencies who award contracts. Franken is a joke, not a good joke though.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
07:55 PM on 02/02/2010
Franken would tie you up in knots in any conversation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
senatortruth
Fox keeps me "INFROMED"!
08:57 PM on 02/02/2010
Franken is a REAL American for REAL Americans.

REAL Americans KNOW this.

Not YOU, of course...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mervr1
People have the power over politicians!
03:19 PM on 02/02/2010
Good for Senator Franken!

If the GOP block this based upon this amendment then all voters should really take note of where their loyalties truly lie....with the corporations and not the people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:06 PM on 02/02/2010
YaHOOOO
Thank you Al and all the Dems that voted for this amendment!
Rethugs Thanks for nothing! Just one more reason you dont matter.
12:52 PM on 02/02/2010
Who'd a thunk he came to the party disguised as a baggage handler.
photo
quorthon
Big government IS the answer!
12:00 PM on 02/02/2010
Franken rulz.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arrech
NY, NY
10:51 AM on 02/02/2010
YES!
10:32 AM on 02/02/2010
perhaps the Congress should stop raping the American people?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arrech
NY, NY
11:03 AM on 02/02/2010
Just say "NO!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arrech
NY, NY
11:04 AM on 02/02/2010
iT'S UP TO THE aMERICAN PEOPLE TO STOP THEM
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
07:06 PM on 02/03/2010
Yes! No incumbents! Get rid of any legislator who has had more than two terms.

Only vote for candidates who pledge to run corporate-clean campaigns, and on a clear platform that YOU can agree with.

Do not vote for ANY Democrat or Republican!

Vote only for independent candidates who clearly state their agendas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sf girl
I like my micro-bio empty.
10:20 AM on 02/02/2010
Yay for this!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeremyfive
09:53 AM on 02/02/2010
That's the way uh-huh uh-huh I lilke it uh-huh uh-huh!!!!!
09:49 AM on 02/02/2010
Al was so much funnier in SNL...but he's getting close...just goes to show you anyone can act.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mervr1
People have the power over politicians!
03:21 PM on 02/02/2010
You're a prime example.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
07:56 PM on 02/02/2010
Your boys are so much better at their hobbies, you know. I'm sure you'll find their pastimes quite humorous. http://www.badrepublicans.com/republican-hobbies.html
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
09:21 AM on 02/02/2010
May as well repeal DADT in the same bill or Franken's ammendment will not mean much.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Darwinita
Goddess Divine and certainly an acquired taste...
09:55 AM on 02/02/2010
two totally different legislative issues.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
senatortruth
Fox keeps me "INFROMED"!
08:59 PM on 02/02/2010
Why do you always LIE???

Oh, right.

RapePublic
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
allengoldchain
Freedom is never voluntarily given bythe oppressor
08:22 AM on 02/02/2010
This law law should be excluded from the defense appropriation bill and stand on it's own merit not just to a contractor but apply to any and all business that conduct such cruel activities. I understand why the democrats included it in the defense appropriation so that it would force the hand of anyone that disagreed with the other 4.2 billion pet projects. That's the problem I have with Al Frankin and gang. This wasn't a noble act it was just used as a political tool to include more earmarks. Then they turn around and tell people that republicans that voted against the bill side with rapist. At the end of the day they are the ones lying to the public. Again this bill should be made into law as on it's own and not an amendment to the defense bill. It should apply to all business period.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:51 AM on 02/02/2010
I empathize with your sentiment, except that the defense budget is directly connected to defense contractors. To me its not a stretch to say those who get paid by the federal government to aid in the war effort will be held accountable to laws protecting the lives of our women. It only makes sense that if a company is getting paid by the US government that those funds should not used to fund employees who torture, imprison and rape our women serving overseas. Following US laws governing the safety and welfare of our citizens overseas should be a prerequisite to receiving government contracts. Besides, you know that the GOP would simply filibuster any laws designed to stop the raping of US women overseas by government contractors. This addendum to the appropriations bill is entirely appropriate, and really the only way for it to pass into law anyway. Its hard to protect Americans when we have a party like the GOP trying their level best to Talibanificate the USA.
10:07 AM on 02/02/2010
Yes, now that is exactly what I tried to explain here before! The Bill is exactly were it should be to pass! I wish the party of NO would let it stand on it's own, but they won't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
07:11 PM on 02/03/2010
This is an evil climate tin which to enact any reforms. Politicians play dirty. I wish it were not so, and that it were not necessary. But the truth is, the GOP would stop this VERY REASONABLE provision in it's tracks if it weren't attached to something very near & dear to the GOP's cold, dark heart.
10:05 AM on 02/02/2010
If the Denfense dept. hires the Contractors, were alse should it be? In the finance Bill! Come on use some Common sense! Rep. have become a Party of NO, an you believe it would stand up?
05:15 PM on 02/02/2010
Many departments hire outside contractors not just the DOD