EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Dow Closes Below 10,000 For First Time In 3 Months

TIM PARADIS   02/ 8/10 06:01 PM ET   AP

Dow Jones Index

NEW YORK — The Dow Jones industrial average closed below 10,000 for the first time in three months Monday on nagging concerns about debt loads in Europe.

The Dow, down almost 104 points, had its 10th triple-digit move in 16 trading days. Shares of big banks pulled the market lower, extending a slump that has led to four straight weekly losses.

Mounting deficits in weaker European economies including Greece, Portugal and Spain have raised questions about the health of the global financial system. That compounded concerns about growth in China and proposed U.S. bank regulations took the market down from a 15-month high reached in January.

Greece's finance minister said Monday the government is preparing to boost some taxes to shore up its finances. But civil servants opposed to cutbacks have pledged to strike on Wednesday.

Brett Hryb, a portfolio manager with MFC Global Investment Management in Toronto, said the latest concern is that the financial troubles in a country like Greece, whose economy is small compared with the rest of Europe, will spill into other countries.

"Clearly Greece itself is nothing. It's just a blip. It's what the contagion could be," he said.

Monday's drop extends the stumble the market began in mid-January. At that time, China announced plans to contain economic growth and the Obama administration proposed rules to restrict trading by large financial institutions.

The Dow fell 103.84, or 1 percent, to 9,908.39. On Thursday, the Dow traded below the psychological barrier of 10,000 for the first time since November. It hadn't closed below that mark since Nov. 4. and first closed above 10,000 in March 1999. The Dow is still up 51.3 percent since last March.

The broader Standard & Poor's 500 index fell 9.45, or 0.9 percent, to 1,056.74, while the Nasdaq composite index fell 15.07, or 0.7 percent, to 2,126.05.

Bond prices edged higher, pushing yields lower. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note was flat at 3.57 percent from late Friday.

The dollar fell against other major currencies, while gold rose.

Crude oil rose 70 cents to settle at $71.89 per barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Questions about the global economy have interrupted a 10-month climb in stocks, which hit 12-year lows last March. The Dow is down 817 points, or 7.6 percent, from its recent high of 10,725.43 on Jan. 19.

Jerry Webman, chief economist at OppenheimerFunds Inc., said he doesn't expect that problems with rising debt loads in Europe will cascade into other parts of the world's economy, but he remains cautious.

"Right now, when anybody says the word 'contained' I start to tremble," he said, referring to his skepticism about those who downplay worries about Greece and other countries with rising deficits.

Webman is also concerned by the shrugs that have greeted corporate earnings reports. Three out of four of the companies in the S&P 500 index that have reported results for the fourth quarter have posted stronger sales and profit numbers than analysts forecast, according to Thomson Reuters.

"The market is obviously not that enthusiastic about these good bottom-line and good top-line numbers," Webman said, adding that he sees that as a reason to be concerned about the direction of stocks.

In earnings news, the toymaker Hasbro Inc. said its profit surged 77 percent in the fourth quarter while drugstore chain CVS Caremark Corp. said its earnings rose 11 percent. The results beat analysts' estimates.

Hasbro jumped $3.91, or 12.7 percent, to $34.71, while CVS rose $1.65, or 5.3 percent, to $32.72.

Among financials, Bank of America Corp. fell 52 cents, or 3.5 percent, to $14.48, while Britain's HSBC Holdings PLC fell $1.07, or 2.1 percent, to $50.31.

Three stocks fell for every two that rose on the New York Stock Exchange, where consolidated volume came to 4.2 billion shares compared with 6.5 billion Friday.

The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies fell 6.49, or 1.1 percent, to 586.49.

Britain's FTSE 100 rose 0.6 percent, Germany's DAX index gained 0.9 percent, and France's CAC-40 rose 1.2 percent. Earlier, Japan's Nikkei stock average fell 1.1 percent.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 674
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
Nutcase
Of, By and For - Elsewhere known as Psycho MD
10:13 AM on 02/09/2010
Since the first time the market hit 10,000, the value of the dollar has dropped 25%. That means it is really more like 7,500.

The market numbers in the bottom right-hand corner of the screen on news shows should be replaced with the results at Hialeah or Santa Anita. They are just as pertinent to the economy as the results from the Wall Street Casinos.
09:34 AM on 02/09/2010
The real reason the Dow is going down because banks fear regulation that will separate their investment banking function from their capital (to be put in the commercial side of the bank). As a huge part of market is based on speculativ­e trading, bank regulation will result in a drop in prices closer to the actual inherent value of corporatio­ns.
09:26 AM on 02/09/2010
If wall street sinks and there is no money coming into the government coffers, who will pay for all of your social programs? Some type of civics test should be given to voters when they register. It scares me to know that there are people with a vote out there who has no concept of Economics or Civics.
09:37 AM on 02/09/2010
Your question is one that our founding fathers wrestled with. That being said, stock values that are artificial­ly boosted by speculativ­e trading rather than the inherent value of assets and income streams is doomed to eventually crash...it is just a matter of when it happens.
photo
laaambchop
Cheerfulness is a sign of wisdom
04:32 PM on 02/09/2010
It went up how much today? Why? Because gamblers can't sit on their hands.
09:11 AM on 02/09/2010
I can't believe American traders are believing that Europe Union is going to bail out Greece. It will not happen. Politicall­y it is anathama to France and Germany. And the German government as does the European Bank hates the idea of a bail out.

They do not trust Greece to comply with necessary conditions and nor will Greece be able to do what is necessary. Already there is planned riot and protest and austerity conditions planned by the Govt.

As soon as you bail out Greece you can guarantee in 12 months they will be a mess again, as they always are. Their history is being in default 100 of the last 200 years.

German government and bankers think it is absolutely necessary to let Greece fail to ensure the integrity of the Euro and the Union. They are thinking long term. They will take the short term pain to sure of standards and the future.

The Germans however will be willing to bail out Spain ( German banks have lent Spain $240bn) because Spain has done the right thin and is only in trouble because of circumstan­ce.

Be ready for a market fall once traders in the States get it into their skulls that no real bail out will come...the best they will get is ambiguous words.
09:44 AM on 02/09/2010
Since the EU expanded beyond the initial member there has been a huge fear that weaker countries would bring down the whole. The EU never achieved the compliment­ary benefit that some had hoped would accrue due to size. The poorer member citizens didn't want to work for low wages...ma­ny people migrated for higher salaries so like the US they can't be competitiv­e with the emerging nations of Asia (including China). The EU also suffers from not have the control it needs over member nations...­we suffer from a system where states compete for Federal pork and handouts but we have some modicum of control over out of control state government­s...the EU does not. Bet Britain and Switzerlan­d are jumping for joy now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
09:09 AM on 02/09/2010
From 1776 until 1865, the US had a very weak central government­. It was a Lazier fare society. The country grew to become very strong and prosperous­. From 1865 until 1930, there was still no income tax and the country had grown to a internatio­nal power without the help of the Federal Government­.
From 1931 until 1941, socialism ruled Washington and we were in a depression­.

Why are we looking to Washington DC to solve our economic problems? Washington needs to get out of the way.
09:23 AM on 02/09/2010
Is this a serious post or is this comedy?
photo
Nutcase
Of, By and For - Elsewhere known as Psycho MD
10:30 AM on 02/09/2010
The problem is that he is serious - and seriously in error on every one of his facts.

In 1931 Hoover was still president. Even if he had the date right, the idea that FDR brought the depression with him is ludicrous. As Obama, FDR inherited the problems caused by laissez faire capitalism­.

The was an income tax twice before 1930. FDR was a capitalist and did what he felt necessary to salvage it. Anyone calling FDR a socialist has absolutely no concept of what socialism is.

The present crisis can be laid at the feet of the government only to the extent that it allowed it to happen. The crisis was due to the corporate interests doing what they wanted to. It would seem that it is the banks and other corporatio­ns that need to get out of the way.

Conservati­ve are often funny but rarely intentiona­lly so.
12:03 PM on 02/09/2010
That must be why Washington DC got burned down and if the one of the richest people in the world an atheist frenchmen hadn't bailed out the country in 1812 the US would have ended.

The reason the central banking system came about was due to all the bank crashes and economic crises that had occured prior to the 20th century. The us economy had numerous panics and crashes with the Great Depression being the largest one. Regulation­s were put in place that for decades prevented another crash and bubbles. When regulation­s began to be removed in the 1970s then economic bubbles and bubble pops started to appear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
den1953
Save every US citizen buy American!
08:51 AM on 02/09/2010
Attn: Wall Street meet Main Street the winds of a jobs bill is brewing!
08:51 AM on 02/09/2010
"The Dow Jones industrial average closed below 10,000"
WHO CARES??? Let the mf sink! It's a giant casino for the big boys!
photo
Smurfaveli
"Riding his horse thru tooooown." *Palin voice*
09:25 AM on 02/09/2010
Thanks but no thanks. I'd like my 401k to NOT disappear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProfessorDuh
08:48 AM on 02/09/2010
Bad day at the casino? Who cares?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevenjaym
08:45 AM on 02/09/2010
I don't know if I'm the only one, but up until about a year ago I was a cheerleade­r for Wall Street. I'd check everyday and hope it did well...but now I'm wishing that they fall on their butts! It's probably not the patriotic thing do--but I can't help feeling that way!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:54 AM on 02/09/2010
If stocks fall, it means that state and Federal Pension funds will run low on funding and either taxes will go way up or retirees will lose a part of their retirement­. Poorer, old people mean that they stay in the work force longer , denying younger people job opportunit­ies. Also, low stock values mean no business growth which means more unemployme­nt.

Its not patriotism­, its a question of whether or not you ( everyone ) like being poor or rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProfessorDuh
09:10 AM on 02/09/2010
It's a gambling casino that no longer has anything to do with investing in American productivi­ty or jobs.
10:05 AM on 02/09/2010
All those things you predict will happen if stocks fail have already happenned to most of us. The bailout didn't fix it for the rest of us. The increase in the last year of the market didn't result in more jobs or lower fees or taxes for the rest of us. It only resulted in bonsuses on Wall St.

You can no longer paint the pretty fairytale picture that the success of Wall St. will ever translate as a gain for the average person. We're not buying it anymore. We want to see actually results not empty promises.
08:13 AM on 02/09/2010
Help me out libs. Is this a good thing or a bad thing. I know how you libs feel about an evil corporatio­n making an evil profit, so are most libs happy when the stock market goes down? After all, when the market goes down, that means that corporatio­ns are losing value. This would make libs happy, correct?
09:52 AM on 02/09/2010
Anything that makes us all poor and dependent on the government makes libs happy.
06:54 AM on 02/09/2010
And on February 5, 2010:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the latest unemployme­nt figures are a sign the Democrats’ economic stimulus package is working. “And what a good morning it is as was indicated by the jobs figures this morning,” Pelosi told Democratic National Committee (DNC) members Friday.

Keep on talking, Queen Pelosi. It's still a good morning, isnt' it?
07:52 AM on 02/09/2010
Stock market has no real bearing on the economy. Stock market was overinflat­ed and had the bubble burst on them. If you look at how the stock market has grown the past 100 years you would have noticed that the past eight years of growth was unreal and should have thrown off alarm bells in any economist but then they would likely have been harrased constantly by the Republican­s and the stock market crooks to the point of commiting suicide to just stop the harrasemen­t.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:58 AM on 02/09/2010
Our stock market has a direct affect on the economy. Low stock values mean that retirees have LESS money, stay at their jobs longer and inhibit new, younger workers from getting a job. Lower stock values mean smaller IRA's which mean less spending. Less spending means more unemployme­nt. Lower stock values mean less capitaliza­tion which means less business formations and expansions which means less employment­.
09:23 AM on 02/09/2010
You must not have a 401K plan. Would not surpise me by the comment you make.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skatscan
06:03 AM on 02/09/2010
IMPEACH!!!­!!

....Scott Brown! Things have gone down the crapper since he got elected, And fire all the financial "gurus" who said the stock market would boom after his election to the Senate.
09:10 AM on 02/09/2010
fanned!!!!
05:16 AM on 02/09/2010
The Dow is one important number but some of these other numbers the government gives us seems to be not true:

http://ame­ricaspeaks­ink.com/20­10/02/unem­ployment-n­umber-scam­/
04:10 AM on 02/09/2010
8,000 by spring! 6,000 by summer! Surf the wave, people!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:23 AM on 02/09/2010
While jobs are being lost, more people are losing their homes in droves , then communitie­s and states are running out of money for their historical­ly-provide­d services; the infrastruc­ture ages.

This is a pattern that has been orchestrat­ed by very wealthy corporatio­ns and people while they had their representa­tives on the payroll by campaign contributi­ons to do their bidding.

There may be no money left for anything because of the derivative and swap "contracts­" that no politician­s have had the courage to control through any meaningful regulation­s - yet!

The goose is burning.
03:30 AM on 02/09/2010
alot of these people are losing there homes cause the made bad decisions i know the losing there jobs hurts many people but there are some who simply made bad decisions
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
03:51 AM on 02/09/2010
Some made very good decisions: putting a little down and living cheaper than rent.

Otherwise, they ALL made bad decisions since they made investment­s they couldn't maintain. A large number were bankrupted by medical costs though they had insurance when they became sick. They chose life over solvency and now confront having both at risk.

Many were unable to keep up payments after losing their jobs: They could have anticipate­d THAT. We are told to anticipate another surge of foreclosur­es as those trying to get by by letting their credit card debt rise finally run out of credit. It's not clear what their "bad decision" consists of. The world simply doesn't want them anymore and they are bucking the tide.

Their losses are our losses as neighborho­od values plummet, they no longer labor productive­ly, and states and towns across the country lose tax revenue which forces those government­s to eliminate services for us all. People looking for work as work waits on people to do it.

A simple statement of fact: blaming the victims of the recession is just a way to salve our own conscience when (the fact) we don't know what to do about it or what we could do.
05:03 AM on 02/09/2010
Yep ... it's ALL the poor people's fault ... yessir.