Super Bowl 2010 Ratings: 106 Million Watch, Top-Rated Telecast EVER

DAVID BAUDER | 02/ 8/10 09:05 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Drew Brees

NEW YORK — The New Orleans Saints' victory over Indianapolis in the Super Bowl was watched by more than 106 million people, surpassing the 1983 finale of "M-A-S-H" to become the most-watched program in U.S. television history, the Nielsen Co. said Monday.

Compelling story lines involving the city of New Orleans and its ongoing recovery from Hurricane Katrina and the attempt at a second Super Bowl ring for Indianapolis quarterback Peyton Manning propelled the viewership. Football ratings have been strong all season.

"It was one of those magical moments that you don't often see in sports," said Sean McManus, president of CBS News and Sports.

Nielsen estimated Monday that 106.5 million people watched Sunday's Super Bowl. The "M-A-S-H" record was 105.97 million.

The viewership estimate obliterated the previous record viewership for a Super Bowl – last year's game between Arizona and Pittsburgh. That game was seen by 98.7 million people, Nielsen said.

The "M-A-S-H" record has proven as durable and meaningful in television as Babe Ruth's record of 714 home runs was in baseball until topped by Hank Aaron. Ultimately, it may be hard to tell which program was really watched by more people. There's a margin for error in such numbers, and Nielsen's Monday estimate was preliminary, and could change with a more thorough look at data due Tuesday.

"It's significant for all of the members of the broadcasting community," said Leslie Moonves, CBS Corp. CEO. "For anyone who wants to write that broadcasting is dead, 106 million people watched this program. You can't find that anywhere else."

Moonves predicted CBS will earn more in advertising revenue than in any other Super Bowl. The good ratings for the game and football in general also set CBS and other football broadcasters up well when selling advertising for next season, he said.

The Nielsen estimate also drew some congratulations from Alan Alda, the star of "M-A-S-H," and the slugger whose record was beaten.

Story continues below
Advertisement

"If the `M-A-S-H' audience was eclipsed, it was probably due in large part to the fact that the whole country is rooting for New Orleans to triumph in every way possible," Alda said. "I am, too, and I couldn't be happier for them. I love that city."

There are more American homes with television sets now (114.9 million) than there were in 1983 (83.3 million). An estimated 77 percent of homes with TVs on were watching "M-A-S-H" in 1983, compared with the audience share of 68 for the Super Bowl.

Nielsen also measures only the United States, and it's possible some World Cup soccer games were seen more worldwide. Accurate measurement of television audiences outside the United States is spotty at best.

Alda also wondered whether the numbers were too close to declare a new champion. He thinks Nielsen didn't take into account large numbers of people watching "M-A-S-H" communally, which is often the case for football games, too.

"Not to say I'm competitive, but in part we are talking about sports," he said. "And I actually AM competitive."

McManus didn't want to jinx it, but the abnormally strong viewership for football this year left him hoping for a record. The NFC and AFC championship games both had their biggest audiences since the 1980s. The growth of high-definition television and its appeal to sports fans has also helped.

A competitive game until the final minutes sealed it. McManus acknowledged some nervousness when Indianapolis jumped out to a 10-0 lead – a Super Bowl rout often makes people turn away from the game – but New Orleans roared back.

The Mid-Atlantic blizzard also helped CBS. After New Orleans, the highest-rated market was snowbound Washington, Nielsen said. More people watched the game from their homes in that area instead of going to parties or bars, and Nielsen does a much better job counting viewers in homes than outside of them.

"Bad weather in the Northeast and good weather in Florida was a good combination for us," McManus said.

The Super Bowl also proved a strong launching pad for the new CBS series "Undercover Boss" that premiered after the game. An estimated 38.6 million people watched the first edition of a series about corporate honchos working secretly as low-level employees in their own companies, Nielsen said. That's third only to a 1996 "Friends" and 2001 "Survivor" as the most-watched program after the Super Bowl.

Meanwhile, Dorito's was a big winner in a measurement of interest in the commercials played during the Super Bowl. TiVo Inc. said the snack company's ad featuring a boy telling a man to keep his hands off his chips and his mom was stopped and played back in 15 percent of homes with the digital video recorder.

The secretly filmed CBS promo with David Letterman, Jay Leno and Oprah Winfrey came in second, followed by the Snicker's ad with Betty White and Abe Vigoda flattened in a football game.

In general, however, TiVo found less interest in the commercials than it has in previous years, judged by how many people paused live action to see them, said Todd Juenger, general manager of TiVo's research department.

Get HuffPost Media On Twitter, Facebook, and Google Buzz!
NEW YORK — The New Orleans Saints' victory over Indianapolis in the Super Bowl was watched by more than 106 million people, surpassing the 1983 finale of "M-A-S-H" to become the most-watched pro...
NEW YORK — The New Orleans Saints' victory over Indianapolis in the Super Bowl was watched by more than 106 million people, surpassing the 1983 finale of "M-A-S-H" to become the most-watched pro...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
275
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (7 total)
photo
wadenelson1   07:23 AM on 2/11/2010
Wal-mart (BREAD) and Superbowl (CIRCUS).
photo
bmermaid   01:34 AM on 2/11/2010
I am 50 years old. I am not a competitive sports fan (i guess i was born without the specatator gene). This is the first time that I ever watched any of the super bowl.
Reasons I watched:
1)snowed in
2) liked the idea of New Orleans winning
3) The Who half time show
4) slight interest in the commercials

Am I the only one?
gkw   09:52 PM on 2/10/2010
The final episode of MASH had 125 million viewers (AP, March 3, 1983). The Super Bowl numbers were great, but MASH still holds the record.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
th3sk3ptic   10:03 PM on 2/09/2010
I only watched SuperBowl because I really wanted to see the Saints lose, when I saw the ref overturn the non 2pt conversion. I turned it because I knew the fix was in and the Saints would win
photo
cybolt   03:48 AM on 2/10/2010
Yep... out of the 106 million viewers, hp gets the ONE who calls "fix."

Your handle should be th3p^r^noid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gussygoat   12:11 PM on 2/10/2010
The Saints won that fair and square, 3Pio.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac   04:53 PM on 2/09/2010
The MASH finale had a 77 share and the SB had a 68 share.

That would mean that the MASH finale is still the top rated telecast.

Deceptive and inaccurate headline...

as always.

:-]
photo
cybolt   06:01 PM on 2/09/2010
The MASH finale captured a 60.2 rating / 77 share. Rating is usually considered the more telling number and here it means that of all households that had a TV, 60.2% had it tuned to MASH.

In 1983, there were 83.3 million TV households so the total number of households watching MASH: 50.1 million.

The Super Bowl captured a 46.4 rating / 68 share. Of all the households with a TV set, 46.4% of those hh had it tuned to the Super Bowl. Lower than MASH.

But in 2010, there are 115 million TV households in the US (estimated to be nearly 100% penetration), so the total number of households watching the Super Bowl: 53.6 million. Higher than MASH.

The point is, the headline isn’t necessarily misleading, it’s like any numerical evidence… it can always be tweaked to fit one’s desires (kind of like what you did in your post).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac   08:49 AM on 2/10/2010
More people watched but it was lower rated.

The headline stated it was "Top Rated" which is simply inaccurate.

If it had said 'most watched' instead of "Top Rated" it would have been accurate.

My post is straight forward and to the point and not deceptive in any way.

:-]
Durango   06:33 PM on 2/09/2010
Don't know about share.

But the headlines are often a disgrace.

My wife's former editor would be tearing the Headline writers to pieces for some of these.

He had standards.
photo
cybolt   06:50 PM on 2/09/2010
Oh, please, don't get me wrong...

As a former journalist myself, I often find the writing and the headlines egregiously misleading and flat-out inaccurate. The one above is simply ambiguous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac   08:53 AM on 2/10/2010
They want to attract attention and stir debate which they achieve by misleading headlines.

Not the best policy in my opinion.

:-]
Durango   03:04 PM on 2/09/2010
I find that number a bit mysterious.

That means 2/3 of Americans did not watch the Super Bowl?

I can't see that.
photo
Vetinari   03:20 PM on 2/09/2010
I dont think they take into consideration groups of people watching one television?

Or do they?
Durango   04:30 PM on 2/09/2010
They said 100 million viewers, not televisions.

I would think televisions would make more sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inorbit   02:31 PM on 2/09/2010
The New Orleans Saints was the only reason to watch it. I thought The Who were terrible and changed the channel after that fiasco of a performance.
RobinSeattle   07:20 PM on 2/09/2010
The Who should have cashed it in after their first "final" tour (which I saw at the Sports Arena in L.A.---i was also lucky to see them with Keith Moon in the mid-1970's). This edition was nothing more than the Daltrey-Townshend Band. It wasn't The Who.
photo
mrspiffy   10:56 AM on 2/09/2010
Everbodee wuz waitin' to see Teeboh...duhhhhh
http://yieldpig.blogspot.com/
photo
TimtheEnchanted   10:52 AM on 2/09/2010
The Superbowl is becoming just another holiday after Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years. it was disapointing to see the morning news shows starting coverage on Saturday. Football after all is very little action tucked into replays and beer commercials.
3 hours to watch a game with a 1 hour regulation time
average game has 80 plays
average play lasts 3 seconds
80x3=240 seconds or 4 minutes.
The ball is moving in play a total of 4 minutes and it takes 3 hours to watch.
StopMakingSense2   01:33 PM on 2/09/2010
Your absolutely right! That's why god created the DVR. Start watching the game 2 hours after it starts and be caught up before it ends. Priceless... Great game by the way. I was rooting for the saints. I like underdogs and New Orleans needed some good news...
photo
Rastageneral   04:21 PM on 2/09/2010
Those stats are mind-blowing! These guys spend more time in the group-hug (huddle) than actually playing the game!

That's why soccer is the world's favorite sport... no commericals (other than the ones they cram in at half-time). In fact, that's why soccer never caught on in the States... no corporation would want to sponsor a sport where they can't advertise profusely.

Oh, and 106 million viewers is chump-change compared to the world-wide viewership of the World Cup. Go Argentina! South Africa 2010.
photo
cybolt   05:34 PM on 2/09/2010
Who cares?

I mean really... clearly you don't care that much about football and watching it but a large number of people in the US do.

You care a lot about soccer but a large number of people in the US don't.

This is news?
Gasparilla   06:45 PM on 2/09/2010
At least there is some excitement and anticipation and strategy in a football game. If watching a soccer ball batted back and forth with only a couple goals scored appeals to you, go to it.
photo
Chise67   08:30 AM on 2/09/2010
I'm glad for N.O. & Drew Brees! I always felt like he wasn't getting his due because he isn't the,"prototype" QB! Let's hope that the SB win will generate monies that will help rebuild the city faster. I, for one, will be at the Mardigras this year for my first experience! Can't wait!!!!

BUT, as a part of the Steeler Nation, I will say this: Soon as Pittsburgh & the cowgirls meet up in another SB, those ratings will be SMASHED! And we'll own a 7th Lombardi!!!!!! (We have Big Ben this time, not Neil O'Donnell!)
photo
BUSTERtheCAT   05:48 AM on 2/09/2010
the field goal kicker was CLEARLY MVP, he misses ONE and Saints get blown out.
BCALM   10:05 AM on 2/09/2010
AGREED, AND DON'T FORGET HE KICKED THE ONSIDE KICK
Durango   03:09 PM on 2/09/2010
They said the punter kicked the onside kick.

Had to read that, didn't hear it from the lame announcers.

But the paper said the punter is the kickoff specialist as well.
photo
BUSTERtheCAT   05:42 AM on 2/09/2010
take away the pools and gamb ling they have 1500 viewers
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
chitown8   02:26 AM on 2/09/2010
I did not watch it. But the is a great number.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joan E. Dowlin   01:11 AM on 2/09/2010
It's because 1/3rd the country was snowed in and had nothing to do but watch TV. That and the Cinderella story of the Saints and Drew Brees. It was a great game.
photo
BUSTERtheCAT   05:43 AM on 2/09/2010
cause 100 million had some kind of a bet on the game
Badgirl   12:06 AM on 2/09/2010
It's the economy! PS why did CBS run so many commercials about their own TV shows? Once upon a time a 30 second ad during Superbowl cost $1.5 million. Yet CBS ran at least 3 ads for "How I Met your mother". Did the economy affect their ability to sell commercial ad time?
Sumocat   09:18 AM on 2/09/2010
Selling an ad to a sponsor is a one-time sale. Advertising the network's shows potentially draws in more viewers over the long-term.
Durango   03:05 PM on 2/09/2010
I thought it is what you do when you don't sell all the commercial time.

Twitter Edition