iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

EPA Proposes New Mountaintop Removal Pollution Controls

Epa Mountaintop Announcement

TIM HUBER   04/ 1/10 05:26 PM ET   AP

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — The Obama administration Thursday spelled out tighter water quality standards for surface coal mines in Appalachia in a move that could curtail mountaintop removal mining.

The policy will sharply reduce the practice of filling valleys with waste from mountaintop removal and other types of surface mines in a six-state region, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson said.

The policy met with immediate praise from opponents who consider mountaintop mining too destructive and disappointment from mine operators who say the new approach will eliminate many valuable jobs.

The agency also released two reports discussing watershed damage in the region from surface mining. Burying streams with mine wastes increases salt levels in waterways downstream, hurting fish and other aquatic life, the EPA said. Jackson said the new policy should protect 95 percent of aquatic life.

"You're talking about either no or very few valley fills," Jackson said. "That's just the truth, that's the science of it."

The lone major permit approved by federal regulators since Jackson began cracking down on Appalachian surface mining a year ago includes no valley fills.

"These new guidelines will reduce the destruction caused by mountaintop removal, and communities will be able to focus on building a clean energy economy," Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune said in a statement.

Virginia-based Massey Energy, one of the largest producers in the affected region, provided a chart showing San Pellegrino and Perrier mineral waters exceed the EPA standard, as did water from a pond at a southern West Virginia mine.

"We're deeply concerned by the impact this policy will have on employment and economic activity throughout the Appalachian region," National Mining Association spokesman Luke Popovich said.

The organization's figures show surface mines in the six states covered by the policy produced more than 150 million tons of coal and employed nearly 20,500 people in 2008. U.S. production totaled more than 1.17 billion that year.

"To painstakingly try to limit the impacts to one kind of mining operation, to a single industry and to future operations is frankly disingenuous," Popovich said.

The EPA is applying the policy in West Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and Tennessee. "All the science here and all the data, much of it comes from the state of West Virginia," Jackson said.

She said it may be applied to underground mining as well, though that practice typically is more palatable to environmental groups. "Please don't think we won't look at and use this same science in evaluating other types of operations," she said.

West Virginia's Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Randy Huffman questioned EPA's approach, saying the agency was changing the permitting process through a guidance document rather than regulations. "They put the standards they want on the mining industry without going through any legal framework," he said.

Moreover, Huffman said EPA's new standard is lower than what his agency had determined was protective of water quality and aquatic life.

"The geology and other characteristics of a stream impact are what causes adverse impacts or doesn't," he said. "There is not a one-size fits all for dissolved solids. That's one of the concerns of the approach EPA is taking here."

__

Associated Press Writer Brian Farkas contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — The Obama administration Thursday spelled out tighter water quality standards for surface coal mines in Appalachia in a move that could curtail mountaintop removal mining. T...
CHARLESTON, W.Va. — The Obama administration Thursday spelled out tighter water quality standards for surface coal mines in Appalachia in a move that could curtail mountaintop removal mining. T...
Filed by Katherine Goldstein  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Totto
"Not 'Noise' One Round: *Music*
03:07 PM on 04/06/2010
The "Use It Up, Mess It Up" Republicans will fight this tooth and nail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patsijean
04:53 PM on 04/04/2010
Do read about the Coal River Wind project. A proposal and movement by the people of the Appalachians who actually live in the middle of this mess to save Cold River Mountain slated for demolition by the coal industry. Many more jobs (and energy returns forever), for generations on will be created by this project. Mountain top removal provides a few jobs for a short time and then they are gone, on to another mountain. Feasibility studies have already been done. It is a well organized and thoughtful plan to save the oldest mountain range in the world. Read below and visit the link.

This makes much more sense:
"In 2007 a wind potential study was commissioned to see if there was the potential to place wind turbines on Coal River Mountain. The wind potential study and the following economic study found that it is possible to place 328 MW of wind energy on Coal River Mountain. That’s enough to power 70,000 West Virginia Homes and provide permanent jobs and $1.7 million in taxes to the county every year."

http://www.coalriverwind.org/
01:11 PM on 04/02/2010
So reinvest in solar and wind, duh
03:25 PM on 04/03/2010
and waste Bio fuels...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research?action=profile complete green energy plan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomHunter
Author of "The Butcher of Leningrad" (a thriller)
10:55 AM on 04/02/2010
In contrast to shaft mining, which does produce a lot of jobs, mountain-top mining is really not labor intensive. It really does not provide that many jobs, unless you count the CEO of Massey Energy as a job.

A better way to think of it is this: if you company is only making a profit by polluting the environment--as is the case in this sort of mining--then your company is really not profitable. With the filth and carbon produced by burning coal, we really need to stop this crap. I understand that we currently make a lot of electricity via burning coal, but that is merely because coal is cheaper since they don't have to pay for the elimination of their waste, which is CO2 in the air.
09:44 PM on 04/02/2010
The above poster just posted the name and home phone number of someone he disagrees with politically.
09:11 AM on 04/02/2010
Would have been nice 30 years ago. Wonder who was President then. Oh, ya, Reagan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
11:28 PM on 04/01/2010
This has been a horrendous, ecologically disastrous practice for decades. Gee, nice they finally noticed. There might even be a couple mountains left to save.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:52 AM on 04/02/2010
I care more about people than mountains. However, I'm an evil Libertarian.

I also would not hesitate to kill and cook any of my cats, if a member of my family was hungry ;)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MAJK
Economic Democracy > Capitalism
05:53 AM on 04/02/2010
"I care more about people than mountains" - Then you should be against mountaintop waste, as it seeps into our drinking water, pollutes our air, and harms the food we eat.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trinity
11:15 PM on 04/01/2010
Senators Bryd and Rockefeller are not going to be happy...Those two and Big Coal will have all those folks living in the poorest countries (where the mines actually are) in WV, wound up and ready to fight (all while the air over their homes are black with coal dust).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:54 AM on 04/02/2010
I used to live near enough to a coal mine for dishes to rattle during blasting. There was not a problem with coal dust ;)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Osborne
07:58 PM on 04/01/2010
"disappointment from mine operators who say the new approach will eliminate many valuable jobs."

Except the floral industry employs more West Virginians than the coal industry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:56 AM on 04/02/2010
"Except the floral industry employs more West Virginians than the coal industry."

That doesn't change the fact that many of these people will lose their jobs as a result of these controls.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Osborne
03:54 AM on 04/02/2010
So put them to work building windmills. The most abundant energy source in Appalachia is wind power, and every mountain turned into moonscape is another city of 50-70,000 that could be running off the current forever. Coal has become a monoeconomy built on generational theft of the worst kind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patsijean
04:54 PM on 04/04/2010
This is a repeat post.
Do read about the Coal River Wind project. A proposal and movement by the people of the Appalachians who actually live in the middle of this mess to save Cold River Mountain slated for demolition by the coal industry. Many more jobs (and energy returns forever), for generations on will be created by this project. Mountain top removal provides a few jobs for a short time and then they are gone, on to another mountain. Feasibility studies have already been done. It is a well organized and thoughtful plan to save the oldest mountain range in the world. Read below and visit the link.

"In 2007 a wind potential study was commissioned to see if there was the potential to place wind turbines on Coal River Mountain. The wind potential study and the following economic study found that it is possible to place 328 MW of wind energy on Coal River Mountain. That’s enough to power 70,000 West Virginia Homes and provide permanent jobs and $1.7 million in taxes to the county every year."

http://www.coalriverwind.org/
07:12 PM on 04/01/2010
I agree with KIV Possum. Go on Google Earth, enable its environmental features, and look up mountaintop removal... the extent of this crime is horrifying. However, at least the Obama administration is trying to put a stop to it.

Now the EPA must turn its attention to high-pressure fracture extraction of natural gas (fracking) which has devastated the once-pristine aquifers of Wyoming and now threatens to irreparably poison fresh water sources all across America.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
05:27 PM on 04/01/2010
Bout time they at least slowed this down.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
04:00 PM on 04/01/2010
Too little, too late. The coal industry has raped the central Appalachians.