More

Bonn Summit: Climate Talks Resume, As Does The Finger Pointing

Bonn Summit

First Posted: 06/09/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:05 PM ET

AFP:

BONN (AFP) -- Hopes of hoisting the UN process for tackling climate change out of the mire after December's flawed Copenhagen summit suffered early setbacks at talks here on Friday.

In the first parley since the stormy December meeting, no immediate consensus emerged among the 194 parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) for plotting the way forward and the mood was soured by fresh finger-pointing.

"The one thing we learn from history is that we never learn from history," said Tosi Mpanu Mpanu of the Democratic Republic of Congo, representing African nations.

Copenhagen damaged "the trust that is necessary for any partnership," he said.

The three-day gathering in the former German capital takes place nearly four months after a summit that, after being billed as the moment when mankind would rally to fight climate change, came within an inch of catastrophe.

Attended by some 120 heads of state and government, the summit was saved from fiasco after a couple of dozen leaders cobbled together a brief document outlining areas of agreement.

Their "Copenhagen Accord" sets down a general goal of limiting global warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), unites rich and poor countries behind pledges for tackling greenhouse gases that cause the problem and earmarks nearly 30 billion dollars in aid from 2010-2012, with a prospect of up to 100 billion dollars annually by 2020.

Critics say the emissions pledges, at present levels, would ensure warming of four C (7.2 F) or more and in any case are only voluntary.

Others have denounced the accord as a stitchup between an elite group of countries; more than a third of UNFCCC parties have still not endorsed the deal.

In the quest to revive the UN process in time for the next big UNFCCC meeting, due in the Mexican resort of Cancun in November and December, many countries on Friday endorsed ideas for speeding the laborious, consensus-driven negotiation process.

These include setting up a "contact group" of several dozen countries that would haggle over core issues, then submit the outcome to a plenary for its approval.

"We cannot go back to business as usual," said a Spanish delegate, speaking for the European Union (EU).

"We need to improve our working methods," said Fernando Tudela of Mexico, a vice minister for planning and environmental policy.

"This process of negotiations requires adjustsment and modernisation without of course using different practises that are used in the united nations."

Several left-led countries in Latin America and the Caribbean were unconvinced.

"The total failure of the meeting in Copenhagen... was simply because the principles of the United Nations were not respected, nor were international rules," blasted Venezuelan delegate Claudia Salerno, who said the "neo-colonialist exercise" seemed set to be revived.

Other issues on the table in Bonn will be how many extra meetings to stage before Cancun and whether attempts should be made to craft a draft negotiating text in the coming weeks.

Read the whole story: AFP

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BONN (AFP) -- Hopes of hoisting the UN process for tackling climate change out of the mire after December's flawed Copenhagen summit suffered early setbacks at talks here on Friday. In the first parl...
BONN (AFP) -- Hopes of hoisting the UN process for tackling climate change out of the mire after December's flawed Copenhagen summit suffered early setbacks at talks here on Friday. In the first parl...
Filed by Gazelle Emami  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
06:32 AM on 04/13/2010
Many areas of the country would be unlivable with a seven degree heat rise. There would be no cooling off in the evenings at all. I fear for the elderly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:25 PM on 04/11/2010
We cannot accept anything above 2 Degrees Celsius. Anything above that will cause hundreds of millions of climate refugees and efforts by states that would cost them trillions. Compared to that, we (the world) would only have to spend 300 billion dollars to prevent that.

it is that simple.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MidRoaderTurnedLeft
11:55 AM on 04/11/2010
OK, new rule: no more climate summits unless a few meaningless hacked emails are first splattered across the land by Fox, Drudge, and their pals.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
09:10 PM on 04/10/2010
Since Copenhagen the public has decisively rejected the theory of man-made global warming. The flaws in the global warming theory are now well known to most people. Also, the credibility of the IPCC has been destroyed. The Himalayan glaciers aren't going away soon. Who will ever forget about them? Also, the Arctic sea ice extent has reached a five-year high this winter. The Polar Bears are safe!

It is difficult to understand why otherwise reasonable people are still spending time at these now out of fashion conferences. Who can justify the vast sums of money spent on transporting people to the conferences, and transporting people back home?
08:37 PM on 04/12/2010
"Who can justify the vast sums of money spent..."??

Effete Liberals can...that's who!

As long as it's coming out of the pockets of hard-working, everyday American taxpayers, they are more than happy to spend it..after all, it's not their money, is it???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
06:34 AM on 04/13/2010
You mean there is ice in the Arctic at the end of the polar winter? Only to a denier would that scenario mean that climate change was a hoax. Unbelievable!
05:39 PM on 04/09/2010
If the Copenhaven treaty was only about reducing AGW it might have had a better chance of being accepted. When you add the $billions in comittments to third world dictators with no control on how it is spent and then add global taxes on top of that, it makes the total packege totally unacceptable. Also, the reduction of 80% of CO2 emissions may not be possible with current technology.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:39 PM on 04/11/2010
What are you talking about? It only failed because China and US couldn't agree with each other. Close to everyone else was ready to sign it.

Countries most vulnerable to climate impacts have not got the deal they wanted. One example: Tuvalu which is buying property in Australia to move its people there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
06:36 AM on 04/13/2010
Yes, sure, let's wait to act on climate change until there are no third world dictators. You sound like you would prefer to do nothing! By the way, the treaty is about reducing AGW. What do you think all the noise is about?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean land-ocean temperature 1880 to present
03:31 PM on 04/09/2010
What a useless, superficial account.

============================
In the first parley since the stormy December meeting, no immediate consensus emerged among the 194 parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) for plotting the way forward and the mood was soured by fresh finger-pointing.
============================

The "mood"?? Nobody cares!

============================
"The one thing we learn from history is that we never learn from history," said Tosi Mpanu Mpanu of the Democratic Republic of Congo, representing African nations.

Copenhagen damaged "the trust that is necessary for any partnership," he said.
============================

That's a reasonable observation and if my representatives try to use *that* or other legitimate complaints from developing countries, especially ones colonized in the past, they need to be fired on the spot and replaced with somebody responsible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Perceiver
11:15 AM on 04/09/2010
Koch Inc. is the main funder of the anthropogenic climate change denial industry. Here are Koch products that you can boycott: Brawny paper towels, Angel Soft bath tissues, Quilted Northern bath tissues, Soft ‘n Gentle bath tissues, CoolMax, Lycra, STAINMASTER Carpet, Dixie cups; paper plates and bowls; and napkins, Mardi Gras paper towels and napkins, Sparkle paper towels, Vanity Fair, and Zee napkins. Also, boycott other corporations and organizations that promote climate change denial.
05:35 PM on 04/09/2010
Where Koch may have spent $millions promoting AGW skepticism, our federal govt. has spent $billions to study AGW but narry a cent for studies by opposing views. Should we also boycott the govt., or do boycotts only apply to one side of the argument??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Perceiver
06:28 PM on 04/09/2010
Whatever boycotts that can be carried out is fine.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
06:37 AM on 04/13/2010
There are no opposing views. If scientists found evidence of something else leading to the warming other than man-made greenhouse gases they are free to publish their results.