iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

US Sues KBR: Iraq Charges From Contractor Were Improper, Says US Government

DEVLIN BARRETT   04/ 1/10 08:08 PM ET   AP

Kbr

WASHINGTON — The federal government sued KBR Inc., the largest contractor in Iraq, on Thursday over what prosecutors say were improper charges to the Army for private security services.

Houston-based KBR Inc. is a former subsidiary of Halliburton Co. It recently won a new contract potentially worth more than $2 billion for support work in the country.

The lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington charged that KBR and 33 of its subcontractors used private armed security at various times from 2003 to 2006. The suit claimed KBR knew under the terms of its contract the company could not bill the U.S. government for such services but did so anyway.

While the lawsuit is a contractual dispute, the case highlights what became a confusing question in the U.S. occupation of Iraq: What authority did private contractors have to carry weapons and use force in the unstable country?

KBR reported 2009 revenues of $4.8 billion from work under the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, according to the independent Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But under the terms of that program, prosecutors said, KBR was to provide logistical support, such as food services, transportation, laundry and mail for U.S. military operations in Iraq. Security protection was to be provided by the U.S. military under the terms of the contract.

In a statement, KBR countered that it was the Army, not the company, that breached the contract "by repeatedly failing to provide the necessary force protection and, in fact, frequently left KBR, its employees and its subcontractors unprotected."

The government's court papers did not say how much money the alleged improper billing may have cost taxpayers.

The suit charged that KBR violated terms of the contract by failing to get Army authorization to arm subcontractors and by allowing the use of private security contractors who were not registered with the Iraqi Interior Ministry.

"Defense contractors cannot ignore their contractual obligations to the military and pass along improper charges to the United States," said Tony West, head of the Justice Department's civil division.

The case grew out of a 2006 initiative aimed at cracking down on fraud in government contracting.

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., a critic of the company, said: "KBR's pattern of abuse must be punished for past behavior and in future contract decisions."

___

Associated Press writer Kimberly Hefling contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The federal government sued KBR Inc., the largest contractor in Iraq, on Thursday over what prosecutors say were improper charges to the Army for private security services. Houston...
WASHINGTON — The federal government sued KBR Inc., the largest contractor in Iraq, on Thursday over what prosecutors say were improper charges to the Army for private security services. Houston...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
big dubya
12:53 PM on 04/15/2010
Still trying to do a war on the cheap. Not gonna work, we have not yet begun to pay the full cost of Bush's misadventure.
shylove2
warfare state is pathological
01:49 PM on 04/03/2010
I think KBR has us there and we didn't secure the coutnry either, from what I've read might be a viiolation of international law, so amazing it may be KBR that actually tries to hold our country accountable here. But the worst part is not having a reason to go at all and everyone just feel into line like good little citizens, Congressmen, and media. It seems like the military gave that advise to Congress but they didn't listen and weren't some of those voices forced into retirement. They were going along with the war too but at least they said what it would take to do it. We have a morality problem here that is pervasive.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
omobob
left coast, usa
12:15 PM on 04/03/2010
Were do you start? Elecrocuting US Soldiers or stealing billions? Were is Cheney now defending family? (KBR)
photo
quoveritas
Surgeon General warns: too much truth can cause...
06:40 PM on 04/02/2010
War profiteering! It's easy money if you can shock your populace into compliance.
08:38 AM on 04/02/2010
Wonder if they will every go after the company over endless abuses during Bush & Cheeny

such as charging $7,500 a month for the rentals of Ford Broncho type vehicles in Kuwait,
Some left in diches due to flat tires.


What about the phoney plastic Turkey Mr. Bush held up when visiting the troops on Thanksgiving?
Did the tax payer have to pay for their own deception?

Or the palet fulls of hundred dollar bills the Republicans sent to Iraq to pay phoney texas companies?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
okim5150
I only drink to make you more interesting
09:51 AM on 04/02/2010
Or the pallets full of hundred dollar bills that just "disappeared"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Javaline
08:28 AM on 04/02/2010
All of the "services" provided by KBR and other contractors used to be provided by the military itself - far more efficiently and far less costly. That should be argument enough to get rid of them.
09:36 AM on 04/02/2010
This is what happens when you go to war under false pretenses with too few troops. But if the US would have had a sufficient force (including support forces), how would Halliburton/KBR have generated so much value for their shareholders. What's a few thousand dead and dismembered soldier, sailors, airmen and marines when there's money to be made?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
okim5150
I only drink to make you more interesting
09:53 AM on 04/02/2010
A former vice president sure cashed in on the war he helped start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
07:28 AM on 04/02/2010
We never had mercenaries prior to Bush. End this madness and have a GOOD PAYING MILITARY!
08:10 AM on 04/02/2010
What, and END Corporate welfare for Cheney and Dubya's RICH$$ white buddies ?? Halliburton reels it's UGLY head once again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
okim5150
I only drink to make you more interesting
09:54 AM on 04/02/2010
Not to mention Cheney himself
07:20 AM on 04/02/2010
When it goes to court, the court will rule that there is not enough evidence to proceed with the trial. The government will then ask the judge to seal all gathered evidence for 70 years, claiming the national secrets act, and the court will agree. Also, the government will ask the judge to tell the public not to ask about the large wad of cash in the back pocket of the judge or high ranking political members. The judge will also agree. Case closed due to lack of evidence. KBR will now be awarded the new undisclosed multi-billion dollar contract that according to the government, no one else wanted, so the government didn't ask or tell.
05:49 AM on 04/02/2010
Can someone please explain to me why KBR is still "winning" contracts for anything?
09:45 AM on 04/02/2010
KBR continues to "win" contracts because the US military no longer has enough support forces to preform these functions and there is no other corporation large enough to compete with KBR to the scale of operation in Iraq and Afghanistan. So the military is stuck dealing with these criminals who cut corners, do shoddy work and then charge the US government again to fix their (KBR's) mistakes. If you work for KBR you can't lose.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
02:44 AM on 04/02/2010
I guess this is a start ...

It's time to take the profit out of war. Granted, we have to buy the weapons and all the other hardware, but Bush/Cheney turned the whole war business into just another get-rich-quick scheme for mercenaries and private suppliers of services previously handled by our skilled (and ever so much more ethical) armed forces.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:39 AM on 04/02/2010
Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles to lead panel on reducing U.S. budget deficits-
it's what we do with those revenues
02:35 AM on 04/02/2010
Great SITE for Documentaries check it out,

http://freeviewdocumentaries.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christian Cullen
Snarky is the new kindness.
02:31 AM on 04/02/2010
Check out my "Center". Gimme my money, b!tches!
photo
robphilnz
Where's my Micro-bio gone?
02:21 AM on 04/02/2010
Reading the two articles in HuffPo on KBR today, as well as many others previously, makes me feel that the names KBR, Halliburton, Blackwater/Xe, Prince and Cheney, the last de facto President, represent the most evil aspects of the American military-industrial-corporate psyche.

They are like cartoon baddies with no redeeming characteristics, operating purely from corporate paranoid megalomania. Ian Fleming could never have made his bad characters as inhuman as these: they would have been dismissed as too ridiculous to exist.
02:18 AM on 04/02/2010
Remember the Franken Amendment? It would have prevented our government from dealing with companies that required employees to go through arbitration in the case of things like workplace rape. The amendment arose from a case involving a KBR employee.

Every male senator in the GOP voted against the amendment, and as near as I could tell, the argument was that KBR had a right to conduct business without fear of being sued just because some American woman gets upset about being raped at work. It was basically a statement that the GOP trusts companies like KBR to do the right thing.

Thanks, KBR, for showing how stupid it is to trust a company like yours.