More

Reid Tosses Bloated Bipartisan Jobs Bill For Something Leaner

First Posted: 04/13/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:30 PM ET

Obama Bipartisanship

The Senate's bipartisan jobs package, which had robust support from the White House and the GOP, but was packed with corporate giveaways, lasted less than a day.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) emerged from a Democratic Caucus meeting Thursday afternoon to announce that he had decided to scrap it, in exchange for a much-simplified package. The decision left aides to members of both parties scratching their heads, but there may be a smart political rationale behind it.

The new bill drops disaster assistance and extensions of unemployment insurance and COBRA helath-insurance subsidies, all Democratic priorities which will need to be addressed before they expire within the next few weeks.

But Reid also ditched one of K Street's highest priorities, an extension of soon-to-expire tax breaks that are highly beneficial to major corporations, known as tax extenders, as well as other corporate giveaways that had been designed to win GOP support.

Reid didn't mince words. "We're going to move this afternoon to a smaller package than I talked about in the press," he told reporters following a meeting with his Democratic caucus. "We're going to do a bill that has four things in it."

One is to expand the Build America Bonds program, which allows state and local governments to borrow at lower costs for infrastructure projects and other jobs programs. "We're going to do the highway-bill extension for one year, which will save a million jobs," he said.

The bill will also include an extension of a small-business tax break under section 179 of the Tax Code, Reid said. The final element is a payroll tax scheme cosponsored by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah).

That provision is estimated to cost $13 billion over ten years and, according to a Finance Committee memo, "would offer an exemption from Social Security payroll taxes for every worker hired in 2010 that has been unemployed for at least 60 days. The maximum value would be equal to 6.2 percent of wages up to the FICA wage cap ($106,800). There would also be an additional $1,000 income tax credit for every new employee retained for 52 weeks to be taken on the employer's 2011 income tax return."

"And then," said Reid, "when we finished that, we'll move on to the tax extenders and all the other stuff. But we feel that the American people need a message. The message that they need is that we're doing something about jobs. We have -- we don't have a jobs bill, we have a jobs agenda. And we're going to move forward on that jobs agenda."

That movement will have to wait until after the President's Day recess, which begins on Monday. Reid said he would have the package ready to go when the Senate returns, and declined to keep members in town for a vote.

"People have schedules. You know, when people leave Washington who are members of Congress, it's not that they head for the beach and sip tea and smoke cigars. People have work to do. We represent constituencies," said Reid.

Some liberals were disappointed that more Democratic priorities, including unemployment and health care benefits, weren't being included, said staff briefed on Thursday's meeting. But in their misery, they were comforted by the fact that the top Republican priority was also stripped from the package. K Street has been lobbying furiously for tax extenders that had been included in the Finance package.

Reid alluded to the real author of those tax extenders. "We are not going to confuse this with tax extenders," he said. "One of my favorite stories was -- I think it was in the New York Times -- one of you wrote about 'Democrats introduce a jobs bill, but most of it was written by lobbyists downtown.'" Reid said the new bill could not be mistaken for the work of lobbyists. Or, as he put it: "No one's written what we're going to bring up downtown."

Reid plans to move forward with unemployment and COBRA in the near future, and still has the giveaways in his pocket to win Republican backing, which is needed thanks to their 41-seat super-minority. But splitting them off for a later vote gives him a chance to highlight which party supports which.

WATCH REID'S ANNOUNCEMENT:

UPDATE: If Reid wanted a fight, it looks like he'll get it. "Senator Reid's announcement sends a message that he wants to go partisan and blame Republicans when Senator Grassley and others were trying to find common ground on solutions to help get the economy back on track and people back to work," said Jill Kozeny, spokeswoman to Grassley, ranking member of the Finance Committee, in a statement. Grassley had endorsed the previous version of the bill. "Senator Reid did this just as Republican senators were saying they liked things in the Baucus-Grassley draft, which would have prevented billions of dollars in tax increases and offset any spending. The Majority Leader pulled the rug out from work to build broad-based support for tax relief and other efforts to help the private sector recover from the economic crisis."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The Senate's bipartisan jobs package, which had robust support from the White House and the GOP, but was packed with corporate giveaways, lasted less than a day. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D...
The Senate's bipartisan jobs package, which had robust support from the White House and the GOP, but was packed with corporate giveaways, lasted less than a day. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,155
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
leonel
MA, Pol.Sci.; MA, Ed.; JD. Veteran.
11:14 PM on 02/14/2010
THIS IS THE RIGHT APPROACH TO LEGISLATION AND CAN BE THE BEGINNING OF CONGRESSIONAL REFORM: SMALLER BILLS WITH NO EARMARKS, NO BACKROOM DEALS.

Everybody wonders how to address all the problems from lack of bipartisanship, earmarking, overwhelming lobby influence, public outrage---and eventually how to address the federal deficit.

It all will come down to congressional leaders only moving forward on smaller and understandable bills.

An amazingly simple, even ingenious, solution.
03:37 PM on 02/13/2010
Good for Harry.

If these big-business corporations paid as much in taxes as middle class Americans do on earned income those billions could very well help pay for healhcare costs.

Stop tax-extenders for the behemoth Corporations. The American people have subsidized their shenanigans for way too long.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:08 PM on 02/12/2010
Unemployment insurance, disaster assistance, or COBRA for that matter hardly constitute "welfare" in the Reagan's-imaginary-welfare-queen sort of way. But as long as we're on the subject, corporate welfare consumed 3x the amount of our taxpayer dollars BEFORE bailout-mania hit Washington -- much of the remaining aid to individuals goes to people who work, very hard, full-time and in respectable occupations to subsidize subsistence wages, determined by market leverage alone, independent of the basic human needs that facilitate the very productivity that has so enriched the capital side of the economy. Ghastly housing projects, designed to warehouse the unwashed masses away from polite society, have conservative fingerprints all over them (especially on the taxpayer money) and have fallen out of favor for good reason. Though abolishing the right to an education would burgeon the ignoramus population and, no doubt, be a boon to the right, universal support from all over the political spectrum takes such an undemocratic, and asinine, idea off the table. Back to article, and my original point: the cuts on the Republican priorities will not dig into basic human needs for food, shelter, healthcare etc. Concessions on the Left will. No congruency.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:14 PM on 02/12/2010
Oops! ..somehow my comment didn't appear as I'd intended, under the one I was replying too...
04:31 PM on 02/12/2010
It's time Reid smelled the coffee. He knows not one Republican will vote with the Democrats on any bill. No need to waste time with them.
03:17 PM on 02/12/2010
Install rooftop pv solar and efficiency upgrades to all appropriate gov building.

That will fix the economy and save us trillion over the years.

Even if the panels are bought in China to 50 cents per Wp, they will be sold by the wholesalers at 1$, then the installers will charge 2-3$ or more, so 75% or more of the profit goes to local contractors.
01:59 PM on 02/12/2010
I don' t like Harry, ""however this is the first Smart thing I have seen out of this man. And I am impressed..... They need a real jobs bill, and they need to insure the jobs go to the American People, unlike the majority of the Stimulus money. This is typically what happens to our new programs, they are designed for the Pockets of the Corporations and they are not the corporations in this country.

"U.S. Department of Energy statistics show 79 percent of the $2.1 billion in stimulus money allocated for wind energy has been paid to foreign manufacturers.

The Spanish company Iberdrola has received $443 million; the Portuguese company EDP has received $229 million; and the British company Terra Firma, which bought a large wind farm in western Pennsylvania, received $42 million.

Analysts worry the stimulus funds will also help create manufacturing jobs in China, and a Texas consortium’s plans to build a wind farm that primarily will rely on Chinese-made turbines using $450 million in stimulus money underscores this fear

A report from the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University found 80 percent of the stimulus money had created 6,000 jobs, and only a small percentage of those jobs went to American workers.'
Unlike the Stimulus bill above,,,,

This Jobs bill needs to stipulate American Jobs, created by American companies, in this country employing Americans...
How hard is this language to insert in a bill.....
11:25 AM on 02/12/2010
President Obama and Congress are a disgrace. Most of them ought to be in prison for bribery, extortion and vote selling. We have a government of criminals.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
teron678
A Pessimistic Optimist
12:43 PM on 02/12/2010
Well if they did just what you wanted ... You'll have no Government ... because this is how Government has functioned since creation .......
11:23 AM on 02/12/2010
1% of Americans own 70% of the wealth of the nation. When are the rich going to be taxed? There are no jobs because all the capital is in rich people's accounts. They do not need jobs, do they?
11:20 AM on 02/12/2010
It looks like Obama and Dems are stalling until after the mid-term election to pass anything. They know the more they run their agenda thru Congress the more Demcoratic voters they piss off.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Jones
11:30 AM on 02/12/2010
Reid just refuses to pass more of the Bush-style corporate tax breaks that served us so well. Republicans in Congress have no other ideas. They want to let corporations keep more of their money so they can invest in important projects for America's future. Like a customer service center in Bangalore. Voters are angry at both parties, because they both sell out the working class on a daily basis. Reid going for a simplified, easy to understand, jobs bill that isn't packed with special interest goodies seems like both a good policy and political move.
Paolo7219
Sometimes doing the right thing means not doing th
12:11 PM on 02/12/2010
It's striking to me that with the economy in tatters, there really hasn't been much movement to correct the situation. Our whole system is dysfunctional. Unemployment, the banking scandal, foreign wars that have little popular support. Nothing is getting done. The country needs viable third, fourth even a fifth political party that are real alternatives to the 'duopoly'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneEarthling
I hear imaginary guitar notes
11:10 AM on 02/12/2010
The original mash also included an extension of the Patriot Act. Not much mention of that.
10:54 AM on 02/12/2010
To all you socialist libs. You are what you are be brave enough to admit it.
www.gallup.com/poll/125645/socialism-viewed-positively-americans.aspx
11:27 AM on 02/12/2010
If you have found socialist libs, give us some names, instead of throwing around a name you don't understand. Rhetoric without thought. Congratulations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Jones
11:39 AM on 02/12/2010
to all you fascist free-market nutjobs:

capital S socialism is where the government runs every sector of the economy. not one liberal or democratic spokesperson that I'm aware of has advocated that as an ideal form of government, ever. However, if you listen to Newt Gingrich or Dick Armey they are absolutely on the opposite extreme. They want government GONE.

I guess, they're right in a way. We'll create more jobs here if we just do away with child labor laws, or really any labor laws of any kind. Why outsource when you can have slave labor right here in the US of A?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDog76A
Neither political party is good for America
01:09 PM on 02/12/2010
oddly enough though, fascism is actually populist, as is socialism. the free market is rugged individualism.

but hey if its more "natural" and "evolutionary" to limit the personal success of one group in order to benefit another by the rules of a third party, as opposed to "survival of the fittest" or "genetics" well then I guess you're right in a way.

"not one liberal or democratic spokesperson that I'm aware of has advocated that as an ideal form of government" I don't know, taking over the banking industry, the auto industry, the healthcare industry, as well as increasing public sector spending for housing and construction and not to mention the existing subsidies that run the farming transportation and oil industries, I'd say the government is getting closer and closer to controlling every sector of the economy.
Paolo7219
Sometimes doing the right thing means not doing th
03:04 PM on 02/12/2010
AJ: Sorry, but I have to correct your misnaming of our right wing friends. Fascist? Correct. Free Market? Absolutely NOT! They are corporate welfare deadbeats who hate social spending because it cuts in on their taxpayer subsidies. Your typical corporate welfare Republican HATES the free market and open competition with a passion. Cuts in on profits. Nutjobs? Well, some of them are, imho. But the 'nutjobs' in power are rational people cynically spouting views they know are not true, but serve their self interest--often at other people's (read: taxpayer's) expense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmyRN
10:47 AM on 02/12/2010
I think this is a good idea. The Republicans were all set to vote for the big bill, so they could show their "owners" (lobbyists, big business,etc) that they were doing what they were paid for, and still claim credit for helping the little folk.
By splitting up the big business perks from helping main street, maybe it will show the people where the Republican priorities are. It will also make it more difficult for the far right to point the blaime at the Dems for more "Big Business Bail-outs".
We all wanted Harry to grow some, I think I sense something sprouting.
10:43 AM on 02/12/2010
With a democratic administration, and a democratic majorities in the senate and house, the credit for any bill that appears to be good for the US will go mostly to the democratic party. Obviously, it is in the best interest of the republican party to defeat any bill that may be good for the democratic party.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:13 AM on 02/12/2010
Oh those darn obstructionist republicans....oh, wait.
photo
Kache
Toodlum, wake up, I hear a prowler downstairs
01:20 PM on 02/12/2010
Wait for you to head your head our of your a z z, nope, we'll move on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:08 PM on 02/12/2010
another genius.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
sunshine14
09:59 AM on 02/12/2010
I do not believe there is any other socialist nations and having Universal Health Care on earth (there is many many many many nations etc )who can boast of being $12 Trillion dollars in debt right? Being the most blessed and richest in natural resources, 4 seasons, clean waters, etc. So isn't there a correlation between prosperity and socialism?
10:59 AM on 02/12/2010
Sun-The only correlation between prosperity and socialism is that the state defines prosperity not a free market system. If the state decides that part of prosperity is you making $10.00 an hour you have to accept that, no matter what you think it should be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDog76A
Neither political party is good for America
01:34 PM on 02/12/2010
Yeah - China is a prosperous nation, more so than we are... but the people aren't prosperous, they get paid dirt for working long hours in sub-par conditions manufacturing goods they themselve could not afford.

But hey they get government healthcare right?