More

Less Than Half Of Americans Consider Themselves Middle Class: Poll

First Posted: 05/15/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:50 PM ET

Family

Slightly less than half of Americans consider themselves middle class, according to a new survey by ABC World News, and four in ten people who think they've achieved middle class status say they're struggling to keep it.

Fourteen percent of the 1,005 survey respondents say they consider themselves "upper-middle class," 39 percent working class and 45 percent middle class.

The average income for poll respondents who consider themselves middle class is about $55,000 a year. Self-described working class folks earn roughly $35,000, and those who think they're well-off earn $95,000. "But income is far from the sole determinant of self-defined middle class status, likely because family size, expenses, local costs of living and other circumstances also come into it," the poll notes. "Even among people with incomes under $25,000 a year, 41 percent describe themselves as middle class. So do 38 percent of those with household incomes over $100,000."

(There are plenty of people who do not think that a household income of $250,000 makes for a rich household, as we are reminded whenever the subject of taxes comes up. It's a state of mind.)

The Commerce Department produced a report in January for the Vice President's Middle Class Task Force that objectively measured obstacles to attaining the middle class lifestyle. That report found that it's more difficult to do than it used to be:

"While incomes for married-couple and single-parent families with two children have increased significantly, much of this rise occurred in the 1990s. In part, these increases occurred because parents are working more hours in order to maintain higher income levels," the report said.

"Unfortunately, while incomes have risen, the prices for three large components of middle class expenses have increased faster than income: the cost of college, the cost of health care and the cost of a house. Thus, we conclude that it is harder to attain a middle class lifestyle now than it was in the recent past."

Rebecca Blank, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs at Commerce, told HuffPost on Monday that the increased costs of college and health care justified the administration's focus on reforming those industries.

"In general, I think that's not a very good thing at all" that it's more difficult to obtain a middle class lifestyle, she said.

For most people, homeownership is the benchmark for middle class membership, with 80 percent of ABC's poll respondents saying that owning a home is a "necessary element" of middle class life.

Part of the survey reveals how the recession disproportionately hurts the less well-off. "Underscoring the depths of the economic crisis, 28 percent of middle-income Americans say
someone in their household has been laid off or lost a job in the last year," the poll says. "That jumps even higher, to 39 percent, among lower-income Americans, and drops considerably to 16 percent of those with $100,000-plus incomes. There's a difference in impact at the low end: Less well-off people are much more apt than those who are better off to say the layoff caused them serious financial hardship."


Click here for a PDF of ABC's poll results.

Click here for a PDF of the Commerce Department's report.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Slightly less than half of Americans consider themselves middle class, according to a new survey by ABC World News, and four in ten people who think they've achieved middle class status say they're st...
Slightly less than half of Americans consider themselves middle class, according to a new survey by ABC World News, and four in ten people who think they've achieved middle class status say they're st...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,321
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
chuck prebys 02:50 PM on 03/15/2010
And the cycle will continue.
Middle class parents will work and work and believe in "the system", go home and watch the wealthy and glamorous on the TV and sigh as they hope their kids end up better than they did.
And the kids, being savvy and smart as most kids from most generations are, will go to school and being raised on the debauchery and greed they see on tv so frequently will graduate  Read More...
03:36 PM on 03/16/2010
$250,000 household income is not "rich" in many expensive states like CA or NY. for two income earners, it's squarely upper middle class. I've made over 80k a year and still had to budget very carefully and watch all my spending. I graduated college a few years ago with over 25k in student loans, yet at that income level, I can't even get a tax credit for student loan interest, which is the whole point of me going to college.

I don't have an iPhone or anything else of the sort (too expensive), and I bring my lunch to work most days. I don't own a flat screen tv, though I'm certainly thinking about buying it one of these days, but only if I get a good deal. I think most people of my income level are at least a bit like me, except those that like running up huge credit card debts. probably my only real luxury is a 2 year old car.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
03:55 PM on 03/16/2010
80k a year in NYC isn't a lot of money......... now try living on 35k in NYC with loans to pay........
08:52 PM on 03/16/2010
I live in an expensive area of California in the heart of Silicon Valley. $250K is still a lot of money even here. I don't have to live in Saratoga, CA, I can live in very nice areas in San Jose or in Sunnyvale where housing is cheaper and still have an extremely nice life style. I can send my kids to private school. I can take nice vacations and drive a nice car. I can live virtually debt free.

The problem here is that if I have a house with 3000 square feet, there is always someone who makes more who can have a house that is even bigger and a car that is even nicer. There is always someone with more money in Silicon Valley unless you are Larry Ellison or the Google boys.

Bottom line is that $250K is still a good income. You just have to not let yourself get sucked into spending $2.5MM on your house instead of just $1MM.
09:06 PM on 03/16/2010
For those of you outside of Silicon Valley, $2.5 MM will buy a nice, large, even new (3,000 sq ft) home in even fairly good neighborhoods. $1MM will buy a decent family home in Santa Clara or San Jose, and a reasonably comfortable town house in Palo Alto or Menlo Park (though there are some neighborhoods where it wouldn't even buy you a small house even in this economy).
09:10 PM on 03/16/2010
I don't think you can compare CA and NYC, I personally think NYC is so much more expensive. For one, there are energy/utility costs that are so much more, more expensive clothing for the weather, more wear and tear on clothing, vehicles, everything. Food is more expensive. I think $250,000 here in NYC buys a much lower quality of life than in some of the above mentioned expensive parts of California, but I stand to be corrected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
"Without a struggle, there can be no progress. "
02:06 PM on 03/16/2010
Define "Middle Class."

Middle Class, Lower Middle Class, Working Middle Class or Working Class would all be fairly accurate depending on the definition.

It seems to me that the "Middle Class" is partially a fiction

If we are talking class perhaps we could more accurately place ourselves in the Nobility or the Mobility.

I suppose I would be a part of the mob.

:-]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
03:57 PM on 03/16/2010
There is a difference between Middle Class and Middle income......... 250k in Omaha Nebraska puts you into the Rich category........... 250k in NYC puts in the middle Class

40k in Omaha puts in the middle class......... 40k in NYC puts you in the poor category
01:45 AM on 03/16/2010
Something very interesting happened in our economy in the last few decades. This has been a real "shake-down" economy. In every business interaction, it seems, companies size up people for every bit of "disposable" income and treat that as if it's gravy to go after. Home mortgages were evaluated based on the rosiest interpretation of what people had. Nest eggs, income cushions, rainy day funds -- these were prime targets, for insurance companies, telecommunications companies, utility companies, auto companies. Everyone seemed to feel that if they didn't stretch people into being tapped to the limit, they weren't doing their jobs. It's like they felt ownership over every free penny customers might have. This is very hard to describe.

Greed is not new. The need for the buyer to beware is not new. But this whole "shake-down" ethos was never such a way of life for mainstream business. When a telecommunications company might slam you for thousands of dollars one month, or a utility company might claim you didn't close your account at a previous address and are now on the hook for someone else's power, or the insurance company tells you the anethesiologist isn't part of the hospital bill and wasn't a preferred provider so you're on the hook for thousands you didn't expect from your surgery -- It's really tough for ordinary people not to be financially derailed by any of the business interactions they have in a middle class life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WYHKTai-Tai
Wyoming, Hong Kong, Tai-Tai
04:37 AM on 03/16/2010
Very well said. I agree. and fanned.
03:08 PM on 03/16/2010
I certainly agree with your assessment. Marketing companies use information provided by municipal agencies to "find" wealthy areas in which to market their wares. You can test this by going to a chain store in a more affluent district and a poorer district. The prices are adjusted to fit the customer base, and so are the goods offered to buyers.

Elizabeth Warren who has continuously advocated for a Consumer Protection Agency and has worked with demographics/income for 25 years, says that in terms of buying power today's paycheck is equivalent to the paycheck of 1983.

Ronald Reagan's budget director said that the tax breaks given to the rich never made it back into the economy. After WWII I witnessed what it meant to be middle class. The guys who benefited from college on the GI bill quickly ascended up the ladder with new homes/cars and their children able to attend college without assistance, while those who were not elegible to go to college under the bill did not. There has been no such "step up" for any generation since. I strongly believe that college education is a leading contributor to middle/upper class structure and should therefore be included in calculating or defining class structure, even though we are supposed to be a class-less citizenry meaning, not ruled by monarchy. When such a large percentage of people living at the poverty level deem themselves to be middle class it is cause for concern.
08:59 PM on 03/16/2010
I agree with your points, too. There was a really interested article in Technology Review in the '90s about the GI bill and how it resulted in not only this prosperous and highly education generation, but also in the strong state university systems we have. (I was also surprised to learn that since men were getting all the money, the number of women receiving higher and advanced degrees did not reach war and pre-war levels until the late '70s!)

Paying for education is an important investment in our society, especially since we made up for the lack of it for so long by the brain drain from other countries in science and engineering (and which Bush jr. essentially put an end to).

Anyway, that Technology Review article was thoroughly researched and supports your point very well. I wish I had a link! (It's probably easy to find with a search on their archives or at the library.)
12:52 AM on 03/16/2010
Alright, tr-olls. Let's have your solutions for the economy. Ops! I forgot. You don't have any.
12:30 AM on 03/16/2010
Thank you President Obama for making a bad economy even worse. Unemployment is much higher, the national debt is at an all-time high, foreclosures still climbing and homelessness is hitting epic proportions yet Obama has repeatedly failed at addressing this issues. Our president is a disaster and man who has never exhibited leadership a day in his life. Even with heavy majorities in Congress, he STILL can't accomplish anything. The only thing that has improved is his golf game.
12:38 AM on 03/16/2010
RE: he STILL can't accomplish anything

Yet you say he did all of those things. Make up your mind. Can he get things done or not?

I know unemployment is HIS fault. Address the issues? Name one bill that Dems in congress have brought forward or a policy proposal by the president that the Repugs have not blocked or attempted to block. Now you're trying to shift the obstruction to the Dems when we both know that all along it has been the Repugs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Kennedy
11:35 AM on 03/16/2010
yes, repubs are obstructionists but part of the problem is the Dems have not come together. Key Dems have been partially responsible for blocking much of the legislation.
01:13 AM on 03/16/2010
No, Obama is not making things worse. When he took office, we were losing over 700,000 jobs a month. Now it is down to 30,000. Were you concerned about the fact that Bush took a surplus and turned it into a record deficit? Oh, that's right. Cheney said deficits don't matter.

The worst recession since the Great Depression can't be fixed overnight. You say Obama's golf game is improving as if he wasn't doing enough while others claim he is trying to do too much. Which is it?

It's too bad that Republicans have chosen to play politics by blocking EVERYTHING to try to make Obama look bad rather than participating in finding solutions to the problems our country faces.
02:19 AM on 03/16/2010
The Repug plan all along has been to stop everything the Dems try de ad in it's track and to then use no results as fire power against them and, more so, against the president.
12:24 AM on 03/16/2010
I feel no sympathy for anyone who voted Democrat and is now facing foreclosure.

If you voted Democrat, you voted for this terrible economy. Remember, you voted for this if you voted for Obama and / or any Lib.

No crying about losing the home.
12:28 AM on 03/16/2010
And voting for a Republican would have accomplished something positive?
12:41 AM on 03/16/2010
No. If you voted for Reagan or any of his Republican successors, you voted for this economy. Today's economy is Ronald Reagan's coming home to roost.
10:27 AM on 03/16/2010
Since Reagan cut the tax rates starting in 1982, the wealth of the USA has increased by about five times from about $12 Trillion to about $50 Trillion.

Just because you do not have the education or the work ethic or the ambition to go and do something to increase your wealth, you should not complain and cry that you were left in the dust. You have no one to blame but yourself.
photo
Rudy2shoes
Retired Administrator
12:20 AM on 03/16/2010
The class destinctions we try to make in America are contrived. They really don't fit the real life equasion of income=status. As in any system, there are only two classes; Ruling class and working class. Ruling class is anyone who can effectively affort to aspire to the ruling elite. In America it is an issue of money and can theoretically be attained by anyone. The working class is comprised of those whose incomes are determined and regulated by others and who "work for a living" with very little or no unearned income. There are sub groups of the two classes and, like it or not, there are "no class" people. There are two major political parties that represent the ruling class, both of which regulate and maintain the working class.

It's that simple. Everything else is make believe.
12:49 AM on 03/16/2010
RE: In America it is an issue of money and can theoretically be attained by anyone.

There's the rub. In theory it can be obtained by anyone. Way too many in the working class vote thinking they will become part of the ruling class someday. Truth is fewer than 5% ever will.
12:15 AM on 03/16/2010
How can a survey with about 1,000 respondants be generalized to all America? Seriously. How about they make statistics a mandatory course for journalism.
12:21 AM on 03/16/2010
Sample sizes for a statistical survey range from about 350 to over 1600. Statistically the results are valid with a confidence level (usually 95%) and a margin of error.

Statistical surveys do just that, generalize about the whole population. Seriously!!
12:10 AM on 03/16/2010
The American voter, perhaps the most stupid of all the industrialized democracies, has continually voted for those whose agenda is, essentially, destruction of the middle class. The voters have bought into the most massive transfer of wealth in the nation's history...transfer from the middle class to the top 1% of the most wealthy. And the middle class continues to support this and they will do so with gusto in the November elections by voting for members of the very party who have engineered the disappearance of the middle class. It is difficult to have any sympathy for the American middle class - they are getting just what they have and continue to vote for.
12:33 AM on 03/16/2010
I don't totally blame the voters, although there are plenty of uninformed voters out there. George Bush wasn't elected by the people in 2000. And I have major doubts about his election in 2004 with all the voting irregularities.
03:21 PM on 03/16/2010
Amen. Why do people keep shooting themselves in the foot by voting for rich repulican ideaology?
photo
Rudy2shoes
Retired Administrator
12:05 AM on 03/16/2010
Ronnie why have you abandoned us we we need you so much now. Someone must step in and lower taxes on the rich so they will trickle down on us a little harder. That's the only way!
12:07 AM on 03/16/2010
Sarcasm, I hope.
photo
Rudy2shoes
Retired Administrator
12:24 AM on 03/16/2010
Don't you love the phrase "trickle down" Buff? I guess it means the same as "let them (peasants) have our droppings".
12:21 AM on 03/16/2010
We're tired of being trickled on.
12:30 AM on 03/16/2010
I didn't see your comment when I posted a reply to Rudy.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Lilly-G
11:48 PM on 03/15/2010
I haven't ever given 'class' much of a thought. I do have class, just don't think of it monetarily.
photo
Grannysue
Been around for awhile!
11:45 PM on 03/15/2010
Welcome to the U.S. serf system!
11:39 PM on 03/15/2010
Would somebody explain to me how anybody making $250K+ thinks he/she is not wealthy. Just so you get a clear idea of how much that is, $250K+ is more than $20,000 a month. How is that not rich?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
12:10 AM on 03/16/2010
Where is your empathy? Do you know what a maid makes these days and lets not even talk about how much the sixty foot boat coast to moor in San Diego Harbor.
12:15 AM on 03/16/2010
Any maid that makes $250K+ is rich.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WYHKTai-Tai
Wyoming, Hong Kong, Tai-Tai
04:42 AM on 03/16/2010
Where do I get that maids job???!!
11:33 PM on 03/15/2010
Lately it seems that the lower half of the middle class is reframed as "needy" and therefore new government programs and benefits are generated to help them. The upper half of the middle class is designated as "among the richest of Americans" who need to contribute more to the investments in the lower half. Go figure. What remains of the middle class is a guy somewhere in Kansas. One thing for sure- when you look at the standard of living of today's middle class, compared to the middle class of the 1940s-1960s there is no comparison. Typical homes today are 3-4 times as large, multiple vehicles, electronic toys etc that yesteryear's middle class just did without
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
UncleJimbo
BLANK!
11:03 PM on 03/15/2010
This is really not a difficult problem to diagnose.....The Entire Country,except for the Top 10%,are getting Poorer....Every Day! Static or retreating Wages....Higher Health Care Costs....Fewer Benefits....Higher prices for all the Basics! .....NewsFlash...The Rich People Have ALL the Money!