iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Geithner: Commercial Real Estate Loans Still Problematic (VIDEO)

First Posted: 05/30/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:00 PM ET

WASHINGTON (MARY GORDON -- AP) -- Mounting losses from commercial real estate loans will continue to be a problem for the U.S. and especially smaller banks, but it can be managed, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Monday.

"Commercial real estate's still going to be a problem for the country," Geithner said in an interview with CNBC. "But we can manage through this process."

Geithner also said the Treasury Department's announcement that it will begin selling the stake it owns in Citigroup Inc., which could net about $7.5 billion to the government, shows "how far we've come" in exiting from the financial bailout program.

The government received 7.7 billion shares of No. 3 U.S. bank Citigroup in exchange for $25 billion of the total $45 billion it gave the financial behemoth during the 2008 credit crisis. The Treasury Department said Monday it will sell the shares over the course of this year, depending on market conditions.

Like any investor, the government will likely hold on to its shares if prices fall steeply. However, Citi shares have been steadily rising with the broader market in recent months, which means the government is likely to pocket a hefty profit.

The government has been trying to unwind the investments it made in banks under the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, that came in at the height of the financial crisis.

Geithner said in the interview the government doesn't want to keep an ownership stake in the financial companies "a day longer than necessary."

The government will use a "careful process" to balance two objectives, he said: ensuring maximum return on the taxpayers' investment while also getting the U.S. out of the business of owning private companies.

On other subjects, Geithner:

--affirmed the Obama administration's recent optimism that an agreement can be reached with Republicans on legislation to bring sweeping new regulations to the U.S. financial system, opening the way to enactment possibly within months. "We're getting close," he said.

--said the financial system "is in a much, much stronger position today" than it was three years ago in the run-up to the financial crisis and the U.S. economy has recovered from the crisis faster than those of other countries. Major U.S. financial institutions have far stronger capital positions than they did three years ago, though many of them still face daunting challenges, he said.

While losses on mortgage loans socked banks at the beginning of the 2008 financial crisis, it is commercial and development loans that have brought dramatic losses for banks in recent months.

Losses have mounted on loans for commercial projects like stores and office complexes, as buildings sit vacant and builders default. Many midsize and regional banks hold large concentrations of those loans.

U.S. banks face as much as $300 billion in losses on loans made for commercial property and development, according to the Congressional Oversight Panel, which monitors the government's efforts to stabilize the financial system.

Sheila Bair, the head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., has said that losses on commercial real estate loans are expected to be the primary cause of bank failures this year, which are likely to exceed the 140 collapses in 2009.

One way to help manage the commercial loan distress, Geithner said, is through the $30 billion fund proposed by President Barack Obama to provide money to midsize and community banks if they boost lending to small businesses. The program, which must be approved by Congress, would use Tarp money repaid by banks, which now has reached about $176 billion.

Many lawmakers, however, want the $30 billion sent directly to the federal Small Business Administration. It would then decide which businesses should get loans.

WATCH the interview:












FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON (MARY GORDON -- AP) -- Mounting losses from commercial real estate loans will continue to be a problem for the U.S. and especially smaller banks, but it can be managed, Treasury Secretary T...
WASHINGTON (MARY GORDON -- AP) -- Mounting losses from commercial real estate loans will continue to be a problem for the U.S. and especially smaller banks, but it can be managed, Treasury Secretary T...
Filed by Grace Kiser  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 71
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:55 PM on 03/31/2010
Context is everything.

Geithner is requesting more taxpayer funds to help his Banker friends resolve their commercial foreclosure crisis "before" Main Street can solve their foreclosure crisis.

How ? ... by "quietly" enabling his Banker friends to REDUCE PRINCIPAL and sell these defaulted commerical loans to "inside" investors at deep discounts.

PRINCIPAL REDUCTION is OK for his Banker friends and their commerical foreclosures ... but not OK for millions of struggling homeowners facing foreclosure on Main Street !

Once again ... the OBAMA administration is using tax payer money to bail out their Wall Street Banker friends while Main Street suffers.

This time there is no excuse ... this is on OBAMA ... no one else.
02:18 AM on 03/31/2010
nothing serious folks....50% means the glasses are still about half full
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
02:18 AM on 03/31/2010
Have NO confident of his understanding - Commercial Real Estate, must be foreign to him.
08:53 AM on 03/31/2010
People have been screeching about the impending CRE bust for over a year - the next shoe to drop.

The same people claimed Geithner's plans would not work. They were dead wrong. Maybe you should reconsider.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
03:42 PM on 03/31/2010
Actually, NO.

Why? I was only talking about Geithner's assessment.
Each market is different and was not talking about CRE as a whole

Some commercial real estate market is booming in this recession.
But definitely, not office, industrial, etc.

Perhaps it was not clear, but again,
NO confidence on Geithner is all expressed.
01:03 AM on 03/31/2010
I travel a lot in what was this beautiful country of ours.
Geithner warns of a commercial real estate crisis .
Were has he been? I see empty store in big malls, small malls completely abandon.
Empty office buildings all over our beloved America for the last three years every year it is worst.
Now he tells us there is going to be a crises the man is a genus.

Lets try something new since the fat bankers get to lend money at 1+ % from the Fed.
Let the Fed lend out to the commercial at the same rate. that would definitely help.
While they are at it lend our tax money at 1% to us tax paying fools so we can be on a even playing field
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
02:17 AM on 03/31/2010
Suggest, Geithner to study commercial real estate, that is all !

Surprise that he is still there...
08:55 AM on 03/31/2010
If your building is underwater, what are you going to pledge for collateral?
09:28 AM on 03/31/2010
Obviously people out of business need a job not a loan.
a low interest loan like the banks are getting would help many businesses stay aflot and many Americans keep their homes.
You sound like banker sitting on a big bonus.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:41 AM on 03/31/2010
I don't need no jobs. I don't need no economy. I gots me some Health Insurance Reform. Yahoo!
01:08 AM on 03/31/2010
Count your blessings you have health insurance.
You are in the wrong place this is about commercial loans.
Have a cup of tea.
01:54 AM on 03/31/2010
This guy should be in prison, along with half of congress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Atlanta
Active Citizen 54
11:33 PM on 03/30/2010
Timmy's setting up the next give away.
Let them fail.
01:56 AM on 03/31/2010
He is a banker boy, they will never be allowed to fail, they are bankrupt and broke. We are being forced to pay for everything they did...its sick. But Obama INSISTS on keeping hmm.change?
08:18 PM on 03/30/2010
The OBAMA administration is "quietly" taking care of the Bank's commerical foreclosure crisis BEFORE taking care of Main Street residential foreclosure crisis.

You see ... Sir Geithner (don't want offend the sensitive screener's) ... needs more tax payer money to help his banker friends .... drum roll please ... here it comes ... REDUCE PRINCIPAL BALANCES on their commercial morgages !

Team OBAMA won't get the same done for Main Street ... but they'll move mountains for their banker friends.

You see bank's will sell their defaulted commercial loans to "insider" investor friends for deeply discounted prices ... by REDUCING THEIR PRINCIPAL BALANCES.

It's OK for Wall Street ... but not Main Street.

OBAMA is continuing to make sure his banker friends get bailed out ... while he continues to ignores the pain and suffering of millions of struggling homeowners facing foreclosure.

But don't despair ... Team OBAMA has floated a new voluntary plan for the bankers to consider ... while they are busy using the money to fix their commerical foreclosure crisis ... first.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:05 PM on 03/30/2010
As if Geithner has ever had control of anything. He's a puppet for Wall street.
06:43 PM on 03/30/2010
You have this one right.

Just having this guy as a cabinet member makes me question Obama's sincerity in representing Americans that are not Wall Street big-wigs.
07:46 PM on 03/30/2010
Where is your evidence that Geithner has at any time ever been a puppet of Wall Street despite the innuendo that HP and the money laundering Spitzer who was supposedly the sheriffs of Wall Street when every bit of the risk taking was at its peak and the whole time Madoff was running his ponzi scheme. Those incrimination emails from AIG not only contained no smoking gun, they clarified that your congressman and your Senators left the Federal Reserve with no authority to regulate or to liquidate a company like AIG. They still do not have it due to the same congressmen and Senators whose collusion and neglect led to the collapse of the economy. Geithner has never worked for any financial institution, unlike Spitzer he doesn't run with the multi-millionaire bankers, and there is no evidence that substantiates your claim. He has collected almost all of the TARP funds given out before Obama took office and never distributed $200 billion of the $700 billion that was available on his watch. By the way, when he was in New York, his kids were in public school unlike the Spitzers. Have you noticed that since the hearing where it was revealed that unlike HP had led you to believe that Geithner had not been involved with the bank bailouts as he was being vetted by the Obama administration for the treasury that those with the innuendo, rumors and speculation have been strangely silent.
12:32 AM on 03/31/2010
You are right about our Crooked Politicians. They are crooked because the crooked Bankers gave them the Millions.
27,000,000 Americans are in the street, Millions more with a big cut in pay , next pension and unemployment checks will be cut. All this as Crooked Bankers are getting bonuses
Somebody did this and it was not we the people.
04:25 PM on 03/30/2010
Timmy worked for the IMF back in 2000-2001.

During the financial collapse of Argentina.
06:19 PM on 03/30/2010
Volcker worked at the Federal reserve in 1979.

During the financial collapse of Jimmy Carter.
06:52 PM on 03/30/2010
good point.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
04:03 PM on 03/30/2010
The heartbreaking developments that I've seen standing empty lately appear to be new industrial parks outside several communities across the Midwest -- an obvious plea for jobs that went unanswered.
photo
FoonTheElder
Always choosing between the lesser of two evils
03:28 PM on 03/30/2010
This will be another opportunity for the top 1%, who already own 70% of the country, to buy up the most valuable commercial properties once their prices hit the bottom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
03:10 PM on 03/30/2010
Commercial loses can be written off, so what's the problem? Or is this just another grab for more bail-out money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gavrielle
Empty... Empty... Empty...
03:39 PM on 03/30/2010
No bailout, but the losses and the bank closures drain more money out of the economy, slow growth and keep the job market from rebounding. It's still a very serious problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nomadrdw
Zen Druid
05:48 PM on 03/30/2010
write offs only work if there is someone around to take advantage of them. once these places go out there is just empty buildings and no one to take that write off.
02:19 PM on 03/30/2010
Watch out for this--

""Many lawmakers, however, want the $30 billion sent directly to the federal Small Business Administration. It would then decide which businesses should get loans.""

So far the Obama admin has followed the lead of the Bush regime in handing over billions of SBA loans to Fortune 500 companies, not the small businesses that comprise over 70% of America's economy. If you follow any of the economic bloggers here who've made a point of raising this important issue, you know how critical it is to getting America back to work that the money go where it will do the most good--Main Street, not Wall Street or K Street!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
LizM
My micro-bio is too long for this space.
02:31 PM on 03/30/2010
You might want to start paying more attention to Secretary Geithner and less to the economic bloggers around here.
02:35 PM on 03/30/2010
When Geithner begins to address the issue of this illegal awarding of billions of tax payer dollars to Fortune 500 companies rather than the small back-bone of America businesses that money is intended for, then I'll listen to what he says.

Until the SBA is forced to adhere to its charted by Obama, we need to stay vigilent about this rip off.
02:42 PM on 03/30/2010
"charter..."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
02:07 PM on 03/30/2010
This little Bilderberg weasel makes me sick...
04:25 PM on 03/30/2010
he is an IMF mole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
04:57 PM on 03/30/2010
It's Rockefeller all over, either way, we never had a chance...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
progressivegreg
Scotty, beam me up
01:40 PM on 03/30/2010
Here in Grand Rapids, Mi. it kind of scary to drive around and look at all the empty space available for lease in the numerous strip malls that have sprung up over the past few years. I don't see any way the developers of these malls are going to be able to pay their loans off.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
05:19 PM on 03/30/2010
The same is true in many parts of California. All you have to do is drive down the freeway to see one empty building/development after another. The problem is real.