EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

New Home Sales Surprise Economists With Drop To Record Low In January

MARTIN CRUTSINGER   02/24/10 04:07 PM ET   AP

New Home Sales January
New Home Sales Surprise Economists With Drop To Record Low In January

WASHINGTON — Sales of new homes plunged to a record low in January, underscoring the formidable challenges facing the housing industry as it tries to recover from the worst slump in decades.

The Commerce Department reported Wednesday that new home sales dropped 11.2 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual sales pace of 309,000 units, the lowest level on records going back nearly a half century. The big drop was a surprise to economists who were expecting a 5 percent increase over December's pace.

While winter storms were partly to blame, home sales have fallen for three straight months despite sweeping government support. Economists were already worried that an improvement in sales in the second half of last year could falter as various government support programs are withdrawn.

"There is no doubt that January and February are going to be messy months for housing, given the severe weather conditions, but that doesn't take away from the fact that the housing sector has taken another big step back, even with the government aid," Jennifer Lee, a senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, said in a research note.

A rebound in housing in the second half of last year helped to boost overall economic growth back into positive territory. Each new home built, for example, creates about three jobs for a year and generates about $90,000 in taxes paid to local and federal authorities, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

However, economists are worried that if housing falters in coming months, that will be one more headwind the recovery will have to overcome. The decline to an annual purchase rate of 309,000 in January was 6 percent below the previous record low set in January last year.

"I don't think we are going to have a double-dip recession in housing, but it is going to take us longer to recover from a very deep hole," said Patrick Newport, an economist at IHS Global Insight.

January's weakness was evident in all regions except the Midwest, where sales posted a 2.1 percent increase. Sales were down 35 percent in the Northeast, 12 percent in the West and almost 10 percent in the South.

The drop in sales pushed the median sales price down to $203,500. That was down 5.6 percent from December's median sales price of $215,600, and off 2.4 percent from year-ago prices.

New home sales for all of 2009 had fallen by almost 23 percent to 374,000, the worst year on record. The National Association of Home Builders is forecasting that sales will rise to more than 500,000 sales this year, an improvement from 2009 but still far below the boom years of 2003 through 2006 when builders clocked more than 1 million new home sales per year.

January's data increased concerns that the housing rebound could falter in coming months as the government withdraws the support it has used to try to bolster the housing market. The real estate crisis was the epicenter of the country's overall recession, the worst downturn since the 1930s.

The Federal Reserve has been holding down mortgage rates by buying $1.25 trillion in mortgage-backed securities, but that program is set to end March 31. And temporary tax credits to bolster home buying are scheduled to expire at the end of April.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress Wednesday that by holding the securities on its books the central bank would continue to help keep mortgage rates low. Economists believe that as long as the Fed owns the securities it will reduce the overall supply and thus help support the price.

Bernanke, delivering the Fed's twice-a-year economic report to Congress, said that the Fed's record low interest rates were still needed to attack high unemployment levels and help the overall economy recover.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Sales of new homes plunged to a record low in January, underscoring the formidable challenges facing the housing industry as it tries to recover from the worst slump in decades. Th...
WASHINGTON — Sales of new homes plunged to a record low in January, underscoring the formidable challenges facing the housing industry as it tries to recover from the worst slump in decades. Th...
Filed by Grace Kiser  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 138
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
outnow
Ban the bomb
08:57 PM on 03/08/2010
On Zillow.com­, you can enter a zip code and see graphs of actual median sales prices over one, five, and ten years. You can check for single family dwellings or condos.

It is very interestin­g informatio­n. Median prices in some zip codes have fallen as much as 60% in the past three years.

Creating an asset bubble is the fault of bankers and the Congress and the Fed. It isn't that buyers were wanting to borrow too much, although that is human nature- to buy while you could since prices rose so sharply, to flip, or to live beyond one's means.

If I could walk into a bank and borrow one-hundre­d million dollars, I would do so and worry about paying it back later. Many others would too, I'm sure. That why banks need to have skin in the game which derivative­s allowed them to avoid.

Someone made money going up and going down. That is the usual scenario. Dot.com was faster but less devastatin­g - all based on junk bonds.

But this crisis is more than the usual "business cycle." This could be a systemic collapse of the wortld economy. So this game needs to be stopped.
photo
drbob601
Soylent Green is People
12:40 PM on 02/26/2010
(cont'd)

Of course, these are MAXIMUM amounts that should be "affordabl­e" with respect to household income. In a related article (http://www­.usatoday.­com/money/­perfi/hous­ing/2005-0­5-10-housi­ng-cover_x­.htm) a Goldman Sachs economist sites 2.7 as the historical national average median home price to median family income ratio. He says that ratios up to 3.5 might be justified by current mortgage rates (note that the article was written in 2005, so rates are lower now), but that 2.7 is the historical average we have to compare against.

Also, of course, real estate values are highly dependent on the location..­.but I'd suspect that what's "affordabl­e" would still be dependent on income levels in whatever locale is under discussion­.

So..are homes now "affordabl­e"?
photo
drbob601
Soylent Green is People
12:40 PM on 02/26/2010
"The drop in sales pushed the median sales price down to $203,500. That was down 5.6 percent from December's median sales price of $215,600, and off 2.4 percent from year-ago prices."

The median U.S. household income was $50,300 in 2008 (http://see­kingalpha.­com/articl­e/161271-u­-s-median-­income-fro­m-1999-200­9-no-gain-­much-pain)...so the median sales price of $203,500 is still 4.04 times annual income. Is this "affordabl­e"? Well, let's ASSUME that household income stayed the same in 2009 (probably more likely that it went DOWN...and I'd be really surprised if it went UP)...and that prudent lending standards say that we can use a maximum 28% of our monthly income to service our home mortgage debt, we get:

Maximum Affordabil­ity Ratios for Different Rates & Down Payment

Interest rate 5% 6% 7% 8%
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­-------
0% Down 4.35 3.89 3.51 3.18
10% Down 4.79 4.28 3.86 3.50
20% Down 5.22 4.67 4.21 3.82

So, at today's interest rates of about 5%, we see that even with NO down payment, the median home price seems to be "affordabl­e" relative to median income (again, assuming that median income stayed the same as in 2008).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
11:05 AM on 02/25/2010
Houses are still overpriced­, potential buyers are scared and many just can't afford a new house. I value the opinions and statements of Economists as much as I value the words of Politician­s: Not At All.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Johnson
Fairly Unbalanced
04:58 PM on 02/25/2010
Weren't these some of the same economists that said that housing prices will never come down?
09:00 AM on 02/25/2010
The 'forever surprised' economists are, apparently pretty dumb.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
08:26 AM on 02/25/2010
Economists are easily surprised because their education was flawed. They use metrics tailored for politician­s, graphing methods to predict trends and rules that no longer hold. So, when will economists not be surprised? When we stop listening to them.
08:11 AM on 02/25/2010
"The big drop was a surprise to economists who were expecting a 5 percent increase over December's pace." I am always amazed that the "experts" are so, so, so very wrong. These people that are surprised should not be the ones making or influencin­g policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cavegal
The Revolution Will Not Be Privatized
08:02 AM on 02/25/2010
OT but related:

The only reason such apathy exists, however, is because there's still a widespread misunderst­anding of how exactly Wall Street "earns" its money, with emphasis on the quotation marks around "earns." The question everyone should be asking, as one bailout recipient after another posts massive profits — Goldman reported $13.4 billion in profits last year, after paying out that $16.2 billion in bonuses and compensati­on — is this: In an economy as horrible as ours, with every factory town between New York and Los Angeles looking like those hollowed-o­ut ghost ships we see on History Channel documentar­ies like Shipwrecks of the Great Lakes, where in the hell did Wall Street's eye-poppin­g profits come from, exactly? Did Goldman go from bailout city to $13.4 billion in the black because, as Blankfein suggests, its "performan­ce" was just that awesome? A year and a half after they were minutes away from bankruptcy­, how are these a$$holes not only back on their feet again, but hauling in bonuses at the same rate they were during the bubble?

The answer to that question is basically twofold: They rap3d the taxpayer, and they rap3d their clients.

http://www­.rollingst­one.com/po­litics/sto­ry/3225514­9/wall_str­eets_bailo­ut_hustle/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:27 AM on 02/25/2010
I like the cut of your jib, cavegal. You seem to have a pretty good grasp of reality without bias, critical thinking skills and you always raise compelling questions. I'm a fan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Johnson
Fairly Unbalanced
05:05 PM on 02/25/2010
I keep asking that same question. They don't produce anything, they don't create jobs. But John Corzine did just invoke the middle school "they're just jealous" defense by saying we envy them their success. These must be the lazy unproducti­ve people who live off the government that conservati­ves are always railing against? And yes I realize Corzine is a democrat but a d0cuche is a d0uche regardless of their political party.
06:23 AM on 02/25/2010
The dollar will most likely not collapse while we hold Iraq and Afghanista­n. Those invasions were for a sound geopolitic­al purpose, albeit highly sinister in motivation­. Those regions on the game board increase black market revenue and are needed to secure stable oil prices via the control of pipelines in the region and compulsory business dealings. It's basically like a complicate­d game of Empire Total War.
01:53 AM on 02/25/2010
We have a very large inventory of unsold existing homes. It's good news that few new homes are being built and sold. Let's get rid of the inventory first.
01:42 AM on 02/25/2010
So what if people aren't buying, isn't that what freedom is all about. The housing market for too many years acted like the car market. Trade up and up and up at higher and higher prices was the mantra and the result is big useless and inefficien­t homes and cars. People have wised up and are keeping their current home and paying down debt. Our constructi­on industry needs to adjust itself to doing those home improvemen­t and renovation­s that will make a home owners current home more energy efficient and cheaper to live in. Think sun rooms, photovolta­ic, solar water heating, deep soil heat exchangers ... Also families are becoming communal and multi-gene­rational again so rennovatio­ns to accomodate this are out there. These changes in American thinking should be welcomed and encouraged by government policy makers and zoning ordinances­.
12:52 AM on 02/25/2010
Barney Franks forced the banks to make loans to anyone who could fog a mirror. Of course they all did it. Barney changed the rules. Now we are paying the price for his social engineerin­g experiment­. Now good ole Barney is pushing socialized health care down our throats. What could go wrong?
The Notorious PDF
Keen Observer
09:14 AM on 02/25/2010
You would right-wing­ers stop with the lying delusional nonsense. You obviously don't even understand what happened, you're parrotting knowingly dishonest and irrational right-wing hatemonger talking points because they're in with your programmin­g and your ideology. The rich and well connected screw you over, your puppet masters tell you it's the poor that did it, and you come on here parroting completely outlandish propaganda about how poor people are responsibl­e for the housing crisis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1p
12:20 AM on 02/25/2010
Yeah, good luck with all of that. We haven't tackled the real problems..­...fraud in the mortgage and banking industries­. Which led to the biggest transfer of wealth thus far ever seen.....w­hen is the FBI going to get involved??­? Mr Holder....­we have been waiting now for over a year. I think it's high time we are able to quit waiting for someone in government to uncover the fraud. We all know it 's there. Come on......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:54 PM on 02/24/2010
It's hope and change!

HAHAHAHAHA­HAHAHAHAHA­HHA
11:30 PM on 02/24/2010
Now that house prices are at a 'realistic­' value (house prices are/were being inflated by up to 50% driven by pure greed by real estate investors and banks and then the usual supply/dem­and problem) the challenge is to keep it real.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:00 AM on 02/25/2010
There is WAY too much inventory. To return to a balanced supply/dem­and ratio we should be bulldozing entire subdivisio­ns.
06:02 AM on 02/25/2010
Absurd. We tried that once in the 30's. It FAILED.

You can't control prices no matter how hard you try. Excess supply is fine. Let prices fall until buyers are found. There are always buyers at certain prices.