iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Republicans Setting Filibuster Record

Filibuster

STEVEN R. HURST   03/ 1/10 02:03 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The filibuster – tool of obstruction in the U.S. Senate – is alternately blamed and praised for wilting President Barack Obama's ambitious agenda. Some even say it's made the nation ungovernable.

Maybe, maybe not. Obama's term still has three years to run.

More certain, however: Opposition Republicans are using the delaying tactic at a record-setting pace.

"The numbers are astonishing in this Congress," says Jim Riddlesperger, political science professor at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth.

The filibuster, using seemingly endless debate to block legislative action, has become entrenched like a dandelion tap root in the midst of the shrill partisanship gripping Washington.

But the filibuster is nothing new. Its use dates to the mists of Senate history, but until the civil rights era, it was rarely used.

A tactic unique to the Senate, the filibuster means a simple majority guarantees nothing when it comes to passing laws.

"The rules of the Senate are designed to give muscle to the minority," said Senate historian Donald Ritchie.

With the Senate now made up of 100 members, two for each of the 50 states, an opposition filibuster can only be broken with 60 votes – a three-fifths majority.

As a matter of political philosophy, the concept of the filibuster arises from a deep-seated, historic concern among Americans that the minority not be steamrolled by the majority.

It is a brake and protective device rooted in the same U.S. political sensibility that gave each state two senators regardless of population.

The same impulse gave Americans the Electoral College in presidential contests – a structure from earliest U.S. history designed to give smaller population states greater influence in choosing the nation's leader.

Given recent use of the filibuster by minority Republicans and the party's success in snarling the legislative process in this Congress, Democrats say the minority has gone way beyond just protecting its interests.

The frequency of filibusters – plus threats to use them – are measured by the number of times the upper chamber votes on cloture. Such votes test the majority's ability to hold together 60 members to break a filibuster.

In the 110th Congress of 2007-2008, with Republicans in the minority, there were a record 112 cloture votes. In the current session of Congress – the 111th – for all of 2009 and the first two months of 2010 the number already exceeds 40. The most the filibuster has been used when Democrats were in the minority was 58 times in the 106th Congress of 1999-2000.

During most of Obama's first year in office and for a few weeks this year, 58 Democratic senators and two Independents who normally vote with them held a filibuster-proof 60-seat majority in the Senate.

That vanished last month when Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown captured the seat of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, who died last summer.

Most notably, Brown's victory has stymied Obama's push to overhaul health care just as the bill was approaching the finish line. Before Brown's election, both the Senate and the House of Representatives had passed separate versions of the reform legislation.

Brown broke the Democratic 60-seat majority before the two chambers could meld differences in their bills for a final vote in both houses.

However, one of Brown's first votes after taking office saw him joining four other Republicans to help Democrats break a threatened filibuster by his party's leaders against a job bill.

The measure, $13 billion in tax incentives for businesses to hire unemployed workers, was quickly passed the next day with 12 Republicans joining Brown and 55 Democrats in favor of it.

Filibusters to make the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress look inept are one thing. Quite another is a vote against creating jobs in an economy with nearly 10 percent unemployment and midterm elections nine months away.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE – Steven R. Hurst reports from the White House for The Associated Press and has covered international relations for 30 years.

___

On the Net:

http://www.senate.gov

(This version CORRECTS the number of filibusters in the 16th paragraph.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The filibuster – tool of obstruction in the U.S. Senate – is alternately blamed and praised for wilting President Barack Obama's ambitious agenda. Some even say it's mad...
WASHINGTON — The filibuster – tool of obstruction in the U.S. Senate – is alternately blamed and praised for wilting President Barack Obama's ambitious agenda. Some even say it's mad...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,122
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
12:12 AM on 03/03/2010
How many filibusters is it going to take until Buster gets his fill? Can't we just take Buster out back and drop him off a cliff or something? I think Buster is a cantankerous little cuss who really needs a good whipping.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogey907
Overfed, long-haired, leaping gnome
07:50 PM on 03/02/2010
The "nuclear option" sounds good to me.

As long as it's a real nuke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CHCCFINC
Executive Dir of CHCCFINC
01:57 AM on 03/02/2010
yes, the filibuster was good when we did have political sensibility, now that sense is somehow dead. You can be conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat but you must have up or down votes and compromise- the idea of compromise is somehow lost on adults but gained in youth
01:02 AM on 03/02/2010
WIC Eligible - TEABAGGER™ WHITE INTERIOR PAINT Available NOW!
TEABAGGER™ Toddler Sancks™.,subsidiary of Halliburton. In Ultra White, Super White, Brilliant White, and, Man You Cannot Get Any Whiter™, for the Whitest of White Houses

Perfect for sprucing up newborn and toddlers bedrooms, guaranteed to flake and peel for generations. Sweet, crunchy and delicious, keeps newly minted Tea Baggers calm and happy until they can grow up to blame all their troubles on the liberal media government conspiracy. If you are unable to afford to paint your newborn or toddler's rooms contact the Church of Saints Levi and Bristol at www.churchoftheholysinglewide.com for the Birthright chapter nearest you, volunteers will supply free paint and labor.

TEABAGGER™ Toddler Snacks, Inc., and Haliburton, Inc., and the RNC have no racial preference, God-no! Michael Steele himself will personally paint all African American newborn and toddler's rooms with your choice of Sweet Delicious, Crunchy Tea Bagger White House Interior Paint. They'll pay YOU to let Michael Steele paint your children's rooms with TEABAGGER™ White Interior House Paint.

Sample our newest shades at the April 1st Alaska Independence Party Diversity Day Celebration. Try Palin Whiteboard WHITE™, our version of a blackboard paint, but White! Comes out of the can completely Blank, and stays that way! You betcha - all ideas, words or blemishes vanish after 30 minutes! You'll never prove there was ever anything on Palin WHITEBoard™ Paint. Also try Leiberman WHITE™, a different shade of WHITE every time you look at it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
12:07 AM on 03/03/2010
dansuf has a bright future ahead writing huffpo comments, I liked it! - Fanned -
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Jaxy
Bah! My micro-bio didn't meet your guidelines
09:50 AM on 03/04/2010
I wish I'd said that! You are so very clever, I MUST fan you for it. Done!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LeftLeanWing
Ah.. I said..Ah Said I said... Proceed Guv'nah
11:20 PM on 03/01/2010
"....
As a matter of political philosophy, the concept of the filibuster arises from a deep-seated, historic concern among Americans that the minority not be steamrolled by the majority.
......"

Therefore some dumb@ss forefather or foregrandnephew created a mechanism where the Minority can steamroll the Majority.....

Something is not correct with this
10:48 PM on 03/01/2010
The _repubs have _FALSELY called the impending health care bill reconciliation the "_nuclear _option" (trying to _scare everyone, as usual)........................ but the repubs are _destroying our country with their _abusive (self serving) use of the _filibuster. We should now call the _repub's _filibusters the "_POISON _GAS _OPTION", because it _kills everyone and is made by a bunch of _nasty _old _farts!
10:17 PM on 03/01/2010
In all honesty -- how many Democrat senators are hiding behind the 60 vote rule? If the Senate decided to get rid of that procedure -- how many Dems would really vote for a measure? Currently they are protected by a rule of that allows them to vote with their party -- no harm, no foul, because they know the Republicans have enough votes to kill discussion. If given the option, in the cold light of day -- and cable tv -- would they vote for the economy-killing, multi-trillion-dollar. budget-busting bills advocated by their party leaders? I think not.
photo
CaroleK1970
I want my country forward
12:58 AM on 03/02/2010
would they vote to continue looking out out for the well-being of the insurance industry all the while bankrupting the American economy ? as long as they are republicans they would. Show me dat birf certifcate colliesue
01:16 AM on 03/02/2010
Colliesue, Your'e half right, and that's as good as you can expect from someone wielding the Republican Occam's sledgehammer with such slavish passion. The half right part - the Dem's have become a bunch of spineless s^#ts hiding behind a supermajority. The all-wrong part - the standard boiler plate Repugnican blather about economy killing bunker buster bills made of pure spent economic fissile material, dense enough to blast a hole clean through the known universe destroying God America and Apple Pie. Come on aren't you going to drudge up death panels and forced homosexuality sections of the act?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lastshot54
Huh?
10:14 PM on 03/01/2010
Are these actually filibusters or threats of such? If the Democrats grew a spine they would force these republicans to actually filibuster, a process that apparently takes a long time. They couldn't possibly keep filibustering everything if it actually meant they'd have to work.
11:40 PM on 03/01/2010
Darn right! These are threats. The Senate can only filibuster one debate at a time, so let's go for it. We might even get to watch endless reruns of some totally fascinating televised debates right at election time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlueHorde
09:01 AM on 03/02/2010
These are actual filibusters under Senate Rule 22,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogey907
Overfed, long-haired, leaping gnome
07:49 PM on 03/02/2010
Oh, "Catch 22". Now it makes sense.
09:28 PM on 03/01/2010
Bring back welfare. I'll admit it, I'm a bum and I want to live off of you. It's not like I want all your money, just enough to live on.
It worked for the Romans, why not us?
Somethng tells me I will be eating cake instead.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:39 PM on 03/01/2010
According to Thug thinking, if you are unemployed you already are eating cake. To think, an entire party unable to think rationaly.
09:53 PM on 03/01/2010
I don't know what's wrong with republicans. I've noticed lately that their feelings are easily hurt. They may have deep seeded insecurities but people have a right to privacy about that kind of thing.
It's hard to imagine what they're thinking because most of the world is focused on them and their inability to accept change.
I can't offer anything constructive to the situation. That's all I have.
photo
CaroleK1970
I want my country forward
12:59 AM on 03/02/2010
I only think what Glenn Beck tells me to think
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carey Grayson
Imadude
08:46 PM on 03/01/2010
I suppose if the Republicans must be good at something, they might as well be good at doing nothing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:40 PM on 03/01/2010
WRONG!! It took a lot of effort & work to ruin the country in so few years. Give credit where credit is due.
08:46 PM on 03/01/2010
It obvious that it is past time to end the filibuster.

At least make them actually filibuster if they want to be such obstinate obstructionists if you haven't got the stones to do away with it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:41 PM on 03/01/2010
Unfortunately that is short sighted thinking. The filibuster serves a purpose. Unfortunately, as with most positive things, it is subject to abuse. We are witnessing its abuse at its most perverse.
12:20 PM on 03/02/2010
Now that it's socially and politically "OK" to use the filibuster and single senator rules on virtually anything, it's time for the Senate to change the rules.

We are losing the social compact derives from the consent of the governed. It can be replaced a couple of ways. One way is to bring the country closer to actual majority rule.

Allowing 41 Senators from disproportionately lower population states to block the will of the vast majority represented by 59 Senators from the larger populations states has terrible consequences. The most obvious is that government can't move to do the will of the majority. The second is that, like in the health care senate debate, a handful of senators can force unwanted, costly deals on the majority. Fighting for 60 is qualitatively different than reaching a simple majority.
photo
CaroleK1970
I want my country forward
12:59 AM on 03/02/2010
the new definition of republicans is to do anything to make the american govt fail
12:23 PM on 03/02/2010
Read John Dean's work over the past decade. He vividly points out that this had been the goal of the GOP since the Reagan era. Why do you think the GOP always presides over greater and greater deficits? To weaken the power of the government when the Democrats are in power. The also move the societal resources toward the top income earners. Those are the ones now moving all the good work offshore.
08:32 PM on 03/01/2010
So those tr011s who say, "The pot calling the kettle black," regarding filibusters, need to read these statistics.

"In the 110th Congress of 2007-2008, with Republicans in the minority, there were a record 112 cloture votes. In the current session of Congress – the 111th – for all of 2009 and the first two months of 2010 the number already exceeds 40. The most the filibuster has been used when Democrats were in the minority was 58 times in the 106th Congress of 1999-2000."

I've called them on that before but never gotten a response. Wonder why.
photo
CaroleK1970
I want my country forward
01:01 AM on 03/02/2010
cuz dems were fillabustering that stupid war and then that other one. show me da berf certificate wagthedog1001
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
x27
Living is easy with eyes closed
07:51 PM on 03/01/2010
Republicans HATE government and spend all their time getting Americans to hate it to.Then when they get back in power,they LOVE government.
07:35 PM on 03/01/2010
What filibusters enable is one Senator from a small state, like Kentucky, for example, to stop a bill that the majority of Americans want passed. Another example, Max Baucus represents Montana with a population of less than 1 million people, yet he has as much power as my senators from California who represent 36 times as many people.

The filibuster is not a way to protect the minority, it is a way for the minority to obstruct the will of the majority. Why should Congress operate any differently from the Supreme Court? The Supreme Court does not require a supermajority to reach a decision. 5-4 decisions are common on issues that affect every American, not 6-3 or 7-2, but 5-4, a simple majority, is all that is required.

There is no reason other than an archaic and outmoded idea that small states need to be protected from big states that drives this anachronism that is undemocratic and leads to corruption. A corporation or other special interest group need only influence one Senator to stop a bill it doesn't like.

It is time for the Dems to call the bluff and force Bunning and the other GOP obstructionists to actually filibuster instead of caving to their threats.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:44 PM on 03/01/2010
Like it or not, the reason is that our fonding fathers wished to implement a system with checks and balances. It is impossible to have any system which is not subject to abuse if those who can abuse the system are vile enough to regardless of the consequences to the country and the people.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Uncle Bill
ex-lawyer and teacher
11:05 PM on 03/01/2010
The filibuster is not a creation of the founders, it is nowhere to be found in their blueprint for our Congress. Nothing in the constitution requires more than a simple majority vote in the senate save for four specific exceptions which require a 2/3rds vote:
1. convictions in trials of Impeachment Art I §3 [6],
2. overriding a veto Art I §7 [2], [3]
3. approving a treaty Art II §2 [2] and lastly,
4. approving proposed amendments to the constitution Art V [also requires 2/3rds of the house]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shivasquest
07:23 PM on 03/01/2010
maloneymam I'm a Fan of maloneymam 8 fans permalink

unemployment in Bush land 7% average.
Unemployment in Obamaland 10.25 % after stimulus 1 and 2 hope and change? jobs? Nope, health care ....Obama knows what's best for you

Reply
-shivasquest 316 fans permalink

reetard.......... Aughts were a lost decade for U.S. economy, workers
By Neil Irwin Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 2, 2010

There has been zero net job creation since December 1999. No previous decade going back to the 1940s had job growth of less than 20 percent. Economic output rose at its slowest rate of any decade since the 1930s as well. Middle-income households made less in 2008, when adjusted for inflation, than they did in 1999 -- and the number is sure to have declined further during a difficult 2009. The Aughts were the first decade of falling median incomes since figures were first compiled in the 1960s.

You wonder why we are knee deep inpooooop?
Look in the mirror.