iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Struggling Families Depend More On School Lunches

School Lunches Families

HEATHER HOLLINGSWORTH   03/27/10 10:32 PM ET   AP

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — For a couple tight weeks after taking in her sixth-grade stepson, Lisa Lewis fretted about how to pay for his school lunches.

Unable to find a full-time job, the 37-year-old works part-time at a Kansas City, Kan., daycare, earning minimum wage. On that money alone, she supports herself, her unemployed husband, her stepson and her 11th-grade son.

"I sometimes cry myself to sleep wondering how I am going to keep my family fed and things like that," Lewis said. "I'm making it but barely."

Her worries were eased when she found out she could get government assistance to pay for the younger boy's meals. Her older son already is part of the subsidized lunch program.

In the midst of a blistering recession, more families are flocking to the federal program that gives students free or reduced-priced lunches. Schools are watching for who enrolls in the program because it gives teachers insight into life at home and officials consider it a barometer of poverty.

The numbers are telling.

During the 2008-2009 school year, about 19 million students received free and reduced lunches, which is 895,000 more than the previous year – a jump of nearly 5 percent and that greatly outpaced the overall increase in school enrollment, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service. Typically, the increases are about 1 to 2 percent each year.

"We have seen record program growth over the past two years as we go through this difficult period," said Jean Daniel, a spokeswoman for the agency.

Meanwhile, 78 percent of school nutrition directors surveyed in the fall said they had noticed an increased number of students eligible to receive free or reduced-price meals for the 2009-2010 school year, according to the School Nutrition Association, a nonprofit that represents those who prepare school meals.

To qualify for the mostly federally funded school meal program, a family of four can earn no more than $28,665 for free lunch and $40,793 for reduced-cost lunches of no more than 40 cents. The guidelines are different in Alaska and Hawaii, where families can earn more and still qualify.

As more students get subsidized lunches, some cash-strapped districts say they are struggling to provide the meals with the amount of money the federal government provides. Schools are forced to dip into other parts of their budgets and they're pressing lawmakers for more funding. For all, it's a stark example of how the recession is hurting families.

In Nebraska, 67 percent of the Omaha Public Schools' 47,000 students are receiving free or subsidized lunches, up from 62 percent last year.

"This year principals have commented that it is the worst they have seen it in terms of families trying to just stay afloat," said district spokeswoman Luanne Nelson. "There has been a marked decline in family income."

The federal government picks up most of the tab for the subsidized meal program, with some states kicking in a small amount. The money is supposed to cover lunches, but the School Nutrition Association said many districts have to squeeze funds for the meals out of other areas of their budgets.

"The reimbursement rate for school lunches hasn't kept pace with the cost of goods," said Lynn McCawley, a spokeswoman in Prince George's County Public Schools in Maryland. "This is especially true as we focus on selecting healthier school lunch choices. As the quality goes up so does the price."

However, the USDA's Food and Nutrition Service said its most recent analysis, released in April 2008 and based on data from the 2005-06 school year, found that the reimbursement rate covered the cost of meals. The rate is recalculated each year to help payments keep pace with costs.

To help schools further, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack is urging Congress as it prepares to reauthorize the Child Nutrition Act to dole out more money.

Regardless of whether districts are losing money or breaking even, they are watching the subsidized meal numbers with interest because of what it signifies their students face at home.

"Families are struggling more and more," said Jennifer Adach, of the Washington-based Food Research and Action Center, who notes that demand for food stamps is also up.

In the Columbus, Ohio, area, about half the students in South-Western City Schools district receive subsidized meals, and officials say they try to ensure the meals are very nutritious.

"It drives us to make sure we are serving fresh fruits and vegetables every day and whole grains, foods that they might not have access to at home," said Beth Glitt, who oversees the district's foodservice department.

And when life is not stable at home, everything changes. Superintendent Mike Mathes, whose district is on the outskirts of Topeka, Kan., said one of the most heartbreaking stories he has come across is 11 students from three families crowded into a rental home and a trailer parked outside.

"The number one priority in those kids' lives isn't school, it's surviving," Mathes said.

His staff received training on teaching students in poverty as the district's free and reduced-price numbers grew.

Among other things, teachers are being advised to think hard about asking students to bring $5 for a field trip or $10 for a class T-shirt.

"Now with a third of our kids living in poverty," he said, "they may not have $5."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — For a couple tight weeks after taking in her sixth-grade stepson, Lisa Lewis fretted about how to pay for his school lunches. Unable to find a full-time job, the 37-year-old ...
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — For a couple tight weeks after taking in her sixth-grade stepson, Lisa Lewis fretted about how to pay for his school lunches. Unable to find a full-time job, the 37-year-old ...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
msjimmied
08:54 PM on 03/30/2010
Of all the topics crawling with tr0lls, this one is the most disgusting display of their callousness. I was volunteering in the high school today to hear the closing messages for the day, one of them was a reminder to bring the food stuff requested as donations so that kids who are on a school lunch program can pick a bag up for the weekend. Luckily, we are still teaching kids the value of sharing.
12:19 AM on 03/30/2010
Wow. 40c -- we were in the 40c category. It's still 40c. That was 30 years ago. I wonder if I was the only kid in my graduating class to go on to an Ivy League institution that was also eligible for 40c lunch. Possibly.
12:18 AM on 03/30/2010
Wow. 40c -- we were in the 40c category. It's still 40c. That was 30 years ago. I wonder if I was the only
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smearjay
na
04:36 PM on 03/29/2010
"Change"....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
04:18 PM on 03/29/2010
feeding our children should be our nation,s top priority they are our future !! and they are worth every copper
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mechelle Gray
Papers Please!
04:24 PM on 03/29/2010
Totally agree.
02:04 PM on 03/29/2010
Summer break is coming up, creating another dire situation for these children.
01:16 PM on 03/29/2010
The liberals are getting new voters every day. Each person that they can force onto welfare will be a likely supporter as they rely more and more on big daddy gov't for their daily existence. Well played, Dems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mechelle Gray
Papers Please!
04:26 PM on 03/29/2010
You really should be "ashamed of yourself". Do you REALLY think these children have a CHOICE?

I pray you never fall unto hard times and need help from ANYONE. Your life can change in an instant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smearjay
na
04:37 PM on 03/29/2010
He's right though. You wanted "Change".. You are getting it.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SMAckley
11:29 PM on 03/29/2010
Incomprehensible. Really.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
12:47 PM on 03/29/2010
My head is still reeling from the statement that 67% of the families of Omaha, NE qualify for one of these programs...incomes below $40,793 for a family of 4.

For shame Warren Buffet...You sank $8 billion into Goldman Sachs....why didn't you invest that money into bringing good jobs to the citizens of your own community?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:07 PM on 03/29/2010
Why is it the responsibility of the federal govt to provide lunch to anyone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tennys Daughter
A fool and his money shall soon perish
01:05 PM on 03/29/2010
Would you prefer the children starve to death?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:03 PM on 03/29/2010
why would parents stop feeding their children if free lunchs went away?
02:11 PM on 03/29/2010
I'd prefer people didn't have children if they don't have the resources to provide for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bthechangeyouseek
01:25 PM on 03/29/2010
Because We the People decided to enact a national school lunch act under the guidance of the USDA.

There is nothing wrong with this type of program, except that we underfund them. Blanche Lincoln's legislation of $.06 cents to the school lunch program that is in need of $.35 is callous.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:13 PM on 03/29/2010
it's ironic that you make allusions to the Constitution which is not only mute on the subject of free lunch but is also the same document I would invoke to question where did the Congress get the authority to enact the school lunch act.

If it is not a power listed in the Constitution as given to the Congress then they may not do it. If circumstances change and we want our federal govt to have more power then we can amend the Constitution and give them this power. Being a Congressman doesn't give them the authority to make any law they want, they are limited by the Constitution. That's why we have the thing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Midnightrain
Hume was the greatest!
10:53 AM on 03/29/2010
What sort of civilization makes a priority of war at the expense of children? What sort of civilization willfully takes food from the mouths of children to rescue itself from its own greed and recklessness - while blaming families for not being "personally responsible"?

The United States is not a civilization. It is misrepresentation of one at best, and a deceitful projection of one at worst.

No civilized being or nation treats its most vulnerable with such cruelty and fundamental disregard.

None.
12:52 PM on 03/29/2010
If I felt that way i would have to move.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bthechangeyouseek
01:19 PM on 03/29/2010
Whether we agree fully with the statements or not, we are trying to pass on how we live or die early around the world.
photo
phree
free your mind
10:51 AM on 03/29/2010
These kids come from the America no one talks about. They are poor and struggling. Those who are against HCR are also against free lunches for these kids. Heartless, they would rather redistribute their income upwards to the rich.
10:28 AM on 03/29/2010
Another example of how delusional we all are about the requirement that all women must have children.

This kind of thinking that somehow we are not fulfilled or that we must procreate when in fact millions are unable to financially care for children must be changed.

Not to mention the additional mental and emotional distress heaped on because of financial difficulties that the children then suffer for as well.

I for one am not saying that children cannot live in poor circumstances and turn out to be contributing members of society as an adult but if you really look reality square in the face you know dam well that I am being truthful.

Children used to be a necessity when we were an agricultural society long long ago. Children were used on the farm as workers and thus were well fed and cared for. Today's children are scared of most of nature they have been so isolated from it.

Time to stop romanticizing the notion that all children if born are coming into a world where food is plenty and things are rosy for their futures. If you need to check on that go to the poorest sections of your own town and see how things are. Every town has one.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
10:51 AM on 03/29/2010
I so agree. Overpopulation is killing this planet.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
12:43 PM on 03/29/2010
Herr Hitler, when did you return?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmericanLeslie
facts + comprehension x logic = great conversation
10:28 AM on 03/29/2010
"In the midst of a blistering recession, more families are flocking to the federal program that gives students free or reduced-priced lunches."

JUST CURIOUS: Considering the number of T-partiers who are out of work and have lost their homes and are further threatened by RNC leaders' refusal to extend unemployment benefits while they take a break from their exhausting jobs of doing nothing, I can't help but wonder how many Tp-families are also "flocking to the federal program that gives students free or reduced-priced lunches" - for their little Tpbaggets.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
12:44 PM on 03/29/2010
According to an article on HP yesterday...many of the Tea Party crowd are collecting unemployment....isn't that a hoot?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tennys Daughter
A fool and his money shall soon perish
01:09 PM on 03/29/2010
Unemployment, Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. The very things they are railing against; there greedy little hands are partakers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmericanLeslie
facts + comprehension x logic = great conversation
04:07 PM on 03/29/2010
Too bad the photos of all T-partiers receiving government aid can't be featured in the newspapers or on the sides of milk cartons in their local communities.