iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

9 Problems Destroying Our Oceans (PHOTOS)

Huffington Post     First Posted: 05/29/10 06:12 AM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 04:55 PM ET

The oceans are rising and getting warmer faster than predicted. 71% of our planet is covered by oceans, yet we still neglect them, harming the innumerable creatures that live in them, and polluting one of our largest resources.

In the fight for the environment, the health of our oceans should be a top priority. We've put together 9 of the biggest issues that threaten our oceans. Tell us which ones you think are the most important!

Loading Slideshow...
  • Overfishing

    Many marine scientists <a href="http://www.oceanconservancy.org/site/PageServer?pagename=issues_overfishing" target="_hplink">consider</a> overfishing to be the worst impact humans are having on the oceans. The Food and Agriculture Organization <a href="http://www.un.org/events/tenstories/06/story.asp?storyID=800" target="_hplink">estimates</a> that over 70% of the world’s fish species have been entirely exploited or depleted. By capturing fish faster than they can reproduce, we are harming entire ecosystems that interact with those species, from the food they eat to the predators that eat them. These losses make the ecosystems more <a href="http://explorations.ucsd.edu/biodiversity/" target="_hplink">vulnerable</a> to other disturbances, such as pollution. A complete overhaul of fishing policies, requiring global cooperation, is needed to achieve a sustainable system.

  • Irresponsible Fish Farming

    Fish farming, or aquaculture, is the growing response to wild fish stocks rapidly depleting. While it sounds like a good idea in theory, it unfortunately has many negative consequences due to poorly managed operations. Nutrient and chemical pollution can occur easily in open-ocean operations when fish feed, excrement, and medication is released into the environment. Farmed fish accidentally released into wild populations can also have <a href="http://www.fao.org/fishery/topic/14894/en" target="_hplink">destructive effects</a>, such as loss of native stocks, disease transmission, and damaging changes in habitat. Unfortunately, the biggest hindrance to overcoming the challenges of an industry that supplies nearly <a href="http://www.greenfacts.org/en/fisheries/l-2/01-fisheries-production.htm#5" target="_hplink">50%</a> of the world’s fish food supply is that it currently remains relatively <a href="http://www.oceanconservancy.org/site/PageServer?pagename=issues_aquaculture" target="_hplink">unregulated</a>.

  • Ghost Fishing

    Ghost fishing is an environmentally harmful issue caused when lost or discarded fishing gear continues to catch fish and other marine life. Often times, the traps trigger a chain-reaction problem when larger predators come to eat the smaller ones that have been ensnared, only to get tangled in the mess themselves. The issue of ghost fishing is <a href="http://www.fao.org/fishery/topic/14798/en" target="_hplink">most common</a> with passive gear that has been abandoned, and also poses a serious threat to other ocean vessels. Stray gear can be caught in the propeller of a boat, damaging or even disabling it. Many solutions have been offered, such as fishing gear made from biodegradable materials or incentives like the Republic of Korea’s <a href="http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/projects/koreajpa.html" target="_hplink">buy-back program</a>, which rewards fisherman for turning in old gear.

  • Garbage

    This one is the most obvious. It’s astounding how much of our trash finds its way into the ocean. Animals become easily entangled and trapped in our garbage, and it can destroy delicate sea life like coral and sponges. In addition, sea turtles and dolphins often mistake plastic bags for their favorite foods, jellyfish and squids, <a href="http://www.oceanconservancy.org/site/PageServer?pagename=issues_debris" target="_hplink">choking them</a> or clogging their digestive system. If that’s not bad enough, hopefully the <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090731-ocean-trash-pacific.html" target="_hplink">bigger-than-Texas trash vortex</a> in the Pacific Ocean and its <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/03/100302-new-ocean-trash-garbage-patch/" target="_hplink">smaller cousin</a> in the Atlantic will help serve as a wakeup call.

  • Acidification

    The ocean absorbs as much as <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080521105251.htm" target="_hplink">one third</a> of the CO2 emitted worldwide, which keeps us cooler but makes the ocean surface much more acidic. This has the effect of limiting calcium carbonate needed by coral, plankton, and other marine life that <a href="http://www.oceanconservancy.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&abbr=press_&page=NewsArticle&id=10341#OceanAcidifying" target="_hplink">use it</a> to build the skeletal frames and shells that protect them. Oceanic acidity has increased by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification" target="_hplink">25%</a> since the industrial revolution, and will eventually destroy much marine life if it increases at this rate.

  • Dead Zones

    Dead zones are areas where the sea floor has little to no dissolved oxygen. These areas are often found at the mouths of large rivers, and are caused <a href="http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/oceancolor/additional/science-focus/ocean-color/dead_zones.shtml" target="_hplink">primarily</a> by fertilizers that are being carried in the runoff. Unfortunately, the lack of oxygen kills many creatures and destroys entire habitats. At our current rate, dead zones will increase by <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081114/full/news.2008.1230.html" target="_hplink">50%</a> before the end of the century.

  • Mercury Pollution

    Scientists <a href="http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/ocean-mercury-increasing" target="_hplink">report</a> that our ocean’s mercury levels have risen over 30% the last 20 years, and will increase another 50% in the next few decades. Emissions from coal power plants are the <a href="http://www.nescaum.org/documents/rpt031104mercury.pdf/" target="_hplink">primary culprit</a>, dispensing poisonous mercury that works its way up the food chain, eventually coming to us through the fish we eat. This <a href="http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=9899" target="_hplink">neurotoxin</a> can alter brain development of fetuses and has been linked with learning problems.

  • Offshore Drilling

    Offshore drilling continues to be a debate, but it’s clear that proceeding with oil production will only exacerbate the dilemmas of our oceans. The use of fossil fuels is the reason our oceans have been heating up and becoming more acidic, but offshore drilling takes the risks even further. When oil is extracted from the ocean floor, other chemicals like mercury, arsenic, and lead <a href="http://science.howstuffworks.com/offshore-drilling-controversy2.htm" target="_hplink">come up with it</a>. Also, the seismic waves used to find oil harm aquatic mammals and disorient whales. In 2008, <a href="http://www.livescience.com/environment/080625-oil-drilling.html" target="_hplink">100 whales</a> had beached themselves as a result of ExxonMobil exploring for oil with these techniques. Furthermore, the infrastructure projects to transport the oil often create <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/02/offshore-drilling-oil-false-hope.php" target="_hplink">worse problems</a>, eroding the coastline. These realities are another reason

  • Shark Finning / Whaling

    The destruction of the ocean’s most important predators has significant consequences that ripple down the food chain. 50 to 100 million sharks are killed <a href="http://www.hsus.org/hsi/oceans/sharks/shark_finning/" target="_hplink">each year</a>, either as bycatch from fishing vessels or directly hunted for their dorsal fins, used in an expensive soup popular across Asia. When finned, the sharks are thrown back into the water, often still alive and left to bleed to death. Unfortunately, sharks reproduce fairly <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/01/jeanmichel_cous.php" target="_hplink">slowly</a> and don’t have a large amount of offspring, so these actions have long-lasting effects on the delicate ecosystems they help <a href="http://www.hsus.org/hsi/oceans/sharks/shark_finning/shark_finning_faq.html" target="_hplink">regulate</a>. Despite the 1986 moratorium on many types of whaling, it still continues to be a problem, with some nations like Japan looking for loopholes and lobbying for lax regulations.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

The oceans are rising and getting warmer faster than predicted. 71% of our planet is covered by oceans, yet we still neglect them, harming the innumerable creatures that live in them, and polluting o...
The oceans are rising and getting warmer faster than predicted. 71% of our planet is covered by oceans, yet we still neglect them, harming the innumerable creatures that live in them, and polluting o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 192
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:34 AM on 04/05/2010
BC Salmon farms are held to high standards when it comes to farming practices. They utilize everything from high tech underwater cameras to monitor feed and consumption as so to avoid dumping into natural habitats.

Many canadian citizens live on coastal communities and are passionate about the wild salmon in their area's, Salmon farming is trying to preserve the life of wild salmon. Overfishing is depleting the world’s wild fish stocks and Salmon farms take the pressure off of wild salmon and reduce the risk of overfishing and minimizing our wild salmon stalk.

Kind regards,
Molly W
06:49 PM on 03/31/2010
An age-old practice, fishing has the benefit of being widely accepted. Reforms to this industry, such as quotas, by-catch restrictions and endangered species protection, come about slowly – and often too late.

Land-based agriculture leads to marine ‘dead zones’ from fertilizer runoff, but the public has little appetite for challenging this industry.

Ocean acidification, which is caused by CO2 absorption, has a far-reaching impact. But addressing fossil fuel combustion around the globe presents a daunting challenge.

In the debate surrounding seafood sustainability, special interest groups focus much of their campaign on aquaculture without putting this misunderstood industry into context.

As a representative of Canada’s aquaculture industry, readers should know our operations are strictly monitored by five government agencies. Our companies comply with a framework of 73 pieces of federal and provincial legislation, which set clear guidelines around everything from stocking density to nutrient build-up under net pens. Readers should also know that antibiotic use on salmon farms is far lower than that of any other agricultural animal producing industry in the world. The Canadian industry is evolving quickly, and we’re working hand-in-hand with globally respected NGOs, such as the World Wildlife Fund, to continue improving our track record of sustainability.

We’re a proud industry that grows fresh, healthy and affordable seafood all year-round. I welcome anyone who’s interested in learning more to visit www.Aquaculture.ca, or contact us directly via the website.

Ruth Salmon
Executive Director
Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance
11:22 AM on 03/30/2010
this is an interesting conversation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:18 AM on 03/30/2010
Economic health will always take precedence over environmental health.
I'd like it if someone could convince me that's not true.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
06:34 AM on 03/30/2010
That is how most people see it because we're a stupid, shortsighted species. The fact is that the economy is a subset of the environment, its fate bound to that of the larger system upon which it depends. Any damage done to the environment has economic consequences.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:38 PM on 03/30/2010
Yes, and going along with what you say:
Damaging the environment reduces the economic choices that are available. This will be happening more and more, and I don't see we'll ever stop valuing economy over ecology.
We're so powerful, but natural laws just keep on doing what they do, and natural laws have the final say. I think we're in big-time denial about that.
12:36 AM on 03/30/2010
I didn't see problems with any of those things listed above.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:50 AM on 03/30/2010
I've described your malady in my posts here already so that fight ye'r look'in f'er has already been fought. enjoy if you can.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
12:50 AM on 03/30/2010
In fact, you would like to see more of all of them, right?
11:33 PM on 03/29/2010
I cannot understand the Left. Instead of getting off of their rear end and doing something, all they can do is squawk and squeal like a bunch of school girls.
11:56 PM on 03/29/2010
So what exactly is the Right doing about anything besides saying "No" to everything? Reading the news these days, all the squawking and squealing is coming from the Right, especially after losing the Healthcare battle, getting busted for spending RNC money in Strip Clubs, getting busted in affairs, confessing or denying their same-sex gender preferences, losing civility and all sense of decorum in Congress, and deciding to be the party of "Hell No." So please, enlighten us about what exactly you and your folks are doing.
12:33 AM on 03/30/2010
Here is what I am doing for the environment. I am using oil and paper products. I am using using lights (coal power) and I love to eat fish and chicken and beef.

I did stop dumping my oil on the ground and leaving my old tires in the forest a couple of days ago. So I am helping out too.
12:25 AM on 03/30/2010
I'm neither "left" or "right." I'm a Libertarian who believes that both major parties are pandering to destructive corporate greed that is threatening the sustainability of our global ecosystem. What Do I do about the problem? I volunteer many hundreds of hours every year alongside other dedicated volunteers of all political persuasions to help out Mother Earth.

We conduct beach and creek cleanups, We conduct water quality investigations on streams and lakes in our area. We work at information tables at environmental events. We help organize and run environmental education and fundraising events. We conduct our daily lives in ways that minimize our negative impacts on the environment. We plant native plants and trees in both State and National Parks and in our own back yards that provide benefits to our local wildlife species.

We make a difference every day while people like you sit around and whine about liberals.
12:34 AM on 03/30/2010
Good for you. You are one of the few.

I think the earth is fine so I am not doing any of those things. Besides, I have planted many trees over the course of my life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
09:03 PM on 03/29/2010
Global warming is increasing the number and extent of dead zones found in the oceans as well.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
09:31 AM on 03/30/2010
Fox news is repeating the claim that there is no global warming and that the thousands of scientists who say otherwise are merely part of a conspiracy to get funds. The fact that the second largest shareholder in Fox is Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud of Saudi Arabia, whose own religious establishment recently announced that any attempts to move away from fossil fuels is sinful, speaks for itself. A more informed opinion is that global warming is due to water vapor in the atmosphere. Although this is used as an excuse to deny human impact on global warming, the obvious question is why the increase in water vapor. The answer is simple enough. Increasing Green House gasses like carbon dioxide, methane, and ozone increases temperatures which in turn draws more water into the atmosphere as vapor; in short greenhouse gasses are the cause of the water vapor increase which is the effect.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
06:04 PM on 03/30/2010
Yes, good comments. I think scientists well know the reasons for the increase of water vapor in the environment. If temperatures decline, the water vapor will naturally decline as well as they are not a driver of temperature increase as is co2.
10:07 AM on 03/30/2010
Sounds to me like there has been a lot of global warming in your head....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
12:13 PM on 03/30/2010
Keep speading the Saudi talking point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
06:05 PM on 03/30/2010
Yes, unlike deniers I tend to use my head.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
08:58 PM on 03/29/2010
Man, it just breaks your heart to see that turtle carrying along that huge net that it can not escape from. I wonder how it can capture food weighed down by that net its entire life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fight The Right
08:21 PM on 03/29/2010
Rush Windbag said in no way can mankind harm the earth.......PAID FOR BY THE REPUBLCON PARTY
07:52 PM on 03/29/2010
I could agree with most of the items mentioned as being realistic environmental issues that need to be addressed. Two of them are not. Acidification is not an issue based on sound scientific evidence and study. In fact, it is nothing but an offshoot of the anthropogenic global warming hoax. Off shore drilling also has not presented the environmental problems it's detractors like to suggest.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
09:01 PM on 03/29/2010
Can you tell us how you arrive at your conclusion that "acidification is not an issue based on sound scientific evidence and study." What are your qualifications to reach such a conclusion? You mean to see that scientists can not even measure the acidity of the world's oceans? Why are you warming deniers so inflexible and dogmatic?
09:43 PM on 03/29/2010
My qualifications are that I am well educated and have several friends working in this particular field. When you have the time for educating yourself, the following article lays this fraud bare for all to see.

http://buythetruth.wordpress.com/2009/03/19/toxic-seawater-fraud/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
09:30 AM on 03/30/2010
You think the trend in global warming is a hoax? LOL.

Irish scientist John Tyndall in 1859 demonstrated under control conditions that the introduction of increasing greenhouse gasses into a controlled environment showed an increasing rise in temperature as it prevented heat for radiating out.

We know this is true by comparing Venus to say to Mercury. Although Mercury is closer to the sun, the side not facing the sun cools quickly and freezes. On Venus even the part not facing the sun the temperature remains high and cooling is almost nonexistent. The difference is Venus has a high concentration of greenhouse gasses.

On earth we have been increasing greenhouse gasses since the industrial revolution with the burning of carbon based fuels. To think this has no effect is on the level of denying reality. To deny the affects of global warming requires one to refute the scientific research of Tyndall - if one cannot do that, then all one has is uninformed opinion.
11:44 AM on 03/30/2010
I already sent you packing once before with your Tyndall argument. Tyndall identified water vapor as the primary radiant gas and not CO2. In fact his studies indicated that CO2 and other greenhouse gases other than water vapor play an insignificant role in radiant activity in the atmosphere. The Venetian argument is an Al Gore ruse and absolutely silly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:26 PM on 03/29/2010
I went to the beach and flatulated while standing in the water.
07:53 PM on 03/29/2010
Yes, but did you play with the bubbles?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fight The Right
08:22 PM on 03/29/2010
Rush is it you?......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rollingrock
05:38 PM on 03/29/2010
China and USA together are responsible for about 2/3 of the world's toxic emissions and greenhouse gasses. If these two countries went to war and nuked each other, all the world's environmental problems would be solved!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Rudderman
GOP: All fringe, no carpet.
04:36 PM on 03/29/2010
Mankind? I understand that, by definition, it’s not about kindness. But considering our general behavior toward each other and the planet, man-unkind would be more appropriate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pa30
All things bright and beautiful
02:27 PM on 03/29/2010
Pretty sad that the CITY conference in Doha just ended , with Japan not allowing any control of fishing or coral harvest. Our lame stream media barely covered it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mor-a-Les
03:09 PM on 03/29/2010
Please sign petition to boycott Sarah Palin's show on the discovery channel http://www.thepetitionsite.com/21/boycott-the-discovery-channel-networks
07:54 PM on 03/29/2010
I am going to watch it just because of your attempt to smear more political chit all over the place.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
09:45 AM on 03/30/2010
Considering her enviornmental record and her encouraging domestic terrorism discovery should be ashamed to pay her good money to provide a service obviously beyond the fake outdoors woman.
photo
Hugatreetoday
Do or do not, there is no try.
01:49 PM on 03/29/2010
EARTH'S OCEANS, not OUR oceans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:13 PM on 03/29/2010
The conceit is appalling and its the reason we can't solve problems at the same pace we create them.