More

U.S. Foreign Aid May Entice Partners To Stay In Afghanistan

Us Foreign Aid Afghanistan

LOLITA C. BALDOR   04/ 1/10 08:48 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon is pouring millions of dollars into equipment and training for its smaller partner nations in the Afghanistan war, a new effort that could encourage some countries not to abandon the increasingly unpopular conflict.

The money comes from a $350 million Pentagon program designed to improve the counterterrorism operations of U.S. allies.

While the funding cannot be openly used as an enticement for NATO nations to either send troops to Afghanistan or keep them in the country, the budding initiative sends the message that those who commit to the counterinsurgency fight could be rewarded.

The U.S. is committing more troops to Afghanistan to beat back a stubborn Taliban-led insurgency – and watching in dismay as allies, including Canada and the Netherlands, look to pull troops out of the 8-year-old war or remove them from combat duties.

Roughly 87,000 U.S. troops are in Afghanistan now, and about 100,000 are expected to be in place by late summer.

The number of allied troops is a bit more than 40,000 and could dip as nations begin bowing to political pressures. The Obama administration has been pressing allies to increase the number of troops, both for combat and for training Afghan security forces.

Defense officials tell The Associated Press that the initial aid package aimed at six small countries – Georgia, Croatia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia – is about $50 million and will be distributed almost equally among them. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the details have not been announced.

Those six countries account for fewer than 1,300 troops in Afghanistan. Most of the money will buy equipment for those forces, the defense officials said, but troops will also receive critical instruction on how to detect and counter roadside bombs as well as other training.

"It's not bribery," said Rick Nelson, a counterterrorism expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "But at end of the day, we're asking these allies to join us and we want them to be valuable partners. And some lack the resources to be partners in ways we need them to do so."

Nelson said that while the money can be an incentive for a country to keep forces in Afghanistan, some of the nations are under a great deal of political pressure to withdraw, and their minds aren't likely to be changed by a few million dollars.

The broad outlines of the plan were forwarded to members of Congress late last week. A second notice with details of how the money will be spent will go to Congress soon.

More than $200 million has been earmarked, with the bulk of it – roughly $150 million in military equipment and training – going to Yemen, a country seen as a growing haven for terrorists linked to al-Qaida.

Officials said there is a broad consensus within the Pentagon that delivering aid to coalition partners in Afghanistan is a priority. They expect to provide help to additional countries when the remainder of the $350 million is parceled out later this year.

Pentagon leaders are also pushing to expand the Afghanistan program beyond its current $75 million cap.

Initially, defense officials believed that the rules of the program prohibited them from spending money to help nations fighting alongside the U.S. in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. But as the Obama administration was debating the U.S. troop surge last fall, Pentagon officials went to Congress to clarify the rules.

Lawmakers agreed that beefing up allies in the Afghanistan war was an appropriate expense, but they would not budge beyond the $75 million cap. Under the rules, the money can be spent building the counterterrorism abilities of smaller, poorer nations that have forces in Afghanistan.

Beyond that $75 million, the aid is meant to provide equipment and training that will build allies' counterinsurgency forces. Included in this latest release of funding, along with Yemen and the Afghan allies, will be aid to the Philippines.

Counterterror officials have grown increasingly concerned about the terror threat in Yemen, where militants linked to al-Qaida are believed to have planned the Christmas Day airliner attack over Detroit.

Officials would not say what equipment Yemen would get, but it is likely to include helicopters, communications equipment and other supplies, in addition to more training of the Yemeni forces.

Last year, the Philippines got about $14 million, largely for radar stations in the restive southern region.

___

On the Net:

Defense Department: http://www.defenselink.mil

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon is pouring millions of dollars into equipment and training for its smaller partner nations in the Afghanistan war, a new effort that could encourage some countries not ...
WASHINGTON — The Pentagon is pouring millions of dollars into equipment and training for its smaller partner nations in the Afghanistan war, a new effort that could encourage some countries not ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:02 PM on 04/01/2010
It's got a "too big to fail" ring about it
11:46 AM on 04/01/2010
What nearly everyone, at least here, ignores is the tremendous advantage being friends with the United States gives a country.

Being the largest military power is completely secondary to being the largest econmic power in the world.

There are many advantages to being America's friend, something in the end most of the Taliban fighters, if not their leaders will come to recognize.

AND: How come there is no story of Herkmetyrs party coming to Kabul to negotiate an end to the conflict.

This is the biggest story to come out of Afghanistan this year. Yet I have not seen it here.

Read about it in my local newspaper.

But the story has been ignored here. Way to go. Bending the coverage to promote an ideology. I thought HuffPost better than that.
11:16 AM on 04/01/2010
More money borrowed from the federal reserve, plus interest, put on the backs of the American public.
11:47 AM on 04/01/2010
And your suggestion to an end of the conflict is?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 PM on 04/01/2010
At least he gets it
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 PM on 04/01/2010
for an endless conflict that is only killing people,
10:54 AM on 04/01/2010
It's bribery, no matter how anyone wants to sugar-coat it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:59 PM on 04/01/2010
Without foreign support, we look pretty bad
09:56 AM on 04/01/2010
He called it "a just and moral war" while receiving his Nobel Peace Prize.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Hood
Out of many we are one ...B.O.
09:48 AM on 04/01/2010
the same as giving mexico billions to support our failed war on the poor (drugs) now we have to pay the world to support our failed wars ever where............WHY NOT JUST END THEM???????????

THE PROBLEM IS.......THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX WHO OWNS DC

780 BILLION MILITARY BUDGE NOT COUNTING WAR
51 BILLION TO MILITARY CONTRACTS MOST NO BID
27 BILLION TO OUR RIGHT WING PRIVATE MERCENARY ARMY BACKWATER
100 BILLION A YEAR TO WAR ON THE POOR (DRUGS)
ESTIMATED COST OF WAR 0NE TO THREE TRILLION MORE ON HIGH SIDE
WHO KNOWS WHAT IS HIDDEN IN THIS

we could stop one war.....and pay for health care rather than paying 100 billion a year destroying our young poor............war on the poor or as they call it war on drugs........this war backed by pharmaceutical giants.........is designed to use our money to protect their profits.........doctors in California where cannabis has been legal since1996......say cannabis could replace 80% of the foul chemicals big pharm produces.......a loss of 544 billion to them.....so they pull the strings and pay off congress to spend 100 billion a year of our money to protect them..........from a weed that anyone can grow.........helps with many ailments..........and has never taken a life........ like the 500,000 their chemicals ki// ever year

END THE WAR ON THE POOR TO PROTECT CORPORATE PROFITS....ITS A LIE.......PAY FOR HEALTH CARE FOR ALL.........

Cherokee Fred Jesus
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
itsme leclerc
09:35 AM on 04/01/2010
excellent initiative
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
"Without a struggle, there can be no progress. "
08:44 AM on 04/01/2010
The number one rule of engagement...

Bribery.

:-]
08:57 AM on 04/01/2010
That which a complacent society condones no less.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:28 AM on 04/01/2010
Nope, no single payer for US citizens, can't do that. BTW, we're using your tax dollars to fund "toys for boys", killing people who can do you no harm, and bailing out the institutions responsible for your current financial condition. Having fun yet?
07:49 AM on 04/01/2010
You get what you pay for. Come on folks, this is the good war. Get behind your President., support the war.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
fcsakes
08:09 AM on 04/01/2010
That's a joke, right? A "good" war?
08:11 AM on 04/01/2010
That's what the Prez called it on the campaign trail...remember?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
usamade
07:45 AM on 04/01/2010
They talk about millions like I talk about pennies. Too much money being poured into war.