iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

King Tut Died From Malaria, Broken Leg, Study Finds

PAUL SCHEMM   02/16/10 04:54 PM ET   AP

King Tut

CAIRO — Egypt's most famous pharaoh, King Tutankhamun, was a frail boy who suffered from a cleft palate and club foot. He died of complications from a broken leg exacerbated by malaria and his parents were most likely brother and sister.

Two years of DNA testing and CT scans on Tut's 3,300-year-old mummy and 15 others are helping end many of the myths surrounding the boy king. While a comparatively minor ruler, he has captivated the public since the 1922 discovery of his tomb, which was filled with a stunning array of jewels and artifacts, including a golden funeral mask.

The study, which will be published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, provides the firmest family tree yet for Tut. The tests pointed to Pharaoh Akhenaten, who tried to revolutionize ancient Egyptian religion to worship one god, as Tut's father. His mother was one of Akhenaten's sisters, it said.

Tut, who became pharaoh at age 10 in 1333 B.C., ruled for just nine years at a pivotal time in Egypt's history. Speculation has long swirled over his death at 19. A hole in his skull fueled speculation he was murdered, until a 2005 CT scan ruled that out, finding the hole was likely from the mummification process. The scan also uncovered the broken leg.

The newest tests paint a picture of a pharaoh whose immune system was likely weakened by congenital diseases. His death came from complications from the broken leg – along with a new discovery: severe malaria.

The team said it found DNA of the malaria parasite in several of the mummies, some of the oldest ever isolated.

"A sudden leg fracture possibly introduced by a fall might have resulted in a life threatening condition when a malaria infection occurred," the JAMA article said.

"Tutankhamun had multiple disorders... He might be envisioned as a young but frail king who needed canes to walk," it said.

The revelations are in stark contrast to the popular image of a graceful boy-king as portrayed by the dazzling funerary artifacts in his tomb that later introduced much of the world to the glory of ancient Egypt.

They also highlighted the role genetics play in some diseases. The members of the 18th dynasty were closely inbred and the DNA studies found several genetic disorders in the mummies tested such as scoliosis, curvature of the spine, and club feet.

Dr. Howard Markel, a medical historian at the University of Michigan, said some of King Tut's ailments including his bone disease likely were the result of his parents' incestuous marriage. Children born to parents who are so closely related to each other would be prone to genetic problems, he said.

Like his father, Tutankhamun had a cleft palate. Like his grandfather, he had a club foot and suffered from Kohler's disease which inhibits the supply of blood to the bones of the foot.

In Tut's case it was slowly destroying the bones in his left foot – an often painful condition, the study said. It noted that 130 walking sticks and canes were discovered in Tut's tomb, some of them appeared to have been used.

Egypt's top archaeologist, Zahi Hawass, who co-authored the study, noted that more than 80 years after Tutankhamun's discovery, technology was revealing secrets about the pharaoh.

The study is part of a wider program to test the DNA of hundreds of mummies to determine their identities and their family relations. To conduct the tests, Egypt built two DNA labs to follow international protocols for genetic testing.

Hawass, who had long opposed DNA testing on Egypt's mummies because it would have been performed outside the country, acknowledged his original skepticism. "I never thought that we would really reach a great important discovery," he said in an interview with The Associated Press.

The new study answered long-standing questions about Tutankhamun's family, tracing his grandfather to Pharaoh Amenhotep III. While some archaeologists have speculated that Tut's father was a little-known figure, Smenkhkare, it now appears that it was Akhenaten, who attempted to change millennia of religious tradition by forcing the country to worship the sun god Aten, instead of a multiplicity of deities.

DNA tests pinpointed the mummy of Tut's mother – and confirmed she was a sister of his father – but the mummy has not yet been firmly identified. Brother-sister marriages were common among Egypt's pharaohs.

"There is a lot fuzziness about the succession and that's why knowing Tutankhamun was the son or direct blood descendant would make a difference," said Salima Ikram, an Egyptologist at the American University in Cairo and an expert on mummies.

The tests also disproved speculation that Tutankhamun and members of his family suffered from rare disorders that gave them feminine attributes and misshapen bones, including Marfan syndrome, a connective tissue disorder that can result in elongated limbs.

The theories arose from the artistic style and statues of the period, which showed the royal men with prominent breasts, elongated heads and flared hips.

"It is unlikely that either Tutankhamun or Akhenaten actually displayed a significantly bizarre or feminine physique," the article said.

Hawass' first high profile discovery involving DNA tests, the identification of the mummy of Queen Hatshepsut, came under criticism because it didn't follow accepted scientific protocols and was not published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

The tests were also not confirmed by a second, independent DNA lab.

This time the work by the Supreme Council of Antiquities DNA lab was replicated by a second DNA lab set up at Cairo University and the results were then published in the American medical journal.

Angelique Corthals, an assistant professor of forensic science at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York helped set up the first Egyptian lab and said the work is being conducted according to international standards.

Hawass predicted that many more discoveries were in the works for King Tutankhamun and the mummy project.

"It will never be revealed completely, still we need more research," he said. "We finished the first great part of the mystery and the second one is coming soon in one year."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 335
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
djekizian
Freelancer
12:56 AM on 03/30/2010
At last, I've found a blog on HuffPuff whose commentators engage in lively, intellectual discussion and debate. Thanx, folks, for providing well-reasoned information on a fascinating and esoteric subject.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Meah
10:52 PM on 02/22/2010
They just need to bury the poor guy.
05:04 PM on 04/12/2010
and give him back his gold mask and the rest of his loot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBodySacred
divine diva
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBodySacred
divine diva
08:44 AM on 02/20/2010
The race of the Ancient Egyptians was definitely black African, and they were in no way related to the modern Egyptians of today. Since ancient times, Egypt had been conquered by various people groups including Greeks, Romans, and finally Arabs (Ottoman empire). The Arab/Moslem people group eventually became the dominant ethnic group in these modern times.

May king Tut now rest in peace.
06:45 AM on 02/22/2010
no thebodysacred . . . they were not black Africans . . .
09:07 PM on 02/22/2010
The ancient Egyptians were not "black Africans" - that's a myth. It's easy to see that in Egyptian art which clearly shows black Africans looking like black Africans, and Egyptians looking different. Look it up.

They WERE people of color, and they are still with us today in the Egyptian Coptic community, direct descendants of the ancient people. The Copts are not European or Arab "white", but various shades of brown skinned.

At one point in Egyptian history black Africans from Nubia (just south of Egypt proper) did conquer the country and become Pharaohs. That lasted about 100 years.
Lynette
Liberals have a lot more fun!
03:42 AM on 02/23/2010
Ever been to Egypt? I just want to know what is the difference between a Black African and a Brown African, lol. If you ever go visit Egypt you will find Egyptians are just that Africans. Black, White, Brown and every shade in-between. Egyptians are Africans. I just remember my 7th grade teacher getting mad when he was told Egyptians were Black. If you have not seen King Tut's exhibition in person you must see it, you'll look and look at the artifacts and try to convice yourself he wasn't Black but seriously after you see the exhibition and visit Egypt you will understand they were of African descent. For that matter everyone is... See life started in Africa, lol. It really did, that's why it's called Mother Africa. There was one tribe then another and another...They didn't appear at the same time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBodySacred
divine diva
06:46 AM on 02/23/2010
David, herein lies so much confusion with Egyptian history. The Copts of today are descendants of the early Christians who lived in Egypt from the time of the Roman empire, hence we are not surprised to see that some of the Copts are white people. These Copts were originally gentile Romans who converted to Christianity during the 1st Century C.E.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patrick Romandy-Simmons
12:20 AM on 02/20/2010
Yay! I'm so glad this mystery was solved, now maybe his family can get on with their lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:58 AM on 02/23/2010
It's not that easy. They're going to need time to process this information, and then the healing can begin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
10:56 AM on 03/29/2010
Yeah, it's good to be the king. Unless, of course, you have a club foot. And a cleft palette. And your ma is your aunt and your dad is your uncle.

Man, no wonder that dude died as a teen. That's some tough love.
05:34 PM on 02/19/2010
One of the interesting points that never gets enough attention is the fact that it was the ancient Egyptians who first discussed the concept of monotheism and not the Hebrews. The concept from the Egyptians can be dated reliably whereas the Hebrew discussion is loosely based on the Old Testament. There is a story that the young Tut was poisoned by the many priests that would have lost their job if there was no harvest god or sun god , etc. A people way before their time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
11:02 AM on 03/29/2010
The Hebrews messed up western sexuality and have a messed up way of looking at just about everything. But they clearly represent a step forward from the Egyptians, who seemed unable to dissociate man from nature. They saw everything as tied to life, and thought that spiritual forces emanated from everything. The Hebrews, on the other hand, were the first people to conceive of the idea of a covenant, whereby God was a distinct "personality", and enjoyed a "relationship" with people. This allowed man to start evolving as a concept that was independent of other things (nature, god, etc). The Hebrews were an important stepping-stone to the Greeks, too, and their cultural accomplishment of elevating man to a position separate from and equivalent to Gods who were fallible, and capable of mistakes. These were crucial baby steps towards secular humanism, which was frankly way above the heads of ancient Egyptians or the Hebrews. The Greeks were capable of this, but only standing on the shoulders of the Egyptians and Hebrews before them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
05:24 AM on 02/19/2010
A crippled and mentally deficient ruling class. A strong theocratic society. Let me guess who was running the country... and since the one attempt to change the society was dealt with promptly, and the status quo (and donations) brought back to the myriad temples, I'm betting the religious leaders were real conservative types. Hundreds of years of stagnation, under religious rule. Oh yeah, I'm seeing some parallels.

Tea, anyone? Or a helping of GOP?
04:01 PM on 02/18/2010
And king Pharaoh thought Moses was his son, but Moses was the son of a woman Hebrew slave.
03:52 PM on 02/18/2010
Yes, he was African. Just looking can see that. King Tut was the grandfather I believe of King Pharoah.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
01:14 AM on 02/19/2010
Huh???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
05:38 AM on 02/19/2010
King Pharoah. Oookey.
01:28 PM on 02/18/2010
They reported yesterday (the day after the story came out) that he was African.... I can't find anything on it on the web... I wonder why!??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
01:15 AM on 02/19/2010
Egypt is in Africa.
06:48 PM on 02/19/2010
Haha exactly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
05:27 AM on 02/19/2010
How blonde ARE you?
01:16 PM on 02/18/2010
for anyone who would like to read a very good fictional account of the events in tut's life, might i suggest A God Against the Gods (which involves ankhenaten and the birth of young tut), and the sequal which is about tut, Return to Thebes by allen drury. they came out in 1976 and 1977.

drury has tut murdered as was once the popular theory but it is very entertaining and puts you right there in ancient egypt.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
american-dolt
Divide and Conquer
11:25 AM on 02/18/2010
Sure looks like something is wrong with him...
12:12 PM on 02/17/2010
Yeah, but all you racists are overlooking the obvious....He's Black! Just look at his picture! ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Shanks
02:07 PM on 02/18/2010
LOL! High cheek bones .....
11:21 PM on 02/20/2010
If you knew the Dinka, Masaai, Karamojong, Turkana you'd not even bring about high cheekbones as a specification.
04:53 PM on 02/18/2010
surprised? I am white, a catholic and knew it was not a white religion for a long time now. What will repubs do?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBodySacred
divine diva
05:45 AM on 02/17/2010
Another plausible explanation for king Tut's deformities was that it was congenital, and had little to do with incest. His father, Akhenaten also had physical deformities himself, as can be seen from drawings and sculptures. I do not agree that the pictorial representations of Akhenaten were deliberate artistic interpretations. What king would want to seen as deformed looking in his portraits? All of the other family members looked beautiful in their portraits, especially his wife Neferetti.
King Tut lived during the time when Ten Plagues fell upon Egypt. It was also possible that king Tut became ill during that time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
06:30 AM on 02/17/2010
The incest can be proven from genetics.

As for the 10 plagues, they simply did not happen as recorded in the bible. We have lots of detail on life in ancient Egypt (with the original writing in stone) and there is not a hint of the biblical plagues nor of a bunch of slaves who escaped.

The real story? There was no Moses. Ahmoses evicted the Hyksos from the Delta area into the Levant. Later this story was reworked and fictionalized into the Biblical account. The Books of Moses are bits of history and mythology all shuffled together with mixed up in times and locations. The "Baby in the Bulrushes" was a Mesopotamian King.

Besides, one simply cannot follow, and should not worship a god who would carry out the 10th plague of killing innocent first born children. We can realize this story came from the need to sacrifice and bury first-grown wheat as seed, as done by the God Osirus.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David VeLar
08:58 AM on 02/17/2010
I agree, it was not Akhenaten's time that the plagues occurred. But the Bible seems to indicate that it was the son of Ramses, Meremptah, that was involved, not Akhenaten.

And if this is not true, why then does Meremptah say in a Stele that he slew the people of Israel? This stele has the first mention of the Israelite people.

Why then is the son of Jacob listed as a Pharaoh in Manetho's history?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBodySacred
divine diva
07:24 PM on 02/17/2010
The history of the Ten plagues is found in Egyptian historical sources as well - Admonitions of Ipuwer. See http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/texts/ipuwer.htm for more information.
12:21 PM on 02/17/2010
duh TheBodySacred . . . the sculptures and drawings of Akhenaten are not the result of physical deformaties . . . it was a change in artistic representation of the king . . . it is a distinct possibility that his androgynous (sp?) form was the result of his being the father and mother of his people . . . remember because of his religious reforms it was only through him and the other members of his family, his wife, his daughters that the people could worship the ATen . . his god . . .

there was no Moses . . . their was no Exodus . . . Tut and Akhenaten did not live during the time of the supposed exodus . . .

there is no evidence historical or archaeological evidence of the Exodus . . . the stories of the OT were written down hundreds of years after supposed events happend . . . they are not reliable . . at all . . .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBodySacred
divine diva
07:27 PM on 02/17/2010
The story of the Exodus is well-recorded in Manetho's book Aegyptiaca. Manetho was an Egyptian priest and historian. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manetho for more information.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBodySacred
divine diva
06:44 AM on 02/18/2010
Macready, with all due respects, this HuffPo article did say that Tut's family did have physical deformities. So the sculptures and drawings we see are therefore representative of those physical conditions. Below is a quote from the article.

"They also highlighted the role genetics play in some diseases. The members of the 18th dynasty were closely inbred and the DNA studies found several genetic disorders in the mummies tested such as scoliosis, curvature of the spine, and club feet.

Dr. Howard Markel, a medical historian at the University of Michigan, said some of King Tut's ailments including his bone disease likely were the result of his parents' incestuous marriage. Children born to parents who are so closely related to each other would be prone to genetic problems, he said.

Like his father, Tutankhamun had a cleft palate. Like his grandfather, he had a club foot and suffered from Kohler's disease which inhibits the supply of blood to the bones of the foot."

It seems Tut inherited these physical traits/ailments from his father/grandfather.
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
04:54 AM on 02/17/2010
John Boehner wants to know where he got his tan...
06:16 AM on 02/18/2010
the discolouration was a result of resins used during the embalming process
04:50 PM on 02/18/2010
keep trying