More

Goldman Sachs's Board Rejects Shareholder Demands To Cut Excessive Pay, Bonuses

STEVENSON JACOBS   03/ 1/10 12:49 PM ET   AP

Goldman Sachs Board

NEW YORK — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said Monday it has rejected demands by shareholders to investigate the Wall Street bank's compensation practices.

Shareholder lawsuits filed recently in New York and Delaware charge that Goldman's compensation levels in 2009 were too high, Goldman said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. The lawsuits seek to recover some of the pay and force the bank to adopt pay reforms. Goldman said shareholders have made similar demands in letters to its board.

Lawmakers and shareholders sharply criticized Wall Street pay after the biggest banks lost billions of dollars on bad mortgage bets, helped cause the recession and then had to be bailed out by the government.

In its filing, Goldman said government agencies and regulators have sought information about its pay practices. The bank said it was cooperating with those inquires but won't grant shareholders' demand for an internal probe or wider pay reforms.

"The board believes that the firm's compensation policies and practices, which directly align pay with the performance of the company, are appropriate and in the best interests of shareholders broadly," Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday said in a statement. "When the firm does well, our people do well and when the firm does less well, our people do less well."

Goldman employees received $16.2 billion in salaries and bonuses for 2009, up 47 percent from the previous year but lower than expected. That's about $500,000 for each of the bank's 31,700 employees. Many employees, however, earned millions.

Canaday noted that the bank set aside 36 percent of net revenue for compensation last year, down from an average of 46 percent since the company went public in 1999.

Goldman, which earned a record $4.79 billion profit in the last quarter, has been the strongest bank throughout the financial crisis. It had less exposure to toxic mortgage-backed securities than other banks and also has been more aggressive in its trading.

Mindful of criticism over its pay practices, Goldman shrank its bonus pool by $500 million in the fourth quarter and put the money into the bank's two-year-old charity, Goldman Sachs Gives.

The company is also paying more in restricted stock instead of cash. Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein received $9 million bonus last year. All the money was in restricted stock that can't be cashed out for five years. In 2007, Blankfein received a record $68 million bonus.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said Monday it has rejected demands by shareholders to investigate the Wall Street bank's compensation practices. Shareholder lawsuits filed recently in New ...
NEW YORK — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said Monday it has rejected demands by shareholders to investigate the Wall Street bank's compensation practices. Shareholder lawsuits filed recently in New ...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 311
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
02:13 PM on 03/02/2010
Shareholders aren't stupid or powerless. They're greedy. You, me , your IRA, my 401K, her Teacher's Pension Fund, his Annuity, their house and my kid who thinks we still got the dough to buy a Wi-Fy- Zippy-Video-Do-Go-Bang, Starring : The Bad Guys! This morning I saw the enemy, and I must say, I'm still rather attractive (in a commercial sense) but someone MUST clean my mirror!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
06:47 AM on 03/02/2010
Reject at your OWN RISK G0LDMAN!

This is going to happen!

CL1ENTS = V1CTIMS means C1ients do not Equal REPEAT V1CT1MS!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Walking an 87-year-old in the sand isn't easy
10:40 PM on 03/02/2010
SECRET AIG DOCUMENT SHOWS GOLDMAN SACHS MINTED MOST TOXIC CDOS

February 23, 2010,
Bloomberg

By Richard Teitelbaum

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-23/secret-aig-document-shows-goldman-sachs-minted-most-toxic-cdos.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:50 AM on 03/02/2010
it's designed that everyone's working for the shareholders.

in reality, everyone is working for the highest paid executives.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive
01:43 AM on 03/02/2010
Since when did Golman not become accountable to their stock holders?

I suggest you dump the entire board, sue them for their ineptitude, then dump your stock if they do not start listening to you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Left is Right and Right is Wrong
02:37 AM on 03/02/2010
All depends on who had the majority - in situations like this it is whoever has 50.001% of the votes wins. Not like the Senate.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive
11:21 PM on 03/02/2010
It appears that you are right. According to this article from Business week, the stock is tightly controlled.

http://www.businessweek.com/1999/99_20/b3629102.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
01:19 AM on 03/02/2010
hey share holders,move your shares .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
breakingpoint
War is a Racket - Smedley Butler
01:10 AM on 03/02/2010
head on the city gates
01:08 AM on 03/02/2010
A company filled with greedy people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
12:57 AM on 03/02/2010
On CNBC pundits always argue if the stockholders don't like the bonuses then let them cut them. Here they did to no avail. It shows really how small a voice stockholders have in corporate governance. Board members and the CEO greases each other's palms with perks and bonuses, and if they bet wrong and the firm implodes, the public pays.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
12:48 AM on 03/02/2010
Let's beat OUR money out of them
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmazingChicken
11:32 PM on 03/01/2010
I'm late to the game as usual.

If anyone can outline an approach available to the shareholders I would love to share it with others. If there is no place in process for replacing the board, then that too should be better known. More and more people want nothing to do with corporate entities acting sociopathically.
11:32 PM on 03/01/2010
Responsible to no one for anything!!!!
11:23 PM on 03/01/2010
So much for shareholder power.....
10:29 PM on 03/01/2010
So, are the shareholders going to stage a riot and trigger a massive selloff? If not, they deserve what they get.

Pensions and other funds...SELLOFF.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Hood
Out of many we are one ...B.O.
10:15 PM on 03/01/2010
one more time..........have enough money you can do anything
09:33 PM on 03/01/2010
It's only a mater of time until they started feeding on their own
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Hood
Out of many we are one ...B.O.
10:17 PM on 03/01/2010
?? they are feeding on us