More

Bart Stupak: Abortion Foe Calls Health Care Resistance A Sign Of 'Courage'

Bart Stupak

JOHN FLESHER   03/11/10 05:20 PM ET   AP

WEST BRANCH, Mich. — Shortly after entering Congress in 1993, Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan withstood President Bill Clinton's charm offensive and voted against free-trade legislation – an early display of the independent streak that has put him at odds with fellow Democrats many times since.

He's now the unofficial leader of a small but powerful bloc threatening to derail another Democratic president's cherished initiative: health care overhaul.

A dozen socially conservative Democrats say they won't support the legislation without a prohibition on paying for abortions with federal money. Stupak wrote a provision to their liking for a House bill approved last November, but the Senate replaced it with wording he considers unacceptable.

With the House closely divided, opposition from his faction could doom the measure and cripple Barack Obama's presidency. Stupak is under intense pressure not to let that happen. Some Democrats in his northern Michigan district are so angry that he's facing a rare – and long-shot – primary challenge.

Anti-abortion allies such as the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops want Stupak, a devout Roman Catholic, to dig in.

He said this week a deal with House Democratic leaders was within reach, although prospects appeared dim Thursday as Rep. Henry Waxman of California, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, said bill supporters would try to pass it without making the changes Stupak's group demands.

Stupak insists he favors overhauling the nation's health care system, even describing it as a "pro-life" cause.

"But you don't start compromising your values and principles based on some historical purpose, so 20 years from now people will look back and say, 'Wasn't that a sign of courage?'" he said. "They'll also say, 'Yeah, where were his principles and beliefs?' I think that lasts longer. When I leave Congress, I'm still going to have my integrity in place."

Connie Saltonstall, a former Charlevoix County commissioner who announced Tuesday she would oppose Stupak for the Democratic nomination, said his priorities were upside down.

"I believe that he has a right to his personal, religious views," said Saltonstall, 64. "But to deprive his constituents of needed health care reform because of those views is reprehensible."

Stupak, an attorney and former state police trooper, has never been in serious danger during 18 years of representing Michigan's northernmost congressional district, which includes the entire Upper Peninsula and a sizable chunk of the Lower Peninsula.

The area is rural, mostly blue-collar and given to electing centrists known for putting constituent service ahead of ideology and party. Its congressional representatives were moderate Republicans for nearly three decades before Stupak prevailed.

It has the second-largest land area of any district east of the Mississippi, measuring roughly 600 miles across. The largest city, Marquette, has just 20,000 residents.

Unseating the incumbent has proven almost impossible. Republicans fielded a solid opponent in 2008, former state Rep. Tom Casperson, but Stupak won with 65 percent of the vote.

He remains popular by obtaining federal money for local projects, avoiding scandals and staying within the down-home mainstream on hot-button issues.

In addition to opposing the North American Free Trade Agreement, disliked by Upper Peninsula labor unionists, he again bucked Clinton by voting against a ban on assault weapons. Gun rights are important to his constituents in northern Michigan, a haven for hunters.

"He does his homework," said Jim McKimmy, the Democratic chairman in Antrim County, who pleaded with Stupak at a town hall meeting this week not to stand in the way of health care legislation. "He knows where the middle is and he knows how to represent his district."

The region's views on abortion are mixed, despite the Catholic Church's strong presence. Stupak says his stand "reflects adequately" his constituency's mindset but is based on bedrock conviction, not political calculation.

"I believe in the sanctity of life," he said this week while driving between public gatherings. "Because it may not be convenient, do you take a life? That's not the standard of a moral society."

Nancy Douglas, a longtime friend and economic development director in Stupak's hometown of Menominee, said she wasn't surprised he would refuse to back down – even to the point of scuttling the health care overhaul.

"It's very much in keeping with what I know of him," said Douglas, who supports abortion rights and has debated abortion with Stupak. "I respect that he is doing what he truly believes in."

Critics accuse him of imposing his religious beliefs on the nation. "It is outrageous and un-American," said Mary Pollock of the National Organization for Women's Michigan chapter.

For 10 years, Stupak was among a small group of conservative Christian lawmakers who rent rooms in a Washington, D.C., town house known as the "C Street Center." It drew attention last year because of sex scandals involving several current or former lawmakers with ties to the dwelling, including Sen. John Ensign and South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford.

Stupak said he moved out in January "because of all the craziness going on about it" but insisted the building was nothing more than a boardinghouse where lawmakers gathered weekly to dine, pray and sometimes discuss personal or spiritual matters. It doesn't have any connection with Stupak's high-profile role on abortion and health care, he said.

"There's no secret oath, no secret pledges, no secret agenda," Stupak said. "C Street has nothing to do with it. People say I'm doing this for the Catholic bishops; they have nothing to do with it. I've always been pro-life. If anything, I've been consistent."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WEST BRANCH, Mich. — Shortly after entering Congress in 1993, Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan withstood President Bill Clinton's charm offensive and voted against free-trade legislation – an ...
WEST BRANCH, Mich. — Shortly after entering Congress in 1993, Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan withstood President Bill Clinton's charm offensive and voted against free-trade legislation – an ...
Filed by Michael Falcone  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,514
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CoronaDischarge 10:27 AM on 03/11/2010
Stupak unfortunately represents the interests of his boarding house keeper better than he represents the needs of those in his district. This isn't courage. It's not doing his job.

Moreover, this article suggests that he has a bit more power than he apparently does have. Current whipping shows maybe 4 congressmen aligned with his position, not the 12 to 15 he would claim. It is instructive that  Read More...
04:08 PM on 03/23/2010
Join us in the fight against abortion!

over 400,000 supporters already!

www.manhattandeclaration.org
02:51 PM on 03/18/2010
"I believe in the sanctity of life," he said this week while driving between public gatherings. "Because it may not be convenient, do you take a life? That's not the standard of a moral society."

"Voted NO on replacing death penalty with life imprisonment. (Apr 1994)"
-http://www.ontheissues.org/MI/Bart_Stupak.htm

so only prolife when it's convenient for him, right?
hypocricy, mysogynist, oppressor of women's rights and freedom.
02:45 PM on 03/18/2010
"According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), there were 820,151 legal induced abortions in the US in 2005." from wikipedia.
(it's not mandatory to report it so the actualy number could be higher but still it's way fewer than 30million)

800k vs. 30 mil
opponents of the health care reform who bases their opposition on the abortion issue, your stance aint about sanctity of life, if you were truly pro life, it wont bother me as much to hear you ramble on how this bill is a baby killing senior killing evil.

does anybody know stupak's voting records and stances on war and capital punishment? i can't stand people who are pro life (esp ones who call pro choice pro abortion) that support death penalties and wars!
05:03 PM on 03/12/2010
Does this article even mention who these supposed "dozen" congressmen really are? NO! Somebody call his bluff already for God's Sake! Nobody actually backs him when it comes down to it. Except republicans, of course.
justobserve
Not left nor right or center. Just a free thinker!
02:51 PM on 03/12/2010
What is democracy when a lone congressman can kill a reform and a presidency after the majority of voters elected this government?
12:21 PM on 03/12/2010
Stupak is now starting to realize what happens to bear cubs when they run into their hungry fathers in the spring.....you get eaten. Pretty much the Democrat's model if you disagree with anything they really want....good or bad.
12:27 PM on 03/12/2010
Right check the other story where Utah GOP's that hop into hot tubs with 15 year old girls and then pay them off to the tune of $150,000, get standing ovations by their brethren. Besides your point is moot doesn't happen that way, that's why dems have a majority and can't do a darn thing with it.
01:05 PM on 03/12/2010
Get on the phone to your Congressional House and Senate reps and tell them your vote this November depends on the PUBLIC OPTION!

http://www.contactingthecongress.org/cgi-bin/newseek.cgi?site=ctc&state=ca

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
01:00 PM on 03/12/2010
HC in wonderland and through a broken glass...
photo
dmsdzinr
Progression wit a twist of sarcasm.
10:39 AM on 03/12/2010
STUPAK is already TOAST! He has given up his religious quest. END OF THIS STORY!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gaylord P Farqua
Herb Gardner Amateur Chef, Historian and Political
09:19 AM on 03/12/2010
This religious crusader represents an area of Michigan that has never enjoyed a really vibrant economy and is very dependent upon hunting, fishing, tourism and modest industry to survive. Stupak's constituents need affordable health care more then many others in the country and he is willing to stand in the way in order to prove a point. The success of Michigan was created mainly by the auto industry in the lower peninsula. Unions created a strong blue collar middle class with big pay checks, superior health insurance, and outstanding pension plans. The Upper Peninsula stayed pretty much the same but benefited from the overall prosperity of the state economy. That is until the auto executives went nuts and refused to recognize the need for superior design and manufacture, fuel economy and pretty much everything the Japanese figured out would sell cars. Of course they blamed the unions for the cost they imposed for their benefits on production. So instead of competing they simply allowed the industry to collapse. Stupak knows all this but his crusade is more important to him.
11:48 AM on 03/12/2010
a mandate to force lower income americans buy insurance - without a public option - is no reform at all, but rather a boon to insurance companies and most importantly - a needed win for Obama.
12:14 PM on 03/12/2010
Apparently it's important to his constituents. I'm assuming your not one of them, so he could probably care less about you.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gaylord P Farqua
Herb Gardner Amateur Chef, Historian and Political
02:08 PM on 03/13/2010
Or he could care less about his constituents and more about his own personal agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
debby6669
09:07 AM on 03/12/2010
Fortunately, Stupak's "coalition" is falling appart. Thanks to Maddow, so is Stupak. I have a theory about Bart Stupak here:

http://debby6669.blogspot.com/2010/03/bart-stupak-is-transgender-former.html
11:54 AM on 03/12/2010
maddow is a fool and so are her hundreds of dedicated viewers.

i suggest you read bob somerby at the daily howler to understand hows she and her insult driven hannity-ite message hurts long term democratic goals.

also, i am very pro choice and was the only straight man working for planned parenthood hq in dc planning the million woman march in 2004, but - i understand a strong catholics view on this funding. I dont agree with it, but i dont find it anything but really duuuumb to call these millions of Indy voters and election deciding Americans names. Thats how and why maddow (and KO) will help us lose the congress in the fall.

by the way, did you know that Biden voted exactly the same on federal funding of abortions as Stupak many times over the last 35 years?
12:18 PM on 03/12/2010
Right on, Right on. Maddow and Olbermann are the Liberal's versions of Hannity and Beck. All of them being completely condescending mouth pieces that try to cater to the masses. All they care about are ratings and whatever it takes to get them. Don't be fooled.....not the brightest people the world to listen to.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
madcat007
12:25 PM on 03/12/2010
Yeah, I'm going to listen to a comedian over a woman with a PhD in political science, hardy Hannity-ite. Rachel Maddow is easily the smartest person on television regardless of what you and HC32 believe. Maddow is not an insulter, but she's been exposing these losers for what they are and they don't like having the facts exposed. BTW, the Stupak amendment goes way further than anything Biden voted for. If the Dems lose congress, it's because they're spineless.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
01:33 PM on 03/12/2010
LOL, Debby! The only thing wrong with your theory is that if you pay attention to who are the most strident anti-women/anti-choice advocates- they are usually men.

The truth is they are misogynists that want to control women.

So, I don't really think he is a trans-gendered individual- as a matter of fact- I heard that he is an ex-policeman.
02:25 AM on 03/12/2010
Isn't he a member of the KKKnights of Columbus?
11:55 AM on 03/12/2010
oh look an anti Catholic bigot!

thats ok here huh?
12:28 PM on 03/12/2010
You're right I'm definitely against Catholic Bigots!
05:00 PM on 03/12/2010
The Catholic Church is a big threat to every sovereign nation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lizr
Shamanic Healer goofing off here
01:26 AM on 03/12/2010
Stupak = Class One A hole.

Dont expect to get health care on women's backs.

Aint gonna happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:02 AM on 03/12/2010
If health care reform dies over the issue of abortion funding, it will NOT be Stupak's fault but Pelosi's. This is not a difficult call if you really want reform. Let women who want abortions pay for them themselves, or let the industry do some pro bono work. Not every bill that passes needs to line Planned Parenthood's pockets.
12:15 AM on 03/12/2010
Your opinion does not add much to the discussion. Let me demonstrate why.

If health care reform dies over the issue of abortion funding, it will be ALL Stupak's fault -- not Pelosi's. This is not a difficult call if you really want reform. Let the current prohibition on federal funding of abortion stand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tweedy54
01:00 AM on 03/12/2010
Please........
11:06 PM on 03/11/2010
stupak appears to be a DINO (democratic in name only). and we all know what happened to the dinosaurs.
11:01 PM on 03/11/2010
Thank God for Bart Stupak. I'm behind him 100%. The man actually has moral character and conviction. How unusual for a member of Congress.
11:11 PM on 03/11/2010
Of course he has moral character and conviction. He's a Knight of Columbus. What else do you expect from us?
11:33 PM on 03/11/2010
LoL..funny. Where were you when Cardinal Egan was aiding and abeting the abuse of children by Catholic priests under his direction? I don't remember you guys asking for legal action. FYI...it's not only a sin, it's also a felony.
11:34 PM on 03/11/2010
BS..he's just serving the political agenda of the Catholic Church which endanger every sovereign nation on earth.
10:51 PM on 03/11/2010
I strongly support Bart Stupak and his Amendment. There is no way on God's good earth that abortion can be considered as "health care".
Let's face facts: Abortion is the deliberate termination of an innocent human life. Nobody has the right to do that. For proof, read the US Constitution. You won't find any such "right" in there. If you want to terminate an innocent human life, don't expect me to pay for it!
Bart, your Brother Knights of Columbus are proud of you and the stand you have taken on this matter. VIVAT JESUS!
11:01 PM on 03/11/2010
If you don't like it, work for a constitutional amendment prohibiting it. Until then it is a legal medical procedure.

Trying to derail a very needed health care reform bill by lying and saying it provides federal funding when it does NOT, is despicable.
photo
Imzadi
Proud Progressive for decades
06:59 AM on 03/12/2010
Excellent response!
11:13 PM on 03/11/2010
Face THIS fact:
It is THE INSURANCE COMPANIES that cover (i.e., pay for) abortions!!!!! NOT the federal government, therefore not YOU.

This is all a big crock...by LAW the government cannot fund elective abortions. Period. NOTHING in this bill changes or nullifies that.