More

Stimulus Money Shouldn't Go Overseas, Say Democratic Senators

FREDERIC J. FROMMER   03/ 3/10 02:56 PM ET   AP

Charles Schumer Stimulus Overseas

WASHINGTON — A group of Democratic senators urged the Obama administration to suspend an economic stimulus program aimed at financing renewable energy, complaining that money is going to projects that are creating jobs in foreign countries.

"We can't jump-start our economy and pull ourselves out of this recession if we are putting Chinese workers ahead of American workers," New York Sen. Chuck Schumer said at a news conference Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Schumer and three other senators wrote to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to request a moratorium on the Recovery Act program. They asked that the moratorium remain in place until they can pass legislation mandating stimulus aid flow only to projects which preserve and create U.S. jobs.

"A critical Recovery Act priority is investment in the domestic renewable and clean energy industry, not investment in foreign manufacturers," the senators wrote in the letter, obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press. The letter was also signed by Sens. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Robert Casey of Pennsylvania and Jon Tester of Montana.

The lawmakers cited a report by the Investigative Reporting Workshop, a project of the School of Communication at American University that does investigative journalism, which found that a majority of the program's grants went to foreign-owned companies, and that a majority of the turbines purchased with the money were built by foreign manufacturers.

"This is not the intended use of Recovery Act funds," they wrote.

A Treasury Department spokesman declined to comment.

Dan Leistikow, a spokesman at the Energy Department, which was copied in on the letter, said the program has helped put Americans to work, and said it funds only projects built in the U.S. He added that the Recovery Act has helped attract more than $10 billion of foreign investment into this country's wind industry, including new manufacturing plants.

"It's the opposite of outsourcing, and we should encourage – not discourage – those kinds of investments," Leistikow said.

While some of the grants go to foreign-owned companies, the administration argues that more than half the components, measured by their value, are built in this country and all the energy projects are installed in this country.

The American Wind Energy Association, the trade group for the wind power industry, called the senators' idea misguided.

"This proposal would torpedo one of the most successful job creation efforts of the Recovery Act, which has already preserved half of the 85,000 American jobs in the U.S. wind industry," the group's CEO, Denise Bode, said in a statement.

Last fall, a joint venture was announced involving China's Shenyang Power Group, Cielo Wind Power LP of Austin, Texas, and a private equity firm, U.S. Renewable Energy Group, to build a $1.5 billion Texas wind energy project. Because the wind turbines are to be manufactured in China, Schumer wrote to Energy Secretary Steven Chu last November urging him to reject federal funding for the project.

"The idea that stimulus funds would be used to create jobs overseas is quite troubling," Schumer wrote, "and, therefore, I urge you to reject any request for stimulus money unless the high-value components, including the wind turbines, are manufactured in the United States."

In response, Chu wrote that the program in question is "available to all qualifying entities; it is not a discretionary grant program administered by the Department of Energy." He also said all the money awarded from the program helps put Americans to work.

"All of the wind turbine installation jobs are created here in America," Chu said.

On Tuesday, Walt Hornaday, president of Cielo Wind Power, said the company has not yet applied for federal money. He said it is looking at several federal grant programs, including one that would provide 30 percent of approved costs, or around $450 million.

He took issue with Schumer's characterization of jobs, saying a majority of those created for the project would be in the United States.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — A group of Democratic senators urged the Obama administration to suspend an economic stimulus program aimed at financing renewable energy, complaining that money is going to project...
WASHINGTON — A group of Democratic senators urged the Obama administration to suspend an economic stimulus program aimed at financing renewable energy, complaining that money is going to project...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 295
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
sunshine14 08:39 AM on 03/03/2010
A little to late? during last administration and during last administration 10s of thousands of Manufacturing companies left with their repubs $2 Trillion in tax cuts and all moved over seas. Why 7 million hard working Americans lost their jobs. Manufacturing companies who are still getting their Bush tax cuts of over $2 Trillion++ dollars which was defined by repubs was to create jobs. How many jobs did  Read More...
11:41 AM on 03/04/2010
Yet another member of Congress complaining AFTER the fact. Maybe if they weren't in such a hurry to ram that thing through, as they did with TARP, they might have given it some thought before making it law.
Who will take ownership of these errors? Or are they errors? In my opinion it was by design in both cases.
10:19 AM on 03/04/2010
This causes me to wonder what else is going on with the stimulus money that we are unaware of.

This is the kind of thing we can expect to happen when we continue to simply throw money at problems.
09:18 AM on 03/04/2010
UpChuck Schumer is a disaster and needs to go.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
returntocommonsense
Democracy is a verb - or at least it should be.
09:13 AM on 03/04/2010
I don't agree with halting the constructions of wind turbines. They should be constructed. What I don't agree with is how the money is being spent.

If stimulus money is being spent on these projects, then the manufacturing of these products needs to be done here by American firms - not foreign firms with manufacturing plants here. The purpose of the stimulus package is to jump start the American economy, not the world's.

There is no difference between sending money overseas for wind turbines and sending money overseas for oil. That money needs to stay here.
09:16 AM on 03/04/2010
It all boils down to the same thing. Why pay American workers when you can get the thing made cheaper outside the country.
09:17 AM on 03/04/2010
We have no textiles or manufacturing industry in this country anymore.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
returntocommonsense
Democracy is a verb - or at least it should be.
09:26 AM on 03/04/2010
I know - I'm originally from Western PA. I watched as the steel industry was shipped piece by piece overseas and the towns that grew up around them die (or still dying).

You have to wonder just exactly how much money these companies pay to have these products shipped back. It has to eat into their profits.
09:11 AM on 03/04/2010
Change you can believe in, what a eeeeeeeeeeeffffffffffffffing joke.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elyriaohio
Stop the Monarchy
07:58 AM on 03/04/2010
Stupid on SO many levels!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
05:36 AM on 03/04/2010
Tax breaks for companies that move production off-shores should be rescinded also.
04:44 AM on 03/04/2010
It's worth trying. The money should stay in the US for sure.
09:38 PM on 03/03/2010
Chuckie's shocked SHOCKED about outsourcing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kelleyajones
09:22 PM on 03/03/2010
Common sense, reasoned thought, moral compass, well informed, no brainer...Not one single shiny stimulus penny should go to any employer that outsources. I can't believe that this point needs be articulated. If every decision maker were fired would they then understand the unemployment crisis? WTF!
08:16 PM on 03/03/2010
Too late for that
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okieborn
Equal Rights For All !
08:03 PM on 03/03/2010
Your right Chuck it should go into your pocket like the payoffs you received from the Healthcare and Insurance lobbyist !!
You sir are shameless and why isn't any charges being brought up for bribery against the Democrats who chose payoffs instead of voting for the uninsured in this nation ??
06:21 PM on 03/03/2010
Shouldn't the preference be for the cheaper product regardless of location if all other things are equal?
What if the cheaper something is in VA and the more expensive is in CA? Just asking.
05:40 PM on 03/03/2010
Taxes recycle money back into our economy by helping to maintain and improve infrastructure and services. Cutting taxes raids our savings and allows for a balloon that always bursts, leaving everybody wondering where the money has gone. The strongest the American economy has ever been is when we had high progressive tax rates on the rich. A low tax rate is the surest way to make sure that all of our savings go straight to China.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lisakaz2
Da ministero dell'interno di Snark.
05:08 PM on 03/03/2010
This isn't "misguided." Americans need jobs and any money should work toward that end.