More

Shroud Of Turin Going Back Up Before The Public

FRANCESCO MANETTI and FRANCES D'EMILIO   04/ 9/10 03:19 PM ET   AP

Shroud Of Turin

TURIN, Italy — The long linen with the faded image of a bearded man is the object of centuries-old fascination and wonderment, and closely kept under wrap. Starting Saturday, and for six weeks, both the curious and those convinced the Turin Shroud is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ can have a brief look.

By late Friday, 1.5 million people had reserved their three-to-five-minute chance to gaze at the cloth, which is kept in a bulletproof, climate-controlled case. Organizers said earlier this year they hoped some 2 million pilgrims and tourists would see the linen during the special viewing from April 10 to May 23.

That number doesn't include Pope Benedict XVI, who will fly up to Turin, Piedmont's capital, in northwest Italy, on May 2 for a day trip to pray before the shroud.

Traditionally, the public gets a peek at the 14-foot-long, 3.5-foot-wide (4.3-meter-long, 1 meter-wide) cloth only once every 25 years. But recent decades have seen much shorter intervals. The shroud went on display in 1998 after a 20-year-wait and then in 2000 during Millennium celebrations.

Church officials resisted putting the cloth on display when tourists poured into Turin in 2006 for the Winter Olympics. But, as city officials recently put it, in a nod to the "importance to the economy and employment" of this city that is automaker Fiat's hometown, they allowed that is being billed as the "first showing of the new millennium."

Since the linen's previous showing a decade earlier, restorers have removed patches sewn on by nuns in 1534, two years after a fire damaged the case then holding the it, Shroud Museum director Gian Maria Zaccone said in an interview with Associated Press Television News.

Taking off the patches allowed the linen to be fully extended and let restorers smooth out creases in what for centuries had been a rolled-up cloth, making for what restorers hope will be better preservation.

"A challenge to the intelligence" is how John Paul II defined the cloth in 1998 when he journeyed to Turin to view it. In a major papal pronouncement about the shroud, the late pope asked experts to study it without preconceptions using "scientific methodology" while keeping in mind the "sensibility of the faithful."

His balanced instruction reflected a Vatican tiptoe around the issue of just what the cloth is, calling it a powerful symbol of Christ's suffering while making no claim on its authenticity.

A Vatican researcher said late last year that faint writing on the linen, which she studied through computer-enhanced images, proves the cloth was used to wrap Jesus' body after his crucifixion.

But experts stand by carbon-dating of scraps of the cloth that determine the linen was made in the 13th or 14th century in a kind of medieval forgery. That testing didn't explain how the image of the shroud – of a man with wounds similar to those suffered by Christ – was formed.

However, some have suggested the dating results might have been skewed by contamination and called for a larger sample to be analyzed.

Among those in Turin on Friday for the start of the viewings this weekend was Antonio Lambatti, a professor of Christian history at the University of Parma, who describes himself as a skeptic.

"In my judgment, it's a fake," Lambatti told APTN. He cited historical research, specifically a declaration by a church official in 1355 that the cloth was a "representation" of the original cloth.

But the fascination about the shroud "goes beyond history and archaeology," Lambatti acknowledged. "It implies a choice of faith."

Besides the 16th-century blaze, the cloth has had other brushes with disasters, including a 1997 fire in the cathedral.

It also might have survived the covetous clutches of Hitler.

In the early weeks of World War II, the cloth was secretly whisked from its resting place in the cathedral to a monastery in Montevergine in the southern Apennine mountains, recalled Rev. Andrea Davide Cardin, director of Montevergine's state library.

"It wasn't so much that Hitler was looking for it, but that the Nazi hierarchy wanted it as a symbol of power, of omnipotence," Cardin said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press in Rome.

Because of a friendship between the monastery's chief abbot and the Savoys, the Piedmont royal family, long custodian of the shroud, Montevergine was chosen for safekeeping, and a hiding place carved in a wooden altar in a chapel of the abbey, Cardin said.

"During the war, no one knew it was there, except for the Victor Emmanuel III (then king of Italy), the head abbot and the Vatican secretary of state," he said.

The shroud was returned to Turin's cathedral in 1946, after the war's end, Cardin said. "What would have happened if, instead of entrusting it to the Benedictine monks of Montevergine, it was entrusted to the monks of Monte Cassino?" Cardin said, saying he was quoting a 1946 letter from then Turin Cardinal Maurilio Fossati in tribute to the shroud's survival.

The Benedictine monastery at Monte Cassino, about 90 miles (150 kilometers) to the northwest, was heavily bombed by the Allies in 1944, and many Savoy family documents about the shroud that were placed there for safekeeping during the war were destroyed, Cardin said.

____

D'Emilio reported from Rome.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

TURIN, Italy — The long linen with the faded image of a bearded man is the object of centuries-old fascination and wonderment, and closely kept under wrap. Starting Saturday, and for six weeks, ...
TURIN, Italy — The long linen with the faded image of a bearded man is the object of centuries-old fascination and wonderment, and closely kept under wrap. Starting Saturday, and for six weeks, ...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 748
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
photo
angrymanspokane
Just a regular guy
05:58 PM on 05/12/2010
Millions of dollars to restore and protect a stained rag. My guess is that Jesus would have rather spent that money to feed the poor and cloth the naked. Doesn't really take a biblical scholar to read the new testament and see what was really important to the man,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CJWebber
02:30 PM on 04/13/2010
The shroud show the image of a bearded man with long hair, however there is no evidence that Jesus had these things. It was the custom at the time for men to be clean shaven with short hair. (as, say, Ceasar). The current portrayal of Jesus as somewhat effeminate is not supported by the Bible and those of you who claim to be familiar with the New Testament should know this.

Nevertheless, the Shroud is a mystery. How or why it was done may not be solvable but it is REALLY not likely to be Jesus.
12:08 PM on 04/12/2010
It bears the image of a bearded man. Therefore it MUST be jebus.

I'm eagerly anticipating the worldwide tour of the "Toilet Paper of Pisa" in the near future..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
11:56 AM on 04/12/2010
This isn't about whether the shroud is that of Jesus, the institutional cover ups of the Catholic Church, or whether God exists or not, much as some might want to pitchfork all their other issues onto the debate.
There's an artifact whose provenance and historical records go back 1500 years and of a manufacture that has been around 3000 years, with a remarkable image of a man imprinted upon it in a way that remains obscured. The only 'scientific evidence' of its alleged fakery, the carbon dating, turns out to be inconclusive, and perhaps, even proof of scientific fraud caused by the desire to attack all religion, an unfortunate phenomena we see much in evidence nowdays.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
07:12 PM on 04/12/2010
I love that you simply ignore the tests on the pigments used to create the image -- research that garnered a scientific award, the protocols were so exacting. And which determined the presence of medieval concoctions that were used in art and relic production at the same time the cathedral in Turin was opened for business.

So, actually, NOT the "only scientific evidence" at all. Funny how fact-finding and science are always seen as the "desire to attack" when they don't confirm fantasy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
09:09 PM on 04/12/2010
Fug, but you really DO make these unsupported assertions, and expect everyone to agree with you. Here's the rebuttal to the paint hypothesis: http://greatshroudofturinfaq.com/Science/Image/paint.html
"Walter McCrone (1916-2002), claimed that he found red ochre (hematite) and vermilion (mercuric sulfide). These are common medieval paint pigments. He was thus able to argue that the Shroud was painted.

That claim has since been proven wrong. Scientists are quite certain about the chemistry of the images, and they are not the inorganic compounds McCrone saw through the lens of his microscope. The images are clearly and demonstrably the result of a chemical change either to the fibers themselves or to an organic material on the fibers that was there before the images were made."
http://greatshroudofturinfaq.com/Science/Image/rogers-on-paint.html
"If it had been painted, some colored material had to be added to the cloth, but the colored material would have gone through the fire of 1532. The pigments and vehicles would have suffered changes in response to the heating, the pyrolysis products, and the water used to put the fire out. No changes in image color could be observed at scorch margins"
"In order to produce the shadings observed in the Shroud's image, the concentrations of pigments would have to vary across the image. No variations in any pigment were observed by x-ray fluorescence spectrometry. The image was not painted with any inorganic pigment of an appropriate color"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
09:10 PM on 04/12/2010
http://greatshroudofturinfaq.com/Science/Image/vinland.html
And your "expert" Walter McCrone, also claimed the Vinland map was a fake. He turned out to be wrong, but I guess anyone can get a 'scientific award' these days.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:46 AM on 04/12/2010
Christians creep me out.
07:09 AM on 04/13/2010
Anyone notice the convenient timing of this release...... like in the middle of the pedophlia scandal?
08:36 AM on 04/12/2010
Wikipedia actually has a pretty good summary of the studies that have been conducted on the shroud. Calling it a proven fake based on one of many studies (with that test itself subject to controversy) is a bit presumptuous, considering that other studies place it in the first century, and with geographical origin in the Jeruselem area. Then again, nothing can change the mind of a close minded person.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
07:13 PM on 04/12/2010
Ah. Wikipedia. The place where everybody can have a say. Can't ask for more authenticity than wikipedia!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgillingham
07:43 AM on 04/12/2010
This was proven to be made in the 1300's -- yet for some mysterious reason the Christians still love to think that it wrapped their Jesus during his resurrection. Which reminds me of "The Last Temptation of Christ" where Jesus has recently been saved from death and has children and meets one of the former disciples who continues to preach about Jesus' resurrection... Jesus tells him that the story the he tells the people is a lie and the disciple says "You see, you don't know how much people need God. You don't know how happy He can make them. He can make them happy to do anything. Make them happy to die, and they'll die, all for the sake of Christ. Jesus Christ. Jesus of Nazareth. The Son of God. The Messiah. Not you. Not for your sake. You know, I'm glad I met you. Because now I can forget all about you. My Jesus is much more important and much more powerful. "
photo
syrius
Excuse me, EXCUSE ME!
07:59 AM on 04/12/2010
Just like Mohammed...and all the rest of what religious zealots want to believe- imaginary power through the belief of an imaginary being- invisible to all. The invisible shield against the invisible forces of evil. Delusions of grandeur!
photo
Walter H
Thou shalt not coerce. One and done.
07:37 AM on 04/12/2010
One day, with effort and luck, we may evolve past such childish nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
knerd
Trapped in a world he never made
04:27 AM on 04/12/2010
It's recently been discovered that the image is that of a 53-year-old Chevron station attendant from Lander, Wyoming.
05:00 AM on 04/12/2010
Gee, did Jesus Christ work in a Wyoming Chevron station too. After all according to the Mormons he was in America preaching to the Indians. It's always interesting how those who can't think freely for themselves will believe anything.

Praise Jesus and Allah Ackbar
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phazeroftruth
07:46 AM on 04/12/2010
South American natives also professed to the conquistadors that someone with Jesus's appearance was buried among them. I have no doubt he existed. What he was is a whole other issue.
02:55 AM on 04/12/2010
Looks like a magic carpet to me. If this is the only "miracle" still ongoing.... uh kinda weak in the "miracle" dept considering all that goes on these days.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
01:57 AM on 04/12/2010
"Church officials resisted putting the cloth on display when tourists poured into Turin in 2006 for the Winter Olympics. But, as city officials recently put it, in a nod to the "importance to the economy and employment" of this city that is automaker Fiat's hometown, they allowed that is being billed as the "first showing of the new millennium."

And that is the reason for the creation and existence of the SOT! Go back 510 years, the Cathedral of Turin was finished in 1491. This was in a time when a Cathedral transformed a backwater into a metropolis, much like building a major stadium or convention centre does for a community today. Instead of using sports to attract the masses, the meme of the time was religious, and Holy Relics were the thing to fetch the Pilgrims (tourists, fleeceable strangers) everytime. And fetch them these relics did, just as the salmon forage the ocean and brought nourishment to west coast native people when they returned to spawn, so to do Pilgrims.

The business and noble leaders of Turin paid for that Cathedral and they damn sure were going to get their money back. The Shroud of Turin is "Smokey The Bear" "Ronald McDonald" and "The Worlds Biggest Donut" (Winchell's Donut House, Pasedina Ca., a 5,000 pounder), ala Turin Chamber of Commerce---1490.

One truly ironic point which is funny as he!!. The Turin Cathedral is built on the same site as the old Roman Theatre., How appropriate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
02:10 AM on 04/12/2010
How dare you bring the economic realities of history into the debate!
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
02:11 AM on 04/12/2010
;>} !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Hart
01:17 AM on 04/12/2010
Look sheeple! Over here! Ignore that child abuser behind the curtain, this is a REAL miracle!

This serial sanctioner of child abuse, this perverted head of a gigantic religious Ponzi scheme should be put in prison where he belongs.

Are all Catholics really that stupid and gullible? Your holy father is corrupt beyond redemption! Will you, like he has done for so many years, just going to look the other way? Baaaaa-aaaaaa. Bleat!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
01:28 AM on 04/12/2010
We're kinda passed the point & laugh stage. Seems childish -- which given the people involved, isn't that safe, hmm? How about something relevent to the particular story? Anything?
03:45 AM on 04/12/2010
I thought what he had to say extremely relevant, and I think that my opinion is more relevant because I spelled it correctly.
04:54 AM on 04/12/2010
Of course it's relevant. The whole sordid business is covered with a shroud. Dawkins plans to arrest the Pope when he visits Britain. The plan is pretty well bound to fail but the professor will have lots of well wishers - and death threats too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oregon bird
01:02 AM on 04/12/2010
At least wave something NEW and shiny to distract us!

In 1988, the Vatican allowed the shroud to be dated by Oxford University, the University of Arizona, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Each dated the cloth as originating in medieval times, around 1350.

Dr. Walter McCrone analyzed the shroud and found traces of chemicals used in "two common artist's pigments of the 14th century, red ochre and vermilion". He makes the case that the shroud is a medieval painting in 'Judgment Day for the Shroud of Turin'. For his work, McCrone was awarded the American Chemical Society's Award in Analytical Chemistry in 2000. His work was checked over (and over, and over) by a number of very smart men who wanted the award for themselves.

The shroud is a fake (gasp!) and the Vatican has had proof of that (beyond the fact that it was never EVER mentioned in any ecclesiastical source -- legitimate or otherwise -- before the late 16th century) for over ten years. More lies, Pope Ratz? More attempts to Magic your way back to the top of the sacred heap? That's just so, so pitiful.

But I still LOVE the story of St. Germaine. Especially the fact that her life of abuse and degradation was recorded by her village priest. The Catholic Church. Proudly reporting its own failure to do a d@mn thing to stop child abuse... in 1602.

How times have changed, huh? Ratzy, why not just offer those rosy little tarts sainthood?
12:51 AM on 04/12/2010
I heard the shroud was declared a fake. What's the deal?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kburlz
12:29 AM on 04/12/2010
Rub paint all over your face, then wrap a sheet around it, take it off and see if the paint on the sheet looks anything like your face. Spoiler alert: It will look nothing like your face. It will be the same height but three times wider than your actual face. It will be like looking in one of those distorted mirrors at an amusement park. Why would this sheet have a perfectly proportioned face if it was supposedly wrapped around Jesus Christ? Answer: It's a freaking fake.