More

South Korea Navy Ship Sinks Near North Korea After Explosion

South Korea Ship

KWANG-TAE KIM   03/27/10 12:57 AM ET   AP

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean authorities stepped up searches for 46 sailors still missing Saturday, hours after a naval ship sank near a disputed sea border with North Korea.

Navy and coast guard vessels, as well as air force planes, were searching the waters near South Korea's Baeknyeong Island where the 1,200-ton Cheonan sank during a routine patrolling mission.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff said rescuers had picked up 58 sailors but 46 still were missing.

President Lee Myung-bak ordered officials to find the cause of the sinking quickly while keeping in mind all possibilities, presidential spokeswoman Kim Eun-hye said Saturday. There was no indication North Korea was to blame, but troops kept a vigilant watch.

Lee reconvened a security meeting and instructed officials to make all efforts to rescue the missing sailors, the spokeswoman said. Kim added there were no signs of North Korean troop movement.

Some senior government officials have speculated the sinking may have been an accident, not an attack, South Korean media said.

Friday's accident happened hours after North Korea's military threatened "unpredictable strikes" against the U.S. and South Korea in anger over a report the two countries plan to prepare for possible instability in the totalitarian country.

The two Koreas remain locked in a state of war because their three-year conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, in 1953.

Since then, the two Koreas have fought three bloody skirmishes in the Yellow Sea waters. And in January, North Korea fired about 30 artillery rounds not far from Baeknyeong; the South Korean military fired 100 warning shots in response.

Unidentified military officials told South Korea's Yonhap news agency that an explosion tore a hole into the Cheonan's rear hull, shutting off the engine, wiping out the power and quickly taking the ship down. A number of crew members jumped into the water, Yonhap said.

Nearby Baeknyeong Island, four hours by boat from the South Korean port of Incheon but just 10 miles (20 kilometers) from North Korea, was turned into a triage center, with islanders helping to treat injured crew members, according to cable network YTN.

In Washington, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said Friday the U.S. was closely monitoring the accident, but there was no evidence that could indicate North Korea's involvement.

"It's looking more and more like it was just an accident that happens on a ship," Carl Baker, an expert on Korean military relations at the Pacific Forum CSIS think tank in Honolulu, said by telephone.

He said Pyongyang was unlikely to attack the far more powerful South Korean military.

___

Associated Press writers Jean H. Lee, Hyung-jin Kim and Kelly Olsen contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean authorities stepped up searches for 46 sailors still missing Saturday, hours after a naval ship sank near a disputed sea border with North Korea. Navy and coas...
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean authorities stepped up searches for 46 sailors still missing Saturday, hours after a naval ship sank near a disputed sea border with North Korea. Navy and coas...
Filed by Adam Taylor  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,208
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
02:23 AM on 05/20/2010
China need to step up in this situation, its looking more and more that a nuke in the right place might bring the north to its senses, lots of collateral damage for sure but its going to happen , we need to be first in this game. . Iran would change its rhetoric in a hurry. .
01:12 PM on 03/27/2010
If the North had anything to do with it they would be offering hyperbolic rhetoric in the upper spectrum of "shrill".....
12:58 PM on 03/27/2010
'Could have been a mine, and it's entirely possible for it to have been an accident...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidwayneosedach
11:56 AM on 03/27/2010
I wonder what Norht Korea's "spin" is on this? That they were being attacked?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:49 PM on 03/27/2010
Having lived on a US Navy destroyer for 4 years I can promise you that there are hundreds of things that can cause an explosion and sinking that have nothing to do with an outside attack. We once had a JP5 ( aviation fuel ) pipe burst in the middle of the night flooding several storage compartments. One spark may have blown the stern off.
11:53 AM on 03/27/2010
It might have been an accident. However, the Obama team is busy constructing an apology just in case the North was somehow involved.
01:11 PM on 03/27/2010
Geez, I have no idea what you are talking about but you sound bitter and uninformed....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:13 PM on 03/27/2010
Your post has as much validity as a Dem supporter shooting out a window. But hey truth never was a conservative strong point.
photo
local21
33% recall rate, Walker is next
09:54 AM on 03/27/2010
G8----" You Sank My Battleship "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Palaver
Men make laws, but the people follow custom.
09:29 AM on 03/27/2010
Good thing both countries don't want a war. If it was the U.S., we'd strike first then ask questions later.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
08:36 AM on 03/27/2010
>>>>>>>>>>>>>there was no evidence that could indicate North Korea's involvement......"It's looking more and more like it was just an accident that happens on a ship,"

Hmm, wonder if it might be prudent to wait until we know what the devil happened before we start talking out the rear about N. Korea and China?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
amazinggrace
Hakuna Matata
09:09 AM on 03/27/2010
Ah, a rare voice of reason.

Fanned KIVPossum.

Should have done this long ago:-) AG
09:48 AM on 03/27/2010
Makes every bit of sense to me.
07:11 AM on 03/27/2010
The headlline reads as though North Korea sank this ship but there is no evidence of that. WAY TO GO HUFPOST AND MSM! RACHET UP THE FEARMONGERING RHETORIC! As far as I am concerned, it was an accident, or option 2 the US did this deliberately to crank up the need to go after North Korea. That wouldn't be the first time (Gulf of Tonkin comes to mind. No Nukes for Iran but they threaten world peace, oh, and the US). The US is great at creating justification for invasions and occupations. We're still in Japan and they can't get us out. So much for free will and freedom of choice.
08:20 AM on 03/27/2010
Fanned !...

and what about "disputed" waters. Why that provocation?
10:58 PM on 03/27/2010
Wasnt Kissinger in S. Korea recently?

Gulf of Tonkin II
06:22 AM on 03/27/2010
This, really, is scary. North and South Korea are proxies, surrogates, for the Chinese Mainland and the United States. China knows we are in deep trouble financially and committed to a couple of stupid wars that they helped finance and will probably call in their marker of several trillion. I hope the Nuclear agreement between Russia and the U.S. holds, but that will require 67 senate votes????? Have we been set up?
07:35 AM on 03/27/2010
the loonys are in the house. if you are hoping for help from Russia you haven't been paying attention or very conversant with history. China isn't interested in a military confrontation when they can get every thing they want by asking. obama is an appeaser par excellence.
07:44 AM on 03/27/2010
I think your fears are misguided. "Red China" so to speak doesn't exist as we used to know it. China loves American and Western Money. NK is a headache for the Chinese becasue they are so very unstable. China will cast off NK in a heartbeat to maintain their economic status. NK offers nothing China econmoically. All North Korea is to China is a large piece of land that acts as a buffer between SK and China. NK is in the verge at a total breakdown. The people are staving and Kim Jong-il is a stark raving lunatic with serious health problems. When he dies, it will be interesting to see what will happen to NK.

I am not saying that there will not be a dust up, but the US has nothing to worry about since NK cannot even fired a missle that can reach the US not that it would ever be an issue....

China will not side with NK...That have way too much to lose.
07:50 AM on 03/27/2010
north korea is the attack dog china tried to house train and failed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
C Bevens
08:58 AM on 03/27/2010
Imiss is quite correct. China doesnt need the headache anymore. they pay a high price for thier buffer. but im not feeling my sympathy for the chinese. they reated this mess. I hope its annoying them to no end.
CB
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CoronaDischarge
Fired Up! Ready to go!
11:10 PM on 03/26/2010
To those criticizing the South Korean Navy, let's not forget our own difficulties, like the Thresher, or the Russian Kursk. Navy ships occasionally do carry explosive devices that may work unexpectedly, or their power plants may experience compromise, or any of a host of unforeseen things may happen, besides hostile actions against it. Until all the facts are known, there is really no conclusion to be drawn about the efficiency of their Navy or any involvement from North Korea.

So far accident seems to be the emerging consensus, unless I've missed a recent revelation.
10:49 PM on 03/26/2010
Sounds
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
11:26 PM on 03/26/2010
You mean SOSUS?

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_25/sosus2.htm
photo
tssent
The facts, ma'am, just the facts
09:30 PM on 03/26/2010
I don't understand why we have a such weak approach
always in getting a repressed country to clean out its own
garbage, meaning, doesn't it seem inevitable that we
are going to invade North Korea at some point (sooner
than later) and 'install democracy"?

How about instead of so much bloodletting up front
we try a few other things first, like:

+ Ok, don't laugh till I'm done please, how about a mass
flyover of North Korea by stealth jets which can't be shot
at or brought down and parachute millions and millions
of those new miniature cell phones that can take photos
and video and can text, and all that, as well as millions
and millions of flyers that explain to people how to use
them, followed by:

+ Another flyover dropping millions and millions and
millions of rechargeable batteries and mini-battery
chargers.

I mean really, if we're going to invade anyway and do all
that bloodletting and sht, why not try something cheaper
first -- both in bucks and in blood.

Let's arm the North Koreans with the truth. I mean, if
we have to do a flyover once a month with whole new
millions of telephones and batteries and chargers,
so what?

Let's let THEM revolt.
Let's let THEM clean up their own garbage.

Why is that we always have to go do the bloodletting
ourselves and pay with American lives and money?

millions and millions of telephones
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
09:37 PM on 03/26/2010
Dear Leader would put it out that anyone who touches the phones would die from US poisining and that if you pick one up the Army would cut off your hand to save your life.
photo
tssent
The facts, ma'am, just the facts
09:45 PM on 03/26/2010
And?
Aren't they dying anyway, even if just in increments?

Can you just imagine what you could do with such
power in the peoples' hands?

Tell them when and where to go.
How to start the uprising.
The day and time.

Does it matter if the government knows or intercepts
your messages?

A better question is, do I care more that fewer American
soldiers have to die for someone else's democracy ?

Absolutely, I do not.

I'm ready to die for my country's continued freedom.
They should be any less willing to die for theirs?
photo
tssent
The facts, ma'am, just the facts
09:53 PM on 03/26/2010
And once they've cleaned up the trash and thrown
out their own garbage

THEN let's send them food, help them rebuild
and stand beside them proudly as they form a
democracy.
photo
tssent
The facts, ma'am, just the facts
09:50 PM on 03/26/2010
Our technology has finally reached the point that we
can conduct the underground remotely, from thousands
of miles away.

Why all the hypocricy? Everyone knows we're already
in there (North Korea) doing all kinds of espionage, mapping
their underground silos or whatever, "....in case." Right.
The "in case" is an inevitability.

I'm tired of all the invasions and the taxes out children's
children's children have been paying since the first war.
Fk a buncha of that.

If the North Koreans want freedom and liberty, why should
we pay for it with our blood and our bux? Let 'em invest
in their own future.
11:02 PM on 03/26/2010
What's wrong with you? Perhaps you and the Dear Leader can enjoy a few pops, watch some porn, then tour the prison camps. Kim Jong-IL should be wiped off the face of the planet.
09:30 PM on 03/26/2010
So... the S. Koreans have a superior navy.

Yet this was a "random" explosion that blew a hole in the hull.

Some superior navy. By this logic, the N. Korean navy should have this happen to them once a month.

Can't have a superior navy if the vessels are prone to "random" and gigantic explosions that sink themselves.

So basically somebody torpedoed a S. Korean vessel and is getting away with it. Nice, I guess the bad guys just do whatever the h3II they please these days.
10:42 PM on 03/26/2010
Could have been a loose mine that had drifted on the currents. Generally best not to start a war unless you're sure the pretext for doing so is right.

eg Iraq - weapons of mass destruction
Vietnam - Gulf of Tonkin Incident
11:10 PM on 03/26/2010
I wouldn't worry too much. The SK government is usually pretty restrained. They are also used to incidents with the North, though this would be unusually bad if it was a deliberately placed mine. Still, I wouldn't feel very comfortable if I was on the penninsula right now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:08 PM on 03/26/2010
Accidents do happen. The hull of the ship will tell the tale-is the hole an innie or an outie.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:18 PM on 03/26/2010
In the first Gulf War, the USS Tripoli hit a mine that was originally sold to the Tsarist Russian government in 1913.

Not that this is a mine strike, but it's interesting.
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
09:45 PM on 03/26/2010
Don't forget the USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG-58), it was almost sunk by a mine in the Arbian Gulf in 1988.

http://www.navybook.com/nohigherhonor/pic-ffg58damage.shtml

The mine punched a nasty hole in her hull and the crew saved the ship by "sewing" it together with cables.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 PM on 03/26/2010
Ya gotta love those Navy guys, they can build a frigate out of rust razor blades if they have to.

Great line from "The Caine Mutiny Court Marshall": "As soon as they tell me who sweeps out the mines in front of the minesweepers, they'll have this thing down pat."