More

Out Of Control: 'Independent' Groups On Track To Outspend Candidates In CA Governor's Race

Governors Race Spending

MICHAEL R. BLOOD   03/22/10 07:22 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — Six-figure donations are rolling in, radio and online ads are running, and researchers are digging for dirt on Meg Whitman, the leading Republican candidate for California governor.

This isn't a look inside Democrat Jerry Brown's campaign. Brown is not in charge or technically even involved in the operations.

The effort is the work of independent Democratic-linked groups that are essentially acting as surrogate campaigns for Brown at a time when he faces a huge fundraising disadvantage against Whitman. The billionaire former CEO of eBay intends to spend more money on the race than any candidate for governor in U.S. history.

The political operations are prohibited by law from coordinating with candidates, but they are free to spend as much money as they want on a politician's behalf. In fact, the Democratic groups could end up raising and spending more money than the candidate himself, a first in a California governor's race.

The movement is reshaping the way elections are waged in trendsetting California while offering a glimpse into America's future after the U.S. Supreme Court in January gave corporations and unions new freedom to spend on many campaigns.

The trend is also an expansion of what has played out in recent elections on a smaller scale. The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, for example, helped President George W. Bush win a second term in 2004 by challenging John Kerry's war record.

And in recent years, California has seen a surge in spending by Indian tribes, companies and labor groups trying to elect friendly candidates to the Legislature, sometimes in amounts that dwarf spending by candidate campaigns.

"Campaigns, particularly for governor and U.S. Senate, are not going to get waged between candidate A and candidate B," said Bill Carrick, a Los Angeles-based Democratic consultant with decades of experience in state and national politics.

"There will be all these satellite, independent campaigns that might have a more profound effect on the campaign than the candidates."

The group began targeting Whitman long before Brown had even officially announced his candidacy. Whitman's campaign is calling for an investigation of one of the groups because it believes they are breaking the law.

The new political order is being shaped largely by Whitman's presence. The former CEO at eBay has already poured at least $39 million of her fortune into the race and could spend an unprecedented $150 million by November.

Brown won't even come close to those numbers.

Figures released Monday show the California attorney general and former two-term governor has about $14 million in the bank. Democratic operatives say he could raise $45 million – but that's only if every person who has donated to a Democratic candidate for governor in recent elections gave him $25,900, the maximum allowable donation for the 2010 race.

Whitman's rival in the GOP primary, Steve Poizner, is another wealthy scion of Silicon Valley who could spend tens of millions of dollars on his candidacy.

For Democrats, the fortunes have rekindled haunting memories of 2006, when Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger used a commanding edge in fundraising to seize control of his re-election race.

If Whitman emerges victorious from the Republican primary, her fundraising edge could put Brown on the defensive in a race with no clear favorite. An independent Field Poll released this week shows the two in a statistical tie in a hypothetical matchup.

That's why other Democrats are stepping in.

Unlike candidate campaigns, the outside groups could bank six- or seven-figure donations from wealthy individuals, unions or sympathetic organizations. One is linked to supermarket billionaire Ron Burkle, a major Democratic donor and longtime friend of former President Bill Clinton.

The groups have set lofty goals they might never reach – raising together as much as $40 million for the Democratic cause.

The advertising and activities of the outside groups could allow Brown to warehouse money while staying above the day-to-day scrum of campaigning, at least for now. Since announcing his campaign this month, his most visible activity has been a string of media interviews.

Brown's political committees have been in virtual hibernation for months, except for fundraising. Meanwhile, independent groups have taken on many of the functions of a campaign, except for the name.

Level the Playing Field 2010, for example, has hired a professional researcher to plumb Whitman's business records. It is running ads on radio, while Brown has not. Its Web site features postings and videos with headlines such as "Meg Whitman's Fake Town Hall."

The backbone of the group includes Chris Lehane, a strategist whose parents were involved in Brown's 1992 presidential campaign; Ace Smith, a strategist who ran his attorney general campaign; pollster Paul Maslin, whose firm handled polling for Brown's attorney general race; and fundraiser Michelle Maravich.

Brown "is going to have to husband his resources and focus them on the later stages of the campaign," Lehane said. Level the Playing Field is "trying to fill that space."

Another group, the California Accountability Project, has staffers shadowing Whitman and Poizner at events to watch for slip-ups – a job usually for a campaign. The group, backed by the Democratic Governors Association, is coordinating with other Democratic groups, which is permitted under campaign law.

Another independent Democratic committee, California Working Families 2010, plans to run ads produced by Larry Grisolano, a veteran strategist who worked on President Barack Obama's campaign.

The group hopes to raise at least $20 million, the same target as Level the Playing Field.

The most recent government records, covering July through December, show Brown paid no political staffers. His campaign said it has about a dozen people on board, but government records released Monday showed that as of March 17 it had only two paid staffers, consultant Steven Glazer and spokesman Sterling Clifford.

Brown has "the people he wanted working on his campaign," Clifford said. The independent groups "have a right to be concerned about an election and share their thoughts with the public, in whatever way they can afford."

Republican lawyers say Level the Playing Field might be working furtively with Brown's campaign, violating election law, and have called for a state investigation.

"There is no doubt these are front groups for Jerry Brown," Whitman spokeswoman Sarah Pompei said. "They are going to be doing his dirty work."

Whitman's campaign points to a Brown speech this week in which he urged union members to attack his rivals.

"I'd rather be the nice guy in this race," Brown said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

LOS ANGELES — Six-figure donations are rolling in, radio and online ads are running, and researchers are digging for dirt on Meg Whitman, the leading Republican candidate for California governor...
LOS ANGELES — Six-figure donations are rolling in, radio and online ads are running, and researchers are digging for dirt on Meg Whitman, the leading Republican candidate for California governor...
Filed by Billy Silverman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 82
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
Littlewords
My micro bio was outsourced to my nano-bio: I'm me
12:31 AM on 03/24/2010
Independents? California has two outrageously wealthy 'Republican' candidates running in the state, one of which is a billionaire....hardly independents.

That said, thanks to five activist jurists on SCOTUS, independent will be taken to a whole new level as corporations start dumping money into campaigns in their attempt to move us to a future state of CorpAmerica...so sad and our election process will be corrupted to levels we never thought possible as corp leaders much more frequently permeate between corporate and political leadership positions as they quickly and deeply erode, denigrate, and hollow out our beautiful government by and for the people.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
12:06 AM on 03/24/2010
Just had THREE Meg attack Poinser ADS within MINUTES . . . media must be SO HAPPY she's "running" . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henrypapillon
Mitt--free up the last 9 years' taxes
08:41 PM on 03/23/2010
As long as "Tweety-bird' whitman gets defeated, that's all I care about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HHarvey
Do not feed the trolls
07:46 PM on 03/23/2010
Damn right we'll be doing his dirty work. Someone needs to tell Meg that all politics is dirty.
photo
CaroleK1970
I want my country forward
07:43 PM on 03/23/2010
Meg might have a chance on RuPauls "Drag Race" reality show but not as a governor. she could use a good ambush makeover though
07:39 PM on 03/23/2010
Dream on, Meg. You could spend every dime you have a hundred times over and we're still not selling the job to you.
05:15 PM on 03/23/2010
YOU'VE BEEN OUTSPENT!

hurry, bid again don't let this election get away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
03:06 PM on 03/23/2010
By "independent", you mean corporations, churches and unions.

The Mormon Church has spent millions attacking gay rights across the US, with the Catholic Church joining in. Now they can just buy politicians to push their agenda, completing their dreams of theocracy (although the LDS Church already runs Utah).
02:21 PM on 03/23/2010
Please Ms. Meg, We need more details, so far, I see an overlay of hate and ambiguity.

What, exactly do you want for 46 million dollars...??
02:14 PM on 03/23/2010
Did anyone mention that she is a REPUBLICAN.....ha ha ha ha....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
filmasart
02:04 PM on 03/23/2010
Huffington Post needs to block these "What has Jerry Brown Done for You Ads." You have controls over the content Google supplies in your adwords account. WTF HUFFINGTON POST! Is this the DRUDGE REPORT?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
12:02 AM on 03/24/2010
make$ no $ence to have the$e ad$ herr . . . .
photo
me again
I'm not wrong....
09:05 AM on 03/23/2010
Whitman ruined E-Bay.....she now can ruin Cali......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tommy McGlaun
09:54 PM on 03/23/2010
It's not hard ruining something that's already been ruined.
photo
Littlewords
My micro bio was outsourced to my nano-bio: I'm me
12:33 AM on 03/24/2010
She will surely find a way to quickly make it worse rather than better. That is the real issue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 AM on 03/23/2010
I want how it was when Moonbeam was Governor.

I like his monastic ideas, as well as his way-ahead-of-the-time idea on energy, education, justice.

If I had more than $25 to donate I would.

I hope there are some old Hollywood typhoons who still will donate.
04:32 PM on 03/23/2010
Tycoons? Or typhoons as in windbags?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:37 PM on 03/24/2010
LOL, brainfart. Sorry. Tycoons. Or a gaggle of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
12:50 AM on 03/23/2010
Here is a list of just some of the bills Schwarzenegger has vetoed:
SB 840 (Kuehl) SINGLE PAYER

* Would establish a process to create a single-payer health care system in California that would enable all residents to have health coverage.

SB 973 (Simitian) PUBLIC INSURER

* Would create a statewide public insurer, connecting existing regional, county-based health care plans, to compete with private health care plans and provide consumers more affordable coverage choices.

SB 1440 (Kuehl) CAPPING ADMINISTRATION AND PROFIT

* Would set a minimum medical loss ratio — requiring every insurer to spend at least 85 percent of premiums on patient care.

AB 2 (Dymally) HIGH-RISK POOL

* Would have reformed the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Program (MRMIP), which provides coverage for “un-insureables” who have “pre-existing conditions.” Efforts would make the high risk pool more affordable and available and eliminate the annual $75,000 cap on benefits.

AB 1945 (De La Torre) INDEPENDENT REVIEW

* Would establish an independent review process if an insurer wants to rescind coverage, and raises the standard in existing law so that coverage can only be rescinded if a consumer willfully misrepresents his health history.

AB 1887 (Beall) MENTAL HEALTH PARITY

* Would require health plans to provide coverage for all diagnosable mental illnesses.

AB 1962 (De La Torre) MATERNITY COVERAGE

* Would require all individual insurance policies to cover maternity services.
12:22 AM on 03/23/2010
She practically ran eBay into the ground. Could only imagine the damage she could do to California.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
filmasart
02:00 PM on 03/23/2010
Can you elaborate, or link to articles? I'm curious.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
12:04 AM on 03/24/2010
oh Meg, you go girlfriend . . . . .
photo
Littlewords
My micro bio was outsourced to my nano-bio: I'm me
12:49 AM on 03/24/2010
Just google her name and ebay, there are plenty of stories. In summary, ebay lost 50% of its share value during her last two years at the helm of the company. She could not evolve the ebay model as the web experience and needs evolved. ebay thrived in the web 1.0 world, but fell quite hard in the web 2.0 era. In comparison/contrast holiday traffic was actually falling at ebay (on the ever expanding web traffic) while folks like Amazon began to eat into antiquated ebay's model and she blew tons of money buying skype for far far too much money. Her price paid made no sense to those in the industry. I know she now regrets the very bad decision and she really let down her share holders that were already suffering from falling stock values.

Here is a succinct short read...by the way, your online, so you might want to try looking stuff up that is easy to find off a simple quick search query. I wasn't sure in your reply if you were being snarky, extremely lazy, or some of both. I say this because Meg's departure tied to stock value failings, loss of market share to contemporaries, along with bad decisions were well publicized. She failed to evolve ebay and started making some bad investments with far too much of the company's money.