More

Climate Deal Not Expected Until End Of 2011, UN Official Says

ARTHUR MAX   03/31/10 09:33 PM ET   AP

Denmark Climate Summit

AMSTERDAM — A new legal agreement committing nations around the world to curb greenhouse gas emissions is unlikely to be completed before the end of 2011, two years later than originally envisioned, the top U.N. climate official said Wednesday.

Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the U.N. climate change secretariat, said countries need to restore confidence in U.N. negotiations following the dismal results of the Copenhagen summit in December, which ended in a vague agreement of principles and a pledge of finances for poor countries most threatened by climate change.

"There was a great deal of frustration at the end of the Copenhagen conference in terms of process," de Boer said in a conference call with reporters from his office in Bonn, Germany.

The next annual conference in Cancun, Mexico, beginning in November should get negotiations "back on track" among the 194 participating nations, with the aim of agreeing on the main elements that could be enshrined in a binding agreement a year later in South Africa, de Boer said.

"My hope is that Cancun will deliver what I had hoped Copenhagen would deliver," said de Boer, who is resigning July 1 after nearly three years in office.

Negotiators will convene in Bonn next week for the first time since 120 heads of state and government met in the Danish capital. The weekend conference was expected to do little more than set a timetable for several more preparatory conferences leading up to the Cancun conference.

In talks in London, Britain proposed a possible two-track process for a new global emissions pact, in hopes of reviving the stalled talks.

The country's Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband suggested that if nations continue to founder in negotiations on a single binding pact there could be two treaties, rather than one.

Miliband suggested the 1997 Kyoto Protocol – an emissions reduction pact which is due to expire in 2012 – could be extended to set binding targets for the countries signed up to the process. A second treaty would cover countries who have never signed up to Kyoto, including the United States and China, he said.

"We are interested in trying to break the deadlock and find ways through some of the issues raised in Copenhagen," Miliband said Wednesday, as representatives including White House economic adviser Larry Summers met.

"We do not want to let a technical argument about whether we have one treaty or two derail the process. We are determined to show flexibility as long as there is no undermining of environmental principles," Miliband said.

De Boer urged the negotiators at next week's Bonn meeting to stop discussing key issues in isolation and to take a holistic approach toward adapting to climate change, deforestation, transferring technology to poor countries and curbing carbon emissions.

Formal U.N. negotiations were set in motion in 2007 to reach a deal within two years that would succeed Kyoto, which set targets for 37 industrial countries to cut carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions blamed for raising the Earth's average temperature.

Scientists warn that global warming will cause disruptions in agriculture, increase water shortages and could lead to a dramatic rise in sea levels and coastal flooding if the arctic ice sheets melt.

The Copenhagen Accord, a three-page deal salvaged in the closing hours of the summit, set a goal of limiting global temperatures to less than a 2 degree Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) increase above preindustrial levels, but didn't say how that should be achieved. It pledged $3 billion over the next three years for poor countries to adapt to climate change and asked countries to submit pledges for curbing their carbon emissions.

On Wednesday, the U.N. climate secretariat released its official report on the Copenhagen conference and listed voluntary commitments from 75 industrial and developing countries to reduce or limit the growth of their emissions by 2020. The report said those countries represented 80 percent of global emissions from energy use.

De Boer said the commitments fell short of the cuts needed to keep the Earth's temperature from rising more than 2 degrees.

Negotiators had originally set 2009 as the target date for a new climate treaty to allow time for ratification and ensure a seamless transition when the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012. Failure to replace Kyoto in time could lead to a legal gap when no binding rules are in place.

But De Boer said he expected countries to continue their climate change policies with or without a new accord. If a deal can be reached in South Africa, "we will have made it in time."

____

Associated Press Writer David Stringer in London contributed to this report

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

AMSTERDAM — A new legal agreement committing nations around the world to curb greenhouse gas emissions is unlikely to be completed before the end of 2011, two years later than originally envisio...
AMSTERDAM — A new legal agreement committing nations around the world to curb greenhouse gas emissions is unlikely to be completed before the end of 2011, two years later than originally envisio...
Filed by Gazelle Emami  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:23 PM on 04/03/2010
After funding the denier industry for decades through a web of conservative think tanks,

www.exxonsecrets.org/maps.php

it looks like EXXON MOBIL is about to sell them out.

Last year Exxon hedged on their rear-guard action with a $600M investment on supposedly carbon-neutral, algae-based biofuel.

http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/energy_climate_con_vehicle_algae.aspx
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/business/energy-environment/14fuel.html

This suggests, a) Exxon may be slow and greedy, but they're not stupid. They've known for decades that fossil fuels DO warm our planet and burning it isn't sustainable indefinately. b) So, they've been seeking to retain dominance, even as petroleum production diminishes, due to climate concerns and peak oil (Note: concern over peaking oil is my inference. Their web site makes no mention of it). c) They think algal oil may be their ticket, as it's 10x more efficient and thus way cheaper to produce than by other means.

Direct quotes from Exxon's biofuel web site:

"Growing algae consume carbon dioxide; this PROVIDES GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION BENEFITS."

"Since 2004 we have invested more than $1.5 billion in activities that REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS and improve energy efficiency, and we will spend at least $500 million on additional initiatives over the next few years."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
08:28 PM on 04/02/2010
De Boer is a lame duck. He continues to talk about future conferences, but he won't be involved in them. Given the fiasco at Copenhagen, there will likely be severe resistence from several nations concerning any future conferences organized by the same players who organized Copenhagen.

It may be that these conferences simply won't occur. The Climategate Scandal, and the IPCC's continuing scandals about their 2007 report have created resistence to this type of international process. The IPCC is simply not credible anymore. So why should nations pay attention to what is said by the IPCC?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gun1934
75 years old fisherman
07:10 PM on 04/01/2010
they said boer is resinging in june-- i guess he cant put up with this climate change hoax any more --just guessing
05:57 PM on 03/31/2010
The later the better...for this nebulous science and its adherents.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:09 AM on 04/02/2010
I don't feel nebulous.
05:39 PM on 03/31/2010
What is going on with the National media?
The Vermont Yankee Nuclear power plant up until a few weeks ago was leaking radioactive Tritium into the Connecticut river and NOBODY SAYS A WORD. The ground around the plant is contaminated with radioactive CESIUM and still NOT A PEEP! Have the powers that be acquired so much clout that they can influence the National scene to this extent?