iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

GOP Already Has Seven Reasons Why Health Care Summit Isn't Legit

First Posted: 04/26/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:40 PM ET

Boehner

Well before a single word has been uttered at Thursday's much-anticipated bipartisan health care summit, Republicans have characterized the forum as something close to illegitimate. In the days leading up to the event, GOP lawmakers trotted out at least seven different complaints about the structure of summit. Their concerns touched on everything from the basis of negotiations to the list of invitees to the funding of the event.

As a refresher, here they are:

1. Democrats aren't willing to start from scratch

"Tomorrow, the White House will convene a so-called 'summit' on health care reform. It's supposedly an effort to find bipartisan agreement and consensus on reform," said Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.). "And frankly, if the administration and Democrats in Congress were actually willing to scrap the bill and start over with a clean sheet of paper, I'd be all for it."

"It's not a matter of taking this or that out of the Senate-passed bill or the House-passed bill, it's a matter of starting with basic principles and going one step at a time, solving particular problems," said Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.)

2. President Obama actually introduced a bill -- a criticism related to the one above, but more focused on the idea that Democrats are still very much engaged in back-room shenanigans.

"The President has crippled the credibility of this week's summit by proposing the same massive government takeover of health care based on a partisan bill the American people have already rejected," House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) declared. "This new Democrats-only backroom deal doubles down on the same failed approach that will drive up premiums, destroy jobs, raise taxes, and slash Medicare benefits."

3. The bill Obama introduced is too short.

"The White House's 'plan' consists of an 11-page outline, which has not been scored by the Congressional Budget Office or posted online as legislative text," said Boehner's spokesperson, Michael Steel. "So they want to reorganize one-sixth of the United States' economy with a document shorter than a comic book, and they're complaining that they can't find our plan on their own website? C'mon,"

4. The summit is superficial and designed to make Republicans look bad.

"It's a trap, a sandbag and a farce," said Curt Smith, a speechwriter for former president George H.W. Bush. "This meeting is tailor-made to present Obama at his rhetorical best and Republicans at their inarticulate worst... Health care was RIP and Republicans have given it CPR."

5. No governors were invited to the summit -- making it too D.C.-centric.

"WH has advised Boehner only Members of Congress may participate in #hc summit," tweeted Boehner. "No governors. Apparently Washington knows best."

6. No state legislators were invited to the summit (see above for explanation).

"Leader Boehner is disappointed the White House has not listened to the American people, who want Washington Democrats to scrap their job-killing health care bill and start over, and he is disappointed the White House has excluded our nation's governors and state legislators from the summit," said Steel.

7. The summit is taxpayer-funded -- which makes it a waste of money.

"Instead of starting over, Democrats in Congress continue to threaten to abuse the very rules of this institution by passing some version of their health care reform bill by a simple majority in the Senate, known as reconciliation," said Pence. "You know, tomorrow's summit is looking more and more like a taxpayer-funded media event designed to set up passage of ObamaCare 2.0, and the American people deserve to know it."

Expectation-setting is inherently a part of any major political event. The White House, likewise, has downplayed expectations that this summit is somehow a do-or-die moment for getting health care legislation passed. But the intensity with which the GOP is spinning Thursday's meeting before it happens is something usually seen before a presidential debate. And the rhetorical flourishes seem likely to get only grander once the summit ends.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,496
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
10:24 PM on 02/25/2010
The GOP says they want a step by step approach to HCR,. Maybe they could fill us in on at least seven of those steps.
04:21 PM on 02/25/2010
Funny how Republicans seems to have no problem spending our money on needless wars and supplying foreign countries with weapons and training so they can then use the weapons to shoot and kill our soldiers, yet they cannot stand the thought of helping Americans get a better deal with healthcare.
I think we should revoke their insurance benefits immediately. Why should they get free coverage? Let them fend for themselves as so many in this country are forced to do every day. Furthermore, let them work for minimum wage!
02:27 PM on 02/25/2010
1) They are there.
2) They are there.
3) They are there.
4) They are there.
5) They are there.
6) They are there.
7) They are there.
etc...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joseph Palermo
Huffington Post Blogger/Author/Professor
01:01 PM on 02/25/2010
This is good, the Republicans are hanging themselves with their own rope -- Obama can win back his base in one bold move if this plays out to the finish,
photo
wolf58
Disabled Vet. Wouldn't have change a thing
12:21 PM on 02/25/2010
I see A hole people
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
12:14 PM on 02/25/2010
Republicans. What are they good for, exactly?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:41 PM on 02/25/2010
Absolutely nothing!

Remembrance of Edwin Starr / War....

"War, huh, yeah
What is it good for
Absolutely nothing
Uh-huh
War, huh, yeah
What is it good for
Absolutely nothing
Say it again, y'all"
11:38 AM on 02/25/2010
how about the real reason:

They didn't do exactly as we told the to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lapdogs
Avid News Reader
11:18 AM on 02/25/2010
Just wondering.

How many of the RECONCILED Tax Cuts pushed through by George Bush were scraped and re-written on a clean piece of paper to satisfy the Democratic demands?

cricket, cricket, cricket
11:16 AM on 02/25/2010
Agent Orange is hoping there will be lots of pee breaks so he can get to the bottle of booze he has

hidden in the #3 stall flush tank. And maybe he can try the wide stance thingy with his fellow

"wide stancers"...ie Sc0tt Br0wn with his pink leather shorts kinda thing
11:32 AM on 02/25/2010
wow, really ........flagged
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greybeard53
All Hail Marx and Lennon !
03:17 PM on 02/25/2010
Flagged for what, Dad? Your profile lists much nastier comments.
11:11 AM on 02/25/2010
Here's a few reasons the GOP isn't "legit"...

“Holding up Ambassadors & hurting foreign policy”… ((check))

“Holding up the appointment of the TSA chief during a time of heightened airport security”…. ((check))

“Voting AGAINST Consumer Protection”…. ((check))

“Voting unanimously against Wall Street Reform”…. ((check))

“Blocking Healthcare Reform despite the popular mandate” ((check))

"Blocking limits on Credit Card Interest Rates" ((check))

"Denying their OWN people extended Unemployment Benefits" ((check))

“Voting against the Democratic GI Bill providing college educations for Iraq Vets” ((check))

“Voting against Franken's R.APE Bill" ((check))

"Belittling your OWN COUNTRY when your President receives the most PRESTIGIOUS AWARD in the world on YOUR BEHALF" ((check))

“CHEERING the loss of thousands of AMERICAN jobs & BILLIONS in revenue when the IOC decided to go to Rio instead”…. ((check))

"Obstructing HHS & allowing a void in the chain of command during a HEALTH CRISIS"… ((check))

"Torture"... ((check))

"Depleted Uranium"... ((check))

“Katrina” … ((check))

"LYING us into a WAR".... ((check))

"4,275 Americans PERISHED" & still counting... ((check))

"46,132 Americans MAIMED" & still counting.. ((check))

"HUNDRED of THOUSANDS of innocent Iraqi CIVILIANS perished".. & counting.... ((check))

"The subversion of our System of JUSTICE.. both CRIMINAL & CIVIL"... ((check))

"The subversion of our CONSTITUTION"... ((check))

"The R.APE of our economy".... ((check))

"The R.APE of our environment"... ((check))

"The R.APE of our SOUL as a NATION"... ((check))

yeah...

THESE are the guys we should be taking ADVICE from?

THESE are the guys that need to SIT DOWN, SHUT UP, & thank GOD that they aren't
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TEHelms
Still learning....
11:01 AM on 02/25/2010
They are PUNKED!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dimplesmile7
10:49 AM on 02/25/2010
They are afraid to have their faces exposed while saying NO. Scary republican inadequate little men.
10:37 AM on 02/25/2010
All this talk from the wackaloon right wing on "socialized medicine" would be comical if so much wasn't at stake for so many people. Please answer, people on this post like GoonieGooGoo and everybody else getting their talking points from glenn beck, what is it about a deficit-neutral plan that results in millions getting medical insurance that you think will somehow destroy the republic?

Be honest, you know this bears no resemblence to any socialized medical system. Rush knows this, Boener, even Michael Steele, they all know this. They lie and spew bile, but at least one understands the reason... they want their party in power, by whatever means necessary. But the crazies on this blog... what's your excuse?

I was a beneficiary of the closest thing to "socialized medicine" we'll EVER have in this country, and let me tell ya', it wasn't bad. Skilled doctors and nurses, no waiting lines, good food. There was FAR more government "control"... that is, doctors employed directly by the government, no insurance company involvement, etc... than anything this health care bill even BEGINS to approach; not only does the system work just fine, but NO ONE ANYWHERE in our country so much as implies it should be changed in any way, much less abandoned. Odd, given the repub crusade against this nasty godless socialism... in this case, brought to you by the evil pinko lefty Department of Veterans Affairs, and that bastion of commie socialist government, the United States Army.
10:43 AM on 02/25/2010
we know it will not be a deficit-neutral plan
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:51 AM on 02/25/2010
Dis somebody say deficit? Take a gander:



Lo and Behold from the Cato Institute:

Here's something from the free market cheerleading, conservative Cato Institute that we should be rubbing the Republican's noses into every time they squawk about big government, "liberal” spending, and the deficit:

"Republicans also have their own policies of big spending to blame. Tax cutting has been made more difficult because Bush has been the most profligate president in decades. In his first five years, 2001 to 2006, federal spending increased 45 percent and deficits have soared. It’s tougher to convince the few centrist Democrats in the Senate to go along with making tax cuts permanent when federal red ink is gushing non-stop.

The big spending policies of the Bush administration have been remarkably short-sighted economically and politically, as they have threatened Bush’s primary domestic policy success of pro-growth tax cuts. For its part, the Republican leadership in Congress has gone along with, and often encouraged, the spending feast of recent years. There are only about 50 serious budget reformers in the 435-member House. For the rest, it’s been a pork-barrel pigout in recent years."

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6621
11:00 AM on 02/25/2010
Who is "we" and what data are you using indicating it will NOT be deficit neutral?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jjgg5
10:34 AM on 02/25/2010
Cry me a river.
10:27 AM on 02/25/2010
When will the REpubs mention that they aren't Christians
10:30 AM on 02/25/2010
i'm not