More

Progressive Group Raises Money For New Candidates With Anti-Blue Dog Pitch

Krystal

First Posted: 05/22/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:55 PM ET

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee announced its endorsement of two relatively unknown Democratic House candidates on Monday, raising more than $40,000 for the pair with an email blasting more conservative Democrats for their work on just-passed health care reform.

"Many public option supporters sent us their thoughts about the health care bill passed by the House last night. Some feel betrayed -- others call it 'a start,'" says the fundraising pitch. "One thing's for sure: A public option was not included by the House despite thousands of us taking action and proving the votes existed in the Senate to pass this popular proposal."

The PCCC puts the blame for that squarely on members of the conservative Blue Dog coalition, citing reportage that House leadership shied away from reinserting a public option in part because it would offend the Blue Dogs, several of whom voted against the final bill anyway.

"I think that clearly the Blue Dogs played a huge role," PCCC co-founder Stephanie Taylor in an interview with HuffPost.

The PCCC exists to shake up the House dynamic that hands veto power to conservative Democrats. To that end, the group has endorsed Ann McLane Kuster in New Hampshire and Krystal Ball in Virginia, who are both running to the left of their opponents in upcoming Democratic primary contests.

"The issue that I'm primarily involved in is I've been an advocate for increasing access to affordable health care," said Kuster, who is running for a competitive seat vacated by Rep. Paul Hodes (D-N.H.), who is running for Senate. Kuster and Ball both pledged to sponsor a public option bill if they win seats in Congress.

"Voters during this process are not just looking for someone who has a 'D' by their name," said Ball, who is in the midst of a primary caucus contest with Scott Robinson. (Ball said her dad, an astrophysicist who did his dissertation on crystals, chose her name; her mother insisted it start with a 'K.') She said Democratic primary voters want someone who will "fight for economic fairness and social justice."

If she wins the primary, Ball would face freshman Republican Rob Wittman in the general election. Both Ball and Kuster are hoping to show some fundraising prowess by March 31 in hopes of winning broader support.

The PCCC formed at the beginning of 2009 to back the kinds of candidates the mainstream party apparatus -- the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, or DCCC -- might pass over because of concerns of "viability" in more conservative districts. The anti-Blue Dog pitch was effective; the PCCC's initial goal was to raise $30,000 -- a goal they'd surpassed by 6:00 p.m.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 192
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
Wupta
Parent
05:00 PM on 03/24/2010
Let's get them out of office
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Haus
03:28 PM on 03/24/2010
All blue dogs must go, how dare they try to reign in spending. The only way to move to a truly progressive government is to spend till we hit bankruptcy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Magdangal
Pirate Satellite
02:13 PM on 03/24/2010
progressives can win as long as they stand for something that worth standing for. if people have a choice between a conservative dem and a republicant then they will choose the republicant. the record shows that.
11:29 AM on 03/24/2010
I hope this group takes redistricting into account. Living in Tx. has taught me that the rethugs will do anything to geremander the lines. Our Rep. has survived not once but twice and still has to run in a heavy red district. Tom Delay made a mockery of the process and we lost Dem seats...poof. IT MATTERS!

Everyone needs to get involved in the local Dem party and get involved in the process now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Haus
03:31 PM on 03/24/2010
Yes, this, because democrats have never done this.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lazercat2008
10:30 AM on 03/24/2010
We already proved we don't need the blue dogs. Do you want to give these States back to the Republicans? Get your head on straight.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lazercat2008
10:19 AM on 03/24/2010
This may not be the greatest Idea. If we get rid of blue dogs in states that would otherwise be red states, you are cutting your own throats by turning the Senate and House back over to Republican Control.

A vote against a blue dog in a red state is a vote against our Majorities in the House and Senate.
11:36 AM on 03/24/2010
I understand not losing a seat in spite of our nose, but some of the Blue Dogs don't need to be Blue. Heath Shuler was put in 2006 mid-term and McCain only took that district by 1-2%. I polled that district and the biggest concern there was healthcare. He voted against it. I can understand concern of congresspeople who win in a red state where McCain took the vote 60-70% but I sure don't understand Shuler's vote.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
10:13 AM on 03/24/2010
I am proud to be one of the more than 2,500 progressives who have contributed to this group and hope that their sponsorship grows by ten-fold today and another ten-fold by the end of the month.
10:13 AM on 03/24/2010
The PCCC is definitely needed to push progressives that the DCCC ignores. For instance, Doug Tudor, Fl-12, is a retired Navy man who fared better in 2008 than any candidate in Florida without DCCC support and better than several Florida races where DCCC poured in millions. Wasserman-Schultz cowtows to her old Florida legislature buds rather than supporting true progressives. In 2010, Tudor faces a Democratic primary race against self-described Blue Dog Lori Edwards, who is already beholden to Big Insurance and is so Republican-lite that she offers no real choice against a Republican candidate. Check out Doug Tudor at www.teamtudor.org.

And remember, a Blue Dog represerntative is one press conference away from being a conservative Republican - just ask Parker Griffith, AL-05.
photo
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
07:20 AM on 03/24/2010
Run these dogs off!!!
05:21 AM on 03/24/2010
It is better to have a blue dog, than a thoroughbred Republican. If these "progressive groups" want to help candidates who can win general elections, it's their money, but if all they want is to become the left's own Club for Growth and help candidates win the same way Sarah Palin does, well then, I think they can be very damaging.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
waynesmyer
07:57 AM on 03/24/2010
Blue Dogs are "stealth" republicans! There are plenty of good Democrats who will not cater to the lunatic fringe!
photo
errol44
Just in town for the GOP circus
09:59 AM on 03/24/2010
Agreed. At least with Republicans, we expect them to be anti-working class/pro-corporate interests. We should neither expect nor accept that from Democrats.
09:48 AM on 03/24/2010
In Indiana, our big blue dog is going, but what will we get instead? I agree that progressives don't want to start looking like a fringe group.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ranta
I don't need no ****** badges.
12:31 AM on 03/24/2010
If Rahm supports them you know you got a Dog.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madbunny
Prison Guard - FireFighter - now a School Teacher
12:28 AM on 03/24/2010
Good. The one thing I hated seeing was the constant caving in to the republican demands that this be a conservative (as in republican) bill even though they were in the minority. The left gave away HUGE chunks of very popular ideas such as the public option, or medicare expansions in order to win over some votes. In the end, it was all a game from the Rs to weaken the bill and make it unpalatable to the general public.

I'd like to see a shift to the left everyime they play that game. If they don't want to get on board and contribute then they'd better be willing to expect that things will take a sharp left. After all, if they're going to vote against it anyway, why bother trying to make them happy?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
12:13 AM on 03/24/2010
Please please please take a page from the Massachusetts senate campaign. It doesn't work anymore to run a senate campaign as though it were a larger city council race. It take razzle-dazzle. Brown got in because they sold him like a box of soap wder. A fuzzy brown pullover sweater, the ad shot with a kitchen for a backdrop, and ZERO substance. Absolutely zero. I should try and pull up aBrown cmpaign shot with old Romney ad. I'd swear they were waring the exact same sweater.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dugmaze
Any man's death diminishes me
11:59 PM on 03/23/2010
As a progressive, I will vote for who best serves everyone's needs. I will not vote for a democrat simply because they're a democrat.

Conservatives are conservatives no matter what party they belong to.

If I could have voted on the healthcare bill, I would have voted no.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
11:47 PM on 03/23/2010
That is a great idea. Even though we might lose some seats, we will have more progressive ever since the 60s.