More

Pay Czar Kenneth Feinberg To Review Executive Pay At Bailed-Out Banks

STEVENSON JACOBS and DANIEL WAGNER   03/22/10 07:27 PM ET   AP

Bailout

NEW YORK — The Obama administration's pay czar is launching a review of compensation for 25 top executives at all financial firms that received federal bailout money, according to three people familiar with the plan.

Kenneth Feinberg can seek to renegotiate any pay deemed not in the public's interest but can't forcibly recoup funds, government and banking industry officials told The Associated Press on Monday. Feinberg is to announce the review Tuesday, according to the officials, who requested anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the plan publicly.

The review is required under the federal law that created Feinberg's position. It will mainly focus on the 2008 pay awarded to five senior executives and the next 20 highest paid employees at 419 firms that benefited from the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. The companies will be asked to turn over compensation data paid to those employees through Feb. 17, 2009, according to the officials.

CEOs at many large banks gave up bonuses in 2008 amid sharp criticism of outsized Wall Street pay packages. Feinberg's review will seek to determine whether other employees received pay deemed excessive or contrary to the public's best interest.

But his authority will be far more limited than the power he had over seven companies deemed to have received what the government extraordinary taxpayer assistance. Since Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. repaid their bailouts, Feinberg now has direct oversight of GMAC, American International Group Inc., General Motors Co., Chrysler and Chrysler Financial.

Feinberg is also expected to announce 2010 pay packages for those companies on Tuesday.

Last month, Feinberg criticized as "outrageous" bonus payments totalling $100 million to AIG employees from the same unit that nearly toppled the firm. Feinberg was unable to stop the so-called retention bonuses, which were contractual obligations agreed upon before the insurer received a $180 billion federal rescue at the height of the financial crisis in late 2008.

In October, Feinberg ruled that the top 25 executives at companies receiving exceptional assistance from the bailout fund would have their pay capped in most cases at $500,000 for 2009. They were required to receive additional compensation in the form of company stock paid out over three years, to try to tie their performance to the fate of their companies.

Even before Feinberg's decision, banks that had received billions in government aid to cope with the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression had been scrambling to repay the government so they could escape the TARP restrictions.

Still, the banks have been responding to criticism of their pay practices, paying more in stock that cannot be immediately sold rather than in cash.

___

Wagner reported from Washington.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK — The Obama administration's pay czar is launching a review of compensation for 25 top executives at all financial firms that received federal bailout money, according to three people f...
NEW YORK — The Obama administration's pay czar is launching a review of compensation for 25 top executives at all financial firms that received federal bailout money, according to three people f...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
ctman47
Micro Me
11:46 AM on 03/23/2010
It is going to be hard to have a rationale discussion on any issue where you see the word czar in the title.
Why don't they change the name to something less emotionally charged?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:51 AM on 03/23/2010
NEW ANNOUNCEMENT: the FED will try to stop the ocean tides because they cause too much instability.

about as likely a chance.
03:48 AM on 03/23/2010
what a joke
12:08 AM on 03/23/2010
Whaaaa???? Have I not heard this already, several times?? Why does he always tell ahead of time? It seems to jinx the outcome!
11:48 PM on 03/22/2010
A lot of the business of Wall Street is figuring out how to get around various rules and regulations - in fact, this was one of the biggest causes of subprime (a lot of investors are restricted to investing in "Investment Grade" securities), but you also see it in "tax arbitrage" or structures, cross border transactions, etc...

It's not like the days of the old JPMorgan - help Company X raise money in terms of capital or debt or otherwise offlay risk to a more appropriate party...

So, they'll figure out a way around this too. It's what they do.
11:20 PM on 03/22/2010
A lawyer friend of mine who works on Wall Street tells me that all the government has to do to not pay these bonuses is to have the pay czar refuse to pay them. I hope that's finally happening.
10:51 PM on 03/22/2010
NONE of these bonuses are in the public's interest....this guy is a joke. We all know NOTHING will be done about the bonuses, so stop with the sham reviews.
09:23 AM on 03/23/2010
Correct, the guy is a paid off political appointee of Obummer's with no enforcement authority. nothing will happpen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:04 PM on 03/22/2010
How can you claim a bonus if your business is being underwritten by the taxpayer? This effectively means that the bonuses come from the public purse. Salaries too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Corners
08:45 AM on 03/23/2010
Yup, and all the money Goldman is using to make bets on Wall Street is also taxpayer money given to them for virtually nothing. Who cant make billions if you loan them billions at 0%? And that is exactly what goldman is doing and why they say they deserve billions in bonuses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
erinsf
Adjunct Pol Sci Professor, trying
09:48 PM on 03/22/2010
Hope he isn't affiliated with the SF Police drug lab.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duckfan00
Après nous le deluge
09:41 PM on 03/22/2010
Mr. Feinberg....Quid Pro Zero....that is what they deserve for their greed and arrogance...it is not that complicated as Americans are finally catching on to....Auction Rate Securities...Credit Default Swaps...Financial tools that are weapons against our interests....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Murray
09:39 PM on 03/22/2010
Nine, nine mine fuhrer! This is America, remember?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LemonMeringue
Happy Birthday, Steve Jobs - Feb. 24th
08:44 PM on 03/22/2010
if this is just for show, don't bother the American people with this.
08:42 PM on 03/22/2010
Czar ?....why do we have Czars in America ?....poor choice of words.
08:59 PM on 03/22/2010
Now really. Are you that naive? Think about why they (yes they, all 32) are called czars. Why do you suppose that is? Perhaps because they answer to no one but the president? Hmmmmm.......makes us think of____________?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 PM on 03/22/2010
Indeed. And we all know what happened to the last one. (Well, I should hope so).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
08:25 PM on 03/22/2010
The execs do not deserve a dime for a bonus , they should have to give 100% back to tax payers!
That is my opinion and I'm sticking to it!

Nirek
07:28 PM on 03/22/2010
So another cosmetic PR attempt that will ultimately be overruled by Geithner as harmful to his buddy Banksters. Wonders never cease with the Obama administration.
davyd56
Adapt & Overcome
07:46 PM on 03/22/2010
You know darn well that it would be MUCH worse under the rethuglicans.
09:02 PM on 03/22/2010
Oh yeah. Uh-uh. Yep. Sure thing. Unfortunately, we are just beginning to see exactly how WORSE it is going to be under this administration. Better worry about that and let your anger toward those bad, bad republicans go. You are gonna need your energy.
07:31 AM on 03/23/2010
Wow. Is that the slogan you hope to campaign on in November? "Well, it could be worse..." That's hardly inspiring. What a crappy rejoinder to "Change you can believe in."