iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Reid Threatens To Bypass Senate With Recess Appointments

First Posted: 04/06/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:25 PM ET

Reid

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid warned Republicans Thursday that if they use the arrival of Scott Brown as an opportunity to filibuster every Democratic nominee, then his party may have to bypass the legislature and rely on appointments made during recess.

"I hope that we can get more cooperation here. I have been someone, Madam President, who has tried hard not to do -- have the president do recess appointments," Reid said from the Senate well Thursday afternoon. "But what alternative do we have? What alternative do we have?"

Brown of Massachusetts, who will be sworn in later on Thursday afternoon, give the GOP enough votes to filibuster any nominee -- and they've shown a willingness to filibuster any nominee.

That leaves Craig Becker, nominated to the National Labor Relations Board, one of many nominations that could be blocked by filibuster.

A recess appointment is made when the president appoints a job prospect while the Senate is in recess. According to Senate Rule 22, a motion to recess cannot be filibustered

A recess appointee could theoretically serve for nearly two years. A person recess-appointed during the president's day break in February could serve until the end of the next session, which would take the appointee to late 2011.

President Bush made 171 recess appointments and President Clinton made a total of 139 recess appointments, according to the Congressional Research Service. Of President Bush's 171 recess appointments, 99 were to full-time positions, and the remaining 72 were to part-time positions.

UPDATE: Debate about aren't, generally, about process, but about power and the outcome of that process. It didn't take long for a helpful GOP aide to send along quotes from Democrats decrying recess appointments when Bush was the one making them.

SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV): "An End Run Around The Senate And The Constitution." "I will keep the Senate in pro forma session to block the President from doing an end run around the Senate and the Constitution with his controversial nominations." (Sen. Reid, Congressional Record, S.15980, 12/19/07)

REID: "They Are Mischievous." Also, understand this: We have had a difficult problem with the President now for some time. We don't let him have recess appointments because they are mischievous, and unless we have an agreement before the recess, there will be no recess. We will meet every third day pro forma, as we have done during the last series of breaks." (Sen. Reid, Congressional Record, S.7558, 7/28/08)

SEN. DICK DURBIN (D-IL): "The President Basically Says He's Going To Ignore The Will Of The Senate And Push Someone Through, It Really Is Troubling." "When you have an appointment that is this critical and this sensitive, and the president basically says he's going to ignore the will of the senate and push someone through, it really is troubling." ("Bush Sends Bolton To U.N." The [Springfield, IL] State Journal-Register, 8/2/05)

DURBIN: "Could Easily Be Unconstitutional ... Certainly Confrontational." "I agree with Senator Kennedy that Mr. Pryor's recess appointment, which occurred during a brief recess of Congress, could easily be unconstitutional. It was certainly confrontational. Recess appointments lack the permanence and independence contemplated by the Framers of the Constitution." (Sen. Durbin, Congressional Record, S.6253, 6/9/05)

SEN. RUSS FEINGOLD (D-WI): A "Slap To This Institution." "Judge Pickering was never confirmed by the Senate, but in a further slap to this institution, the President put him on the court through a recess appointment." (Sen. Feingold, Congressional Record, S.13289, 10/24/07)

FEINGOLD: "The Administration Could Put In Place The Most Egregious And Political Leadership, And We--The Senate--Could Do Nothing About It." "Is that what we want? It means most likely there will be recess appointments this winter for the 10 major leadership positions in the Department. And what does that mean? Simply stated: The administration could put in place the most egregious and political leadership, and we--the Senate--could do nothing about it. We would have reduced transparency and reduced congressional oversight." (Sen. Feingold, Congressional Record, S.14158, 11/8/07)

SEN. CHRIS DODD (D-CT): "I Think It Is An Abuse Of The Process, Whether Democrats Or Republicans Use It." "Remember, this is written in the Constitution to provide during these long periods when Congress was not going to be around at all and you had to put people in place. Now what presidents do -- Democrats and Republicans -- is wait for a week or two recess to come along and slip someone in. I think it is an abuse of the process, whether Democrats or Republicans use it." ("Democrats Decry Bolton Appointment," Fox News, 8/01/09)

SEN. FRANK LAUTENBERG (D-NJ): A Recess Appointment "Bends The Rules And Circumvents The Will Of Congress." "'[E]ven while the president preaches democracy around the world, he bends the rules and circumvents the will of Congress' at home. ("President Sends Bolton to U.N.; Bypasses Senate," The New York Times, 8/02/05)

SEN. PAT LEAHY (D-VT): "A Recess Appointment ... Just Angers Everybody When It's Done." "In the years I've been here, there has been ample precedent for this when Congress is going to be out, rather than try to do some kind of a recess appointment, which just angers everybody when it's done without concurrence of both the chairman and the ranking member." (Judiciary Committee, U.S. Senate, Hearing, 2007)

SEN. PATTY MURRAY (D-WA): "People Are Concerned." "With that in mind, Senate Democrats said they have little faith that Bush will play nice and refrain from making the controversial appointments. Democrats have been blindsided by Bush before, particularly in April when the president tapped three controversial nominees for executive branch slots. 'I always worry about it,' said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). 'I think every time there's a recess, people are concerned that the president might use that' option, echoed Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), the Democratic Conference secretary." ("Reid Mulls Pro Forma Sessions," Roll Call, 11/15/07)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid warned Republicans Thursday that if they use the arrival of Scott Brown as an opportunity to filibuster every Democratic nominee, then his party may have to bypass th...
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid warned Republicans Thursday that if they use the arrival of Scott Brown as an opportunity to filibuster every Democratic nominee, then his party may have to bypass th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 909
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
OneLiberalLady
Liberals rock!
10:11 AM on 02/06/2010
Every parent knows you just can't keep threatening and expect the child to conform. Eventually the kid catches on. You have to limit your threats and back them up with action.
Reid and the other Dem leaders must be childless.
12:32 AM on 02/06/2010
Oh Harry, you and the current batch of Dems are so manly.
04:00 PM on 02/05/2010
I'm so sick of Harry Ried. He comes across as a total and I do mean total wimp. Stop threatening and just do it for heavens sake. The Repugs have already told you to #@%$ off!
04:47 PM on 02/05/2010
Good grief, you said it. In addition to Becker's job, don't we still have many national security positions open as a result of the Republicans--even before we lost our one seat?

Not only should Obama appoint EVERYONE he can next recess, which is February 15, but he should hold a press conference and just crucify the Republicans for endangering public safety. This is a huge issue because of the recent intelligence warnings that another terrorist attack is eminent. And I'm sick of Republicans spinning garbage and getting away with it. I'd like to see someone spin some truth.

It would be nice if these clowns went on the offensive for a change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whyworry
Proud Liberal
03:51 PM on 02/05/2010
Way to go Harry! Get er done!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:47 PM on 02/05/2010
good to see that harry Reid appears to be growing a pair. If republics are going to block all appointees, then what is the choice? Government agencies need people at the to run them. Without an agenda carried out by leaders of these agencies, how can anyone expect things to improve in our country.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
02:57 PM on 02/05/2010
Don't treaten, just do it.
02:23 PM on 02/05/2010
"What alternative do we have?"

Well... we could square our shoulders, take a deep breath...and take a small dose of what we ourselves dish out, regularly.
01:53 PM on 02/05/2010
Majority Leader Reid, don't keep talking about recess appointments, JFDI.
04:49 PM on 02/05/2010
JFDI indeed! I love acronyms.
01:36 PM on 02/05/2010
Just do it! The repugs set the precedent now feed it back to them. Just wait till their back in power and crying about the dems treating them the same way.. Boo Hoo... You can't reason with the unreasonable..
photo
Horus45
Liberal Activist, anti-Fascist
01:20 PM on 02/05/2010
It's about f'in time Harry!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gin1234
I am not fond of republicans.
11:56 AM on 02/05/2010
Just do it, Democrats. All this hand wringing is getting old and hurting the country. Sheesh.
11:17 AM on 02/05/2010
Reid should have done recess appointments a long time ago. What a force he is, isn't he?
10:59 AM on 02/05/2010
John Bolten anyone????? Remember when you libs were outraged when Bush did this? Have some ethics and morals, take the high road, don't be phonies...if Bush was supposedly wrong, then why follow his path?
photo
Jeff1958
What a long strange trip it's been
01:21 PM on 02/05/2010
Because the Republicants are the Party of No.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
01:22 PM on 02/05/2010
Bush was wrong, but we cannot allow the whole country to be held hostage by Republicans who want earmarks in order to allow business to go on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:53 AM on 02/05/2010
Yes. The GOP does, in fact, have a 41 to 59 majority.
The Democrats: all hat, no cattle.
12:38 AM on 02/06/2010
Indeed. And in that vein. Dems time to cowboy up.
10:16 AM on 02/05/2010
Stop talking DO IT.

this is what hurts the dems. They keep talking and talking and talking and everyone blows them off. Make a few appointments and see if the repubs are willing to come to the table then. And oh yeah, get your arguement and presentation together and present it to the people immediately after the appointment. Get your rebuttal to the repubs ready the minute they open their mouths. The dems are being painted and defined because they let the repubs do it .
Enough when do we start with the action?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gun1934
75 years old fisherman
05:11 PM on 02/05/2010
hey no bs-- we got to get reid out of here in NOV-- hes not even thinking of the jobs -- millions of people cant provide fo there family--the can only think of that dumb obamacare-- theyve wasted a year on that dumb obamacare ---- hope thats clear hehehe