More

Iraq Election Results: Al-Maliki Holds Early Edge

Mideast Iraq

BEN HUBBARD AND QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA   03/11/10 05:56 PM ET   AP

BAGHDAD — First results from Iraq's parliamentary election showed the prime minister and his secular rival locked in an extremely tight contest Thursday amid fraud allegations by rival parties and a chaotic, unpredictable vote count.

The partial tallies came from only five of Iraq's 18 provinces. However, Iraqi officials who have seen results from across the country said Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's coalition appeared to have a narrow edge, though not an outright majority.

That foreshadows tough and lengthy negotiations to build a government and choose a prime minister.

The partial results, posted on TV screens in Baghdad to crowds of reporters, were the first in an election that will determine who governs the country as U.S. troops go home – and whether Iraqis can put behind them deep sectarian tensions that once brought their nation to the brink of civil war.

The initial tallies from Sunday's vote suggested an exceedingly tight contest between coalitions led by al-Maliki, who gained popularity as security improved, and former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, a secular Shiite who sharply criticized the prime minister for failing to boost reconciliation efforts between Iraq's factions.

The emerging picture was a setback to hard-line religious Shiite political leaders who saw al-Maliki make gains in two southern provinces deep on their turf. Allawi appeared to be drawing on Sunni support north of Baghdad.

Results did not include the race's big prize – Baghdad – which accounts for 70 of the parliament's 325 seats.

Thursday's announcement set off a wave of fraud accusations, largely from Allawi's Iraqiya coalition which said it uncovered dozens of violations. It said these included soldiers not being allowed to vote, interference in the electoral commission's work and some polling stations failing to post results.

In a statement, the group said it found "rigging to an extent that would render the elections useless for reflecting the voice of the Iraqis."

Election commission officials did not respond specifically to the allegations, but said the commission had received more than 1,000 complaints about potential violations, all of which would be investigated.

Al-Maliki gained ground against hard-line religious parties in two southern provinces. In Babil, where about a third of the ballots had been counted, the prime minister's State of Law coalition won some 69,000 votes. He also came out on top in Najaf, where his bloc won some 56,000 votes.

The tallies were a blow to al-Maliki's main Shiite competition, the religious Iraqi National Alliance, which includes a party led by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Since rising to prominence as part of a Shiite coalition that won the 2005 elections, al-Maliki has tried to recast himself as an inclusive leader for all Iraqis.

Allawi's non-sectarian Iraqiya list, which included Sunni candidates, fared better in central Iraq, where there are more Sunni voters. In Diyala province, Iraqiya received almost 43,000 votes, more than four time's al-Maliki's take. In Salahuddin, Allawi's list had more than 34,000 votes, about five times that of al-Maliki.

Analyst Joost Hilterman of the International Crisis Group said the initial results were largely what he expected. He cautioned that final calls are hard to make without knowing about Baghdad.

"Who gets Baghdad is still the most important thing," he said.

Results from a fifth province, Irbil, showed the Kurdish Alliance, representing the two main Kurdish parties, defeating the upstart Kurdish party, Gorran, in the self-rule territory.

Iraqi officials who have seen wider counts from across the country said al-Maliki's coalition appeared to be coming out on top.

Speaking to Al-Jazeera TV, Ammar al-Hakim, who heads the Shiite Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, said al-Maliki's bloc was ahead "by some seats." He said the assessment was based on information supplied by 40,000 observers from his alliance.

Almost all Iraqi political parties and coalitions post observers at polling stations and counting centers across the country, serving as a check against fraud.

Chaos reigned through much of the day before the first results were posted on large TV screens, with election officials offering different explanations of how much information would be released and when.

The officials said they had no deadline for releasing final results and were undecided about whether they would make public more results Friday.

Leaders from competing political parties visited the counting center during the day, which officials said helped ensure the count's transparency. Others questioned the appropriateness of candidates getting so close to the counting process.

Al-Maliki underwent surgery Wednesday but was quickly released from the hospital and back at work Thursday, according to a statement from his office. An adviser, Yassin Majid, said the surgery was "simple," but refused to say what it entailed.

____

Associated Press writers Sameer N. Yacoub, Qassim Abdul-Zahra, Lara Jakes, Katarina Kratovac and Rebecca Santana contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGHDAD — First results from Iraq's parliamentary election showed the prime minister and his secular rival locked in an extremely tight contest Thursday amid fraud allegations by rival parties a...
BAGHDAD — First results from Iraq's parliamentary election showed the prime minister and his secular rival locked in an extremely tight contest Thursday amid fraud allegations by rival parties a...
Filed by Adam Taylor  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:02 AM on 03/13/2010
Can you even fathom a stat"could be one of the great achievements of this administration."a statement like this from Biden?:

THIS administration? Are you kidding me? So now Obama gets credit for Democracy in Iraq? LOL

NEWSWEEK:

"something that looks mighty like democracy is emerging in Iraq. And while it may not be a beacon of inspiration to the region, it most certainly is a watershed event that could come to represent a whole new era in the history of the massively undemocratic Middle East."

-- a strategy that was fiercely opposed by Messrs. Biden and Obama, by virtually the entire Democratic Party, the political class, and almost all of the foreign policy establishment -- was a wise and politically courageous decision. That doesn't necessarily mean the war itself was worth the cost. Where Iraq finally ends up will determine that matter. But it's clear, I think, that the commonly held view that Iraq was "probably the biggest foreign policy mistake in American history" (Joe Klein) was wrong and foolish. The former American ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, put it as well as anyone has: "In the end, how we leave and what we leave behind will be more important than how we came."

Amazing....I have always thought Bush did the right thing but handled it badly.....Now Obama is going to get credit? LOL That's funny right there....Obama can actually cause the whole thing to go tohell in a hand basket..
11:17 PM on 03/11/2010
Irak is a great democracy - the new Athens maybe - where both candidates Al-Maliki and Alawi are American-trained operatives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
08:12 PM on 03/11/2010
His (Al-Maliki)political troubles will be after of departure of the American troops,instability.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
javajava
Pastafarian Liberal Progressive Socialist Hippie
11:18 PM on 03/11/2010
Yeah. We most likely witnessed the last Iraqi "free" election. There will be instability but a governing faction will emerge. Pray the streets are not filled with more innocent blood.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
07:32 PM on 03/11/2010
Would it be too soon for the INA to claim the vote was rigged, take to the streets, and become the darling of the Western media?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
porsche996
an inelastic scattering of photons
07:22 PM on 03/11/2010
The western MSM might as well just report that Al-Maliki has won a tremendous landslide victory of overwhelming endorsement as they did in the first days after the election of Karzai in Afghanistan.

The results are proven to irrelevant. The leader is determined by the western powers....regardless of the legitimacy of the election or the will of that country's people, this is a proven fact, but the western MSM will go along with the farcical display and subterfuge of revisionist history double speak.

Karzai was elected as leader of that democratic government as Bush was elected the leader of this one and Al-Maliki will be elected leader of Iraq.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
05:57 PM on 03/11/2010
BTW, does anyone here know who got control of Iraq's largest oil field, the Majnoon Field, under Al Maliki? HINT: it was neither an American company nor a jen-tyle company.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
porsche996
an inelastic scattering of photons
07:24 PM on 03/11/2010
zionistoilmafia.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Khirad
09:11 PM on 03/11/2010
Dutch aren't gentiles? Malaysia isn't America, though. I'll give you that.
05:08 PM on 03/11/2010
al maliki and al hajaj beyoussef is one you know what mean al hajaj benyoussef
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
04:52 PM on 03/11/2010
Since the invasion two players have benefited greatly. First, the Kurds. Non arabs who were second class citizens to the Sunnis and Shiites. Now its the time of the Kurds, who are not beholden to Bagdad, to flex some political muscle. Perhaps an independent, Kurdistan. The other beneficiary is of course Iran.
05:10 PM on 03/11/2010
An independent Kurdistan would mean Civil War.

Iraq does not need any more Civil War.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
07:30 PM on 03/11/2010
And not only in Iraq.

(But it would be funny to see the US and others try and twist themselves up in knots trying to figure out which side to favour. In Turkey, they have to be careful not to get too far from the Turkish government, or there goes the TAPI pipeline, and any hope of keeping Iran and India from becoming entwined.)
04:52 PM on 03/11/2010
What Iraq needs more than anything is a legitimate government that is able to create some semblance of stability.

If Al Maliki is the man to do it I say; More power to him.

And the USA as all of the West and Russia and China should do whatever we can to help the country become stable.

The Iraqi people deserve far better from the world and history than they have received.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
05:54 PM on 03/11/2010
Al Maliki is the direct product of an American war crime.
09:23 PM on 03/11/2010
Al Maliki is an Iraqi.

Are you?
04:02 PM on 03/11/2010
i think the iraqi problem is going to star the usa dont knowes what meanes the iraq
10:05 PM on 03/11/2010
That's easy for you to say.

Although, I gotta agree on this one.
02:05 PM on 03/11/2010
Thank goodness America brought democracy to the Iraqi people. And Kudos to a clean, corruption-free election.

Now if we could only force, I mean teach, democracy to the rest of the world.
03:56 PM on 03/11/2010
"If you have something good, you don't have to force it on people. They will STEAL it from you!" - Dick Gregory
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kassandrasduplex
05:55 PM on 03/11/2010
Democracy at the barrel end of a g. un. They used to call it "pacification" when Smedley Butler was doing it. I love puppet shows.
01:46 PM on 03/11/2010
Is anyone taking bets on when the NEXT Iraqi election will be held?

I'd like to put $20 on "Never"

And I'd GLADLY lose the bet!
04:53 PM on 03/11/2010
I don't think we should be pessimistic.

Iraq has come a long ways since the "Surge."

And I think we should all have hope. Not despair.