iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Save America's Treasures: Obama Administration Cuts Hillary Clinton's Historic Preservation Program

BRETT ZONGKER   03/ 7/10 02:26 PM ET   AP

Obama Administration Cuts Hillary Clintons Histori

WASHINGTON — As Hillary Rodham Clinton was leaving the White House, she asked Laura Bush first lady to first lady to continue one program if nothing else – the historic preservation program Save America's Treasures.

Mrs. Bush said she knew about the project and pledged to see it through.

Now, the grant program Clinton created that helped restore the original star-spangled banner, Rosa Parks' bus, President Lincoln's summer cottage in Washington and hundreds of sites across the country is on the current administration's chopping block.

"The unfortunate thing is we had no warning" the program was being wiped out of President Barack Obama's budget, said Bobbie Greene McCarthy, who has overseen the program at the National Trust for Historic Preservation and was Clinton's deputy chief of staff. "It was like being hit by a truck."

The program has paid out nearly $294 million over the past decade to more than 1,100 different sites and generated at least $377 million more in matching funds, according to the National Trust. The National Park Service administers the program, but the nonprofit trust is its chief advocate and helps coordinate applicants.

Historic preservation advocates have shifted into survival mode.

They argue the program, with its relatively meager federal funding of $30 million annually, has created more than 16,000 jobs across the country at a cost of about $14,000 each. They point out the White House's federal stimulus package is creating jobs at a cost of $248,000 each.

At the same time, the program has become a favorite pot of money for members of Congress to fund pet projects through earmarks. Lawmakers have sent home money to restore small-town movie houses and county courthouses.

The earmark process may have sullied its reputation as the program's competitive, merit-based process could be bypassed with a willing congressional sponsor. It's also a tight budget year with shifting priorities.

Budget watchdogs have been critical of the earmarks for years because they say the process rewards political muscle, not project merit.

"That certainly makes it a less desirable program from a budgetary perspective because it means it's inviting waste into the system," said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense. "It's supposed to be competitively awarded. Why would you then reserve all this money that is then just a fiefdom of powerful members of the Appropriations Committee?"

The Office of Management and Budget said as much in its justification for eliminating the program. Save America's Treasures and a related program started by the Bush administration called Preserve America "lack rigorous performance metrics and evaluation efforts," the office said. And at least half the program's funding "is provided without using merit-based criteria."

National Park Service spokesman David Barna said the Interior Department is simply facing a tight budget and wants to reclaim the program's $30 million for priorities in national parks, which face a $9 billion maintenance backlog.

"I don't think it's fallen out of favor. It's just a matter of priorities," he said. "We all have to do as much as we can to reduce government spending."

The park service would still award $500 million a year in local tax credits for historic preservation, he said.

Advocates say that's not enough because grant money is critical in leveraging private support for restoration projects.

"If this program goes away, there is nothing to replace it," McCarthy said.

Because the Obama administration has been generous to arts and cultural programs, it was surprising to see the preservation programs cut, said Richard Moe, president of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Their contributions were cast in doubt without giving program managers a chance to prove the funding's impact, he said.

The group is pledging to strengthen and standardize the criteria used for grants awarded by congressional sponsors.

Last year, Rep. Jim McDermott of Washington sought a $250,000 earmark to help restore The Rainier Club, an elite Seattle social club with politically connected members. It was considered historic by local standards but wasn't recognized as "nationally significant."

The grant request wasn't funded after it drew media scrutiny, but it called into question whether other requests were granted by earmarks regardless of the criteria.

Part of the problem was each congressional office was setting its own criteria for the program.

"Up until a couple years ago, it was pretty haphazard," McCarthy said. "Frankly, I don't think they're necessarily abuses ... as much as just not recognizing what the program's requirements are."

Earmarks have been kept as part of the grant program to help promote diversity and geographical balance among applicants, she said. Otherwise, money would flow heavily to projects in the older Northeast states and less to sites west of the Mississippi River.

Some historic preservation projects have become economic engines, organizers said. The Colonial Theatre in Pittsfield, Mass., for example, was one of the earliest sites restored with help from a federal grant. James Taylor later recorded a CD there, and it continues to operate as a full-time performance space.

"I think it's very shortsighted for the program to be zeroed out," said Missouri Rep. Russ Carnahan, co-chair of the Congressional Historic Preservation Caucus. "We know preservation works and creates jobs."

The program's creator, now Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, has been informed of what's happening, McCarthy said. "I think beyond that, it's up to her," she said.

Advocates are calling on friendly ears on Capitol Hill and may try to reach current first lady Michelle Obama.

"I don't think it's too late," McCarthy said. "We're trying everything."

___

On the Net:

Save America's Treasures: http://www.preservationnation.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — As Hillary Rodham Clinton was leaving the White House, she asked Laura Bush first lady to first lady to continue one program if nothing else – the historic preservation progra...
WASHINGTON — As Hillary Rodham Clinton was leaving the White House, she asked Laura Bush first lady to first lady to continue one program if nothing else – the historic preservation progra...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 549
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
09:35 PM on 03/15/2010
It's unfortunate but I think necessary. The government needs to trim more things like this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:50 PM on 03/08/2010
Individuals, communities and non-profit orgnizations have ALWAYS managed to raise money and presere treasures without federal subsidies. Our nation is TRILLIONS of dollars in debt and it grows by the seond. ENOUGH http://defeatthedebt.com/debt-clock/?gclid=CJDYgdC2qqACFctx5QodH3XAaQ

The big treasures "saved" by Hillary's pet program would have been saved anyway. All it does is make organizations dependent and vulnerable because of federal subsidies. Save the Treasures or save Hillary's big ego?
05:08 PM on 03/08/2010
So the Patriot Act and No Child Left Behind are utter failures that we keep dumping trillions of dollars into, but Save America's Treasures, with an annual budget nearly equal to what we continue to pay Blackwater every month, is beyond repair because a couple of Congressmen can't read the instruction manual?

I won't be voting for Obama again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:32 PM on 03/08/2010
What other Federally funded programs gets so much in private matching funds?

Bad deal to cut it.

For every dollar we cut from the project, we lose two.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seelieme
12:29 PM on 03/08/2010
Another case of "What have the Romans (read Government) ever done for us?" being most applicable. Don't like taxes? Who does? But what do taxes proavide? What have taxes ever done for us? Plenty. Folks seem to be asleep over this and wake up only when their (sacred) cow is gored/culled/cancelled. We do get the government we deserve. But so many suffer when tea-bagging "I don't see cause-and-effect" philosophy meets policy.
12:24 PM on 03/08/2010
Is HP just trying to create discord between the Clinton and Obama camps?
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
12:18 PM on 03/08/2010
I'm a big proponent of preservation. It makes sense to me from so many angles, from energy savings through local self respect to national identity.

There is one thing that baffles me, however, and maybe this sad loss of funding will help bring resolution. Why, when preservation is the motivation, does the object first fall into ruin and the restoration require hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars, whereas when the threatened object luckily catches the eye of the preservation minded and budget conscious, then the tight-wad tricks and experience-based insight purveyed by "This Old House" will give it new life for a relative pittance?

I suppose the answer is location, timing, community attitudes and economic vitality, or capricious luck. Even so, as I've tried to tell the National Historic Trust, an alliance with "This Old House" might yield stunning results, and perhaps the knowledge base represented by the likes of Tom Silva is the key national treasure that desperately needs to be preserved through a renewal of respect for the talented tradesman.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:03 PM on 03/08/2010
Another example of letting Main Street struggle while wall street prospers.
12:00 PM on 03/08/2010
After several years of funding, the most important sites have been preserved, or should have been. Time to move on with the money. If congressmen failed to protect projects in their regions, that's their problem, they should have prioritized and focused. If after all this time and money, sites weren't preserved, the project can be capped and called a failure.

The next program should be the USDA CRP program, paying landowners not to farm.
12:20 PM on 03/08/2010
Agree. We should consider just how effective this program has been and why they haven't sought private funds to offset possible federal losses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
11:39 AM on 03/08/2010
Why doesn't the Obama Administration cut the funding for the Reagan Legacy Project and the Reagan Centennial?? That would be much more prudent.
12:08 PM on 03/08/2010
They haven't? That's something I could get behind. Let's all contact our legislators.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ttowse
11:31 AM on 03/08/2010
How about an American history month. Not Just Black history, but people who consider themselves Americans. Why limit by colour? This way children would learn the history of their town, city, etc. and see how they fit into the big picture. Or would this build better citizens?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DnDCfromChi-town
11:37 AM on 03/08/2010
what r u talking about
12:12 PM on 03/08/2010
If your town, city, state is already doing that everyday then I think they are failing in their sworn duty to provide for the children of your community. Or is it that you want us to outlaw the obserance of Black History month? And I would question your motives on that.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
blingbling65943
11:29 AM on 03/08/2010
I know it's been said many times before, but "But we can still find the money to fight endless wars around the world"?
jrfromdallas
Who you calling a jive turkey?
11:29 AM on 03/08/2010
Sounds about right to me. What is so important about those national treasures. Let's use the money to put Obamas face on Mt.Rushmore or we can make his childhood home in Indonesia a historical site and offer free roundtrip tickets for americans that would like to see that. Better yet let Obama give more money to ACORN.
12:03 PM on 03/08/2010
Carl Rove will find a place on Rushmore before any elected official does.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:28 AM on 03/08/2010
Bill and Hillary Clinton have repeatedly defended the bail outs of Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan.

People have to understand that the 'bail outs' takes away taxpayer money that could otherwise be used for these types of purposes.

So I don't feel sorry for her at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:13 PM on 03/08/2010
Hey genius...it's not about her, it's about the History that money saves or preserves.
12:25 PM on 03/08/2010
Since the federal government is constrained by public opinion not to spend more or go into debt, and money is the only thing that can save these treasures, then we have to look to Wall St. to save them. They have the money, the lack of oversight and regulation, the profit to provide bonuses to their executives. They can only be seen as the ones with the resources to do so. Why haven't they stepped forward?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:29 PM on 03/08/2010
Hey 'know-it-all'....it is about her because these types of articles try to distract you away from the culprits who make these types of decisions; who defends one policy that has consequences against another.

That's what's wrong with politics today, is that nobody wants to take responsibility for a catastrophe that was caused in part by previous decisions.

If you want these 'treasures' then CANCEL THE BAIL OUTS

Every single penny that goes towards bailing out the losses of Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan could be used more productively in our economy.

Therefore anyone who defends the bail outs should not complaing about losing 'historical treasures', social security, jobs, etc. anything
.... because supposedly it was absolutely necessary to bail out Warren Buffet who owns primary shares of Goldman Sachs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitar63
01:02 PM on 03/08/2010
She doesn't benefit from this. WE THE PEOPLE DO. Way to take make a point that has nothing to do with anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:32 PM on 03/08/2010
My point has everything to do with it.

If you don't want our 'historical treasures' to disappear then stop defending the bail outs and join the throngs in chorus to CANCEL THE BAIL OUTS!

From now on, everything this country loses is a direct result from the bail outs - PERIOD
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AZAFVET
11:25 AM on 03/08/2010
Why do we need these National Treasures when we have Iraq and Afghanistan to showcase? Ruins of what were perfectly good buildings and untold number of dead, isn't that our new legacy?
11:56 AM on 03/08/2010
I will never forgive our government for allowing the wholesale looting of Iraq's museums and libraries after we invaded. The media focussed on toppling Saadam's statute, we blinked the wealthy added treasures to their private collections.

And we will never leave Iraq until they sign the PSAs (Profit Sharing Agreements) that the corporations want signed and Bush protected with Executive Orders. I hope we don't blink again.