iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Democratic Senators Fight Obama Over State Projects In Health Bill

ALAN FRAM   03/13/10 06:31 PM ET   AP

Health Care Bill Kickbacks

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says he wants projects helping specific states yanked from the health care bill Congress is writing. Democratic senators, being senators, beg to differ.

The Senate-approved health measure lawmakers hope to send to Obama soon would steer $600 million over the next decade to Vermont in added federal payments for Medicaid and nearly as much to Massachusetts.

Connecticut would get $100 million to build a hospital. About 800,000 Florida seniors could keep certain Medicare benefits. Asbestos-disease victims in tiny Libby, Mont., and some coal miners with black lung disease or their widows would get help, and there are prizes for Louisiana, the Dakotas and more states.

"We're going to do what we have to do to get a bill out of the House and Senate," said James Manley, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. As for Obama's wish list of deletions: "We'll certainly keep it in mind as we pull together a final bill."

That tepid salute underscores the prickliness with which many senators have greeted what they consider Obama's meddling in their business and raises questions about how successful the president will be in erasing the special projects from final legislation.

It also highlights a spat between a White House and Senate, dominated by the same party, that the president has ignited just as he needs to garner support to finally push his No. 1 legislative goal to passage over monolithic Republican opposition and nervous Democrats.

Obama's proposal to eliminate state-specific items comes with polls finding heightened public opposition to backroom political deals. Republicans have been happy to fan that discontent. Many Democrats, particularly House moderates facing tight re-election battles this fall, are eager to dissociate themselves from such spending.

The president wants votes from House Democrats "who were deeply offended by those provisions in the Senate bill," said Sheryl Skolnick, who analyzes federal health legislation for CRT Capital Group of Stamford, Conn. "Clearly the math was, 'I gain more in the House by taking out those provisions than I lose in the Senate.'"

Obama has railed against the "ugly process" of cutting special deals, but the president and his top advisers were prime players in negotiations on the agreements to win votes and push the legislation forward.

Republicans say Obama's push to remove deals for states won't help. Because every Democratic senator voted for that chamber's bill and all its special provisions, even voting later to remove them leaves those Democrats in a pickle, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told reporters Friday.

"They will have then voted for them before they voted against them," McConnell said of the bill's projects, an echo of the line that 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry uttered that proved politically damaging.

Obama came out with a summary last month of the nearly $1 trillion health overhaul legislation he wants. It specifically eliminates $100 million in extra Medicaid money the Senate bill provided solely to Nebraska to help win support from that state's Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson. The so-called Cornhusker Kickback drew such widespread scorn that even Nelson favors repealing it.

Obama also proposed changes in the Senate bill that, without mentioning it, deleted extra Medicaid money for Massachusetts and Vermont, the Florida Medicare exemption and some money for Michigan, according to White House officials.

Days later, at Obama's nationally televised meeting with bipartisan leaders on health care, his 2008 presidential rival, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., criticized the Senate bill for exempting 800,000 Florida seniors from cuts in the privately run Medicare Advantage program. Obama surprised him by agreeing, and that tone has carried over as the White House and top congressional Democrats labor to complete a compromise health package.

"We've made it clear to the Senate that the president's position in the final legislation should not contain provisions that favor a single state or a single district differently than others," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said this week.

There are exceptions. The White House says $300 million for Louisiana, which helped win support from moderate Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., should survive because of that state's struggle to rebound from its 2005 pummeling by Hurricane Katrina.

Even so, Obama's targeting of state projects is going over poorly in the Senate.

Take Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who helped win extra Medicaid money for his state in the Senate health bill.

Vermont is one of several states that have already boosted the benefits they provide to many poor people. All states would get added federal financing for a nationwide Medicaid expansion under the Senate bill. But states such as Vermont – already providing more generous benefits – say they're being shortchanged and don't want Obama taking that money away.

"What I told Harry Reid is that Vermont does the right thing, and I don't want Vermont to be penalized for doing the right thing," Leahy said.

The White House asked lawmakers to delete $100 million to build a public hospital in Connecticut inserted by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. But the money will remain in the final bill, according to people familiar with Democratic negotiations who spoke on condition of anonymity to disclose the unannounced decision. Less certain is the fate of other money the White House wants eliminated for Montana.

Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., put a provision in the Senate health bill allowing many of the 2,900 residents of Libby to qualify for Medicare benefits. Some of them have asbestos-related diseases from a now shuttered mine.

"It simply doesn't make sense to ignore this obligation, or victims of these disasters," Baucus said.

Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., won a Senate provision making it easier for longtime coal miners or miners' widows to get compensation for black lung disease.

The Senate bill also has extra money for hospitals and doctors in North and South Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.

___

Associated Press writers Erica Werner and Charles Babington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says he wants projects helping specific states yanked from the health care bill Congress is writing. Democratic senators, being senators, beg to differ. The ...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says he wants projects helping specific states yanked from the health care bill Congress is writing. Democratic senators, being senators, beg to differ. The ...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,196
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (51 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suzukimom
05:37 PM on 03/15/2010
Now I know why Bernie Sanders supports the bill... $600 million over ten years for Vermont is a lot of money. So at least we know Bernie's price to sell out the rest of us.

I heard him in an interview last week, and he was complaining about how Kucinich won't get behind the bill. In doing so he attempted to paint Kucinich in a negative light. It is deeply disappointing that someone we might have thought of as having a great deal of integrity, Sanders, has not only sold out on his own ideals and the American people but would also attack the only Democrat, Kucinich, who has not sold out. Very sad.
03:52 PM on 03/15/2010
Shove off Baucus, you maroon.
08:22 AM on 03/15/2010
Well, no surprise here, the formatted audience participation soap opera continue in Ameria's now titled drama "Health-Care Reform". Wake Up America!!! Each and every week for the last 15 months or so someone comes out with a new episode of twists and turns that the mass media will pitch as could this be... the cause of health-care derailment? A host of potentially new villians continue to surface while the masterminds of this drama keep trying to portray themselves as the heroes, telling everyone NO and start over!!! On cue the participants go into a frenzy name calling, labelling, arguing and debating the same information over and over again seeking that adrenaline rush of what will come next. It doesn't matter that the status quo is unsustainable both fiscally and in lives. Words like honor, ethics, morality, and trust are being eroded from our society. Lies are taken as truth and packaged as the core of American values. Truth is labelled as something we all need to run and hide from out of fear that something worthwhile and beneficial would help someone other than ourselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okieborn
Equal Rights For All !
06:37 PM on 03/14/2010
Sen. Baucus ,
How are the payoffs going with the pharmaceutical and Insurance companies ??
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sarabono
Oldie but Goody
09:29 AM on 03/15/2010
And the Florida PAYOFFS, and Vermont, and Conn, and South Dakota, and North Dakota, and Nebraska, and Louisiana.......

This Bill is like the Stimulus, lot's of fat and little meat for the middle class working folk....

And did i memtion new fines (taxes) for the middle class....extracted via "big brother" mandates....
03:52 PM on 03/15/2010
Well I suppose.
05:31 PM on 03/14/2010
Republicans think they can attack Democrats for voting for the state-specific handouts in the senate bill before voting against it. That is the funniest thing I have ever heard.

First, Republicans have been completely hypocritical and have flip-flopped on a number of issues during this debate, so they can mention the state-specific stuff and Dems can mention a number of things like the exchange, medicare cuts, etc.

Secondly, the state-specific stuff won't be in the bill anymore,so if they try to attack that element, they would look bad for not voting to remove that stuff when the vote comes up on the reconciliation bill,

Third, they said they were for reform, but haven't voted for it nor did they do anything about it when they were in power. Sounds like empty promises.

They are grasping at straws at this point
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanetE
07:45 PM on 03/14/2010
Here's the problem:

The current Senate bill (with all its inadequacies such as different states being allowed to slip while all the other states have to pay) is the one that has to be voted on WITH NO CHANGES.

If it passes, IT WILL BECOME LAW. PERIOD.

Now, I ask you . . . no matter what the Senate promises the House (yes, we will definitely make all the changes you want), why in the world would they? And how in the world COULD they? They barely got it passed the first time with it exactly the way it is.

The Senate would have to try to make the fixes the House wants, but the Senate didn't want those things, that's why they changed it to begin with!!!

And the changes would have to be done through reconciliation. However, only budget related matters can be voted on that way. And most of those fixes are not allowed to be voted on that way, they would have to have 60 votes, not 51.

So, you tell me. WILL the House get those fixes made by the Senate, no matter what they are promised? I highly doubt it.
08:03 PM on 03/14/2010
good
08:36 AM on 03/15/2010
You say that the reconcilliation process relates to the budget, which is true. Please tell me which items listed in the articles can't be considered in the budget? Doesn't reconcilliation mean presenting a provision in the budget resolution directing a committee(s) to change existing law(s) in order to bring spending, revenues, or the debt-limit into compliance with the budget resolution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
partyof1
Liberals Don't Think, They Feel. It Is Just That S
12:05 PM on 03/14/2010
Reid says taxes are voluntary.. another Liberal in his own universe. Thats the best news I have heard all day.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6q0slMhDw8&feature=PlayList&p=4A0FF4339E8F12D0&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=1
03:53 PM on 03/15/2010
duh
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
11:32 AM on 03/14/2010
Do these Senators think this HCR bill is good for the country and their states or not? Then take out the pork and let them vote for it on the merits of the bill. If they are motivated by pork then we are not getting a reasonable appraisal on the merits of the bill.
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
11:03 AM on 03/14/2010
Obama, in a rare display of sense, knows these earmarks will raise the cost of the bill exponentially
10:37 AM on 03/14/2010
This is OH so typical of Senators. Here they go again. The House and Speaker Pelosi do the heavy lifting and the Senators reward themselves. The President needs to call them out publicly, although I know he is not inclined to do so. The Senate is a terrible body of feather-bedding, do-nothings. We, the citizens need to change them as often as possible and in the case of Democrats, during the primaries.
Back to Speaker Pelosi, she is very, very effective and for this reason the Republicans has elevated her as a primary target. But the American voter needs to pay close attention to who has been effective on behalf of the Public and who is simply feeding at the Public trough.
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
11:08 AM on 03/14/2010
Thank you. I think she's one of the best ones up there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:09 AM on 03/14/2010
All these special deals should be funded by the companies who caused the problems, not funded by the American taxpayer. The coal and asbestos industries should be held accountable for the health problems they have created.
Agent672
Myers's in Life
03:55 AM on 03/14/2010
In regards to this bill I would like to quote former candidate Obama. "Enough!". Pass the damn bill!
photo
24hourrifle
A time comes when silence is betrayal
08:12 AM on 03/14/2010
"former candidate obama"....y'mean that dude who used to be a progressive?......i remember him....that guy was f'king awesome.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
goldnchyl
We are one
08:45 AM on 03/14/2010
anyone who would consider Barack Obama a progressive at any time during the campaign was not paying attention. Or maybe suffering from the dreaded projection dis-ease.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Pandaforum
01:35 AM on 03/14/2010
obamacare is a corrupt bill being passed by corrupt legistlators. the American voters will make their voices heard in the 2010 elections.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Svrkevi
01:53 AM on 03/14/2010
bleh bleh bleh...can we please move on the education and immigration..I agree...you disagree..lets move on
03:25 AM on 03/14/2010
I'm voting Democrat in 2010, but since I live in North Central Washington it won't matter much. Only Republicans get elected here. Patty Murray has my vote for Senate. Dino Rossi might run and could beat her. He's a right-wing kook and will get huge support from the entire East side of the state. Eastern Washington is a lot like Idaho. FoxNews conservatives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanetE
01:01 AM on 03/14/2010
Oh, I just found out something.

You know, there's an advertising/marketing gimmick called "the bandwagon approach".

As you may know, it's when you make people think that EVERYONE else is doing this so of course you should too. Pelosi etc keep saying OH, we are almost there, we will have ALL the votes we need in a few days ......

but I just found out that there are FIFTY-ONE Representatives who are still on the fence, still unsure of how they will vote. FIFTY-ONE.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:27 AM on 03/14/2010
We know Nancy is lying

If she had the votes, she wouldn't be talking about it.

She would have called for a vote & passed the Senate bill as her president ordered her to do.

They are all lying and have been since day one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Svrkevi
03:06 AM on 03/14/2010
whoa, HCR has been awesome...statements like this make it so entertaining..politics are going to get reaally boring once it passes though..sigh a slow summer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littlerabbit
12:25 AM on 03/14/2010
Democrats just don't know how to be winners. When the R's were in the majority, they didn't have this kind of trouble.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:34 AM on 03/14/2010
Democrats' leadership works for the same people as the Republican leadership.

They are doing what they intended to do, force people to buy insurance.

That has been the goal since day one and here we are, on the verge of the president signing into law a bill that forces everyone to buy insurance.

They have been quite successful so long as you know their goal. Obama never intended to do anything he claimed. He threw his supporters under a bus long ago. As do most presidents.

They are corporate shills who are paid to convince people to vote against their own self interests.

Obama & Bush were both very successful at doing so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Svrkevi
01:55 AM on 03/14/2010
I don't see it that way...I see it as insurance companies being FORCED to carry us. To many companies take money from costumers...and then drop them when the costumer becomes them. Insurance companies will no longer be able to do that and will all now be forced to compete for us. Of course they're going to get PAID like crazy..but you the costumer decides which one...there is such a thing as a good insurance company.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lairs
12:35 AM on 03/14/2010
WOW, are democrats waking up???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanetE
11:51 PM on 03/13/2010
When we are young, we think our parents know everything, we look up to them and admire them.

As we get older, we realize they are only human and they do make mistakes.

And when we realize that, we feel disappointed.

Well, call me a late bloomer, but I have always felt that our men and women in Washington were intelligent and were listening to us and fighting for us.

And I have to tell you now, I am EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTED. And sad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 AM on 03/14/2010
I was a citizen activist (self financed lobbyist) for about ten years.

Most politicians are little more than used car salesman. They tell people what they think they want to hear. They promote the "good" while ignoring or downplaying the "bad."

Obama's mandatory insurance & pork bill is an excellent example.

If you pay attention to his pitch, he is extolling the virtues of buying insurance. That is his entire message. He wraps it in language that leads people to believe it will solve all their little problems when it will do no such thing.

He is an insurance salesman on a grand scale and no different than the guy coming to your front door telling you why you need to buy his amazing product.

Which about all any politician is.

There are rare exceptions but they don't usually remain in office for very long.
12:37 AM on 03/14/2010
Your right about the salesman part but I don't see any serious opposition to the current president. We just want to keep it clean and have a good debate in the next election. Our goals are long term.
We're sticking with the 3rd string quarterback.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
05:17 AM on 03/14/2010
To really put yourself in their shoes, go out and raise a million dollars to keep your job. I am in awe that so many will risk it all to do the right thing as they see it.