iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Koua Fong Lee: 'Toyota Defense' May Free Jailed Minnesota Man

STEVE KARNOWSKI   02/25/10 06:43 AM ET   AP

Koua Fong Lee Toyota Defense
Koua Fong Lee: Jailed Minnesota Man Claims 'Toyota Defense'

LINO LAKES, Minn. — Ever since his 1996 Toyota Camry shot up an interstate ramp, plowing into the back of an Oldsmobile in a horrific crash that killed three people, Koua Fong Lee insisted he had done everything he could to stop the car.

A jury didn't believe him, and a judge sentenced him to eight years in prison. But now, new revelations of safety problems with Toyotas have Lee pressing to get his case reopened and his freedom restored. Relatives of the victims – who condemned Lee at his sentencing three years ago – now believe he is innocent and are planning to sue Toyota. The prosecutor who sent Lee to prison said he thinks the case merits another look.

"I know 100 percent in my heart that I took my foot off the gas and that I was stepping on the brakes as hard as possible," Lee said in an interview Wednesday at the state prison in Lino Lakes. "When the brakes were looked at and we were told that nothing was wrong with the brakes, I was shocked."

Lee's accident is among a growing number of cases, some long resolved, that are getting new attention since Toyota admitted its problems with sudden acceleration were more extensive than originally believed. Numerous lawsuits involving Toyota accidents have been filed over the recent revelations, and attorneys expect the numbers will climb.

In testimony before Congress, company executive renewed their apologies for underestimating the safety problems but also acknowledged that they still may not have identified all the causes for the sudden acceleration.

The uncertainty could wind up helping Lee and others. Attorneys for both the 32-year-old St. Paul man as well as the victims' families say they're encouraged by the evidence that the problems went beyond models that originally were recalled.

If Lee's car was defective, "We don't want an innocent man sitting in prison," said Phil Carruthers, who prosecuted the case for Ramsey County.

A Toyota spokesman declined to comment on Lee's case.

Lee, a recent Hmong immigrant with only about a year of driving experience, was driving his pregnant wife, 4-year-old daughter, father and brother home from church the afternoon of June 10, 2006, when their Camry zoomed up an Interstate 94 exit ramp in St. Paul. Police said it was traveling between 70 and 90 mph when it rear-ended an Oldsmobile stopped at a red light.

Javis Trice Adams, 33, and his 10-year-old son, Javis Adams Jr., died at the scene. Adams' 6-year-old niece, Devyn Bolton, was paralyzed from the neck down, and died shortly after Lee was convicted.

At his 2007 trial, Lee testified he was certain he tried to brake. But a city mechanic testified the brakes worked fine, and Carruthers, the prosecutor, argued Lee must have hit the gas by mistake. Lee's attorney at trial, Tracy Eichorn-Hicks, seemed to concede as much, arguing Lee's actions fell short of gross negligence.

In the end, a jury convicted Lee on two counts of criminal vehicular homicide. At sentencing, Ramsey County District Judge Joanne Smith gave Lee the maximum after emotional testimony that included Devyn Bolton's mother, Bridget Trice, saying to Lee: "I hope you understand what you've done to my family, Mr. Lee. You have ruined it."

Lee's Camry wasn't among those subject to Toyota's recent safety recalls, but Toyota did recall some 1996 Camrys for defective cruise controls that could cause sudden acceleration.

Lee's current attorney, Brent Schafer, said several '96 Camry owners whose cars were not in the recall have filed sudden-acceleration complaints with federal regulators.

Bob Hilliard, a Texas attorney, is preparing a lawsuit by the victims in the Lee crash. Hilliard said other federal complaints suggest a defect more widespread than recalled cruise controls – something with engine control modules that could extend to other Toyota makes and model years.

Hilliard said he's aware of about 16 potential class-action cases filed around the country on the basis of the automaker's recent revelations. Attorneys for the victims' family declined to make them available, but Hilliard said they feel differently about Lee now. "They seem to have made peace with the fact that he's telling the truth," Hilliard said.

Lee said he's grateful.

"I feel like them believing in me is a gift that I've received from God," he said.

Schafer said he'll file paperwork soon asking to reexamine the wrecked Camry, which still sits at the St. Paul police impoundment lot. All sides expect that request to be granted. Then Schafer would have to persuade the judge that new evidence merits a new trial.

Judges usually are skeptical about claims of new evidence, but Joseph Daly, a law professor at Hamline University in St. Paul, said Lee's chances appear to be good. "I really think a judge would be inclined to let that evidence be presented," Daly said.

Still, Carruthers said several factors would work against Lee. Lee testified his brakes didn't work, not that his car suddenly accelerated. And two experts – a city mechanic and an engineer hired by Lee's insurance company – didn't identify sudden acceleration as a problem with the car. Schafer said sudden acceleration is the only reasonable explanation for what happened.

Lee said he never had driven before immigrating to the United States and settling in St. Paul's large Hmong community in 2004. He was working to get his high school equivalency degree before the crash, and he's still working on it in prison. He wept as he described the impact of his imprisonment on his wife and four children, ages 8, 5, 3 and 2, who are on welfare.

"Right now it is very difficult for them," Lee said tearfully. "It's because my children are still very young. My wife is going to school and there aren't people to help her out. My kids ask about me constantly. They ask me when I'm going to come home. They ask about me. I don't know what to say to them."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
LINO LAKES, Minn. — Ever since his 1996 Toyota Camry shot up an interstate ramp, plowing into the back of an Oldsmobile in a horrific crash that killed three people, Koua Fong Lee insisted he ha...
LINO LAKES, Minn. — Ever since his 1996 Toyota Camry shot up an interstate ramp, plowing into the back of an Oldsmobile in a horrific crash that killed three people, Koua Fong Lee insisted he ha...
Filed by Grace Kiser  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 465
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
01:32 PM on 04/21/2010
This whole case stinks.

He may have hit the gas & not the brakes; Toyota may or may not be responsible for some fault with his vehicle, but either way, 8 years is crazy! I cannot believe he got 8 years!

When I think of people going to jail for 8 years, I think of crimes, not accidents. Nothing in my bones tells me this man intentionally killed those people. The whole thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I wonder had his last name been different would the outcome have been different? Look at similar accidents and sentencing in those cases.

Not every case means someone has to be jailed. Sometimes things just happen. Accidents happen!

I could honestly say that, had someone I love been in the car that man hit, I would cry for him as much as I would cry for them. Given what I know of the case, which honestly isn't a lot, but from what I gather it seems he's a decent guy, I don't think jail time is appropriate, and if it was, NOT 8 years!

It's a tragic, horrible accident. It didn't involve DUI or drugs, he wasn't fleeing from police, hadn't robbed a bank, etc. I am saddened and angered that real criminals get more time (or as much) as this man.

I feel terrible for the victims family and I feel terrible for his family. They are all victims.

This is sad, terrible.
09:30 AM on 03/12/2010
This poor guy has been taken away from his family for three years. Please help him at CarBump.com
09:28 AM on 03/12/2010
This poor guy has been wrongly taken away from his family for 3 years. You can help him out at CarBump.com. Please pass it on.
02:28 PM on 03/05/2010
The driver was an adult with only one year of driving experience, so the likelihood that he pressed the accelerator instead of the brake is high. Newspapers are filled with stories of inexperienced teens and senior citizens having accidents because they pressed the wrong pedal. There are even horrific stories of seniors plowing their cars into crowds, killing and maiming many people. At the age of 85, my dad drove his Toyota through his garage door as he accelerated out of control. When teens and seniors are involved in accidents comparable to Mr. Fong Lee's, is it usual practice to send then to prison for eight years? What was Judge Joanne Smith thinking?
03:16 PM on 03/01/2010
I couldn't help but be curious about why this man was apparently rail roaded, no matter the reasons of the accident, and I came across this article. Apparently in July of 2006, one 'Fong Lee' was shot and killed by a policeman. It sounds like it inflamed the community and battle lines were drawn.
Then you have another 'Fong Lee' come up in court involved in a deadly automobile accident and is handed an unreasonable sentence by the powers that be. The community didn't know back then that the police claimed he had a gun and may have planted the gun to cover up their own murder. With this climate, there is no wonder he got the sentence he did.

http://www.startribune.com/local/stpaul/42333722.html
03:39 PM on 02/28/2010
So the criminal "Justice" System seems to think that it may have made a "mistake". But how could this be a "mistake"? The prosecutor got his conviction and made career points. the judge, Joanne Smith, got a chance to act "tough" by sentencing Lee to the maximum; it helps at election time! Never mind that he was driving his family home from church, you know how those Hmong drive don't you, "your Honor".

And then there is Attorney Eichorn-Hicks who seems to have been content to argue the obvious legal position that this di not constitute Gross negligence on the criminals part! Now, it appears that the gross negligence was committed by every member of the bar that was involved in this trial. It seems that the only one not guilty of Gross Negligence is the man sentenced to prison.

So what is the next step in this miscarriage of justice? To insist that Mr. Lee finish his term because he was duly convicted? To insist that there is no wrong committed here because the plaintiff was convicted in "GOOD FAITH"? Or to let Lee rot in prison because a mistrial my open up the state to liability claims?

Stay tuned for the next episode in the continueing saga of CYA and "I'm always right and NEVER wrong!"
11:33 PM on 02/26/2010
Everyone seems to be directing their rage at Toyota. I don't see this so much as an indictment of Toyota. Sure, they are responsible and should be liable, but they didn't do this to Lee. The American criminal justice system gone mad did this to Lee. I see it as a clear symptom of what is wrong with our current popular reasoning and with the American justice system. There is clearly something wrong with a society where people are punished with severe prison sentences for accidents. What have we become? Why is it necessary that the nearest powerless and lowest status person has to go to prison whenever something bad happens? Our certainty that someone is criminally responsible for every unfortunate accident, and our assumption that the responsible party is the most powerless and lowest income person in the vicinity is what the real problem is here. That is what is most tragic here -- not Toyota's error. If, by chance, the underlying truth was discovered in this case, how many people are rotting in jail for reasons just as ridiculous which will never be discovered. I just can't keep watching this nonsense and not state the obvious. The real injustice here is what was done to Lee. The current system is most similar to that period in human history when powerless people were put to death for causing earthquakes. We have lost our moral compass and sense of justice in our bloodthirsty quest for punishment as the answer to
04:34 AM on 02/26/2010
Wait..... if you know you are going jail, why have another kid, and if you are still working on your high school diploma! Sigh...... people need to stop breeding when they can't afford it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
washlib
05:27 PM on 02/26/2010
or maybe you just need to mind your own mthrfcking business.

But then i'm sure your life is perfect, and you've NEVER made mistakes, right?
photo
Faraja
Greed is Good
06:04 AM on 02/27/2010
this is very interesting! bwa h ahahah h a!
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
04:06 AM on 02/26/2010
This guys case surely merits looking at again....
A friend of mine had a lucky escape when the accelerator went south, luckily he had a lot of straight road to play with and had the presence of mind to switch the ignition off.
Toyota have taken their eye off the ball recently, but will learn a lot from the experience!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mirabai305
Are you Jeff Vader?
03:32 AM on 02/26/2010
I'm not a mechanic and I don't know much about cars, so someone help me out here. If the car was traveling between 70-90 miles per hour and he was aggressively applying the brakes, wouldn't there be significant damage to the brake pads? Wouldn't there be some sort of evidence that he was in fact attempting to stop the car? What would that do to the brakes in this scenario?
06:21 AM on 02/26/2010
In this particular case (Toyota)
There is no direct (mechanical) link between brake pedal and brake pads/assembly.
As they say the link between those two is "software", and no plan B if sh.. happened.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mirabai305
Are you Jeff Vader?
02:30 PM on 02/26/2010
Ok, that's interesting. I hope I'm not being a simpleton, here. My understanding of the accelerator issue is that the electronic accelerator gets stuck. That doesn't affect brake function at all, does it? So if he pressed the brake and the brakes in fact engaged as one would assume they would since the problem is with the accelerator and not the brakes, wouldn't there be evidence that the brakes were in use at the time of the accident? Because what I read in the article was that the proof indicated the brakes were functioning normally. If the brakes were working, wouldn't the brake pads show that?
photo
MarsAmbassador
Per angusta ad augusta
03:28 AM on 02/26/2010
1 year ago I would have told you that the only vehicle I'd ever buy and TRUST was a Toyota. Now I'll never own one for as long as I live. I'd rather drive a Ford. And if you know me, I'm sure your dentures just fell out of your mouth...Found On Road Dead and Fix Or Repair Daily aren't just clever acronyms...they EARNED those.
02:10 AM on 02/26/2010
I remember when I was a beginning driver and I slammed hard on the accelerator, thinking it was the brake.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
02:26 AM on 02/26/2010
Thank you. It is a VERY common mistake. I've done it in a Ford! The problem is you can't often convince the driver they did that because in their panic they do not realize what they have done. Every one of the most advertised cases against Toyota have been shown to have mitigating circumstances exonerating Toyota, such as additional floor mats added by the owner or claims the driver made not proven by physical evidence.
But the media created reality is succeeding in convincing people something exists here that doesn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
10:21 PM on 02/27/2010
Exactly what the poor man described is a documented complaint against Toyota...nonsense...they build dea th traps.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uncle Bill
ex-lawyer and teacher
01:55 AM on 02/26/2010
Accident reconstruction could verify the brake application, the neutral shift, don't know about the ignition, it would depend on the ignition system and whether there was a functioning black box or trouble code recorder in the engine management system. There are lots of facts which can be determined by forensic examination and testing after the fact.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
02:22 AM on 02/26/2010
Any high speed application of brakes, emergency or otherwise would show physical evidence. This guy stepped on the gas instead of the brakes, pure and simple. He might not have had much experience with cars in Thailand. NO vehicle will continue to accelerate if the brakes are applied at full strength, they are designed to hold a vehicle despite engine power. Try it yourself in a safe place. Step on the brakes and then try to accelerate. The car will not move.

This guy hit the gas instead of the brakes. It happens all the time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flhu
I get angry, but at the right things.
05:20 AM on 02/26/2010
"NO vehicle will continue to accelerate if the brakes are applied at full strength"?

You haven't been paying attention, have you? See, there's this recall being done by Toyota...
05:30 AM on 02/26/2010
I am from MN i have being following this case for a long time.I understand what you are saying, but you can step on the accelerator instead of the brakes but we (drivers) right a way realize and hit the brakes. in this case the drive found out the brakes was not working right before he exited the freeway. from the freeway exit to the accident place is a little under mile distance. So you are telling in all that distance he didn't know he was accelerating not stepping on the brakes?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
01:44 AM on 02/26/2010
MEDIA SMEAR OF TOYOTA
Anyone who believes a 96 Camry with old fashioned cable operated throttles is part of this "scandal" is a fool.
For a clear-eyed look at the media created smear of Toyota see this article...
http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/feb2010/bw20100225_403524.htm

The Toyota Witch Hunt

One by one, upon closer examination, we find the most advertised cases are likely floor mats or driver error. And the "experts" arguing against Toyota are almost always on the trial lawyers' payroll.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blastocyst
Happy to be here
07:10 AM on 02/26/2010
Your assertion begs the question: Who is on Toyota's Payroll?
Think about it.
11:58 AM on 02/26/2010
Ummm. Actually, it's pretty clear Kassandrasduplex is on Toyota's payroll. The question is how much has Toyota been violating Rule 255 of the FTC rules and will this be the next big scandal for Toyota?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uncle Bill
ex-lawyer and teacher
07:59 AM on 02/26/2010
Bull- there are reverse lock outs on all electronically controlled transmissions and mechanical lock outs that prevent a car moving forward at any significant speed from being shifted into reverse since the 19060's.
Locking up the rear wheels does not disable a modern anti-lock system on a vehicle with traction control, each wheel must have its own speed sensor and independent control. Since the 1970's all vehicle in the US must use a triangulated braking system which ties one rear wheel with both front wheels. There goes the locked rear wheels, front wheels must spin argument for non traction control cars.
Look up how a cruise control works with a cable operated throttle- it can overrides throttle input in certain cases of cruise control malfunction.
Your article casts aspersions against experts whose credentials are superior to the author's on the basis of their economic interests, but Toyota's experts are subject to the same economic self interest in pleasing their corporate client, just as every expert witness in every case in every court in the US. Try again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:40 AM on 02/26/2010
He must have had his floor mats all wrong.

Toyotas for sale, cheap. Buy one, get two. Honorable apology included: "So sorry."