iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO Chief, Called To White House Over Last Minute Health Care Flare Up

Obama Labor

First Posted: 05/17/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:50 PM ET

With a health care reform proposal being patched together for final consideration in the House of Representatives, gripes over a key element of the legislation could trip up the delicate process.

On Wednesday, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka was called into an unplanned meeting at the White House to discuss late-stage negotiations on a proposed tax on high-end insurance plans. According to sources familiar with what transpired, congressional leaders had begun discussions earlier in the day (perhaps last night) about accelerating the tax's impact in order to produce more savings under the president's revised health care bill.

Under the president's plan, those families with health care plans over $27,500 and individuals with plans over $10,200 would be taxed starting in 2018. That tax would be indexed to the Consumer Price Index plus one percent, which would provide some additional comfort to those with high-end policies -- specifically for labor workers who had bargained for these plans.

The plan, however, got tripped up after congressional negotiators received poorer-than-expected feedback from the Congressional Budget Office, a senior Democratic hill aide confirmed. And as a compromise, on Wednesday, they began discussing indexing the tax simply to the Consumer Price Index.

"What the White House is putting out is not any big major changes to the deal," said a source briefed on the matter. "What they are talking about is the way things are right now the tax was indexed to CPI+1 and they want to change it to CPI general inflation."

Trumka, who has fought tirelessly against an excise tax, was summoned to the White House to discuss the matter late in the afternoon. Whether the adjustment was agreed to or was enough to endanger the powerful union's support for health care legislation is not yet known.

The AFL-CIO will be discussing the matter more formally at a meeting among officials tomorrow.

"I can't get in to what he discussed with the White House," said AFL-CIO spokesman Eddie Vale. "But he will be discussing health care with the executive committee tomorrow."

With Additional Reporting By Arthur Delaney

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 977
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
03:22 PM on 03/19/2010
CORRECTION: Use Capital Gains, not Liquid Assets
Until Congress members, politicians & the rich experience the equivalent high costs of medical care, nothing substantial will be done.
........................................................... HEALTHCARE REFORM
.........................................................ALL PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE
..........................Family of Four: Annually 6% GROSS INCOME & 10% CAPITAL GAINS
Capital gains for calendar year.
Adjust percentages so funds collected equal costs.
Work out details of transition from profit based to functional based healthcare.
Republicans and Democrates represent the rich Americans, not the 97% of Americans.
Please wake up America.
01:36 AM on 03/19/2010
So now we know what he got from his visit to the White House. An extended "Special interests" exemption of the Cadillac tax from the original bribed agreement of 2013 to 2018 instead.
01:00 AM on 03/19/2010
Until Congress members, politicians & the rich experience the equivalent high costs of medical care, nothing substantial will be done. Thus all pay 6% of gross income plus 10% of liquid assets for all medical costs (family of four).
........................................................... HEALTHCARE REFORM
.........................................................ALL PAY THEIR FARE SHARE
.........................................6% GROSS INCOME & 10% LIQUID ASSETS (family of four)
Adjust percentages so funds collected equal costs.
Work out details of transition from profit based to functional based healthcare.
Republicans and Democrates represent the rich Americans, not the 97% of Americans.
Please wake up America.
04:50 PM on 03/18/2010
I wish Unions would get together and form a third party to oppose these corporate Dems.
03:53 PM on 03/18/2010
"Is this the best we can do? Only 3% of Americans will go to a new public plan, while currently 33% of Americans are either uninsured or underinsured?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nhvAluve5k




-- Kucinich, referring to the House public option that Pelosi has said won't be in the bill. (Apparently, we can do even worse.)

Kucinich's on Countdown (no real cost controls):


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1S3s6G-AcGc

"They're whipping against the public option they pretended all year long to so vigorously support."
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/12/democrats

We're talking about the watered-down-to-nearly-nothing public option that Kucinich excoriated.

This a subsidy for a profitable industry with players like Anthem who raise rates by 39% -- for corporations whose job it is to create profit for shareholders by denying care and/or by extracting as much money from tax payers as possible.

But, of course we all know that enough people will cave to the pressure. Corporate welfare always wins.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Disciple1
To err is human;To disagree with me is ignorant.
11:13 AM on 03/18/2010
This is a non-issue, as a long-standing member of various labor unions, I can say with great confidence that the AFL-CIO is not going to throw a wrench into the works if this amounts to know more than a minor modification to the original agreement. Let's not make news where there is none.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulfla99
10:46 AM on 03/18/2010
Obama, the ALF-CIO and the unions.

It can not get any more c*rrupt than that.
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
11:38 AM on 03/18/2010
Actually, yes.

You would be allowed to suggest that...
12:34 PM on 03/18/2010
Really? I was thinking Cheney Halliburton Blackwater Enron AIG Goldman Sachs...etc...etc....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mystic01
Proudly pro-union
01:27 PM on 03/18/2010
Agreed. They define corruption.
01:40 AM on 03/19/2010
I was thinking they both qualify. I don't choose favorites in a cesspool of choices.
10:13 AM on 03/18/2010
Trumka as the Secretary-Treasurer of the AFL-CIO took the 5th when he was under investigation over an illegal funding scheme with the Teamsters. Everyone has a right to take the 5th, but the AFL-CIO prohibits office holders from doing so. Just more proof on how corrupt labor unions are.

Wondering what Obama promised him using taxpayer money?
10:08 AM on 03/18/2010
10 years of revenue used with 6 years of expense. This is what it has come to. Making unions exempt and taxing others with similar plans. This is what it has come to.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:03 AM on 03/18/2010
Obama said he wanted to fundamentally change America. Unions, Acorn and various other special interests gave big money to him and now they want their cut.Obama needs to pay off everyone including Dem congressmen in this horrific government takeover to get support.I dont trust the CBO thaqt is using Obamas unsubstantiated numbers to calculate their findings and unbelievably these people are going to let Obama get away with this.
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
10:17 AM on 03/18/2010
When you add in Acorn as a "special interest", it just makes you look ignorant.
02:48 PM on 03/18/2010
I don't understand the overall approach. The reason Clinton may have been successful balancing the budget may have been because he avoided cost speculation. He didn'say, "this is what I want to do and this is what it will cost ", he said, "this is what I want to do".
10:00 AM on 03/18/2010
If you are going to get away from special interests you have to include the unions
10:17 AM on 03/18/2010
And trial lawyers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amondale
10:00 AM on 03/18/2010
New main ... CBO numbers are out ...

DEMOCRATIC HC BILL COST: $940 billion over a ten-year period

SAVINGS: $130 billion 1st ten years, $1.2 trillion over the next ten years.

GOP HEADS EXPLODING: Priceless
10:07 AM on 03/18/2010
How do you pay for the 4.6 trillion in new spending that Oshama either voted for, or has signed into law as Prezident?

Twenty years from now, let's meet back here and see if the CBO numbers were correct...For the first time in Human History.

Regards,
Paulo1
Thanks for reading, (even if you disagree)
09:59 AM on 03/18/2010
Please please please Mr. Trumka have a spine and kill this monster give away to the insurance industry.

The Democrats have sold out the progressives on every single issue and are now selling out the country with this monstrosity. Much as I loath the idea of a Republican administration I am not willing to put up with a Democratic one that is just as bad. Kill the bill, lets take our lumps for political ineptitude and selling out the base in the fall and move on. (Without Obama Pelosi and Reid)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spartacus275
I'm still here
02:30 PM on 03/18/2010
So let me make sure I have this right. You are willing to put up with another 8 years of Republican rule that would set the middle class in this country back another 20 years? Have you ever heard of not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good? Medicare, Social Security, COBRA were all bills that were less than PERFECT when they were enacted. Paulo1 you are totally delusional.`
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
09:57 AM on 03/18/2010
In his FOX interview Obama mentions the "Left". You never hear any Republican president mentioning the "Right" in a similar fashion.

"I have rejected a whole bunch of provisions that the left wanted that are — you know, they were very adamant about because I thought it would be too disruptive to the system. " -- Obama

I think the above sentence encapsulates it all.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,589589,00.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amondale
10:00 AM on 03/18/2010
Of course you don't hear any Republican mention the righttards. Which ones are you referring to? Tea Baggers? Conservatives? BeckBots? RushBots? FoxBots? There are too many factions to encapusulate them all.

Republicans are divided and will ensure Democratic wins for the next few election cycles if they continue on this current course.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
10:08 AM on 03/18/2010
You might have missed the gist of my message. ;-)
12:27 PM on 03/18/2010
sposton,
You need to get your facts right. President Obama is not saying he rejected a lot of republican ideas because Republicans are the right. He said he rejected a lot of the "lefts" idea's meaning his own party. Get with the program guy. But then it sounds like you don't know which program you are in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
01:04 PM on 03/18/2010
Read what I've said one more time because sure as hell I did not say what you are implying.

Obama is saying he did not go with the Left because that would have been too "disruptive" to the system. That means he went to the right to please the "system".

My point is that no Republican president would have done anything like that to please the other side claiming what the "right" wants would be too "disruptive" to the system. Get it? They get what they want and Democrats can't.

What Obama has done is a like a unilateral disarmament for no good reason because he still did not get any Republicans. This process waters down what is already watered down. Pathetic performance for both Democrats and Obama. They take off the table everything before they start negotiating and then they have nothing to negotiate with.
09:56 AM on 03/18/2010
Just a side note,

Why is it OK for PMSNBC to cut away from the Republican response to the CBO numbers, and the "deemed" rule being used for the first time to actually pass a bill that affects ALL americans?

When Fox cuts away from Liberal drivel, the lefties here scream and yell....Double Standards at play once again?

Proof that the the Liberal agenda is one fold..."Do as I say, not as I do"
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
soupson52
Truth to power pays big dividends
12:23 PM on 03/18/2010
Sir. Ignorance does not equal bliss. You are unaware of the repub's use of the "deemed" rule?
Even faux shoud have mentioned it at some point.
01:15 PM on 03/18/2010
it has never been done on 1/6 of the economy
01:13 PM on 03/18/2010
agreed