More

Iraq Election: Major Turnout At Polls Despite Insurgent Violence

REBECCA SANTANA   03/ 7/10 09:14 PM ET   AP

Iraq Election Polling Station Bombed

BAGHDAD — Iraqis defied insurgents who lobbed hand grenades at voters and bombed a polling station Sunday in an attempt to intimidate those taking part in elections that will determine whether their country can overcome deep sectarian divides as U.S. forces prepare to leave.

The conclusion of the vote, however, did not spell an immediate end to political uncertainty. It could be days until results come in and with the fractured nature of Iraqi politics, it could take months to form a government.

Sunnis and Shiites seemed united in one way Sunday – defiance in the face of violence. Many came out of polling booths waving fingers dipped in purple ink in a now-iconic image synonymous with Iraq's democracy. In one Baghdad neighborhood, relatives who had just lost a family member in a bombing walked down to the polling booth to vote.

The violence was a direct challenge to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki who has gained popularity as violence across the country has plummeted.

"I voted for Nouri al-Maliki because I trust him as a man who succeeded in getting rid of militias and building a strong state," said Saadi Mahdi, a 43-year old engineer in the southern oil city of Basra. It was there that al-Maliki first established himself as a leader willing to go against his fellow Shiites when he routed militias aligned with anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

It was an election day that demonstrated starkly how far the country, a rare democracy in the Middle East, has come since the last nationwide parliamentary vote in December 2005 and how much still holds it back.

Instead of unified sectarian parties playing strictly to their Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish voters, the political blocs contesting the election were much more fractured and made at least some effort to cross over into other sects. Whereas only party names were known in the 2005 ballot – in order to protect candidates from assassination – this time cities were plastered with candidates' faces on posters as Iraqis voted for individual people.

And the American military presence so prominent in 2005 was limited on election day to helicopters buzzing over head as a massive deployment of Iraqi forces took the lead on the ground.

Still the violence that shook Baghdad served as a reminder of the insurgency's persistence and adaptability.

Insurgents used mostly rockets, mortars and explosive-filled plastic bottles hidden under trash to terrorize voters on their way to the polls. With those tactics, they managed to get around a vehicle ban in place across the capital for most of the day and killed 36 people, almost all of them in Baghdad.

Al-Maliki faced a double challenge at the polls. Al-Sadr has aligned with another Shiite religious party, the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, though he is not running in the election himself. On the other side, al-Maliki is being challenged by former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, a secular Shiite, whose nonsectarian stance and criticism of the current government has won him secular Shiite followers as well as Sunni supporters.

"They symbolize the unity of Iraq," Hasan Aziz, a Sunni Turkoman, in the northern city of Tal Afar, in Ninevah province, who voted for Allawi's Iraqiya alliance. "It will bring us together."

No one coalition is expected to win an outright majority in the 325-seat parliament so the coalition that gets the largest number of votes will be tasked with cobbling together a government with other partners – possibly a tough task for al-Maliki who has angered parties across the political spectrum during his nearly four years in office. But in Iraq's freewheeling democracy, no one believes that any political alignment is off the negotiating table.

The two Kurdish parties, known for their political unity, are thought to be key to forming any future government. But even they have been divided with an upstart party called "Gorran" eating into their dominance.

Kurds have harnessed their power with the two main parties – KDP and PUK – forming a solid front on the national level on issues they consider important such as determining the future of disputed areas claimed by both Arabs and Kurds. But Gorran's rise could mean a less unified front that may weaken Kurdish power.

Many have viewed the election as a key test of whether the country can finally overcome the sectarianism that has divided Iraq, a country once ruled by Saddam Hussein's iron-fisted Sunni-minority rule then by a Shiite-majority government.

But the election season showed just how difficult it will be for Iraq to put that deadly chapter behind it. Instead of issues such as security or government services dominating the campaign, it centered on the country's divisive Baathist past after a government committee with murky legal standing banned hundreds of candidates for alleged ties to Saddam's regime – including many high-profile Sunni candidates.

After polls opened in the morning, loudspeakers from mosques across the country called on Iraqis to vote. In the Shiite Baghdad neighborhood of Hurriyah – where three people were killed when someone threw a grenade into a crowd of voters – clerics challenged people to go to the polls like "arrows to the enemies' chest."

In the mostly Sunni neighborhood of Azamiyah in northern Baghdad, Walid Abid was speaking as mortars boomed several hundreds yards (meters) away.

"I am not scared and I am not going to stay put at home," said Abid. "Until when? We need to change things. If I stay home and not come to vote, Azamiyah will get worse."

Polling places were surrounded by barbed wire, both male and female voters were subjected to intensive searches and at times the only vehicles on the road were Iraqi army Humvees and police SUVs.

An Interior Ministry official speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media said a total of 35 people died in Baghdad but did not have a breakdown of where the deaths occurred. In the city of Mahmoudiya, about 20 miles (30 kilometers) south of Baghdad, a bomb inside a polling center killed a policeman, bringing the day's total to 36.

There was no claim of responsibility but U.S. and Iraqi officials described the violence as the work of insurgents trying to intimidate voters. An al-Qaida front group in an Internet posting early Sunday said anyone taking part in the vote would risk "God's wrath and the mujahideen's weapons."

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates praised the performance of Iraqi security forces and played down the violence, saying he was told by U.S. military officials that only "a handful" of militant attacks had caused injuries. He said there was no confirmed mortar attacks on Baghdad, and that in eight of nine provinces in the south, there were no security incidents at all during voting. U.S. officials have said that most of the explosions in Baghdad were caused by "bottle noise bombs" designed mostly to scare voters.

President Barack Obama praised Iraqis who took part in the historic vote.

"We mourn the tragic loss of life today, and honor the courage and resilience of the Iraqi people who once again defied threats to advance their democracy," he said in a statement.

About 6,200 candidates competed for 325 seats in the new parliament, Iraq's second, full-term legislature since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion seven years ago this month.

Iraqi election officials have said that they will announce preliminary results after at least 30 percent of the ballots are counted in all of the country's 18 provinces, a process that could take at least a few days.

It was too early to tell if turnout would top the 70 percent during the December 2005 polls although officials had estimated before the vote that turnout would be lower.

__

Associated Press writers Katarina Kratovac, Hamid Ahmed, Saad Abdul-Kadir, Ben Hubbard, Hamza Hendawi, Qassim Abdul-Zahra and Sameer N. Yacoub in Baghdad, Matt Ford in Nasiriyah, and Lara Jakes in Qahtaniya contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGHDAD — Iraqis defied insurgents who lobbed hand grenades at voters and bombed a polling station Sunday in an attempt to intimidate those taking part in elections that will determine whether t...
BAGHDAD — Iraqis defied insurgents who lobbed hand grenades at voters and bombed a polling station Sunday in an attempt to intimidate those taking part in elections that will determine whether t...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,599
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:28 AM on 03/10/2010
Congrats Iraq. One step at a time.
Thought you'd like to see this great collage on You Tube reminding us of the progs discussing the imminent dangers of Saddam & his WMD program. Particularly loved the speaker's comments. She had so much clarity of thought in those days.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cwqh4wQPoQk
11:52 AM on 03/08/2010
This was the true victory in Iraq. This should be a great day in American history as it is probably the best example of a democracy that we created in a long time. I wasn't for the war, but seeing the result is an awakening. I don't understand why the Oscars trumped this important story of victory for our ideals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
julie1215
08:24 AM on 03/08/2010
Good for them. I hope it works out for them. But voting doesn't always mean you have a democracy. We've been voting a long time, and we have less representation than ever.
jerryatthebeach
Till Death Do You Barrier Island...
07:50 AM on 03/08/2010
Fighting for Democracy. Our country had become to complacent but were fighting back to regain our liberties. God Bless all Iraqis and our soldiers who laid down their lives in the name of freedom.
05:32 AM on 03/08/2010
Thank you, George Bush, whatever your flaws, for giving peace a chance in Iraq, the only way true peace can happen; free choice.

Millions of Iraqi voters, despite the Taliban gangsters, show that people have unalienable rights, and it includes freedom and free choice, fundamental to human nature, which people want for themselves.

Sorry, Saddam. Sorry, Osama. Sorry, "progressives". Not the government, or an Imam, or an anointed elite, who legislates peace and hands out privileges; it comes from the people themselves, exercising their rights.

Just like our Constitution.
08:49 AM on 03/08/2010
I thought dear old George created the war.
photo
SolarArray
Republican = Trash America, Any Cost
02:31 AM on 03/08/2010
Well done George Bush. I bet your proud of the chaos you've left in your wake. Sleep well?
07:47 AM on 03/08/2010
Dictatorship under saddam = good

Free voting and democracy now = bad

Really?

Yes, it is sad that there are people who fear and would keep others from being free. This democracy is in its infancy. Once the Iraqi people overcome these terrorists who want to prohibit freedom, and they will, the situation will improve.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BOBINMO
01:51 AM on 03/08/2010
None of this matters. Anyone with 1/2 a brain knows the minute we pull out they are going to start killing each other again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DocSyracuse
A socially liberal, fiscally conservative surgeon
11:29 PM on 03/07/2010
Awesome job, Iraqis!!!

And just think: before the troop surge, nearly all dems, especially Harry Reid, were trying to cut and run in Iraq.
01:50 AM on 03/08/2010
Was it worth the American lives and treasure spent? Not in my opinion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BOBINMO
01:55 AM on 03/08/2010
We havent pulled out yet,have we? I would hold off on that victory dance if I were you.
10:51 PM on 03/07/2010
Boy I sure miss Bush.

Thanks for spreading democracy to the Iraqis GWB.
I'm proud of the Iraqi people for fighting along side the US
to bring about their own freedom.
01:51 AM on 03/08/2010
Perhaps you should be thanking the American tax payers and the American who gave their lives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BOBINMO
01:53 AM on 03/08/2010
Quit complaining about the budget deficits then.
10:35 PM on 03/07/2010
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent"

Applies everywhere

Stay safe people of Iraq, don't let them intimidate you
jerryatthebeach
Till Death Do You Barrier Island...
08:57 PM on 03/07/2010
They're fighting for a Democracy. Wake up America or we could lose ours...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Demarcus Jackson
Community College Psychology Prof in the South
10:18 PM on 03/07/2010
Agreed! I think the American People must become more involved in their democracy. We have become a nation of cynics and nihilists, incapable of understanding the grand uniqueness of our republic and the power of the people in shaping its destiny. I am constantly envious of nations like Iraq, whose burgeoning democracy is coming in full fruition, despite the violent attitudes of the murderers who cloak their evil deeds under the name of Allah and Islamic faith. The voting citizens of Iraq are literally dodging bullets and bombs and still they turnout in huge numbers! It is amazing. The average election day of most Americans are mundane, at best, and yet we cannot even muster a decent election turnout rate. It is pathetic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:20 AM on 03/08/2010
It is worth noting that Iraqis all get THE DAY OFF for the election. Everything shuts down, so there isn't much else to do but vote.

Still, even if that were the case, I don't think we would have as high turnout as Iraq does. Being a Democracy for a long time tends to lower turnout. US is one of the oldest democracies. Switzerland has a long democratic tradition, but an even lower voter turnout then the US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Demarcus Jackson
Community College Psychology Prof in the South
08:15 PM on 03/07/2010
It is crazy that Iraqis go out and vote in relatively large numbers, despite real and potentially fatal violence, yet in America voter turnout is shamefully low. Most Americans are not dodging bullets, suicide bombers, and roadside bombs to go vote. The apathy and cynicism that we display toward our republic will be our downfall.
photo
screechingllama
Can You Still Have Fun?
06:37 PM on 03/07/2010
Kudos to the Iraqis who voted.


JUNE 2009- WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday that he does not believe Saddam Hussein was involved in the planning or execution of the September 11, 2001, attacks. He strongly defended the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq, however, arguing that Hussein's previous support for known terrorists was a serious danger after 9/11. "I do not believe and have never seen any evidence to confirm that [Hussein] was involved in 9/11. We had that reporting for a while, [but] eventually it turned out not to be true," Cheney conceded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jannsmoor
09:06 PM on 03/07/2010
I could have sworn Cheney said Iraq was involved in 9-11. I know he said there was a connection between Iraq and al Qaeda, which turned out not to be true.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BOBINMO
01:56 AM on 03/08/2010
Yes he did. On many occasions. Still says that.
05:44 PM on 03/07/2010
I think it's hilarious that so many try to claim that elections held here in the U.S are fraudulent every election cycle, but we think that we can trust the voting outcome in a place where they are literally paying people to vote, or killing people who vote - depending on which way you vote.

You're welcome for the democracy! Oh, yeah, and Sorry... for the democracy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SPQR1775
04:47 PM on 03/07/2010
No the Iraqi's did not try to dismantle our Democracy, Bush-Cheney-Rummy and the cabal of rich interest did. Iraq is moving toward the utopian society that we will all have one day, next they will force all ME to demand more freedom. I see Iraq becoming a secular nation in line with Turkey system of governance within 10 short years, 2020!
05:21 PM on 03/07/2010
Iraq would be there if prez obama had his way - gotta thank that guy bush
05:40 PM on 03/07/2010
We can try to take the credit all we want, but the ME was becoming more free before the U.S. got there. All our involvement is doing is delaying the inevitable by trying to force freedom on a people not ready for it yet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LinkSync
08:15 PM on 03/07/2010
That is not "all".
Our "being there" falsely props up BIG OIL and its Global Profit making scheme in the face of known technology that would TAKE BIG OIL DOWN.
These passionate delays, victories or otherwise matter not at all.
What matters is the money keeps flowing to the Corporations.
That is the real "ALL" that you were talking about.
Wrapped in a flag or out in the open in the SUPRME KOURT it is the same thing.
PROFITS.
When the Middle Class is gone and there is no more Money it will not mean there is no POWER.
The Corporations will not die when their customers do.
They will become what they are meant to become for all to see.
Government.
The free farmers got invaded a long time ago, by bad guys.
They used fear and intimidation to then Farm the Farmers.
This has evolved into Law and Government and all the Other Halls of the “people’s power”.
Democracy is the only formalized form of self government that could combat the new “Farmers” of the people.
But what can be done when those Farmers, those Corporations are “people” with “rights?
When Government is “for Profits” it is no longer for the people.
Welcome to the Republic of Iraq…..