iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Volcker Rule: Bank Lobbyists Fight To Change 'Must' To 'May'

Financial Overhaul Volcker

Huffington Post   First Posted: 05/22/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:55 PM ET

As you may just have heard the devil is in the details. Or, in the case of the latest push to reform Wall Street, the devil is in whether or not the details will actually be mandatory.

Bank lobbyists looking to weaken the Volcker Rule are targeting its language, Business Week reports.

The financial reform bill unveiled by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D - Conn.) last week includes a rule prohibiting commercial banks from owning or investing in hedge funds, private equity funds or proprietary trading operations. The mandate, one of two chief reforms proposed by former Fed Chair Paul Volcker, was revealed by President Obama in January.

Dodd's bill stops short of implementing the Volcker Rule. Instead, it requires that the government "shall issue final regulations implementing" the ban. But lobbyists for the financial industry argue that it hasn't yet been shown that the rule -- which according to one somewhat questionable estimate would cost the top eight banks $11 billion next year -- would effectively curb any of the behaviors that led to the last financial crisis. Accordingly, industry reps are reportedly scrambling to replace 'shall' with something a whole lot less stringent. As one lobbyist told Business Week:

"We believe the regulators should have the discretion to deal with the situation on a company-by-company basis," said Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs at the Financial Services Roundtable, a Washington-based trade group. "You can't have a blanket prohibition on proven risk- management techniques."

When senators meet to debate changes, "our hope is that they change 'must' to 'may,'" Talbott said.

Citigroup already appears to expect the Volcker Rule may not be a rule per se. The bank -- the world's largest financial institution -- is still expanding its proprietary trading unit, Bloomberg reported last week:

Citigroup is trying to preserve the unit, which produces about $100 million of annual revenue, as banks face a proposed ban on proprietary trading dubbed by President Barack Obama as the Volcker rule. Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit fed concern among the unit's remaining employees that Citigroup's commitment might wither under U.S. pressure when he told a bailout oversight panel this month that banks shouldn't use their own money to speculate, the people said.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
As you may just have heard the devil is in the details. Or, in the case of the latest push to reform Wall Street, the devil is in whether or not the details will actually be mandatory. Bank lobbyi...
As you may just have heard the devil is in the details. Or, in the case of the latest push to reform Wall Street, the devil is in whether or not the details will actually be mandatory. Bank lobbyi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:44 AM on 03/24/2010
Size of tarp bailout is directly proportional to the greatness of the failed business model, and proof of it.
photo
collettethehedgehog
My micro-bio is So running on empty
12:10 PM on 03/23/2010
Changed from banks may make money on a risk to-banks must. Capitalism killed by Ayn Rand "Free Marketer's." The irony is epic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 AM on 03/23/2010
The FDIC should not back any accounts in an investment bank that gambles on these tricky investments. People would know this up front and it would be up to them whether they kept their money in these reckless institutions.
08:49 AM on 03/23/2010
Bankers have to protect their legal right to steal.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
04:15 PM on 03/22/2010
Wow, how do I get laws that pertain to me switched from Will to May? Income tax, and Mortgage agreements, speed limits, Man do I have a list!
05:46 PM on 03/23/2010
We have got to stop supplicating to these parasites. A third grader knows the word 'may' holds no value for the agreed in a contract. If they just have to change the word 'must', change it to 'WILL'.