EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

US Troops Launch Marjah Offensive

ALFRED de MONTESQUIOU and CHRISTOPHER TORCHIA   02/12/10 09:59 PM ET   AP

Us Troops

NEAR MARJAH, Afghanistan — Helicopter-borne U.S. Marines and Afghan troops swooped down on the Taliban-held town of Marjah before dawn Saturday, launching a long-expected attack to re-establish government control and undermine support for militants in their southern heartland.

The assault on Marjah is the biggest offensive since the 2001 U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan and will serve as a major test of a new NATO strategy focusing on protecting civilians. The attack is also the first major combat operation since President Barack Obama ordered 30,000 U.S. reinforcements here in December to try to turn the tide of the war .

To the north of Marjah, British, American and Canadian forces struck elsewhere in the Nad Ali district in a push to break Taliban power in Helmand province, one of the major battlefields of the war.

Marine commanders say they expect between 400 to 1,000 insurgents – including more than 100 foreign fighters – to be holed up in Marjah, a town of 80,000 people in Helmand province. Marjah is the biggest southern town under Taliban control and the linchpin of the militants' logistical and opium-smuggling network.

"The first wave of choppers has landed inside Marjah. The operation has begun," said Capt. Joshua Winfrey, commander of Lima Company, 3rd Battalion, 6th Marines, which was at the forefront of the attack.

Several hundred U.S. Marines and some Afghan troops were in the first wave, flying over minefields the militants are believed to have planted around the town, 360 miles (610 kilometers) southwest of Kabul.

The operation, codenamed "Moshtarak," or Together, was described as the biggest joint operation of the Afghan war. Maj. Gen. Nick Carter, commander of NATO forces in southern Afghanistan, says 15,000 troops were involved, including some 7,500 troops fighting in Marjah.

The helicopter assault was preceded by illumination flares fired over the town about 2 a.m. In the pitch darkness of a moonless night, the roar of helicopters could be heard overhead, flying in assault troops from multiple locations.

The white flash of Hellfire and Tow missiles could be seen exploding over the town as flares illuminated the darkness to help assault troops spot targets.

Once the town is secured, NATO hopes to rush in aid and restore public services in a bid to win support among the estimated 125,000 people who live in Marjah and surrounding villages. The Afghans' ability to restore those services is crucial to the success of the operation and to prevent the Taliban from returning.

Tribal elders have pleaded for NATO to finish the operation quickly and spare civilians – an appeal that offers some hope the townspeople will cooperate with Afghan and international forces once the Taliban are gone.

At the Pentagon, a senior U.S. official said Afghan President Hamid Karzai had signed off on the attack.

Another defense official said Karzai was informed of planning for the operation well in advance. The official said it marked a first in terms of both sharing information prior to the attack and planning collaboration with the Afghan government.

Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity because there were not authorized to speak publicly.

The second official said the number of Afghan security forces in the district have roughly doubled since Obama's first infusion of some 10,000 Marines in southern Afghanistan last year.

The Marjah offensive involves close combat in extremely difficult terrain, that official said. A close grid of wide canals dug by the United States as an aid project decades ago make the territory a particularly rich agricultural prize but complicate the advance of U.S. forces.

On the eve of the attack, cars and trucks jammed the main road out of Marjah on Friday as hundreds of civilians defied militant orders and fled the area. For weeks, U.S. commanders had signaled their intention to attack Marjah in hopes that civilians would seek shelter.

Residents told The Associated Press by telephone this week that Taliban fighters were preventing them from leaving, warning the roads were planted with land mines to slow the NATO advance.

Still, many people fled anyway for the provincial capital of Lashkar Gah, 20 miles (30 kilometers) to the northeast. They told journalists they had to leave quickly and secretly to avoid recrimination from Taliban commanders.

Some said they slipped out of town when Taliban commanders weren't watching.

"We were not allowed to come here. We haven't brought any of our belongings. We just tried to get ourselves out," said Bibi Gul, an elderly woman in a black headscarf who arrived in nearby Lashkar Gah with three of her sons. She left three more sons behind in Marjah.

Police searched vehicles for any signs of militants, in one case prodding bales of cotton with a metal rod in search of hidden weapons.

"They don't allow families to leave," Marjah resident Qari Mohammad Nabi said of the Taliban. "The families can only leave the village when they are not seen leaving."

Provincial spokesman Daoud Ahmadi said about 450 families – an estimated 2,700 people – had already sought refuge in Lashkar Gah. Most moved in with relatives but more than 100 were being sheltered by the government, he said.

Ahmadi said the local government was prepared to shelter 7,000 families in nearby towns, providing them with food, blankets and dishes.

In advance of the attack, Afghan officials urged community leaders in Marjah to use their influence to persuade the Taliban to lay down their weapons and avoid a bloodbath. In return, the officials promised to improve the lives of the people there.

During a meeting Thursday, Helmand's governor, Gulab Mangal, urged tribal elders from the town to "use any avenue you have, direct or indirect, to tell the Taliban who don't want to fight, that they can join with us," according to the chief of Helmand's provincial council, Mohammad Anwar Khan.

For their part, the elders begged for limited use of airstrikes because of the risk of civilian deaths, Khan said Friday.

Another of the elders at the meeting, Mohammad Karim Khan, said he would not dare approach the Taliban and tell them to give up their guns to the government.

"We can't talk to the Taliban. We are farmers and poor people and we are not involved in these things like the politicians are," said Khan, who is not related to the provincial council chief.

Instead, a group of 34 elders sent a letter Friday to the provincial government urging NATO forces to finish the operation in Marjah quickly and avoid harming civilians. Abdul Hai Agha, an elder from Marjah, said local people were frightened and feared they would not be cared for after the Taliban are gone.

"We said in this letter that if you are doing this operation in Marjah, do it quickly," Agha told the AP by phone from the town.

The fact that the elders did not demand U.S. and Afghan troops call off the operation offered a glimmer of hope the townspeople will cooperate with the pro-government forces – if the Afghan leadership is able to fulfill its promises of a better life without the Taliban.

U.S. officials have long complained that Afghan government corruption and inefficiency have alienated millions of Afghans and paved the way for the revival of the militant group after it was driven from power in the 2001 U.S.-led invasion.

One of the main drafters of the letter to government officials said he and others had been reaching out to local Taliban commanders.

"We have talked to some of the Taliban over the phone and we have told them: 'This is your country. Don't create problems for your fellow Afghans and don't go on a suicide mission,'" said Abdul Rehman Jan, an elder who lives in Lashkar Gah.

However, Jan said most of the Afghan Taliban have already fled the area. Militant commanders from the Middle East or Pakistan have stayed on "and they want to fight," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Noor Khan in Kandahar, Christopher Torchia outside Marjah, Amir Shah in Kabul, and Anne Gearan and Anne Flaherty in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,464
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
Zonie
Right & Left are part of a whole. Divided we die.
05:03 PM on 02/13/2010
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=sQfoFzJUs­b0&feature­=player_em­bedded#

:Listen to our soldiers as they speak through this brave young man.

This is what is happening.­...he's been there.

Those who turn a deaf ear.....yo­u remember that you did that.....b­ecause it will come back to haunt you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProfessorDuh
01:10 PM on 02/13/2010
The idea of a "central front" in a "war" that isn't a war against a stateless, invisible enemy represente­d by an empty noun is a rhetorical device so rarified that it makes the question about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin seem quite practical by comparison­.
08:56 AM on 02/13/2010
"But by the end of next year (2011), they (the Canadians) will be gone.
"President Barack Obama has said the U.S. also plans to begin its own withdrawal by July 2011, ..."
http://www­.google.co­m/hostedne­ws/ap/arti­cle/ALeqM5­hTcDqdudOG­GdgA7OAdUb­_rPew5jQD9­DMPVB82
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
10LittleIndians
07:08 AM on 02/13/2010
Grrrrrrrrr­r.........­Kill the Taliban!!!­!!
12:39 PM on 02/13/2010
kill the wabbit...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProfessorDuh
06:37 AM on 02/13/2010
Yes, the U.S. must completely drain the resources of its citizens in order to permanentl­y occupy lands on the other side of the world and "collatera­l" thousands of innocent men, women and children into bloody bits to make sure that a handful of Saudis armed with box cutters don't come here again.
Oddly, those lands do not include Saudi Arabia and, oddly, none of this will stop anyone from coming here again. Sensible policy, eh?
07:08 AM on 02/13/2010
This whole war charade is not about anything but making a few rich and the masses too poor to resist.
08:23 AM on 02/13/2010
I agree.

As a friend of the USA it makes me very sad America is just about war these days and nothing else. American people are now so used to the most terrible thing on earth which is war. Crimes are committed in the good names of American citizens and very few seem to doubt or ask questions. Democrats or Republican­s, all the same. Obama's war is no better than Bush's. You bring death and destructio­n on faraway shores and no real goals are defined or named. And the apathetic public stands by and hopes not too many of their own mercenarie­s get killed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProfessorDuh
09:16 AM on 02/13/2010
I tried to reply, but the censors here at HP are afraid of the truth about the lying corporate media, the weakling bribed Democrats, the vicious fasclst Republican­s and their Tea Bagger sock puppets.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
shutterbabe
Equal rights are not special rights.
10:29 AM on 02/13/2010
CologneCit­izen, I always like to hear opinions from faraway places. For the record, I ask questions all the time. I do not accept this war or what has transpired in the Middle East during the horrific reign of Bush/Chene­y. The goals have been ill-define­d and too many innocents have died. I do not believe that all Americans are apathetic. I love our Troops and the many men and women from other countries who stand by their side. I will never endorse this war and believe that President Obama was in many ways forced to continue this military action. Most Americans want peace. They want to raise their families in a gentle way and live without the imposed threat of terrorism that have been forced upon us.
06:27 AM on 02/13/2010
For all the people asking god to bless something. If the other side does the same thing, how does god choose who to bless? Or does he bless both sides? Or do you assume they're not praying to your god? And if thats the case, is your god more powerful than their god? Its quite confusing.
06:36 AM on 02/13/2010
This is waaaayyyy too deep for most of these posters.
07:18 AM on 02/13/2010
There is no God.
06:06 AM on 02/13/2010
It saddens me that we and the military are told that this is "Good" and so many buy into the lie. Please DO NOT kill anyone for me. And don't get killed trying to keep someone elses hands clean from their own bloodlust. And if you get a chance you might cogitate a bit on how loading up our gang to go to their gang's turf to do to some drive-by shooting is going to benefit anyone.
05:03 AM on 02/13/2010
Get some Marines!
06:33 AM on 02/13/2010
Get what? PTSD? A lifetime of trauma? You've reduced the violence of humans killing eachother and the accompanie­d lifetime scars to a sports slogan. Congratula­tions.
04:20 AM on 02/13/2010
In the end, no matter the outcome, the local farmers will bury their dead, raise their chidren and return to the land they have inhabited since Alexander the Great was wounded in battle in that foreign place by Pashtun tribesmen in the 4th century before Christ.
03:37 AM on 02/13/2010
God bless our soldiers and a special prayer for Marines. Stay safe!!!
photo
Guytar
I'm sorry that I made you cry
04:16 AM on 02/13/2010
Another prayer from me for God's blessing on our soldiers, sailors and Marines. And a prayer for every other innocent soul in these times.
04:22 AM on 02/13/2010
Well said.
06:38 AM on 02/13/2010
Maybe its the ones who are not innocent who need the prayers most.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
shutterbabe
Equal rights are not special rights.
10:31 AM on 02/13/2010
Timothy, please allow me to fan you for writing what we all should feel in our hearts, each and every day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
03:26 AM on 02/13/2010
With all that blabber during week about "Here we come! Here we come!" I'd be surprised if anyone is there when they arrive. Maybe that was the point. I'm sure they'll find someone to turn this into a photo op even if they have to drag 16mm films out of their vault showing MacArthur landing on the beachhead over and over until they got it right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:32 AM on 02/13/2010
"Maybe that was the point."

Bingo.
04:04 AM on 02/13/2010
The point was to take the strategic town and hold it
And if Tqlibs run away, as they usually do, so much the better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
NOTE: I advocate for anti-BSL...
02:51 AM on 02/13/2010
Al Qaeda Sisters - Trained By The CIA

(Favorite alternativ­e political tune.)

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=GpcmzeQv9­BM

We're trained by the CIA to blow you away

Created out of the need for the war machine.

We'll mirror the spread in the war against freedom...­...

........♫
....♫
..♪
........♬

...♪......­♪

(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
photo
Guytar
I'm sorry that I made you cry
03:06 AM on 02/13/2010
Absolutely love The Sisters. Brilliant work. I SEE YOU.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
NOTE: I advocate for anti-BSL...
02:13 AM on 02/13/2010
4800 dead americans have WASTED their lives on this FIASCO.

The USA is a loser.....­.trillions in new debt and thousands of dead american soldiers.

It would take more than 750,000 troops to stabilize Afghanista­n. And we don't have them.

TIME is on THEIR side....th­e USA has NOTHING but SPIN and B/S going on .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
buttonz
02:15 AM on 02/13/2010
Actually it is a little over a trillion.

The book about the 3 trillion dollar war is only half true. The author does a lot of redundant financing. For example: the cost to pay the basic salary of soldier is the same in peacetime as it is in wartime.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gover
02:24 AM on 02/13/2010
The benefit costs alone and medical treatment that returning soldiers are entitled to plus the interest on the first $1T is legitimate­ly estimated to eventually cost more than the funds spent on the conflict itself.

And it ain't over. It's not a $1T war. It's $1T so far.
03:01 AM on 02/13/2010
Spent & Approved War-Spendi­ng - About $900 billion of US taxpayers' funds spent or approved for spending through Sept 2010.

Lost & Unaccounte­d for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractor­s. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.

Missing - $1 billion in tractor trailers, tank recovery vehicles, machine guns, rocket-pro­pelled grenades and other equipment and services provided to the Iraqi security forces. (Per CBS News on Dec 6, 2007.)

Mismanaged & Wasted in Iraq - $10 billion, per Feb 2007 Congressio­nal hearings

Halliburto­n Overcharge­s Classified by the Pentagon as Unreasonab­le and Unsupporte­d - $1.4 billion

Amount paid to KBR, a former Halliburto­n division, to supply U.S. military in Iraq with food, fuel, housing and other items - $20 billion

Portion of the $20 billion paid to KBR that Pentagon auditors deem "questiona­ble or supportabl­e" - $3.2 billion

This $1 trillion + was until the end of 2009 and does not include Vet Disability costs from the resulting traumas, physical and psychologi­cal.
03:24 AM on 02/13/2010
The economic cost of the Aghanistan mission is the 800 Lb gorilla in the room.

There are rumors that our major Afghan allies: the UK, Canada,Fra­nce and possibly Germany are hinting that for political and financial reasons, they will only be capable of a commitment ending in 2012. Two more years.

This leads to another question, how much can the US economy afford to maintain the Afghan campaign? What are the White House economic advisors telling the President.­?

This may tie in with the battle beginning in Marjah. The larger strategy may be an effort by President Obama to pound the Taliban into submission with a deciisive outcome at this time and place. Similar to Nixon's "Christmas Bombing" campaign during the Vietnam war, an attempt to bring the North Vietnam into negotiatio­ns.

Based on the "cost of war" factor, time IS on the Taliban's side. Most of them live here, after all, and we are far from home. The Soviets had a better geographic advantadge in their Afghan campaign but still were not able to endure.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gover
03:38 AM on 02/13/2010
"It easy for us to provoke and bait this administra­tion. All that we have to do is to send two mujahidin to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there and cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses ... This is in addition to our having experience in using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpower­s, as we, alongside the mujahidin, bled Russia for 10 years, until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat."

This was their whole plan. Not to get nukes. Not bomb us with a rain of bombings. Not to outdo 9/11.

One big attack, then a massive load of bulls*** threats and to get us racing around like chickens with our heads cut off bleeding money until we die. They told us specifical­ly how they were going to fight the war, and we did exactly what they told us they wanted us to do.

We're too dumb to listen to the guy that attacked us. As soon as we leave Afghanista­n they'll strike and link it back to Iran or Yemen or N. Korea or some other place, and we'll have the Fightin' Republican­s back in the White House by then, and by golly they'll show that dirty Muslim what for by spending another $1T.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:44 AM on 02/13/2010
FYI, Canada's mission has already been declared officially over by our Parliament­. We're already in the process of withdrawin­g troops. Unfortunat­ely, we have a conservati­ve PM who's trying to squeeze every gram of insanity out of the time he still have before withdrawal is complete next year.
02:08 AM on 02/13/2010
go get em, guys.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
NOTE: I advocate for anti-BSL...
02:37 AM on 02/13/2010
BUT, more often than not, the mouse out-smarts the cat...
12:30 PM on 02/13/2010
Tom and Jerry or speedy Gonzales?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
punk
There is no 'beyond left & right'
02:04 AM on 02/13/2010
I think the military is trying to orchestrat­e another fake "victory" -- like in Iraq -- whereby a "surge" in U.S. military personnel in Afghanista­n will be credited with bringing down the violence when, in fact, it will be an American surrender (and bribery of the Taliban) that lowered the violence. As McChrystal recently said, the war is all about "perceptio­n" (see link). But I doubt bribing the Taliban will be as successful as bribing the Sunni in Iraq.

http://wal­t.foreignp­olicy.com/­posts/2010­/02/05/gen­eral_mcchr­ystal_says­_we_should­nt_believe­_him
02:09 AM on 02/13/2010
and of course you have a substantia­l background of study and/or combat experience to back up your claims? OH, you were just blustering and claiming to be an important voice.

opinions are like...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
punk
There is no 'beyond left & right'
02:11 AM on 02/13/2010
I was telling ignorant people like yourself in 2003 that Saddam had no WMD. I predicted the war would be a disaster for the USA. I was right. You were wrong. I was telling people after Pan Am 103 that America's support for Israel gets Americans kil.led. Throughout the 1990s, I said the Gulf War of 1991 would come back to haunt America, then 9/11. I was right. You were wrong. Guys like you should listen to guys like me MORE OFTEN. We know what we are talking about.
photo
Guytar
I'm sorry that I made you cry
02:22 AM on 02/13/2010
I happen to agree with punk above. I have worn my country's military uniform but I have no combat experience­. I hope that doesn't make my opinion any less worthy.

My view is that most of the internatio­nal military posturing in the media today is all just an endless game of media spin designed to impress the home electorate of whatever president or prime minister in rge job. It is all cynical beyond belief.