iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Kathleen Sebelius To AHIP: Stop Attacking, Start Lowering Premiums

Sebelius

First Posted: 05/10/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:45 PM ET

Speaking before a crowd of insurance industry officials on Wednesday, President Obama's chief health care aide Kathleen Sebelius argued that they should embrace reform of the system rather than fighting it -- or else suffer the consequences in the form of lost customers.

"I'm hopeful that you will take the assets that you have, the influence and the bully pulpit that you have and use it to start calling for comprehensive reform to pass. Start looking at giving Americans some relief," the Health and Human Services Secretary said. "Instead of spending energy attacking parts of the proposal that you don't like come to the table with strengthening the parts that are there that you talked about from the beginning are central to comprehensive reform."

Sebelius's speech came on the second day of a conference hosted by the major insurance industry lobby group -- America's Health Insurance Plans -- in Washington D.C. One day prior, a host of union officials and progressive leaders had led thousands of protesters in a demonstration outside the same conference, accusing insurance giants of being "dark titans" and "domestic enemies" and calling for citizen arrests.

The Secretary's approach was a bit tamer. While she did occasionally take a tough tone with the AHIP crowd, the remarks were more conversational than lecturing. Indeed, some of the toughest snippets of the prepared remarks that the White House sent out to reporters were toned down in the actual address. Instead of calling out the lobby for launching a late-stage million-dollar ad campaign to defend their opposition to reform, Sebelius spoke more broadly about how the president's plan and AHIPs demands actually weren't that far apart.

"Over the last year we have seen tens of millions of dollars spent by the insurance industry spent on ads to help kill health reform and we started with a conversation a year ago saying this was an important step," she said. "And it might be understandable if the president or Congress was proposing something radically different than the plan you put forward yourself. For example if we started with the premise that we should just eliminate the private insurance market in order to do some kind of single payer system like Europe and Canada. And as you know there are members of congress who favor that kind of structure. But the president believed we should build on the existing system."

The somewhat cordial tone was set from the start, when Sebelius insisted that, despite the hype, she was not there "to vilify hardworking employees of insurance companies across the country." (The crew from the Daily Show, which grabbed and filmed attendees as they left the room, will probably take care of that.)

That said, Sebelius did make the case that health care reform was an economic imperative, both for the country and, longer-term, the insurance market representatives sitting in the ballroom.

"You can continue the opposition to reform, and if you do, and reform fails, I can give you a pretty good prediction of what happens next," she said. "By next march, when you are meeting again, premiums will take even a bigger bite out of American's wages, your market will shrink even further, more Americans will lose their employer sponsored insurance and we will have a situation where the market is unsustainable."

Adding a human element to the speech, she urged attendees to put themselves in "the shoes of your remaining customers for a moment" -- citing reports of sharp increases in premiums throughout the country. Sebelius asked those in attendance to pledge to be more transparent about their billing practices, including providing justification for the rate spikes.

On this narrow request -- and on her broader hope that AHIP offer constructive suggestions to improve the health care bill -- she was taken up on her offer.

"We accept the secretary's challenge to come back to her in a very short period of time with specifics to be added to the legislation that can help with cost control," said AHIP's CEO Karen Ignagni. "We will follow the AHIP practice of sharing information, making sure we are doing absolutely everything to insure that where we have diagnosed a problem we are doing everything we can to find solutions."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Speaking before a crowd of insurance industry officials on Wednesday, President Obama's chief health care aide Kathleen Sebelius argued that they should embrace reform of the system rather than fighti...
Speaking before a crowd of insurance industry officials on Wednesday, President Obama's chief health care aide Kathleen Sebelius argued that they should embrace reform of the system rather than fighti...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,736
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (70 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
07:57 PM on 03/17/2010
Real World to Seblius - get your dosc, hosp and drug companies to control their spiraling costs and then insurance premiums wouldn;t rise. UnderObama you wil enslave all of us to insurance companies so that that cost of medcial services will never be ocntrolled. Ansdif we don;t to be enslaced then you wil tax us into submission - ever hear of 10% unemploymnet and the great recession? Oh yeah that's right you guys are the cerators ofit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MARYHOBE
Member of the tribe of man
06:19 PM on 03/11/2010
I still think that the one-payer model is the way to go and compromising with the insurance companies is like dealing with the devil. Why do you think the public option is so hated by the insurance industry? Quite simple, they believe that the American people will go to the one-payer model and vote for it with their feet or rather with their wallets and they, the insurance companies, will be left with an empty bag.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
02:47 PM on 03/11/2010
We agree, Ms Sebelius. We know the Republicans are using their lying scare tacticts, and this makes us as angry with them as we are with the Insurance & drug companies. We hear nothing to cause us to believe half of the people are against the Health Care bill. We're so sick of the Republican lies, and worse yet that their lies are for the purpoose of destroying all they can. We know that if Republicans had their way there would not be Social security or Medicare. I wonder how many of the supporters of Republicans would be willing to give up their Medicare & Social Security. And as for the tale about socialized medicine, what do the Republicans call their FREE INHOUSE medical care?

We're glad Democrats are now using tough talk and we would like to see Republicans warned that they will lose their favored kind of health care if they continue refusing Health Care for the rest of the people. This is what they deserve and we go along with it. Lets do it.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
02:36 PM on 03/11/2010
W
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
07:48 AM on 03/11/2010
Sebelius: "Over the last year we have seen tens of millions of dollars spent by the insurance industry spent on ads to help kill health reform..."

Tells you that there are a lot of yachts and private jets at risk, doesn't it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:16 AM on 03/11/2010
is she growing backbone??????

........wtf???
04:23 AM on 03/11/2010
Kucinich.... you better take the stick out of your a** and vote yes on this bill. If you don't I will personally donate $ to whoever primary challenges you. You were hired to represent your constituents and frankly the American people, not your own political ideology. Don't act like a Republican and kill the bill because it doesn't have everything you want in it. Do you have the guts to vote for it or are you going to chicken out like the Republicans and cry that it doesn't have all you want? This is serious! People are dying everyday and you grandstand! Your actions are exactly what makes people sick about Washington.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:37 AM on 03/11/2010
Come on Sec. Sebelius, if you and Obama et al were really serious about REAL health care refrom, you would by-pass these insurance companies, clean up and expand MEDICARE to every American who wants to enroll as an alternative to these scummy insurance companies.

Your faux outrage at the insurance cartel does not fool me--not for one second!


http://www.pnhp.org/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:56 AM on 03/11/2010
sorry-- reform--lol.
01:48 AM on 03/11/2010
Katleen sure do not look healthy! is she stress out or what?
01:29 AM on 03/11/2010
The power of money and industry through corporations is now stronger than governments. Entrenched power structures (ie insurance companies in this case) will not change on their own.

We the ordinary people... united and mobilized is the only power strong enough to righten and correct our present situation.

We need to demand a decent and affordable healthcare system in our country....and this is universal healthcare or the single payer model....and not some corrupt deal made with lobbyists for corporate healthcare and big pharma.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 AM on 03/11/2010
persimmon8,
well said and fanned.
01:23 AM on 03/11/2010
Now the house wants to bypass the vote. While the filibuster (in the senate) has been used way too much this is not democracy either. The progressives lust for this bill at all costs is not going to end well.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/House-Democrats-looking-at-Slaughter-Solution-to-pass-Obamacare-without-a-vote-on-Senate-bill-87267402.html
01:56 AM on 03/11/2010
The "progressives" do NOT lust for this bill at all costs. Many progressives feel it will entrench privatization of the health insurance industry with mandates to purchase their product. Many "progressives" want a single payer system.
02:14 AM on 03/11/2010
Cool.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
02:53 PM on 03/11/2010
Not going well for whom? Your Republicans? Will you Republican supporters then give up your Social Security and Medicare, since according to your Republicans, it is Socialized medicine and they've been attempting to destroy it also for many years. WAKE UP and smell those Republican's rotting stench.
12:49 AM on 03/11/2010
Greedy bullies never change, until you bloody their nose. Create nationalized health care, like all the other first world nations already have
12:44 AM on 03/11/2010
What I love about this administration is their cool, calm rationality and pragmatism.

Here's Sebelius telling it like it is. Everyone loses if we stick with the system as it is, even the Insurance Companies.

I don't believe that these corporations are inherently evil. It's that without strict regulation they will act callously - because they must. That is the consequence of unregulated markets.

Republicans, right-wingers, tea-baggers, Libertarians et al simply fail to understand this.

Markets WANT regulation... even though they will fight tooth and nail against it. Good regulation separates the smart businessmen from the charlatans and opportunists. Good regulation makes companies compete for the public interest. Good regulation destroys monopolies and creates a meritocracy.

Regulation, the right kind of regulation, is essential for prosperity. It's simply common sense.
02:12 AM on 03/11/2010
Someone gave an interesting analogy before. If you built roads in a new city and had no rules, stop signs, police, etc. but were free to go in whatever direction and wherever you wanted, there would be chaos. Society needs a degree of rules to prevent chaos. Corporations are by definition about making money and profits and not about providing for the common good of a society. So, we as a society must place enough rules on a business to prevent it from hurting society overall while allowing it to function. Fine line...but deregulation is not the answer.

Notice, the wealthiest man in the world is from Mexico. It somehow just doesn't seem right that the wealthiest man in the world is from a "developing country".
03:33 AM on 03/11/2010
Well, if you ever notice recently, the economic collapse in 2006-2007 all affects developed countries substantially. The developing countries, very much less, all thanks to China and Russia.

The Chinese and Russians, both of which are socialist and communist countries, are beating capitalist developed countries like US, UK, Italy, Irelan, Greece, Germany, and Japan.
photo
kskids9
Enraging liberals with my wisdom
12:17 AM on 03/11/2010
still - nobody wants to talk about who has to shoulder the burden of paying for this bill.. Only half will be covered by those "buying in".. where does the other half come from??
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
02:56 PM on 03/11/2010
Where does the other come from? From the wealthy finally again paying their fair income tax amounts as they did before Ronnie Regean first imunized the wealthy from the tax burden.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
11:37 PM on 03/10/2010
Time to bypass the effing insurers. Grayson's Medicare buy-in bill would be an excellent start:

http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/03/10/alan-graysons-four-page-medicare-buy-in-bill-introduced/
photo
kskids9
Enraging liberals with my wisdom
12:15 AM on 03/11/2010
why not just en-slave all doctors, nurses, paramedics et all..
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
12:22 AM on 03/11/2010
How does an optional Medicare buy-in enslave doctors, nurses, et al.? Do you think they want all your health care money going to some insurance company exec?
01:34 AM on 03/11/2010
bull statement.....my sister is a nurse who detests working for corporate hospitals who only look at the bottom line over quality of care and compassion for patients and staff.
02:22 AM on 03/11/2010
Medicare buy-in is a still an excellent idea because:

1. It would give people an option other than private insurance companies.

2. It might even help our job situation because some people aren't retiring due to high health care costs and they just can't afford to. If health care costs were less of an issue, some people would choose to retire, thereby further opening up the job market.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:53 AM on 03/11/2010
Grayson sounds good but what does he mean by "buy in"? I hope he means through taxation.
I understand HR-676 as my uncle belongs to PNHP-- but I don't understand Grayson's plan.
If anyone can explain?
Thanks!