iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Airport Security Checks Revamped For Travel To U.S.

EILEEN SULLIVAN   04/ 2/10 10:23 PM ET   AP

Airport Security Screening Checks
Airport security rules are being revamped for travelers flying to the U.S.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. government is refining its terror-screening policy to focus on specific terror threats and not travelers' nationalities. The new policy replaces a security requirement put in place after the attempted bombing of a jetliner en route to Detroit on Christmas Day that singled out people from 14 countries that have been home to terrorists. It also expands the pool of foreign travelers targeted for extra screening beyond those whose names are on a U.S. terror watch list.

The changes, announced Friday by the Homeland Security Department, come after a three-month review of counterterrorism policies ordered by President Barack Obama in the wake of the near-miss attack.

Officials hope the new procedures will close a dangerous security gap that that allegedly allowed Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to board a Detroit-bound airplane in Amsterdam with a bomb hidden in his underwear.

It should also significantly decrease the number of innocent travelers from the 14 countries who have been inconvenienced by the extra screening, said a senior administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive security issues.

The countries that had been affected include Afghanistan, Algeria, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Under the refined policy, a person traveling to the U.S. would be stopped if he or she fits a specific description of a potential terrorist provided by U.S. intelligence officials – even if the suspect's name is unknown.

Currently, passengers' names are compared to names on U.S. terror watch lists. If air carriers have a potential match to a watch list, the passenger is either banned from flying to the U.S. or subjected to extra screening such as a full-body pat-down before boarding the airplane.

For example, if the U.S. has intelligence about a Nigerian man between the ages of 22 and 32 whom officials believe is a threat or a known terrorist, under the new policy all Nigerian men within that age range would receive extra screening before they are allowed to fly to the U.S.

If intelligence later shows that the suspect is not a terrorist, the extra screening for others matching the description would be lifted.

One of the reasons Abdulmutallab was able to board the flight in Amsterdam was that his name was not on a U.S. terror watch list. However, officials intercepted a conversation in Yemen about a Nigerian man being trained for a special mission.

If officials in Amsterdam had known to screen passengers who fit the profile, it is possible Abdulmutallab would have been caught, the senior administration official said.

Mohammed Albasha, spokesman for the Yemeni Embassy in Washington, called the changes a good step for U.S. diplomacy.

"Smart intelligence will provide good security," he said.

One of the biggest challenges in keeping terrorists off U.S.-bound planes is that the U.S. does not have the authority to screen passengers in foreign airports.

In the past three months, senior U.S. security officials have been meeting with foreign countries to discuss how to improve aviation security, and many countries have adopted enhanced screening methods, including the use of body-scanning machines.

"Anytime we can make better and more sophisticated use of intelligence, that's a step forward," said Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. King is the top Republican on the homeland security oversight committee and a member of the intelligence committee. "This should have been done before."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — The U.S. government is refining its terror-screening policy to focus on specific terror threats and not travelers' nationalities. The new policy replaces a security requirement put ...
WASHINGTON — The U.S. government is refining its terror-screening policy to focus on specific terror threats and not travelers' nationalities. The new policy replaces a security requirement put ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,587
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Lloyd
01:41 PM on 04/04/2010
So mention should be made of how the Vatican is backing the "Reconquista" of North America:

[QUOTE] . . . the Roman Catholic Church has its own plan of reconquest. She is determined to reestablish the power she once exercised over the civil governments and populations of the world. The pope, along with the Reconquista cadre, views South, Central, and North Americas as being one "from Argentina to Alaska." On several occasions, Pope John Paul II has "consecrated" this "America" to "Our Lady of Guadalupe." The Mexican people streaming across America's porous southern border are Roman Catholics. It is in the interest of the Vatican to establish as many Roman Catholics as possible in the United States of America. The pope and his partners in spiritual crime care little how the job is done—whether illegally or legally—just so it is done.1[/QUOTE]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Lloyd
03:59 AM on 04/04/2010
Sen. Schumer's ignorance is amazing. One reading of this proposal shows he knows nothing about the topic.

For example, one of his "principles" is that each illegal must undergo a "background check."

Really...?

Mexico can't do the kind of background checks he's talking about. Mexico is in a state of all-out war with the drug cartels. In places like Ciudad Juarez 5000 people have been murdered in the past 27 months. The drug cartel there is controlled by Amado Carrillo Fuentes, a man who makes $250 million a WEEK.

With that kind of money, Fuentes owns everything in the town, including the police department which is why the government has brought in the army.

When Fuentes orders a person's record destroyed or change, you do it or you get killed.

There's no NCIC in Mexico, and the closest thing to it is thoroughly corrupted, yet Schumer blissfully talks about "background checks."

The man's a fool and a dangerous one at that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 PM on 04/03/2010
"smart intelligence"...as opposed to what w`eve had?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RRK70
06:33 PM on 04/03/2010
I'm curious how Cuba wound up on the list, a sign of the parameters being politicized?
12:21 PM on 04/26/2010
these checks have nothing to do with safety or security. its about taking control, and because americans value "freedom" so much. americans cant feel "free" unless there are check points at every street corner, and people on the roads are checked for id cards ever 15 minutes.
05:46 PM on 04/03/2010
test (CAPS)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:31 PM on 04/03/2010
Sorry---too late, but A
05:46 PM on 04/03/2010
American screening through the use of machines is all about making money and keeping people freaked out, confused, and fearful enough to give away even more of there civil rights. Israel spends way less money compared to US and has far more security http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/01/05/1010019/should-israel-be-a-model-for-us-airport-security
02:54 PM on 04/03/2010
Just don't try to bring in any golf balls! I got pulled aside at LAX returning from Mexico. TSA was all over my golf balls, especially a few colored ones. After 3 or 4 blueshirts got involved, let me through.
02:05 PM on 04/03/2010
Did you know that Steve Jobs is half-Arab?
02:17 PM on 04/03/2010
Did you know that half of Arabs have jobs? What happens when the oil runs out? It won't be pretty I can tell you that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sarabono
Oldie but Goody
01:50 PM on 04/03/2010
Well, the D's institute profiling without calling it profiling. Instead they call it variable data points which point in an interesting direction that we should watch for and check out.......
02:12 PM on 04/03/2010
I was once bitten by a large dog. Now I just run away from anything with fur and four legs. No reason to get my brain involved in the process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sadwitness
Haters have no effect on me. I'm idiot proof.
12:26 AM on 04/04/2010
grrrrrrr
lol
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:39 PM on 04/03/2010
You want terr0rist's names? Look under "Registered Republicans".
02:13 PM on 04/03/2010
My dad worked for a living, I’m a Democrat.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:35 PM on 04/03/2010
Very good, someone has to support these Red States.



States Receiving Most in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:
1. D.C. ($6.17)
2. North Dakota ($2.03)
3. New Mexico ($1.89)
4. Mississippi ($1.84)
5. Alaska ($1.82)
6. West Virginia ($1.74)
7. Montana ($1.64)
8. Alabama ($1.61)
9. South Dakota ($1.59)
10. Arkansas ($1.53)

States Receiving Least in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:
1. New Jersey ($0.62)
2. Connecticut ($0.64)
3. New Hampshire ($0.68)
4. Nevada ($0.73)
5. Illinois ($0.77)
6. Minnesota ($0.77)
7. Colorado ($0.79)
8. Massachusetts ($0.79)
9. California ($0.81)
10. New York ($0.81)
01:24 PM on 04/03/2010
Why can’t we put border security in charge of airport security? That way I could bring a wheelbarrow full of guns onto a plane.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sarabono
Oldie but Goody
01:51 PM on 04/03/2010
and drugs....
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jeb50
Retired.
01:00 PM on 04/03/2010
Older people and kids are in for it now.
12:29 PM on 04/03/2010
Maybe we should go on offense? We know where the bad guys are who are forcing us to live like this, maybe we should march into their crappy country and pull them out of their caves and put a stop to this nonsense. Nahhhh. Let’s just keep living like sheep and pretending we don’t know where they live.
12:30 PM on 04/03/2010
We did that. In Iraq. Didn't go well.
12:36 PM on 04/03/2010
Good point. I wish Saddam was still there too. He was a swell guy. Attacking Iran and Kuwait, Killing all those innocent Kurdish women and children with gas attacks, slaughtering the Shiites in the south. Can’t get enough of that good stuff. And now its’ all come to a stop. Boooriiinggg.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sarabono
Oldie but Goody
01:55 PM on 04/03/2010
Were doing that in Afghanistan and it's also not going well. Were heading for 600 Dead American's in Afghanistan this year, over twice what it was last year.

For reference, the highest American Deaths in Iraq, in any one year was 800.
01:37 PM on 04/03/2010
You mean the "Cave like offices" at the capitol?

The "People Doing This To Us"..are our own...ummm.."Representatives"...you live in fear..because they've convinced you..utilizing "f.e.a.r." or False Evidence Appearing Real..that there's this "Threat From Without"! Yet..not only Is there no "Threat from without"..but the "Threat"..is from "Wiithin"...

The People denying our liberty..are the FBI/DHS/CIA/NSA..ad nauseum!

So..you really believe..that the worlds #1 Opium Producers..ummm..can't just buy their own planes? Really? Or trade/barter for them from the Narco-traffickers crossing the border carrying anything they like at the very moment?

Really?

So..where's the Car Bomb? Or the Lone Telephone Pole thats been cut down? Or the One "Assassination"?

And if your "Answer" is.."See..they're doing such a great job.." well..I have this to say to..that:

The....Drug...War! A Fiasco..

However..there's One Area the War On Drugs has impacted "Successfully"! Its single handedly erroded Civil Liberties to the brink of Ruin! Now the War On Terror..looks to "Finish The Job"!

The WOT has erroded our Civil Liberties..to the "Brink"..with a Combat Brigade on American Soil...Posse Comitatus eliminated..Police now "Assets" of CIA 'Fusion Centers'..business' spying on customers via the Diabolical "Infragard"...and for what?

What? The Guys that beat the Ivans can't figure out what "broke" Joe Stack was able to do..?

Oh..okay? Whatever!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Lloyd
12:28 PM on 04/03/2010
This is a t follow-up to my earlier post inwhich I made the point Schumer's amnesty bill fixes nothing except the next election.

The fact is, if we grant amnesty to the 20 million, 40 to 60 million will immediately take their place.

Granting amnesty sends a message to the world that we don't have the backbone to enforce our immigration laws. Of course, if Schumer can explain how we get this backbone by kow-towing to La Raza, et. al., I'd be all for it. Usually, though, when you show weakness people take advantage of you.

Amnesty exacerbates the "immigration" problem, not "fix" it.

Amnesty assures us that in the space of five years we'll have 40 to 60 more illegals demanding we "fix" our "broken" immigration system again.

And the irony is we have any number of HONEST ways to fix the problem once and for all.

The first fix is the easiest because it requires we only enforce existing law -- arrest and jail all those who employ illegals.

That's it.

The 20 million will start self-deporting by the thousands.

Let's get started ...
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jeb50
Retired.
01:03 PM on 04/03/2010
Sorry to say schumer is our rep. Voted against him every chance I could.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Lloyd
03:43 PM on 04/03/2010
Schumer's ignorance is amazing. One reading of this proposal shows he knows nothing about the topic.

For example, one of his "principles" is that each illegal must undergo a "background check."

Really...?

Mexico can't do the kind of background checks he's talking about. Mexico is in a state of all-out war with the drug cartels. In places like Ciudad Juarez 5000 people have been murdered in the past 27 months. The drug cartel there is controlled by Amado Carrillo Fuentes, a man who makes $250 million a WEEK.

With that kind of money, Fuentes owns everything in the town, including the police department which is why the government has brought in the army.

When Fuentes orders a person's record destroyed or change, you do it or you get killed.

There's no NCIC in Mexico, and the closest thing to it is thoroughly corrupted, yet Schumer blissfully talks about "background checks."

The man's a fool and a dangerous one at that.
11:28 AM on 04/03/2010
Look at the drag TSA is having on the economy.

I do not think Al Qaeda ever dreamed of this lasting impact on the world.
Have we become vicitms of the terrorists?
Of course we have no choice.
And now TSA is a great source of jobs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:09 PM on 04/03/2010
Well, Bushie and Chick Deney really tried their best to not let us forget. They maintained their power base with FEAR tactics.
12:30 PM on 04/03/2010
And Obama is maintaining his stupidity base with handouts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
01:12 PM on 04/03/2010
meet the new boss....