iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pope Paul VI May Have Been Warned Of Pedophile Priests In 1963

Pope Paul Vi

GILLIAN FLACCUS   04/ 1/10 01:06 AM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — The head of a Roman Catholic order that specialized in the treatment of pedophile priests visited with then-Pope Paul VI nearly 50 years ago and followed up with a letter recommending the removal of pedophile priests from ministry, according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Associated Press on Wednesday.

In the Aug. 27, 1963, letter, the head of the New Mexico-based Servants of the Holy Paraclete tells the pope he recommends removing pedophile priests from active ministry and strongly urges defrocking repeat offenders.

The letter shows that the Vatican knew, or should have known, about clergy abuse in the U.S. decades ago, said Anthony DeMarco, a plaintiff attorney in Los Angeles who provided the letter. The accusation comes as plaintiffs in Kentucky are attempting to sue the Vatican for negligence for allegedly failing to alert police or the public about priests who molested children.

Yet the problem was very well-known to Rome well before the 1960s. The 1917 code of canon law criminalized sexual abuse of minors. Five years later, the Vatican penned a document outlining detailed procedures for handling such cases. In 1962, that document was updated and has been used in many of the lawsuits by victims against U.S. diocese and the Vatican itself.

The letter, written by the Rev. Gerald M.C. Fitzgerald, appears to have been drafted at the request of the pope and summarizes Fitzgerald's thoughts on problem priests after his Vatican visit.

The letter echoes other Fitzgerald writings about wayward priests.

Several news organizations, including the AP, reported last year that Fitzgerald was intent on buying an island where priests attracted to men and boys could be segregated, and even made a $5,000 down payment on a Caribbean island for that purpose.

"It is for this class of rattlesnake I have always wished an island retreat, but even an island is too good for these vipers," he wrote an acquaintance in 1957.

In 1960, he sent two priests from the Paracletes to the island of Tortola to investigate the location – but his dream of an island monastery dedicated to trouble priests ended when the new archbishop of Santa Fe overruled him, his successor, Rev. Joseph McNamara, has said in an affidavit.

A message left with the Paraclete order at one of their two existing facilities in Missouri was not returned. A number for the second facility was disconnected. The offices of the Vatican spokesman were closed late Wednesday.

Tod Tamberg, spokesman for the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, defended the church and said it was unlikely Paul VI ever saw the 1963 letter.

"The fact of the matter is, the prevailing ideas at the time about how to deal with abusive behavior were not adequate," Tamberg said. "Clearly, society and the church have evolved new understandings of what causes sexually abusive behavior and how to deal with it."

Fitzgerald opens the five-page letter by thanking the pope for an audience the day before and says he is summarizing his thoughts at the pope's request on the "problem of the problem priest" after 20 years working to treat them.

He tells Paul VI that treatment for priests who have succumbed to "abnormal, homosexual tendencies" should include psychiatric, as well as spiritual, counseling – but goes on to warn about the dangers of leaving those individuals in ministry.

The letter also touches on priests who have consensual affairs with women.

"Personally, I am not sanguine of the return of priests to active duty who have been addicted to abnormal practices, especially sins with the young," Fitzgerald wrote.

"Where there is indication of incorrigibility, because of the tremendous scandal given, I would most earnestly recommend total laicization," he wrote. "I say 'total' ... because when these men are taken before civil authority, the non-Catholic world definitely blames the discipline of celibacy for the perversion of these men."

The letter proves that Vatican officials knew about clergy abuse decades ago and should have done more to protect children, plaintiff attorney DeMarco said.

The church has come under fire for transferring priests accused of sexual abuse to other parishes, rather than reporting the abuse to civil authorities and removing them from ministry.

The problem of clergy abuse has been known to Rome well before then. The 1917 code of canon law criminalized sexual abuse of minors. Five years later, the Vatican penned a document outlining detailed procedures for handling such cases. In 1962, that document was updated and has been used in many of the lawsuits by victims against U.S. diocese and the Vatican itself.

Fitzgerald's letter shows the pope knew how pervasive and destructive the problem was, DeMarco said.

"He says the solution is to take them out of the priesthood period, not shuffle them around, not pass them from diocese to diocese."

The letter was released in Los Angeles by attorneys who represented more than 500 victims of clergy abuse in their record-breaking $660 million settlement with the Archdiocese of Los Angeles in 2007.

Attorneys working on the Los Angeles cases found it among court papers related to clergy abuse cases filed in New Mexico in the late 1980s and early 1990s and fought to get it unsealed.

Thousands more pages of confidential priest personnel files from the Los Angeles cases were to be released as part of the 2007 settlement after a review by a retired judge overseeing the process. The review, however, has dragged on for nearly three years.

The letter released Wednesday is different from a 1957 letter made public last year in which Fitzgerald seeks help from the Bishop of Manchester, N.H. in finding a placement for a priest leaving the treatment program.

Attorneys also released a 250-page, redacted transcript of the 2007 deposition of the Rev. Joseph McNamara, who took over the Paraclete order after Fitzgerald.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

LOS ANGELES — The head of a Roman Catholic order that specialized in the treatment of pedophile priests visited with then-Pope Paul VI nearly 50 years ago and followed up with a letter recommend...
LOS ANGELES — The head of a Roman Catholic order that specialized in the treatment of pedophile priests visited with then-Pope Paul VI nearly 50 years ago and followed up with a letter recommend...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 399
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
08:59 PM on 04/03/2010
It strikes me as very funny that the article goes back only to Paul VI. My RC stepfather thought it would be a good idea to put me the local Catholic grade school back in 1944. The watchword there among us sixth graders was, "Watch out for Father Manning."
09:16 AM on 04/02/2010
I think it's highly unlikely that news of this kind of abuse didn't reach the highest level of the church's hierarchy, but how is God himself somehow always able to avoid the bad press? While his lieutenants take the heat, he somehow maintains his "Teflon" god status and sashays out of getting any blame laid at his feet. Where was God during this abuse? How many "believers" go on about how blessed they are? They give thanks for blessings God supposedly has showered on them. Yet, now I've heard people of religion argue that it's the Priest's "freewill" and therefore God is not responsible. Huh?! In God's own house, his own servants abuse innocent children and this wasn't his fault, but he should be thanked and praised for supposedly allowing other believers to win the Superbowl?! Maybe God could have saved just a few of the blessings he showered on others to prevent these perversions!
photo
ColdSnowMan
Global political pundit wannabe amateur
02:01 AM on 04/02/2010
An important addition to what Gillian's article says here:

"The 1917 code of canon law criminalized sexual abuse of minors. Five years later, the Vatican penned a document outlining detailed procedures for handling such cases. In 1962, that document was updated and has been used in many of the lawsuits by victims against U.S. diocese and the Vatican itself."

The 1962 document was updated in 2001 to make cases involving abusive priests pontifical secrets.

And the mandatory reporting of child abusing priests that the US Catholic Church has is not worldwide. It is just an American thing added recently.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/india_knight/article7078888.ece

"A 1962 document that Ratzinger updated in 2001, when he was the Vatican’s head of doctrine. It’s about priests who are accused of sexual relationships with children. The 2001 instructions read: “Cases of this kind are subject to the pontifical secret.”"
photo
ColdSnowMan
Global political pundit wannabe amateur
02:17 AM on 04/02/2010
To clarify, "And the mandatory reporting of child abusing priests *to police* that the US Catholic Church has is not worldwide. It is just an American thing added recently."
photo
ColdSnowMan
Global political pundit wannabe amateur
01:56 AM on 04/02/2010
I have a problem with Tod Tamberg's suggestion that it was unlikely Paul VI ever saw the 1963 letter.

The Pope asked for the letter in an in-person audience. What cleric would block The Pope seeing something he specifically asked for?

Tamberg continues "The fact of the matter is, the prevailing ideas at the time about how to deal with abusive behavior were not adequate. Clearly, society and the church have evolved new understandings of what causes sexually abusive behavior and how to deal with it."

I am old enough to remember those times and ideas well, and judging by his words, Tamberg is not.

I can't blame the Catholic Church for having some pedophiles amongst its priests. A group of 600,000 is going to have some criminals in it. But the Church tolerated and protected these criminals, even facilitating further crimes.

It was not ancient Sparta. Even in the 1950s and 60s, no half-way law-abiding manager would assign a known pedophile to jobs involving unsupervised access to children.

So even by the standards of the time, Church managers (popes, cardinals, archbishops, bishops) actively committed wrongful acts by assigning known child abusers, pedophiles and child rapists to jobs involving unsupervised contact with children.

And the vows of silence used to force children and parents into silence, to prevent the police being informed, on pain of eternal damnation, this obstruction of justice, were also out of step with the 1950s and 60s.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Twaine
10:17 AM on 04/02/2010
Once the church became an expert at manipulating men it turned to boys ... that happened a long time ago. To survive the church must now manipulate the press.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnotherAndy
Justice for Trayvon
12:07 AM on 04/03/2010
Imagine is another global corporation got caught doing that. Or change the crime, say instead of pedophiles, serial killers. Say the corporation is General Motors, or Toyota. They know that one of their dealers is murdering prostitutes, or blond-headed librarians, or men who where bow-ties. Instead of alerting the police, the car company cancels his car dealership but gives him another one in another state or country, and pays his living expenses to relocate there.. They do this for dozens of serial killers. Wouldn't everybody who ordered, or organized, or aided the serial killers to escape justice be criminally liable?

The Vatican was running a Witness Protection Plan for pedophiles for decades at least, in many countries, and this scandal will continue to grow. I don't think Church will ever be able to live this down.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rf dude
Just an average Man of Bronze - now in Steel!
11:14 PM on 04/01/2010
'
Devils Island II - for Popillion...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:43 PM on 04/01/2010
"He truly rose to the level of HIS incompetence by being made a SAINT, recently."

At least get your facts straight before exposing you bad case of diarrhea of the mouth: Pope Pius XII HAS NOT BEEN MADE A SAINT.
photo
ColdSnowMan
Global political pundit wannabe amateur
02:05 AM on 04/02/2010
Of all the wrongs being talked about on this page, you feel like SHOUTING some guy was not made a saint?
05:07 PM on 04/01/2010
Who you gonna believe - the New York Times, or the leaders of a superstitious cult? Tough call.....
05:21 PM on 04/01/2010
Given the Times' lying in the run-up to the war, it is indeed a tough call.
05:25 PM on 04/01/2010
I was trying to forget about that..........you're right.....but still.....
05:26 PM on 04/01/2010
...and those bishops are snazzy dressers....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheGripester
bites when poked
04:51 PM on 04/01/2010
Oh, cut it out. Everyone in the church has known about this since it was founded. One of the core things that early Christianity represented was a spiritual escape for oppressed people in the Roman Empire, many of whom were slaves that had been abused in every way by their owners since childhood. And when the Catholic Church became the state religion, they inherited a lot of the moral corruption of the religious bureaucracy. Things only got worse once priests were forbidden to wed. You can't tell me that every pope hasn't known in great detail that there was a problem with this in the church since the fall of the Roman Empire.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
One more Thing
01:33 AM on 04/02/2010
Shakespeare should have warned us!
12:37 PM on 04/02/2010
Shakespeare was Catholic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:45 PM on 04/01/2010
NAMBLA has more integrity than the Catholic church.

That might seem crazy at first, but think about it for a second: as abhorrent as they are, NAMBLA doesn't pretend to be something they are not, in fact, it's right in their name, "National Man Boy Love Association."

The head of the RCC is supposed to have direct divine guidance from God, so the fake bewilderment in the, "But I didn't know," statements coming from the church are invalid. Unless, of course, the Pope doesn't actually have divine guidance and the church is not true (which would seem obvious at this point, but people are super tribal, what can you do?).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaticaDeGato
Hissing and scratching with gusto.
04:11 PM on 04/01/2010
Are you a member?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:27 PM on 04/01/2010
Do you understand the meaning of the word "abhorrent"?
06:58 PM on 04/01/2010
"Are you a member?"

What difference does it make? What are you really asking?
08:33 PM on 04/09/2010
Every NAMBLA member(Sic Men) want to have sex with little boys. You can't say the same for every priest or every catholic member.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juna
Golden Rule is my religion
02:57 PM on 04/01/2010
As an abused child myself, I have paid special attention to this issue and thought about it for a long time. Just this morning it came to me that we should rejoice. This is the reason: child abuse has been going on for many centuries. Documented instances are only available since the middle of the 20th century, it seems, and the RCC stands out with its institutionalized system for perpetrators and systematically enabling the abusers to continue, But why rejoice? It is because, at long last, there is a huge public outcry against this evil, the likes of which has never been seen before. At last the problem is addressed full face, and perhaps, just perhaps, the child torturers will be stopped.
photo
ColdSnowMan
Global political pundit wannabe amateur
02:04 AM on 04/02/2010
I totally agree with you Juna.
02:55 PM on 04/04/2010
I agree with Juna. Having worked in this field on and off throughout my career and in the vein of Emergency Medicine, I have had significant contact with these issues and the sequela they leave on thousands of people- -including family and friends. I say it is about time to take off the bushel and let the light shine. The more people feel comfortable talking about this, the less cover the abusers will have. The numbers are astounding, the problem is amazing. It is a relief to see progress in this arena. The Catholic church ASKS for pedophiles, as long as it keeps its celibacy program. Pedophiles find this a place of perfect cover: no one asks why they are not married and free access to children who will do whatever they want. That program continues to be a recipe for disaster.
02:40 PM on 04/01/2010
When did the Pope know? C'mon. Does anyone serious believe that sexual abuse by priests only started in the 20th Century?? This has been going on for centuries.

Do see "Delivery Us From Evil" about the LA Diocese moving a pedophile priest around for decades. The priest is now retired and living on a church annuity in Ireland (after a few years in jail - finally.)

And the Pope's "apology" came after the US RC franchise paid out about $2 BILLION in claims to its victims. Thanks to those lawyers and victims who sued - NOT because the Vatican voluntarily came clean.

I believe the church really is sorry: SORRY IT GOT CAUGHT
02:26 PM on 04/01/2010
thanks for the fix. i enjoy this site's coverage of issues, and i appreciate the inclusion of my commentary. and if i was to blame for an accidental edit of my own material, i apologize for my snit.

thanks muchly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wollstonecraft
Self-described liberal, and proud of it.
02:18 PM on 04/01/2010
I'm reacting with revulsion to these revelations, but this isn't unique to the Catholic Church. Any institution functioning as the Church does--impenetrable secrecy, no accountability, power with no limits, unhealthy beliefs about sexuality, an absence of women in decision-making, I could go on--any institution like this is bound to be riddled with behavior like this. You can't trust institutions like this to police themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterLoffredo
02:23 PM on 04/01/2010
Of the forces driving human beings, the Church understood that sexual desire was the strongest, and therefore, the one the Church must seek to dominate (excuse the pun!) at all costs. Thus, for parishioners, sex for any purpose other than procreation between a heterosexual man and a woman was prohibited. For priests, who could only be men, sex was completely off limits. Oh, and these orders were, of course, infallible!
Okay, so, who would be drawn to join such an extremist organization, one in which the most powerful urges in our species were deemed unacceptable under all but the most proscribed conditions? Well, it's Psychology 1.0 folks. Only people who have major issues around sexual expression, extreme guilt and shame combined with a harsh, oppressive conscience and an attraction to authoritarianism would seek out the ludicrous and maniacal restrictions of such a regime. And Psychology 2.0 will tell you that eventually, the rubber band will snap and the full force of the repressed, festered and now extremely distorted sexual urges will explode out in compulsive, destructive behavior, and that doesn't just mean child abuse; it mean all kinds of acting out, including violence.
http://fullpermissionliving.blogspot.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
One more Thing
01:41 AM on 04/02/2010
The Family Fellowship House on C Street in Washington demonstrates this concept quite well.
02:18 PM on 04/01/2010
why did the part of my comment pertaining to the ongoing lawsuits to audit the church's seizure of jewish property and their laundering of plundered money get deleted? if we're discussing the morality of said institution, how is this not relevant?

if this is standard procedure here, i have no use for this place.
02:12 PM on 04/01/2010
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/archives/Wall/1922_06_09_Solicitation_Instruction_English.htm

Time for the international courts to take this on.