iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Makes Emotional Appeal To Senate Dems To 'Finish The Job On Health Care'

First Posted: 04/05/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:25 PM ET

Obama

President Barack Obama made an emotional, public appeal to Senate Democrats on Wednesday to finish the job on health care reform.

Appearing at a Senate Democratic Caucus retreat, Obama acknowledged the difficulties that the party has had in dealing with a Republican bloc hell-bent on filibustering even the most mundane pieces of legislation. But he implored the lawmakers to remember why they had run for office and the promises they had made to their constituents.

"So many of us campaigned on the idea that we were going to change this health care system," the president declared. "So many of us looked people in the eye who had been denied because of a pre-existing condition, or just didn't have health insurance at all... and we said we were going to change it. Well, here we are with a chance to change it."

He continued: "There's a direct link between the work that you guys did on that and the reason you got into public office in the first place. And so as we think about moving forward, I hope we don't lose sight of why we're here. We've got to finish the job on health care."

The president's appearance came just one day after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), in a conference call with new media reporters, spoke in favor of the Senate fixing its health care bill by whatever parliamentary means possible as a pre-requisite for House Democratic action.

"The fact is, when [they] go into reconciliation," Pelosi said, "if in fact the Senate decides to do that...I believe that it would be predicated on those areas of agreement that were signed off on before,"

If the ball is indeed in the Senate's court, it's members did not receive specific instructions from Obama on how to get health care passed. The president stuck mainly to the broad appeals for action while also acknowledging that the process had been hurt by the lack of transparency in late-stage negotiations. "I think we paid a price for it," he said, in reference to talks that went unrecorded by C-SPAN cameras, as he had promised they would during his campaign.

Obama also offered a sharp rebuke of lawmakers on the other side of the aisle for feigning an interest in bipartisanship when their objective is clearly to trip up the entire reform process. "They say they want to work with us, and we extend a hand and get a fist in return," he said.

It was probably no coincidence that the first four senators to ask questions -- Arlen Specter (Pennsylvania), Michael Bennet (Colorado), Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas) and Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) -- all find themselves facing tough primary or general-election races. To varying degrees, Obama used their questions as a means of addressing and alleviating larger political concerns. In a message to the Democratic Caucus at large, he urged everyone to stop watching cable news and start talking to constituents at home.

"Just turn off the TV," he said. "And go talk to folks out there instead of being in this echo chamber where the topic is constantly politics... It is much more difficult to get a conversation focused on how we are going to help people than a conversation on how this is going to help or hurt somebody politically."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
President Barack Obama made an emotional, public appeal to Senate Democrats on Wednesday to finish the job on health care reform. Appearing at a Senate Democratic Caucus retreat, Obama acknowledged t...
President Barack Obama made an emotional, public appeal to Senate Democrats on Wednesday to finish the job on health care reform. Appearing at a Senate Democratic Caucus retreat, Obama acknowledged t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,819
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
02:59 PM on 02/04/2010
Funny how over 75% of the population favors a not-for-profit healthcare plan and yet the holy RepubNOcan Trinity will mislead you to believe it's the other way around. I'm sick of this...every person I know is for a NOT-For-Profit INsurance reform bill. This is a total fallacy perpetrated by the same ones over and over.

The Holy RepubNOcan Trinity consists of

All regular RepubNOcans
All RepubNOcans disguised as Democrats in order to get elected after Bush (Ex = Blanch Lincoln, etc)
All Republicans disguised as Independents (Ex = Joe LIEberman)

If you vote Republican you get one but if you vote Democrat or Independent, you get one also. So for all intents and purposes we are forced to deal with a one-party system from now on...Republicrat. I'm sick of all of this. More than one "REAL" Democrat is absolutely furious and seething with anger.

I will no longer vote since a vote for a "REAL Democrat" does not count anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
profoundimagery
Human Being - Born Savannah GA. Raised in South Br
06:22 PM on 02/15/2010
I am saddened to hear that you will not vote because you don't believe there a vote for a "REAL Democrat" counts. If that were true then none of those we trust would be there. Letting the bullies win is no solution, because the bullies love attacking people who run away or remain silent. If past elections, increased corruption, and corporate media has not revealed this then I don't know what to say to encourage you or the millions who voted to fight.

More saddening is that people who believe they can escape the consequences of corporate aggression in government by refusing to participate or by moving to another country. I was one of those people, but won't be again unless the Supreme Court giveaway of Democracy to corporations stands. But then I realized that there is no safe haven on the planet, because the world's richest entities are doing the same in all countries. The governments of Europe are under siege by the "conservative party" as well as in Iran (Converting to formal Dictatorship) while all lessors are framed for take over via espionage, media black outs, lies, and black balling; interest bearing debt/ over speculation, and forced bankruptcy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
12:20 PM on 02/04/2010
Senate Dems that do not support either a public option, single payer or medicare for all need to be targeted by primary challengers that do support one of these goals and voted out of office. While Independents and Democrats cannot stop supporting democrats in general - Republicans back in office could mean the end of social security - we can and should stop supporting the party in general. Target your donations to where they are going to count.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
10:01 AM on 02/04/2010
Notice how the far riight never says a word about the "biased media" now that the media is almost 98% anti Obama?
photo
bridgeman
Jesus was a Jazz fan
12:15 AM on 02/04/2010
The dems do not have the Go.Nads to pass HCR.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
profoundimagery
Human Being - Born Savannah GA. Raised in South Br
07:23 PM on 02/15/2010
Your comment is pompously wrong. Those who have fought were extremely courageous, but lack the support of corporate welfare (bribery corruption) which came to dominate government operations during the GOP terms in office. More importantly they lack the willingness of a lathargic public to seek the truth or hear both sides of arguments addicted sources infamous for deception like FOX News.

I encourage you who think ill of the few who've made the (under-publicized) historic gains this year (and saved our hinies from a depression) have the gonads to visiting the upper right hand corner of politifact.com and acknowledge the surprising truth regarding the 91 promises kept, the 88 blocked by the corporate oligarchy, the 17 un-kept and the 220 still on the burner. I ask do you have the gonads to then acknowledge the magnitude of wealth hurled against them under which these gains were achieved.

Wealth that destroyed the economy, bankrupted millions, 960 hate groups, the illegal Iraq War, Credit Default Swaps, Over-speculation, Deregulation, Media black-outs of truth, gave equal platform to known lies on FOX News, Multipled the genocidal practices of Insurance Companies through denied care, destroyed air purifying resources and 75% of drinking water, oppressed equal rights at work, supported Enron, GW Bush, gave No-Bid Contracts to war profiteers, and Vise President Cheney, Die-Bold and CS&S voter machine fraud,...etc. No. This White House has been more courageous than any White House group has ever been.
09:03 PM on 02/03/2010
The calculus for Democratic congressmen has to be this: Which path is going to lose me the least votes. The problem is that there are lots of conservatives and independents who are going to mobilize against Dems who vote for it. There are lots of progressives who will stay home if Dems fail to pass it. So which path is going to hurt less in November?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Schurman
08:53 PM on 02/03/2010
End the filibuster and get it done.

Show your support here:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Changing-the-US-Senate-rules-bring-back-democracy/278379601906?v=wall
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:17 PM on 02/03/2010
Obama comes out NOW ????????????????? For healthcare ??????????

Where has he been for ...........Single Payor ??????? The Public Option ?????????

Missing In Action.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:48 PM on 02/03/2010
All summer long, hardly a peep from Obama on healthcare! His polls are up a little and here they come again with this crap Senate Bill, lets get it done theme again! They can and should pass PO/Single Payer and make it real reform through reconciliation but I have very serious doubts that they have good intentions or plans to make it anything more than a watered down, anemic, joke on the folks who elected them. November can not come soon enough!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
profoundimagery
Human Being - Born Savannah GA. Raised in South Br
07:33 PM on 02/15/2010
That is a flat out lie. He made so many public statements on this issue that it became redundant. Where do you get off with this garbage? He addressed all audiences more times than anyone should ever have to: personal audience with You Tube, National addresses, Special addresses, traveled the country on the topic, challenged the republicans to come up with something besides espionage, fought the insurance companies, referenced hearings by congress, posted multiple articles on whithouse.gov, interviewed on all major talk shows and late night. How does Huffington post disallow my comments and allow yours is the real question.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
10:03 AM on 02/04/2010
Lew,

Being for single payer would be a waste of time. It would never pass Congress. Public option? You need to blame that one on the blue dogs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
12:21 PM on 02/04/2010
Get them out. Let's have a real election between a real progressive and a real conservative for a change and see who the people actually pick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ilse
06:57 PM on 02/03/2010
Obama also offered a sharp rebuke of lawmakers on the other side of the aisle for feigning an interest in bipartisanship when their objective is clearly to trip up the entire reform process. "They say they want to work with us, and we extend a hand and get a fist in return," he said.

And so Blanche Lincoln suggests to President Obama that they should work with republicans on healthcare, when she knows good and well the republicans are not interested in any kind of healthcare reform at all. Vote blue dog democrat Blanche Lincoln out in November. Can't stand that corporate prostitute!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:56 PM on 02/03/2010
I am SO with you. Faved and fanned.
05:53 PM on 02/03/2010
our federal government has turned into a national government. Our founding fathers belived in bottom up government (local and states power) vs bottom down (nationalist, extreme federal power)

they believed in power and government that is closest to the people is best.. that is not what is happening now, we have people in control who believe in big government and massive programs based out of DC, it simply doesnt follow our constitution
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ilse
07:00 PM on 02/03/2010
It simply doesn't follow our constitution? You mean the way it did when George W Bush was in office?
photo
OB-GYN
To Your Health, America. Live Long and Prosper!
07:00 PM on 02/03/2010
".... law professor Sanford Levinson wonders whether it makes sense to give "Wyoming the same number of votes as California, which has roughly seventy times the population".[21] He thinks this imbalance causes a "steady redistribution of resources from large states to small states." Levinson is critical of the electoral college since it allows the possibility of electing presidents who do not win the majority of votes. Levinson's book Our Undemocratic Constitution[22][23] lists numerous flaws with the current Constitution, including the view that small states have too much clout in the Senate. Further, Levinson does not like the electoral college. ...presidents have been elected by the electoral college despite failing to win the popular vote: 1876 (Rutherford B. Hayes), 1888 (Benjamin Harrison) and 2000 (George W. Bush).[25]

Vanderbilt professor Dana D. Nelson believes the presidency has become too powerful. In her book, Bad for Democracy, she argues that all citizens seem to do, politically, is vote for president every four years, and not much else. Nelson criticizes excessive worship of the president or presidentialism and sees the office as essentially undemocratic.[27]

Yale professor Robert A. Dahl sees a problem with an American tendency towards worship of the Constitution itself, and sees aspects of American governance which are "unusual and potentially undemocratic: the federal system, the bicameral legislature, judicial review, presidentialism, and the electoral college system."] Levinson and Labunski and others have called for a Second Constitutional Convention.."

-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitution
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Annirich
09:21 AM on 02/05/2010
This country was built on the constitution. These ivy league professors who claim to have intellect are idiots.
photo
screechingllama
Can You Still Have Fun?
05:31 PM on 02/03/2010
The GOP insists this is a govt takeover of healthcare. If so, why wouldn't democrats want tort reform since they would be on the hook? The GOP makes little sense.
05:56 PM on 02/03/2010
the biggest supporter of dems is the attorneys.... guess y the dems dont want to limit tort cases cuz it hurts the lawyers in the pocketbooks
06:40 PM on 02/03/2010
Please look into the statements before you make them. In states that have what you call "tort reform," health care costs are NOT smaller. Also "tort reform," is usually understood to mean "depriving victims of malpractice of the right to restitution in court." While people who never study tort in the first place (or the economics of health care in the second place), really dig the fairytale that tort and lawyers are to blame for high medical costs, it is simply not true. Really wanting to believe that Sasquatch and the Tooth fairy exist does not make it so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geaaronson
06:57 PM on 02/03/2010
we´re not opposed to restrictions, it´s just the GOP has set the limits so low as to be unjust. Give us a good number and we will go for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deepfreezevideo
Now with even MORE microbial micro-bio!
05:12 PM on 02/03/2010
Dear President Obama:
Too little too late.
With all due respect sir, on health care - you DROPPED THE BALL, and now it's too late.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hulagirrrl
04:58 PM on 02/03/2010
This message made my day today: "In a message to the Democratic Caucus at large, he urged everyone to stop watching cable news and start talking to constituents at home."

He is telling it like it is, and I am glad.
05:58 PM on 02/03/2010
the problem is for him, is that the constituants dont want his program... bottom line man. that is y the moderate dems are freaking out cuz the american people dont want it.... if u have extreme majorities in both the senate and the house and the presidency... there is no reason y they cant pass it except for one reason... the moderate dems are worried about reelection, cuz they know they will be voted out if they vote yes.. and now they are really done cuz they basically now have a 1/2 vote on it which is enough to get voted out in 2010
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:02 PM on 02/04/2010
I agree they don't like the Senate bill but overwhelming they do like a public option.
04:55 PM on 02/03/2010
Heh, Heh, stick a fork in this turkey and go back to the drawing board.
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
04:54 PM on 02/03/2010
Now he gets involved? Too late President Passive.
You had a year. We're moving on.
05:07 PM on 02/03/2010
Strange how the President has a 4 year term but everyone acts like the game is over in one.
06:01 PM on 02/03/2010
cuz he has overstepped his power and spent all is political capital on far left programs

his arrogance lies in his belief that he could just keep sayin cute speeches and he will get by
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
07:37 PM on 02/03/2010
Strangr hoe people forget that you don't just grow the traits of character and leadership after botching your first year without having them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
04:49 PM on 02/03/2010
Another thing the far right does not grasp is how different the make up of presidential elections are compared to off year elections. One of Obama's problems now is that the people who came out to vote for him are not regular voters. Minority groups, and younger people, tend not to vote in off year elections. The main reason why the Republican's won New Jersey and Virginia was VERY low turn out.

Obama will be re-elected easilly in 2012. He has 99% of the black vote, 85% of the hispanic vote, and most of the other minority groups. Bush was once making inroads with hispanics. The right wing was SO offensive during the Sotomayor hearings that the Republican's may have lost them forever.

In truth, Obama will only need about 35% of the white vote to be re-elected. The turn out in presidential years is far higher.

Far righties pronouncing Obama a "Lame duck' really do not know their history. Bill Clinton was in FAR worse shape after his first year. He was re-elected by a WIDE margin.
05:05 PM on 02/03/2010
true; legislative control will be lost, but Obama's got a solid 8 years if he plays his cards right, appearing moderate and bipartisan.

we need him in just in case one of these conservative Supreme Court justices makes a delightful exit
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
05:08 PM on 02/03/2010
In fact, things would be easier for Obama if the Pups took the Congress. Then they have to get something done. They can not get things done without Obama.

Of course the Supreme Court is the number one reason to oppose right wingers in the White House.
06:08 PM on 02/03/2010
ur missing the point, "appears bipartisan" is not going to work anymore

people dont trust his words anymore sorry bro, he has lost independents
09:45 AM on 02/04/2010
Perhaps President Obama will not run in 2012; because, he is so disgusted with the gridlock that has turned the legislative branch into a corrupt, self-serving institution that is owned lock stock and barrel by the corporations. Our Congress is no longer the "people's house." Congress has become a whore house. Each seat enriches its occupant. The whole system is corrupt. What we need to do is throw the whole lot out, and make it clear that if they don't do what the majority wants to do, then we will throw them out too. Once our public servants leave government, they can never become a lobbyist. This will do away with the crooks.