More

Obama Health Care Summit: Democrats Skeptical Of Meeting With GOP

ERICA WERNER   02/12/10 09:59 PM ET   AP

Obama Health Care Summit

WASHINGTON — In a make or break move, President Barack Obama on Friday challenged three dozen Republicans and Democrats to participate in a one-of-a-kind televised summit this month to thrash out a deal on health care.

House Republicans immediately greeted the invite to the Feb. 25 event with derision, casting doubt on whether it would yield any bipartisan agreement to extend coverage to millions of Americans and rein in medical costs. "We need answers before we know if the White House is more interested in partisan theater than in facilitating a productive dialogue about solutions," said Kevin Smith, a spokesman for House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio.

But Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was more receptive, saying he would work with the White House "to maximize the effectiveness of the meeting."

The summit is considered a last, best attempt to revive Obama's yearlong quest, now stalled after Democrats lost their filibuster-proof Senate majority. Yet since Obama proposed the summit last weekend, Republicans and Democrats have voiced skepticism, with some in the GOP wondering if it would be nothing but a spectacle that could benefit the president at their expense.

By presiding over a meeting with three dozen lawmakers trying to get a word in edgewise, Obama may be able to dominate the conversation and the visual images. That's what many Democrats say he did at a Jan. 29 session when he faced a roomful of GOP House members in Baltimore, controlling the microphone for much of the event.

The Baltimore event proved riveting for many Americans because it ranged over many topics and included numerous moments of partisan sparring. A half-day televised session on the complexities of health care may prove much less inviting to the average viewer.

In its invitation, the White House argued that remaking health care was imperative, and Obama challenged Democrats and Republicans to come up with comprehensive bills before the Blair House event – legislation that would be posted online.

Citing bills passed in the House and Senate, the White House said "this is the closest our nation has been to resolving this issue in the nearly 100 years that it has been debated. The Blair House meeting is the next step."

White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius cited the recent 39 percent rate hikes by Anthem Blue Cross in California as urgent proof the overhaul effort must be completed.

"As the president noted this week, if we don't act on comprehensive health insurance reform, this enormous rate hike will be 'just a preview of coming attractions,'" they wrote.

The letter was sent to McConnell, Boehner, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

The White House named 21 lawmakers the president wants to attend the summit: the top leaders in the House and Senate and of the committees with jurisdiction over the health legislation. Obama also invited the top four leaders to invite four more lawmakers each, bringing the total to 37 – 20 Democrats and 17 Republicans.

Even prior to the invitation, Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., a physician and head of the Republican Study Committee, dismissed the summit in an op-ed as "simply an attempt by the president to use the White House as a political tool to intimidate his way into a government takeover of health care. The American people and Republicans in Congress will not be taken by this Chicago-style politics."

At the summit, Obama will offer opening remarks, followed by comments from a Republican leader and a Democratic leader, according to the format detailed in Friday's letter. Obama will then moderate a discussion on four topics: insurance reforms, cost containment, expanding coverage and the impact of health legislation on the deficit.

Officials from the White House Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation also have been invited.

The letter stands as a challenge not just to Republicans but also to Democrats, who have yet to finalize a deal on sweeping overhaul legislation. They were on the verge of doing so last month before the special election victory of Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts deprived Democrats of the filibuster-proof supermajority they need to move forward in the Senate.

That threw the whole undertaking into disarray and congressional leaders have been struggling to pick up the pieces. Some hope the summit will break the logjam one way or the other.

In the letter, Obama pressed Democrats to resolve their difference in the disparate House and Senate bills and come up with final legislation before the session. He also asked the Republicans to produce a comprehensive bill.

Democratic leaders are working toward a package that could pass the Senate under controversial and complex rules that require only a simple majority vote, not the 60-vote supermajority they no longer control – a strong-arm partisan approach infuriates Republicans and makes moderate Democrats uneasy.

Democrats and Republicans are far apart in their approaches. Democrats' legislation would cover more than 30 million uninsured, while a House Republican plan would cover only 3 million. Members of both parties say they see a few areas for common ground, including reforming the medical malpractice system, and finding ways to allow consumers to shop for insurance plans across state lines.

___

Associated Press writers Charles Babington in Washington and Brian Witte in Annapolis, Md., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — In a make or break move, President Barack Obama on Friday challenged three dozen Republicans and Democrats to participate in a one-of-a-kind televised summit this month to thrash ou...
WASHINGTON — In a make or break move, President Barack Obama on Friday challenged three dozen Republicans and Democrats to participate in a one-of-a-kind televised summit this month to thrash ou...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 746
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
actionspeaks
I am a visionary-humanitarian
01:36 PM on 02/16/2010
Health Care Reform Will Bring Better Life To America
“Go into the highways and byways…”
Send into America, from OFA, volunteers and other workers, who will set the principles of Health Reform in their connection with President Obama,USA and those of America’s Leadership, vowed to appropriate Health Care to the improvised , middle-class, as well as every other American and the American family. Request that OFA messengers will go before every family and individual, online computer literate, in the trenches, the highways, byways, off liners, computer illiterates as well as the loners, who have found politics, an absolute, “no-no”. Encourage all America, that each stand to gain something, positive and progressive, for their fellow men and women, boys and girls, and see if the “breath of life” will not aptly return to America and the wide world. (Includes quotes from 1898, egwltr54)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
actionspeaks
I am a visionary-humanitarian
01:35 PM on 02/16/2010
HERE’S HUMANITY!
HEALTH CARE REFORM WILL BRING BETTER LIFE TO AMERICA.—
To my children, family, friends, neighbors, community, city, county, state, America, and the wide-world, I say, with enthusiasm, Prosecute the Health Care Reform Bill, with tact and ability. Set to work the youth involvement with OFA, suggest strong communications and education of other young women and young men with the elderly/disabled in America. Combine Health Care Reform with the proclamation of bettering humanity, moving America to a more rational human society.
“Resist the devil and he will flee from you.”
Make regular, organized, strategic efforts to lift America out of the destructive level that “bought off” recent legislative members, oppressors and oppressor-agents, are using to convince and frighten America, and, into which they, who have resigned from America law and legislation, have fallen. Some, like, our former vice president, Cheney, have remained in this fallen and bitter state for many years and continue through “Hater” tactics to draw other legislators, congressional, who are distressed. Most resigning or resigned legislators feel they are without safe distress discharge circles.
01:26 AM on 02/14/2010
Are you all awared that Anthem Blue Cross has outsourced to overseas non-US licensed doctors to make medical decisions on requested medical services?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
womanwithstixs
Just because you're paranoid
07:53 PM on 02/13/2010
Among the improvements I fought for is a provision that will preserve benefits for an estimated 800,000 Medicare Advantage enrollees in Florida, and another provision that will protect tax benefits for seniors who have high medical expenses.

I also introduced an amendment that would force pharmaceutical companies to give rebates to the Federal government for certain drugs purchased under the Medicare Part D program. These rebates would close the coverage gap in Part D known as the donut hole and save the government billions of dollars. I was disappointed that this amendment was not included, but I made clear that when a final
letter continued.

version of the bill is negotiated, I expect there to be a mechanism for closing the donut hole for seniors.

Regardless of where anyone stands on the specifics, I think we all can agree that the system we have can be unfair and too costly, and needs to be fixed. Although this bill is not perfect, it contains a number of reforms that are necessary if we are to have any chance at expanding access to health care while reducing the cost over the long term. Again, I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue. Please don't hesitate to contact me in the future.

Sincerely,
Senator Bill Nelson
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
womanwithstixs
Just because you're paranoid
07:52 PM on 02/13/2010
I wrote to my Senator's and this was the letter I received. Anyone else have a letter to share.
Dear Ms. H:

Thank you for contacting me about health care reform. On December 24, 2009, I voted for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The bill passed the Senate, and now negotiators are working on a way forward to create legislation that can get through both chambers. In his State of the Union address, President Obama urged Congress not to walk away from health care reform, and I agree that families and businesses cannot afford the status quo.

The Senate bill I voted for has many good elements. It would allow those who are happy with their insurance to keep what they have got, including veterans and seniors on Medicare. It stops insurance companies from dropping people when they get sick or denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions, and creates State-based exchanges where folks without coverage can find it at an affordable price. Additionally, it contains several measures aimed at reducing overall medical and prescription drug costs and eliminating waste and fraud in the system. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that the bill as passed by the Senate will reduce the Federal budget deficit by $130 billion over ten years and $1.3 trillion in the following ten years.
02:21 PM on 02/13/2010
The conference will serve as a real game changer;

I suspect both parties working togeather will be very difficult, but not impossible. It's obvious what the gop is planning, they want to prevent anything from getting done, this will hurt the dems at election time.

The gop used the same plan during the Clinton era, he was still very effective in getting things done, I'm sure the Obama admin has a very effective plan for the comming weeks.

If the Dems simply past GOOOOD legistration, using the 60 votes, reconc,etc, it would serve them very well, they must show they can be effective.
02:05 AM on 02/13/2010
Cold War Strategies often did not discriminate between casualties in theater or civilian population centers ...

Then; civilians were as much a target in MAD defenses as soldiers ...

Today we are in the middle of a new type of terrorist-war, where civilians are again targeted by America's enemies .

If you accept this; then it is entirely appropriate and necessary for the US government to become progressively involved in healthcare and healthcare funding issues.

Philosophically, this is an appropriate function of government and a natural extension of civil defense .

National Healthcare should have been enacted during the Cold War, but remains a pertinent idea in our own time .
photo
William1950
everything I say could be wrong
03:48 PM on 02/12/2010
People... we have got to get rid of the influence of lobbyists. Our government is not... it is the corporations government... run by them and for them. The democrats are afraid of the President meeting with republicans? The republicans think it is a trap of some kind? Could it be that Obama knows that only by exposing all of them to the light can they be seen as the frauds they are? Face it, democrats and republicans alike are complicit in the mess we find ourselves, they did nothing to save the economy, they did nothing to keep our jobs here, they did nothing to get health care passed.. they are doing nothing to fix social security or medicare.. except line their war chests with money from the corporate donors.. is it not obvious? can you not see? I don't know the answers to our problem, but I can see the cause.. and we are all living the result.
Massive greed and unchecked hubris from the top, and apathy from the middle, and dispair from the bottom.. happy new year ya'all...
03:24 PM on 02/12/2010
LOL!!! The Super Minority has them on the run again, face it folks dems have not got this governing thing down.
02:48 PM on 02/12/2010
Quoting Jon Stewart: "Suck it up, grandma!" Don't blow this Dems.
02:12 PM on 02/12/2010
"Moderate Democrats in both chambers are cool to the simple majority approach, which surely would infuriate Republicans and risks being perceived as a partisan gambit."

Oh no!
We can't risk infuriating Republicans!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atcrossroads
02:32 PM on 02/12/2010
Why would they want to follow the simple majority approach when the 'minority rules' approach seems to work so well? I mean, don't you know you can get your way with 33 votes much easier than with 59? As the Becker confirmation, or the lack thereof, has just demonstrated.
01:49 PM on 02/12/2010
The GOP's plan is a complete failure written by the Health Insurance Lobby. Here's an example. In 2007, National Health Expenditures totaled 2.24 Trillion dollars. Lets assume that amount remains statistics for the next 10 years. The CBO reported that the total savings over the next 10 years from Tort Reform in the GOP House Bill totals 54 Billion dollars, which equals 5.4 billion dollars a year. Therefore, the percentage of annual health expenditures saved through GOP tort reform is 5.4 billion/2.24 trillion = 0.02%.
03:35 PM on 02/12/2010
54 Billion is still a savings. I believe it would have been much more difficult for the GOP to claim a lack of bipartisanship if the Dems would have thrown them the tort reform bone.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Teresa201
"Well done is better than well said"
04:15 PM on 02/12/2010
I believe tort reform does not control the cost of insurance at all.......
As proven in many states already.

We will probably give them their tort reform...
And then watch them vote No.

That's exactly why our President threw it out there in the SOTU...
So the voters could watch them vote against it.
The GOP added 180 ammendments to the HC Bill, then voted against it.
Let's see how this shakes out!
gconners
A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall
04:32 PM on 02/12/2010
"Tort Reform" is a "red herring." As you note, it is a very, very minor percentage of total health care expenditures. It's just a convenient and easy way to try to block ANY health care reform!
photo
laaambchop
Cheerfulness is a sign of wisdom
01:31 PM on 02/12/2010
just another example of where the money goes and goes and goes:

http://www.fiercehealthfinance.com/story/amerigroups-225m-fine-may-not-benefit-providers/2008-08-20

Amerigroup's $225M fine may not benefit providers: Last week, Medicaid health plan Amerigroup agreed to pay $225 million to settle charges that it excluded pregnant women and sick members to avoid paying their bills.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jwredd
01:28 PM on 02/12/2010
Obama should start the meeting by calling up the party leaders to agree on the meaning of some of the terminology. "If you're going to say 'government takeover' again and again tell us what constitutes a takeover and compare that to what's in the current bill. If you're going to call me a socialist, please define socialism and let's compare my actions, and yours for that matter, to that definition."
01:00 PM on 02/12/2010
Maybe the Republicans should be allowed crib notes to make them more comfortable.
01:16 PM on 02/12/2010
hehe!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jwredd
01:31 PM on 02/12/2010
I'd even be happy to give them a few lifelines if that makes them happy.