More

Lieberman To Take Lead On 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal

Huffington Post   First Posted: 04/24/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:35 PM ET

Lieberman

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) will be the lead sponsor of legislation to repeal the controversial "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that prevents openly gay people from serving in the U.S. military.

"I will be proud to be a sponsor of the important effort to enable patriotic gay Americans to defend our national security and our founding values of freedom and opportunity," said Lieberman in a statement.

"I have opposed the current policy of preventing gay Americans from openly serving in the military since its enactment in 1993," Lieberman continued. "To exclude one group of Americans from serving in the armed forces is contrary to our fundamental principles as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and weakens our defenses by denying our military the service of a large group of Americans who can help our cause. I am grateful for the leadership of President Obama to repeal the policy and the support of Secretary Gates and Chief of Staff Admiral Mullen."

To progressives, Lieberman has been the most frustrating and disappointing member of the Democratic caucus for the past year, especially when he flip-flopped to oppose a Medicare buy-in during the Senate's debate on health insurance reform at the end of last year. His opposition to DADT, of course is nothing new.

Polls show that most Americans support the policy's repeal. That includes Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, who announced his opposition to the policy during a Senate hearing at the beginning of the month.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) will be the lead sponsor of legislation to repeal the controversial "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that prevents openly gay people from serving in the U.S. military. "I ...
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) will be the lead sponsor of legislation to repeal the controversial "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that prevents openly gay people from serving in the U.S. military. "I ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 654
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
Dastius-Krazitauc
I wouldn't tech them peas o' hern.
10:34 PM on 02/24/2010
Did Sen. Gillibrand relinquish the lead or did he just take it from her?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler VanderMeer
06:50 PM on 02/23/2010
I might gain some respect for Mr. Lieberman if he doesn't flip flop on this issue. What he did with the health care bill was absolutey traitorous and backstabbing
photo
Horus45
Liberal Activist, anti-Fascist
04:59 PM on 02/23/2010
How is his handling of this going to sit with his buddy McCain?
McCain is dead set against repealing it.
12:36 PM on 02/23/2010
Trying to do a little image repair Joe? Ain't gonna work! Can't speak for everyone but I WILL NEVER forget the spoiler roll you played in the health care reform fight.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cogs
12:27 PM on 02/23/2010
I would rather Joe take the lead on ending US involvement in an illegal war.
10:44 AM on 02/23/2010
The only thing I wish with all my heart is that when Joe gets voted out he would lose his health care insurance.
photo
LeFlaneur
does nuance.
10:42 AM on 02/23/2010
I fully expect this will all move forward until the 8th inning when Joe does a complete about face and undermines the entire process.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:05 AM on 02/23/2010
Don't trust this creepy guy. He'll make sure it doesn't get repealed. He's just spy for the Republicans.
09:58 AM on 02/23/2010
Chances are, he will change is mind, so don't get your hopes up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jones
Dances with Weims
09:44 AM on 02/23/2010
Just hearing his voice makes my skin crawl.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
istvan13
The world needs more thinkers.
09:33 AM on 02/23/2010
This has the appearance of political gamesmanship, an attempt to get back into the good graces of the general public. Notice he came out for DADT after the polling number came out, and after the leadership in the military came out against DADT.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:29 AM on 02/23/2010
Let's hope he doesn't do a flip-flop before this thing is over and done with. Maybe I am just being paranoid, but I feel that having Sen. Lieberman on the right side of this issue may end being the kiss of death.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tugar
"We The People"
05:59 AM on 02/23/2010
I Agree totally ! Because Joe is known for doing a dance or two when it comes to any issue !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:26 AM on 02/23/2010
If anyone could kill something before it even got started, he's the man for the job. I'm sure I'm not the only one who starts to nod off every time he speaks or look at a picture of him. This is the guy who’s going to champion the repeal of DADT. Oh my god, now it is definitely going to take at least a year to talk about it, then another to implement it. Hopefully by then all the wars will be over and the previous two years achieved the primary goal of delay as long as possible so there are no disruptions during an active war.
From what I understand you can attach the repeal to the annual defense appropriations bill, which comes up for a vote in the spring. This way they would have to vote against money for defense in order to stop the repeal, nobody would dare do that, would they?
There are several blue prints out there from several other countries who repealed their own DADT how many studies (delays) does it take to repeal a law? It is not like it has never been studied in the US before for god’s sake. This is a prime example of why Washington can't get anything done and tactics that are used to intentionally delay legislation, not to mention the money wasted.
Anyway, yawn, I think I hear Liberman talking, goodnight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nubret2008
05:16 AM on 02/23/2010
Now it's very likely that the repeal will fail...
05:01 AM on 02/23/2010
easy to understand, corporations don't care about this issue.