More

Obama's Budget, Jobs Plan Faces Early Tests In Congress

Obama

TOM RAUM   02/ 2/10 04:39 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's $3.8 trillion budget outline drew bipartisan fire on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, with Republicans complaining it doesn't address deficits soon enough and raises taxes too much. Democrats balked at some of Obama's spending cuts.

It was a rocky reception for the day-old document, underscoring election-year restlessness and rising public anger at bailouts, bonuses and ballooning deficits. The complaints across party lines suggested it could be difficult for Obama to win support for key parts of his budget, even from members of his own party.

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., called Obama's proposal to cancel NASA's manned moon return program shortsighted. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., derided his proposal to include Army Corps projects in a proposed partial three-year spending freeze. Sen. Jay Rockfeller, D-W.Va., said environmental priorities in the budget would unfairly burden coal states such as his.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, under grilling by the Senate Finance Committee, said that despite the lively crossfire he could see a bipartisan consensus building that "deficits matter, tax cuts are not free."

"The American people want to see their leaders coming together and bringing practical solutions" to the problems created by the worst downturn since the 1930s, Geithner said.

In one sign of possible common ground, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., suggested there is support across party lines for Obama's proposal to give companies a $5,000 tax credit for each new worker they hire in 2010.

"We need to work on legislation that will create jobs. And we need to work across the aisle, so that the legislation on which we work can become law," Baucus said.

Even so, Obama may not be able to count on one Republican senator who has worked with Democrats in the past. Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, blasted Obama's effort to create jobs while proposing higher taxes on families making more than $250,000 a year. Snowe said the tax increase would also hit small businesses, leaving many owners unwilling to start hiring again because of uncertainties over future tax liabilities. "Who is going to take the risk?" Snowe asked.

One contentious area was Obama's proposal to draw up to $30 billion remaining in the $700 billion bank bailout program, enacted in 2008, to invest in community banks to encourage them to lend to small businesses. Obama promoted the program on Tuesday at a campaign-style appearance in Nashua, N.H.

New Hampshire Republican Sen. Judd Gregg argued that money from the Toxic Asset Relief Program that is left over or repaid by banks is by law supposed to go toward paying down federal debt. "It's not for a piggy bank because you're concerned about lending to small businesses," Gregg told White House Budget Director Peter Orszag.

Orszag replied that the administration was well aware of the provision in the TARP legislation – and that's why it is seeking legislation to authorize the program.

But separately, Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., told Geithner the administration shouldn't wait for legislation to OK such small-business loans, it should just extend the money – as it had done in using TARP funds to help bail out automakers and Wall Street financial giants.

The government "put the screws to the community banks and gave all the money to the big banks. Right now people are cutting lines of credit to small business," Cantwell complained.

The administration has also proposed a $90 billion tax on big banks over ten years to help recoup losses from the TARP program. Geithner told senators the U.S. might have to extend such a tax – the administration calls it a "fee" – beyond the ten years if bailout costs haven't been recouped by then.

The Democratic chairman of the Budget Committee, Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota, joined Republican Gregg in faulting the administration for not doing enough to stanch the deficit flood.

"I don't see the focus on bringing down that long-term debt," Conrad said. Years of deficit spending, aggravated by the recession and two wars, have swollen the national debt to a whopping $12.3 trillion.

While Obama's economic team was sparring with members of the Senate Finance and Budget committees, his Pentagon team was defending its part of the budget before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the $768.2 billion defense share of the budget would help pay for "a broad portfolio of military capabilities" as it fights wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and help the U.S. "prepare for a much broader range of security capabilities" for the future.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the panel that the war in Afghanistan is now the Pentagon's top priority, adding: "The Afghan people are the center of gravity and defeat of al-Qaida the primary goal."

__

Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor and Stephen Ohlemacher contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's $3.8 trillion budget outline drew bipartisan fire on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, with Republicans complaining it doesn't address deficits soon enough and raise...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's $3.8 trillion budget outline drew bipartisan fire on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, with Republicans complaining it doesn't address deficits soon enough and raise...
Filed by Michael Falcone  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 68
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okieborn
Equal Rights For All !
07:20 AM on 02/03/2010
I am so proud for President Obama, he is definately in the attack mode, and I have a real good feeling he is going to stay there !!
Now this is the President I volunteered and voted for !!
It is so good to see the Rethugs. on the defense !!
Your looking good Mr. President !!!
photo
ohiomark
Rush Geek
09:34 PM on 02/02/2010
For all you Libs who believed Obama when he said that 95% of working families would NOT have their taxes go up one dime, read this:

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=519783

The worst kind of taxes are the "back door" kind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
platanoman
Be sincere; be brief; be seated.
08:19 AM on 02/03/2010
sorry, but investor business daily is one of the most partisan folks i ever read. there are same genius who said stephen hawkings "wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless". They are liars. And I wouldn't even read that link.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
themodernleader
09:03 PM on 02/02/2010
The 30 billion is another tip of the hat to the bankers. It will not stimulate hiring or manufacturing. If it is lent to equity funds it will stimulate speculation and hedging of markets and so on. The few will benefit.
Obama does not trust the American people. He does not believe in the principle of human growth and development. Otherwise, he would take the wo billions and provide value producing jobs.
I remember as a child overhearing the men tell how government jobs in CCC and WPA and so on developed their skills and made them save money. It was also clear that it instilled self confidence, self esteem and inner balance as they became contributors of an emerging, vibrant democracy. I understood how desperate they were and how government work changed their lives towards becoming productive and responsible citizens.
Obama only understands the banking way of winners and losers, the weak and the strong the rich and the poor, the few rulers and the ignorant masses. We live under dangerous rule.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
07:01 PM on 02/02/2010
Why is it Obama wants to try repeating plans which did not work under Roosevelt and George W. Bush?

•During the 1930s, New Deal lawmakers doubled federal spending--yet unemployment remained above 20 percent until World War II.
•Japan responded to a 1990 recession by passing 10 stimulus spending bills over 8 years (building the largest national debt in the industrialized world)--yet its economy remained stagnant.
•In 2001, President Bush responded to a recession by "injecting" tax rebates into the economy. The economy did not respond until two years later, when tax rate reductions were implemented.
•In 2008, President Bush tried to head off the current recession with another round of tax rebates. The recession continued to worsen.
•Now, the most recent $787 billion stimulus bill was intended to keep the unemployment rate from exceeding 8 percent. In November, it topped 10 percent.
--N. Boortz

The Heritage Foundation has a clear piece on why such Keynesian government spending does not work effectively. Anybody seriously interested can look it up.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
08:35 PM on 02/02/2010
Heritage Foundation writes to deceive.
That is their purpose.

See how they do it a few posts below.
04:29 PM on 02/02/2010
Obama campaigned hard on eliminating the $12 Billion a month spent on Iraq War, as a complete waste of money. McCain campaigned on spending the $12 Billion for another 100 years. The Obama budget spends $300 Billion on the Iraq and Afgahn Wars. That's 3 Times the money Bush was wasting. No benefit to the American people. The chinese are spending $267 Billion on the world's fastest bullet train. We spend it to remake Afghanistan. Bush gets a third term.
12:49 PM on 02/02/2010
"Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, blasted the idea for the $5,000 tax credit, saying businesses won't hire workers until they need them. "Who is going to take the risk?" she asked."

"businesses won't hire worker's until they need them"?

Ok, I miss the point. Don't Most ER's Wait until they Need worker's before they hire anyway?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
11:39 AM on 02/02/2010
"- + wilsonveteran I'm a Fan of wilsonveteran I'm a fan of this user 119 fans permalink
Yes do away with them. With Social Security are you saying the government can save your money wiser than you. This program is already bankrupt so the answer to that is no.
Medicare and medicaid. If you allowed health insurance companies to sell across state lines instead of the government mandated monopolies they have now you would bring that cost down and like the sixty's our elderly and everyone else could afford health insurance again. "

==================

1 - You REALLY misunderstand Social Security.
First of all, there is GOOD reason to believe the system NEVER runs out of money.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/social-security-isnt-broken

And Social Security is a SAFETY NET program, not a retirement program. My friends whose father died when they were young got Social Security until they were adults. Another friend has a debilitating disease, and he gets Social Security. None of these people are of retirement age.

2. Insurance sales across state lines. I looked into this.
Cheap insurance is not something I want to have if anyone in my family needs it.
Great Idea though. Sell useless insurance so that people are covered by a name.
Next stop: Banktruptcy.
Who is for more wealth transfer for the middle class to the rich?
How GOPer can you get?
11:39 AM on 02/02/2010
Geitner on cspan now.
11:36 AM on 02/02/2010
Picture shows him scratching his head. LOL , Clueless.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
11:30 AM on 02/02/2010
"- + wilsonveteran I'm a Fan of wilsonveteran I'm a fan of this user 119 fans permalink
Once again here are the numbers from the CBO.
"

Oh, please. Do not insult my intelligence.

1- I asked for your number on the Bush Budget, which you keep insisting was $2.5 Tril. Your link only talks about deficit. There is no budget number in there. Where is the Bush BUDGET number?

2- Your link, the heritage foundation, posted a disingenuous graph, which YOU KNOW is disingenuous. It is titled the BUDGET Deficits. GIVE ME A BREAK.
Bush did not include his two wars in the BUDGET. Neither did he include ANY money for emergency relief. ZERO. And Obama does.

Factor those FACTS into the Budget projections, and any REASONABLE person comes out with a totally different picture than the one you portray.
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
11:25 AM on 02/02/2010
Read it and weep:
"For Mr. Obama and his successors, the effect of those projections is clear: Unless miraculous growth, or miraculous political compromises, creates some unforeseen change over the next decade, there is virtually no room for new domestic initiatives for Mr. Obama or his successors."

Huge Deficits May Alter U.S. Politics and Global Power
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/us/politics/02deficit.html

The Chinese are telling US what to do and the IMF will enforce it.
11:30 AM on 02/02/2010
Ha,Ha, Ha, You were taken in by NYT magazine, not the professionals that say we've already began the bounce back! I'm old enough to have heard that trash in the past to!
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
12:11 PM on 02/02/2010
Feeling pretty bouncy, are ya? Too bad only the rich are "recovering" the GNP ( gross national product) feel by 2.7% So. all we are "producing" is weapons. Heard we just told some to Taiwan and the Chinese are mad after Obama promised them on his visit that we wouldn't "move to constrain" them. Promises, promises. Can't eat promises.
Sometimes one finds info in the most unlikely places, I found. HAHAHAHAHA your own self.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
11:46 AM on 02/02/2010
"...MAY Alter.."

Do you understand that "MAY" also means "MAY NOT"?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dizmo4
11:09 AM on 02/02/2010
GOP talk of across the board tax cuts = they want tax cuts for millionairs and billionaires. They don't really care if someone making $45,000 gets a tax cut.
11:37 AM on 02/02/2010
Kassandra sound gleeful with bad news from NYT for the economy! That is what (R) hope for, an they don't care who gets hurt or if the U.S. fails! That is sick as they come guys!
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
12:18 PM on 02/02/2010
Kassandra issued a warning, that's all. Don't go all neurotic on me. OK? I'm not feeling very "gleeful" right now.
You folks who think anyone still not in love with Obama is a republican are just as bad Koolaid drinkers as the R's...just a different flavor
10:48 AM on 02/02/2010
This US Budget, jokingly referred to as a budget, does not get it. JOBS is the most important ingredient to recovery. No news flash this, however where are the jobs to come from? One way is to revamp and repower the Space Program. Shuttles to be retired? How do we get from here to wherever space exploration is to take us, on Russian and Chinese craft? WHY? Take the shuttle systems we have, revamp and update them with 21st century technology and construction and begin the space race all over again; TARGET, Moon colonization by 2025. Why lose the technocracy advantage to the rest of the world and lose the space race jobs in the process. We cannot afford to live on past dreams and performances and not create the right jobs today to expand upon new opportunities or expanding upon the old we have in our own grasp. Space is just one example, there are many more. In summary the Space adventures have done more for medicine and computer technology to better the present world we live in than any other source I can recall. The US needs to continue to enforce and lead and be strong Space is one way. This budget doesn't take the right steps it just promises more of the same in a different gift wrapped package. No change why? The Space program is not welfare it is discovery in a grand way. JOBS need to be home grown as always. This budget says no.
11:01 AM on 02/02/2010
If it's between Lower NASA Budget for awhile, an chooseing to create jobs-----than so be it! We need NASA to, but we can't do it all right now! You want him to pick/choose/when he does u compl.
photo
wilsonveteran
Free America End Big Government
10:29 AM on 02/02/2010
This budget will further hamper job creation and the overall economy. You cannot take more money from the private sector, ie business or people that have capital to invest in business, and expect them to expand. A $5,000 tax credit for each person hired is a joke. Who will spend $35,000 to get $5,000 no one.

If you want to create a strong robust economy trim the budget by a trillion or more and give everyone across the board tax cuts. I really believe the American People and American business can spend the money wiser than our government.
10:49 AM on 02/02/2010
Fine, if it's a joke! I want to see your proposal right here on HP on Job creations, lifting the economy an I want pacifics,dollar amt., projections! Give it up, or shut it up!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
purplet
10:51 AM on 02/02/2010
Really? Then why did we lose 2.5 million jobs before anyof Obama's plans were in effect? Why are we short 5 million jobs with tax cuts- If American businesses do such a great job than why are they laying off workers but paying their CEO's bonuses and huge salaries even though they are in the red? How is the tax cuts working when they ship the jobs overseas or get visas to bring workers here? Across the board tax cuts? how does that create jobs or stop the mega corps from taking advantage of the tax cuts and sending jobs overseas? Where would you cut a triilion dollars from?
11:03 AM on 02/02/2010
republicans don't want to punish Big Banks for giveing Big Salarys to CEO's! That our tax's an they won't even help with that small step right now! They sit an say NO
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
10:26 AM on 02/02/2010
More smoke and mirrors. It's like Reagan never left office.
10:52 AM on 02/02/2010
Wait! you didn't like Reagon who's a (R), an the (R) party is so busy now talking Reagon up. just who doe you like or dislike? Palin maybe, Nude Cent. Senator, Stanford? Who? come on!