iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Foreclosure-Prevention Plan Lagging, New Data Shows (EXCLUSIVE)

First Posted: 05/09/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:45 PM ET

Foreclosure

Only about a third of the homeowners who have successfully completed the trial period of the Obama administration's mortgage modification program have been offered permanent relief, according to new federal data obtained by the Huffington Post.

The conversion rate -- about 33 percent -- is woefully short of what the Treasury Department had forecast. Treasury thought the rate would be "ranging up to 75 percent," Herbert M. Allison Jr., assistant secretary for financial stability, told the Congressional Oversight Panel in October.

The other two-thirds of homeowners who have gone through the trial program and made the necessary payments remain in limbo. Some of those homeowners -- more than 350,000 of them -- will ultimately lose out on the kind of relief the administration has repeatedly promised: averting foreclosure through lower monthly payments.

"I remain very concerned about the relatively small number of conversions from trial to permanent modifications for homeowners," said Richard H. Neiman, New York's superintendent of banks and a member of the COP, in an email to HuffPost. "Hundreds of thousands of homeowners are left in limbo by [mortgage] servicers and [are] once again at risk of foreclosure."

Rep. Jim Jordan, an Ohio Republican on the House Oversight Committee who had a memorable exchange last month with one of Treasury's top housing officials, was more blunt: "It's not surprising these numbers are lower than expected," he said in an email. "This program has been a waste of taxpayer dollars and harmful to the very families it was supposed to help."

The Home Affordable Modification Program, a year-old initiative which promised to help up to four million homeowners avoid foreclosure through lower monthly payments, is the administration's signature effort to help struggling borrowers stay in their homes. Part of Obama's $75 billion Making Home Affordable program, HAMP is designed to help homeowners by paying everyone in the mortgage chain, from the borrower to the mortgage bond investor.

But this incentive-based program, criticized by many consumer advocates and Wall Street housing analysts as inadequate and ineffective, has had a rocky time delivering on its promise.

The new data was contained in a series of answers by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to questions posed by Neiman and his colleagues on COP, including Harvard Law professor and bailout watchdog Elizabeth Warren.

"As of the end of January there were over 116,000 permanent modifications and over 67,000 permanent modifications pending final approval," Geithner wrote in his letter, which the panel received last week. "This group of approximately 180,000 permanent and pending permanent modifications represents about a third of the population of total modifications who have completed the trial modification and are at a point in the process where they are able to convert to permanent."

Geithner added that he recognizes that "there is much additional work to be done in converting borrowers to permanent modifications."

Rep. Dennis Kucinich, chairman of House Oversight's Domestic Policy subcommittee, said in an interview that Treasury isn't devoting as much attention to homeowners as it does to Wall Street.

"Treasury has been very slow to use the authority provided by Congress... to help keep homeowners in their homes," the Ohio Democrat told HuffPost. "And this contrasts with the emergency with which both [the Bush and Obama] administrations have worked to bail out the large financial institutions."

Kucinich said there's only one solution left.

"I've come to the reluctant conclusion that the only way to accelerate the program and also provide adequate incentives for homeowners who sacrifice to stay in their own homes is through permanent, locally-tailored, unconditional reductions in mortgage principal," he said.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair advocates principal write-downs to help distressed borrowers, particularly for "underwater" homeowners -- those who owe more on their mortgage than the underlying home is worth. More than 11 million homeowners, comprising about a quarter of all homeowners with a mortgage, are underwater, according to real estate research firm First American CoreLogic.

A senior Treasury official told HuffPost on Monday that the department was heading towards more writing down of principal as part of its mortgage modification efforts, and that an announcement was to be expected in the next few weeks. But a Treasury spokesman e-mailed to say that Treasury was "NOT poised to roll out a major principal write-down program."

Treasury has steadfastly refused to make principal write-downs a significant part of its foreclosure-prevention efforts. Officials have repeatedly used the phrase "moral hazard" -- a theory that posits that when people enjoy the fruits of their actions without having to suffer any of the consequences they do it more -- to explain why they don't want to write down mortgage principal for homeowners.

Kucinich was pessimistic about the ability of any program that doesn't involve principal reductions to help floundering homeowners. "Instead, we're going to stay on this slow path to default, foreclosure and personal bankruptcy," Kucinich said. "And our economy is going to continue to suffer."

He added: "It's funny that moral hazard is a concept when it comes to Main Street but not to Wall Street," a reference to the massive bank bailouts.

More than 2.8 million homes were lost to foreclosure last year, according to data provider RealtyTrac. The firm expects a record three million foreclosures this year.


READ Geithner's responses below:


Geithner responses to COP
FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Only about a third of the homeowners who have successfully completed the trial period of the Obama administration's mortgage modification program have been offered permanent relief, according to new f...
Only about a third of the homeowners who have successfully completed the trial period of the Obama administration's mortgage modification program have been offered permanent relief, according to new f...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 233
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
12:42 PM on 03/16/2010
Help others avoid Mortgage Scams. We are trying to create a database of Mortgage Workout and Mortgage Modification specialists (service providers) and Mortgage Workout Programs. Please help us gather and review at: http://www.mortgageworkout.us
08:28 AM on 03/11/2010
No real surprise here, can anyone show me a government (FED) program that works well?
photo
Areyoukiddingg
We need a Reset
11:35 PM on 03/10/2010
Let's get real folks. Anyone who bought a home in the last 5 years in most areas of the country basically got screwed. The appraisals were way way out of line due to the ninja loans and the banksters approving anyone who was breathing. After all, the market could only do up, right? So now, what we have are about 60 million homes out there that mostly honest people purchased (with the implicit understanding prices could only go up) and now they're screwed. And in many cases the banksters knew they were screwed and wrote the loan anyway so they would have enough mortgages to fill another sack of sh*t securitization to sell to investors. Then the banksters bought credit default sways, actually betting against the homeowners being able to perform on the loan. So when you default, they not only get paid by the private mortgage insurers, their bet pays off. That's why they don't want to lower principal & keep homeowners in their homes. They actually WANT you to default because it earns a much much higher profit than doing the honorable and reasonable thing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:39 PM on 03/10/2010
When are we going to stop having new "ides" from the very geniuses who caused this crap? None of their programs worked. Obama, please fire Geithner, Summers and any other Clinton mold leftover.
06:21 PM on 03/10/2010
i also do not understand when BOA , Wells or Chase are just the servicer of the mortgage when the mortgage is owned by Fannie or Freddie , how the homeowners are still being foreclosed on without speaking with Fannie or Freddie directly !!!!
06:18 PM on 03/10/2010
why does NO ONE in the entire USA stand up when the president is on one of his rock star tours and ask him MR PRESIDENT WHY ARE YOU DOING NOTHING ABOUT THE MODIFICATIONS THAT YOU STOOD IN FRONT OF THE PUBLIC AND SAID WOULD SAVE 4 MILLION HOMEOWNERS FROM FORECLOSURES....why MR PRESIDENT do you think you can just say something and then never have to act on what you say...if i ever find myself in the same room as him, you can guarentee i will call him out on being a liar and a fraud of HOPE and CHANGE
06:09 PM on 03/10/2010
The National Foreclosure train which started in Ohio left the station in 2000 and led the USA in number of foreclosures to 2006.In 2007-2008 & 2009 there were 6.3 million more foreclosures nationally. It has been 10 years, exactly what has 6 termOhio Congressman Dennis Kucinich legislatively done to prevent this crisis?
I can understand today’s concern of Dennis Kucinich he is up for re-election this year.
In 2005 Congress passed a more restrictive change to the Bankruptcy act give the.
Government programs don't work because they are unacceptable to the Banking industry.
Simply put the Banks have all the rights and the consumers have none.

Realistically the answer to foreclosure prevention actually is very straight forward- include and make mandatory that the mortgage borrower become an equal participant in the solution through mandatory federal arbitration with federally chartered bank that legally own and hold the rights to the mortgage within the same regulatory system that the banks lends its mortgage money.
The federal arbitrator could be within the federal Bankruptcy Court system and have the absolute authority to address and settle the issues with the borrower and the lender.
Remember that our elected politicians watched Wall Street destroy the American economy and did nothing.
Those same politicians for 10 years have been watching our neighbors loose their homes because they have no rights.
We need to put a leash on the Pit Bull Banker to prevent the Foreclosure bite.
Michael LittleBig
Cleveland Ohio
3-10-2010
02:32 PM on 03/11/2010
right on!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:39 PM on 03/10/2010
Here's an issue no one talks about. The housing industry in it's desire to squeeze maximum profit out of every square inch of land they buy has been building increasingly bigger more expensive houses. Real estate agents love them of course since they work on commission. Try to find a small reasonably priced house built in the last 30 years. They don't exist. So if you're a young couple or a single person of any age looking to buy an energy efficient small comfortable house you're out of luck.
05:48 PM on 03/10/2010
The biggest reason they don't exist;
1. zoning ordinances-minimums of 1 or 2.5 acres per home
2. costs for in ground approved septic systems ( rose to $10-15,000)
I wanted to build small single family home, 800-1200 sf, that are built with later additions in mind.
I was hoping to be able to sell these homes for $180K, they would have cost me about $138K if I built three of them simultaneously. The local zoning board in Greene county wasn't happy about my putting them on single acre parcels, with a three acre green zone for playground equipment, and a basketball court and bicycle path.
The upstate towns were also much more interested in having much more expensive homes built, because the property taxes would be higher.
I tried to get this passed for almost ten months and had to give up after spending ten thousand on lawyers, and sub division plans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:10 PM on 03/10/2010
Those are your local ordinances. The town sounds like its run by snots.You're certainly not like the builders around here where they cram huge houses on 1/2 acre lots with public sewer and water. It seems the area you're building in is a high end suburban one trying to maintain their aura of exclusivity. Sucks bad since it seems like you had good intentions to build affordable housing for people like me. And that's rare
06:15 PM on 03/10/2010
I was lucky in that I'm a single person and decided to buy my mother's house (kept it in the family) 'cause I wouldn't be able to get anything near a much space for the price (less than $150k). But, even with that, after the economy tanked and people started losing their jobs or getting pay cuts (like me), it put me in dire straits with making mortgage payments. I wasn't rolling in the dough before, but I could make my payments okay. Made a little over 40k/yr, but now it was cut to less than $35k. Times is hard.
04:39 PM on 03/10/2010
Obama sucks-Geitner-Sommers-Bernanke-suck-Congress sucks---
My home which I built was independently valued at $585K in August 2005
I have $110K first mortgage- 15 year and an HELOC for $58K
I have been out of work for eighteen months, I am not behind on my mortgage but have used up all my savings to remain current with it and all my bills.
I contacted my mortgage holder, American Home Mortgage Service Co about letting me pay interest only for one year, which would reduce my mortgage payment from $1,277.97 a month to $585 per month.
There was no losing money, no write downs, nothing, this would give me time to either find a new job, or to sell my house. I can't get an answer from them about this!
Every system in this country is crap, if your not in a good job, your f---ed.
Giving the big banks money at a half a percent after bailing them out, I want every member of Congress to have a heart attack! or a stroke! At least their medical insurance will keep them alive, mine will send me a letter saying DENIED!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:29 PM on 03/10/2010
585k house. I'm curious. How many in your family compared to how much sq feet your house is? Also since I can't afford a 585k house why should I pay to keep you in yours?
05:37 PM on 03/10/2010
My family has four members. My house is valued atr so much because I am a furniture maker and built this custom house by hand over two years. It is just under 2800sf, on three acres, 3-5 bedroom, three full baths, steam- jacuzzi full basement ect...
I spent $190K building it and two years of my time.
I don't see where I am asking you to pay anything. I only had a $150K mortgage on this house, the rest is equity I have lost due to this housing meltdown.
So a--hole, maybe you should learn how to read and comprehend better.
All I was asking for was a year to pay interest only while I either found a job or sold my house, now worth a little over $325K. My loss not yours!
06:09 AM on 03/11/2010
It would seem you're going to pay either way. The guy defaults on his mortgage. Boom less property taxes for the city. Your's go up to cover it. He has to relocate to another state : Boom less state tax income. Your's go up. He goes bankrupt w/out a job and becomes homeless: Boom ; less Federal income tax: Your's go up. The bank has to sell the house at a loss : The Fed steps in to compensate : who do you think pays for that ? Housing prices increase to cover losses. You go to buy a new house : now you are getting much less house for a much higher cost. But when you go to sell your home you find it is worth much less than you thought. It's a dominno. When it happens in mass ; it's a snowball. If you crunch the numbers you find it's much cheaper to keep the guy in his house. When they do build they throw up entire neighborhoods of poorly constructed, cheaply built homes which start at over 100K and they are not energy efficient. Anyway : You get the point.
04:31 PM on 03/10/2010
You'll note that all of these are people who have already been approved for trial loan modifications and have made their payments, but now are not being approved for permanent modifications. It's the banks who are dragging their feet on this, but don't want to publicly reject the program for fear of looking bad.
04:25 PM on 03/10/2010
Alot of them probably cannot be helped. THEY had to have the BIG FANCY HOUSE, that they could not afford in a million years but they felt if they made $30,000./yr they should have a $500,000 home. Sorry for them, NOT. I got a home within my means and they should have too. Enough is enough.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:47 PM on 03/10/2010
Funny. I'm single and I make 45 to 50 and I was constantly told I could afford a $250,000 mortgage. Real estate agents and mortgage brokers just couldn't seem to comprehend my lack of desire to own a 4 bedroom 2.5 bath with a dinning room 2 car garage and finished basement. I got disgusted and I stayed in my small cheap to heat and cool apartment. Then the economy went south. I still have my job but my pay is 5 grand less but because I ignored the attempts of others to line their pockets at my expense I'm not hurting. I've had to back off the amount going into retirement planning but my bills are paid on time and my credit rating remains high.
06:02 PM on 03/10/2010
This is an ignorant and selfish statement. "I got mine and can't see farther than my own nose, so screw everyone else. They must be stupid or lazy or whatever I can think of to make me disregard them." I've started the process of mortgage modification over a year ago because I, who bought my mother's house that I grew up in for about $140k ("BIG FANCY HOUSE" in the inner city of Chicago) in June 2007, got a 14% pay cut a couple of years ago on Thanksgiving so I have been struggling ever since to pay my mortgage and the rest of my bills. I WAS within my means before the economy tanked and my employer decided to cut everyone's pay rather than eat the cost themselves or fire a bunch of people. Every time I call my loan officer to ask the status of my modification, they just keep saying "It's still processing." To try to stay afloat for the past year, I ended up maxing out the only 2 credit cards I have to make sure my mortgage payments were met on time, when I had a near zero balance on them before. Now, at the beginning of this year, my mortgage payments went UP because of escrow adjustments. Peachy.

As much as it might comfort you to paint a caricature of people who are in need of help so that you can feel okay with not caring, the world's just not that simple.
04:25 PM on 03/10/2010
Hey there is no program that can save foreclosures unless I pay for someone elses mistake. unresponsible lender and unresponsible borrower.
09:49 PM on 03/10/2010
Most of the time (not every time, but the vast majority of the time) it was ONLY the irresponsible lender. NOT the borrower.
They could afford the mortgage they took out in the first place. The lenders don't tell them, or gloss over the fact that after 2 years they are going to raise your interest rate 2% every 6 months until you do something about it or go under.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:03 PM on 03/10/2010
There's BoA retention, and mitigation, the different departments don't talk to each other....it's a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarieNat
Lobbyist, wanna make something of it?
03:43 PM on 03/10/2010
Wow. Wasn't it just this week that this very Huff Post reporter claimed that "not a single homeowner" had been helped by this program? My how things have changed in a few days time! Perhaps he decided to do his research this time.
06:06 PM on 03/10/2010
Could you link that story that said not a single one was helped 'cause I never saw that one. I have seen stories that said only a minimal number of people have been helped and that's pretty much what this one says.
10:44 PM on 03/10/2010
Seconded!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarieNat
Lobbyist, wanna make something of it?
03:36 PM on 03/10/2010
The 'make home affordable program ' as it stands , is a piece of crap ! I checked it out. They want a whole lot of information. My mortgage co. uses it's debt collections department which is in Delhi India or somewhere else thye don't speak English. They have been harrassing me for the past few months to pay an escrow shortage I refuse to pay because the escrow was not done right. I can't turn them in to the 'no call' because they are not in the U.S. (that's why GMAC uses them) . So they want me to give a lot of personal information to this collections agency : Information which my mortgage co. already has at it's disposal : so the outside collections agency can decide if I qualify. NO F.. ing way ! I'll go bankrupt first ! This has got to be the lamest program they could come up w/ and still say they did somehtng. It's par for the course : Look at the Credit Card bill, The health (insurance) bill, and the soon to be watered down no teeth Financial Reform bill. MHAP is just as useless and ineffective as these other examples. There is good reason no one wants to use it ! It needs simplified , streamlined and fast tracked so the mortgage co. can handle the paper work w/ ease, efficiency and speed. Agree w/ Kucinich : Permanent Principle pay down is most sensable. Right now it's just JUNK !
09:42 PM on 03/10/2010
I truly feel it's less the program itself that is the problem, but the various financial institutions that still were very instrumental in causing this whole mess.
Of course it doesn't help anybody when those banks that were irresponsible in not educating customers about what they were going to do after the initial 2 year fixed payments (or more likely completely ignored telling them) are the same ones "offering" these programs.
It isn't that the mortgage companies need it streamlined etc. They need to want to use the program. But I don't think they want to help anybody. If all they had to do was click 4 keystrokes on their computers and change your interest rate and reduce people's payments by phenomenal amounts it wouldn't change the fact that they wouldn't.
It's not the program. It's not the paperwork. It's the financial institution. IMO.
10:49 PM on 03/10/2010
If it's not the 'program' but the undermining obstructionist financial institutions that are the problem why wouldn't the administration want to find that out and correct the problem ? Why leave it dangle while people suffer and go bankrupt and they give each other stupid looks and say Why ? One would think that this possibility would have been anticipated and mechanisms preventing the banks from laying down on it would have been installed. If the banks are the culprit and aren't conducting the program properly wouldn't it seem to call for a fix. The administration acts as if it's oblivious to any problems or if they aren't they don't seem to understand what the problems are. If it's the way it's being administered that's one thing. There are problems w/ the program itself. It's complicated and invasive and degrading as well. You even have to write a sympatyy letter begging. Maybe they are running it exactly the way it is specified to run it. Maybe the goal is not to help as many as possible but to avoid doing anything unless it's absolutely necessary. It's not unusual for the Government to set up a program to supposedly help then make it so messed up that no one wants to use it . I'd say you may be partially right. I doubt the banks have any interest at all in reducing mortgage payments, interest, principle etc. but knowing this the administration should have a plan in place to deal w/